OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£240PassMark multi-core score:35551N. of physical cores:8CPU boost clock speed:5.4 GHzCPU socket:AM5TDP (Thermal design power):105 W

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 34 expert and video reviews and 11 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

8.4/10

★Better than 98% of processors

8.6

★Better than 98%

8.3

★Better than 91%

8.3

▲Better than 86%

8.5

★Better than 98%

7.9
Gaming
Gaming
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
8.9
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
9.3
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
9.4
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
4.0
L3 cache
8.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
7.8
Video editing
Video editing
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
10
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
20.0%
8.9
CPU threads
15.0%
4.0
L3 cache

Where to buy

N/A~ £240

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

Based on 10 · 9

Reviewers like its fast gaming and single-core speed, but complain it runs hot, needs strong cooling and offers weak value.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

Based on 190 owners sharing their experience in online comments

53%positive32%mixed15%negative

Owners praise its fast performance, value, and upgrade path, while high temperatures, finicky tuning, and uneven gaming results frustrate some.

What owners like

Fast, smooth gaming performance23
Undervolting with Curve Optimizer or a fixed voltage around 1.2V cut CPU temperatures by 10 to 40 degrees, with little or no drop in game performance.18
With PBO or a curve offset and a decent air or AIO cooler, owners keep the chip around 60 to 75°C under gaming load.18
Owners reach 5.2 to 5.6 GHz all-core with voltage and offset tuning, and some get extra headroom from very fast DDR5 RAM.14
Owners say it handles gaming, multitasking, streaming and Adobe work well, running games and creative apps smoothly at everyday settings.14
Owners say bundle deals, often with free DDR5 RAM or a discounted motherboard, bring the price well below the 13700K or 7800X3D.12
Owners value the AM5 socket, which gives a clear upgrade path to later Ryzen chips without buying a new motherboard.7
Owners report strong performance per watt, with gaming loads staying around 75 to 90W after undervolting or a power limit.7
The integrated Radeon graphics run older or light games such as GTA V, CS:GO and Valorant at playable frame rates without a graphics card.4

What owners dislike

Under heavy load on stock or weak air coolers, the chip often reaches 85 to 100°C and can throttle, and some owners see it shut down.30
Owners say PBO, Curve Optimizer and voltage settings need trial and error, and some settings cause crashes or unstable boots.28
Some owners see lower-than-expected fps in games such as Warzone, PUBG and Valorant despite strong GPUs, and blame CPU limits.25
Aggressive PBO or undervolt settings can cause crashes, freezes or boot failures, and some owners need to back off to milder levels.25
Several owners see GPU usage stuck at 50 to 80 percent in some games, which they attribute to the CPU's small cache and limits.10
Under sustained heavy load, owners say the stock cooler or a weak cooler makes the fans run loud.3
Owners say the 13600K and 13700K beat the 7700X in multi-threaded and some gaming tests, and Intel leads in some gaming benchmarks.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

8.4

Show more

Hide

Platform

9.0

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

Performance

8.8

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

7.3

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

8.7

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated graphics

7.6

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

Power & Thermal

5.2

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 7700X better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

3.1x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (35,551 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
35,551 vs 11,469
2.87x higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (14,960 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
14,960 vs 5,209
93.7% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,974 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,974 vs 1,535
63.4% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,180 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
4,180 vs 2,558
2.75x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,701 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
7,701 vs 2,804.5
22.7% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
4 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
8 vs 4
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raphael vs Kaby Lake).
Raphael vs Kaby Lake

23.9% higher review score
Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
80%
8.0
Average grade
20%
9.6
Popularity
Grades by review (34)
24 reviews: 19 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 10 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.3 vs 6.7
9.0% higher list score
List score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (11)
List score: in 11 of 87 lists (13%)
8.5 vs 7.8
18.4% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has better value for money than the average processor (8.62 vs 7.3).
8.62 vs 7.29
16.7% higher sentiment score
8.4 vs 7.2

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM5 vs FP5).
AM5 vs FP5
More extensive crypto acceleration
This processor offers more extensive crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA).
AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA

3.1x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (35,551 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
35,551 vs 11,469
2.87x higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (14,960 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
14,960 vs 5,209
93.7% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,974 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,974 vs 1,535
63.4% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,180 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
4,180 vs 2,558
2.75x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,701 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
7,701 vs 2,804.5
22.7% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
4 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
8 vs 4
57.8% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (773 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
773 vs 490
8 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
16 vs 8
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x4.5 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
8x4.5 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
2 more CPU cores
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
8 vs 6
4x higher bus transfer rate
This processor has a higher bus transfer rate than the average processor (32 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
32 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
17 higher clock multiplier
This processor has a higher clock multiplier than the average processor (45 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
45 vs 28

More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raphael vs Kaby Lake).
Raphael vs Kaby Lake
2.16x more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (4 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
4 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
58.3% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (5 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
5 nm vs 12 nm
3.56x larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
32 MB vs 9 MB
59.9% smaller die size
This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (71 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
71 mm² vs 177 mm²
2.67x larger L2 cache
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
8 MB vs 3 MB
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 5 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 5 nm vs Intel 14 nm
2x more L2 per core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
33.3% larger L1 cache
This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (512 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
512 KB vs 384 KB

12 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (28 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
24 usable lanes
28 vs 16
Newer PCIe version
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (5 vs 3).
5 vs 3
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
77.4% higher memory bandwidth
This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
Newer DDR support
This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR5 vs DDR4).
DDR5 vs DDR4
2x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB
62.5% higher memory speed
This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
Supports ECC memory
This processor supports ECC memory, while the average processor does not. 32% of processors support it.
Higher JEDEC memory speed
This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR5-5200 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR5-5,200 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz

Better integrated GPU
This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (AMD Radeon Graphics vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
AMD Radeon Graphics vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
1 more supported displays
This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
4 vs 3

5 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 7700X worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.33x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
105 W vs 45 W
2.33x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
105 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
91.7% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (2 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
2 vs 24
Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, Memory Guard, Secure Processor, Shadow Stack, GMET, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, Memory Guard, Secure Processor, Shadow Stack, GMET, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, Memory Guard, Secure Processor, Shadow Stack, GMET, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, Memory Guard, Secure Processor, Shadow Stack, GMET, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4

91.7% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (2 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
2 vs 24
Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)

No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.33x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
105 W vs 45 W
2.33x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
105 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0

Digital David

≈ estimated

02/04/2023

Hands-on review · installation, benchmarks and temperature tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is excellent for content creation and rendering, but for gaming alone the cheaper 7600X makes more sense.

6.0

Nicolas11x12 English

≈ estimated

17/11/2022

Hands-on review · gaming, productivity, temperatures and platform costs

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong CPU, but expensive motherboards and memory make it hard to recommend.

4.0

STS

≈ estimated

26/10/2022

Hands-on review · benchmarks, gaming and eco mode tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is not recommended, as the 7600X is better for gaming and the 7900X for work.

8.0

Hardware Unboxed

≈ estimated

28/09/2022

Hands-on review · gaming and productivity benchmarks

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is the Zen 4 pick for gamers right now, though AM5 platform costs make it pricey.

Overview video

Not graded

Brand video

Not graded

Hands-on video, no verdict

Overview video

Overview video

Overview video

RGBibelOfficial · 05/03/2023

Comparison · 7700X against Intel Core i5-13600K

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a good choice if you already have AM5, but the 13600K is the better pick for anyone coming from a 12400F.

Likes

Much lower power draw than the 13600K at full load
Gaming performance nearly matches the 13600K
Clearly ahead in multi-core benchmarks

Dislikes

Needs DDR5 and pricier AM5 motherboards
No clear gaming advantage over the 13600K

Club Gaming and Tech · 25/11/2024

Hands-on tuning · silicon quality and curve optimizer tests

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X gains a lot from undervolting, but results depend on the chip's silicon quality.

Likes

Big temperature drop after a curve optimizer undervolt
Clear explanation of voltage offset tuning
Results checked in Cinebench and gaming tests

Dislikes

Results vary widely from chip to chip
Finding stable values takes a lot of trial and error

RinconStiff · 05/11/2022

Hands-on review · gaming FPS and temperature tests

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong value chip with stable, fast performance, though temperatures run a bit high under load.

Likes

Very stable and fast performance
Strong frame rates in demanding games
Good core count for video editing and rendering

Dislikes

Temperatures run somewhat high under load
Needs decent liquid cooling to stay in check

Gwolf Gamer · 10/10/2022

Hands-on review · integrated graphics, benchmarks and temperature tests

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is fine for esports and office work without a graphics card, but not for demanding AAA games.

Likes

Integrated graphics reach playable frame rates in esports titles on low settings
Dota 2 runs at over 120 fps on low settings
Strong multi-core score in Cinebench R23
Useful as a backup if the graphics card fails

Dislikes

Only 18 to 20 fps in demanding triple-A titles
Reaches 93.8 degrees under full load
Integrated graphics are weaker than AMD's G-series chips

MoreThanTech · 02/10/2022

Hands-on tuning · undervolt and power limit tests

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X runs hot at stock settings, but an undervolt lowers temperatures and power use at the same speed.

Likes

Temperatures drop a lot after an undervolt
Same clock speeds as stock, with lower power use
Stable through 30-minute Cinebench runs

Dislikes

Stock voltage and power settings are aggressive
Cooler gets very loud under full load

Prodigeek · 27/09/2022

Hands-on review · benchmarks, gaming, temperatures and power

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X delivers clear performance gains, but higher power and heat and an expensive platform make it underwhelming.

Likes

Big performance jump over the previous generation
Good gaming results in the tests
Good manufacturing process for the new architecture

Dislikes

Higher power consumption and temperatures
New platform is expensive, with costly motherboards and memory
Little gaming benefit to justify the cost

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.5

techspot.com

✓ explicit

30/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review: Faster than Core i9?

Benchmark review · Zen 4 eight-core

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a top gaming chip, edging out the Core i9-12900K in tests, but it runs hot and needs a new AM5 motherboard.

8.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

29/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review - PCMag

Lab test · Gaming and productivity

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong 8-core chip for single-threaded work, but it trails the Core i7-12700K in many multi-core tests and has weak built-in graphics.

9.3

techradar.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X review - TechRadar

Lab review · Mainstream desktop CPU

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a fast 8-core chip for most buyers, strong in gaming and everyday tasks, but it needs new DDR5 memory and lacks 3D V-Cache.

9.0

gizbot.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review: Best Mainstream Gaming Processor Out There

Hands-on test · Gaming performance

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong gaming chip that matches the Ryzen 9 7900X in single-core speed, but needs DDR5 memory and draws more power than the 5700X.

8.0

club386.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X review: 8C16T excellence - Club386

Lab test · Eight-core CPU

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X handles productivity, content creation and gaming well, but its DDR5 memory was still maturing and early speeds fell short of expectations.

8.0

windowscentral.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X review: What 12th Gen?

Lab test · Benchmarks and temperatures

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong upgrade for owners of older AMD chips, but it needs a new AM5 motherboard and runs hot under load.

8.5

cgmagonline.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X CPU Review

Lab test · Gaming and productivity

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong gaming chip that nearly matches the 7950X in games, but heavy video editing and rendering suit the 7950X better.

9.5

tweaktown.com

✓ explicit

03/10/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X "Zen 4" CPU Review

Benchmark review · Streaming and productivity

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X suits streamers and professionals who want more cores and higher boost clocks, though multi-core scores sit mid-pack.

8.0

trustedreviews.com

✓ explicit

22/02/2023

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review

Benchmark review · Gaming and single-core

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a good fit for gaming and single-core tasks, but heavy 3D animation and multi-core work favor the Intel Core i9-13900K.

8.0

custompc.com

✓ explicit

26/06/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X review

Lab test · Overclocking and power

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is an efficient eight-core chip that overclocks well, but the Core i5-13600K is faster in most tests.

8.0

pcguide.com

✓ explicit

03/02/2025

Ryzen 7 7700X review - Is it worth it in 2025? Would you like to compare these results against the newer Ryzen 7 9700X or see a list of compatible AM5...

Retrospective review · Productivity and gaming

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is an efficient eight-core chip that sits awkwardly between its siblings, with the 7900X better for productivity and the 7800X3D for gaming.

10

lesnumeriques.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review: The Ideal CPU for Gamers

Hands-on test · Gaming and efficiency

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a gaming-focused 8-core chip whose Eco Mode cuts its power to 65W with little speed loss, though it runs hot at its default 105W setting.

10

global.techradar.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review - TechRadar

Lab test · Benchmarks and gaming

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is the best CPU for long-term overall performance, though it trails the Core i9-12900K in multi-core and video work.

9.8

geeknetic.es

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review: Full In-Depth Analysis

Hands-on test · Architecture and features

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X keeps eight cores but adds faster clocks, PCIe 5.0 and USB4, and suits buyers moving to the new AM5 platform.

9.0

gameit.es

≈ estimated

31/10/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X: Full Review

Full review · Gaming and productivity

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X matches the 5800X3D in games and is far faster in demanding workloads, which suits buyers who want both gaming and productivity.

9.2

profesionalreview.com

✓ explicit

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review (Full Analysis)

Lab test · Gaming and power draw

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong gaming CPU that draws less power than the Core i7-12700K, with slow memory reads as its main weakness.

9.0

elchapuzasinformatico.com

≈ estimated

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review

Lab test · Gaming and productivity

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a strong gaming chip with fast all-round speed, but it lacks the extra cores that help the 7950X in professional work.

9.0

hardzone.es

✓ explicit

27/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review: The Most Balanced Gaming Processor

Lab review · Zen 4 eight-core

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a fast eight-core chip for daily use and gaming, though its AM5 platform needs DDR5 memory and a new motherboard.

5.0

tomshw.it

≈ estimated

26/09/2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 7 7700X | Review

Lab test · Rendering and gaming

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is fast in single-core and office-style tasks, but it hits 95°C under full load and lags the Core i7-12700K in Blender.

8.0

digitec.ch

≈ estimated

27/09/2022

A Small and Fast Hothead - Ryzen 7 7700X Review

Hands-on test · Gaming and temperatures

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a fast gaming chip that beats the Core i9-12900K at 1080p, but it runs hot under load.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

Exceptional gaming and single-core performance, often rivaling higher-end Ryzen 9 chips in gaming scenarios
Future-proofed platform with support for DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0 lanes
AM5 socket longevity ensures compatibility with future CPU upgrades for several years
Integrated RDNA 2 graphics included for basic display tasks and troubleshooting
Strong generational performance uplift over the previous Ryzen 7 5800X
Excellent power efficiency under load compared to Intel 13th Gen competitors

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

High operating temperatures (up to 95°C) under heavy workloads are common and by design, requiring robust cooling
High total platform entry cost due to expensive AM5 motherboards and the mandatory requirement for DDR5 RAM
No CPU cooler included in the box, adding to the initial purchase price
Weak integrated graphics performance that is unsuitable for any serious gaming
Occupies an 'awkward' market position, often outshined by the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600X for pure gaming or Ryzen 9 for heavy productivity

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a high-performance desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture using a 5nm manufacturing process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 4.5 GHz and a max boost clock of up to 5.4 GHz, supported by 32MB of L3 cache and a 105W TDP. Main characteristics include support for the AM5 socket, DDR5 memory, and PCIe 5.0, along with integrated RDNA 2 graphics. Its primary pros are exceptional single-core and gaming performance that rivals higher-end chips, improved power efficiency over previous generations, and a future-proof platform. However, its main cons include high operating temperatures that often reach 95°C under load, the lack of an included stock cooler, and the high total cost of entry due to mandatory DDR5 and AM5 motherboard requirements.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Processors

Intel Core i7-12700K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Processors

Intel Core i5-14600K

Processors

Intel Core i5-13500

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Processors

Intel Core i5-14600KF

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 7 7700X with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and other processors

No results found