OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£220PassMark multi-core score:31545N. of physical cores:8CPU boost clock speed:5.1 GHzCPU socket:AM5TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 45 expert and video reviews and 9 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

8.1/10

★Better than 96% of processors

8.5

★Better than 97%

8.1

▲Better than 87%

8.0

▲Better than 72%

8.4

★Better than 98%

7.0
Gaming
Gaming
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
8.2
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
8.2
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
8.4
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.5
L3 cache
8.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
7.6
Video editing
Video editing
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
10
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
20.0%
8.9
CPU threads
15.0%
2.5
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

Based on 9 · 24

Standout integrated graphics and efficiency win praise, but gaming views are split and it makes little sense paired with a graphics card.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

Based on 179 owners sharing their experience in online comments

61%positive7%mixed32%negative

Owners praise its capable graphics and efficient operation, while gaming limits, driver instability, and heat problems temper satisfaction.

What owners like

Integrated graphics run demanding games at 1080p; owners report about 1660-level frame rates when 8 GB is assigned to graphics memory.46
Works well for video editing, rendering and 3D modeling without a graphics card, and owners say it handles Premiere, DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop smoothly.16
Fast dual-channel memory (6000 MT/s or higher) noticeably improves integrated graphics performance, and tuning memory timings can help even more.14
Pairs well with a dedicated graphics card; owners report no CPU bottleneck with cards from RX 580 up to RTX 4080.11
Draws very little power and runs quiet, with total CPU and integrated graphics draw around 100 W under load.10
Memory overclocking helps: owners run DDR5 at 6400 to 8000 MT/s on suitable boards, and the chip rewards tuning power and timings.9
Good value for buyers who skip a graphics card now, with an easy upgrade path later on the same AM5 platform.8
A larger aftermarket cooler or a liquid-metal repaste lowers temperatures well below what the stock cooler reaches under load.6

What owners dislike

Demanding new games often run at low settings and low frame rates, and some titles stay well below 60 fps even at 1080p.28
Some owners get graphics driver crashes, black screens or hangs, especially after Windows or driver updates, and fixes vary.14
Under gaming load the stock cooler lets the chip reach 85 to 95 °C, so a larger aftermarket cooler is recommended.13
Some owners cannot run fast memory profiles such as EXPO at 6000 MT/s, and the system freezes or stays at 4800 to 5400 MT/s.9
Some owners report freezes, restarts or shutdowns during games, which they link to memory profiles or motherboard issues.9
Some boards fail to boot until a BIOS update is applied, so check motherboard BIOS support before buying.5
Upscaling and frame generation do not work well for some owners, and the AMD driver may reject the integrated graphics.4
The default 512 MB graphics memory limits performance; owners raise it to 4 GB or more in the BIOS for a large gain.3
With only 16 GB of RAM, owners see stuttering and low frame rates in games and when many apps are open.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

8.1

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.9

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

What reviewers say

Performance

8.2

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

7.1

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

8.4

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

What reviewers say

Integrated graphics

8.7

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

What reviewers say

Power & Thermal

8.0

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 8700G better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

2.75x higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (14,326 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
14,326 vs 5,209
2.75x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (31,545 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
31,545 vs 11,469
53.3% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,922 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
3,922 vs 2,558
2.52x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,061 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
7,061 vs 2,804.5
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Phoenix vs Kaby Lake).
Phoenix vs Kaby Lake
72.4% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,646 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,646 vs 1,535
4 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
8 vs 4
15.9% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz

19.4% higher review score
Reviews score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
80%
7.5
Average grade
20%
9.8
Popularity
Grades by review (45)
23 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 13 estimated from the review. 22 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.0 vs 6.7
7.7% higher list score
List score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (9)
List score: in 9 of 83 lists (11%)
8.4 vs 7.8
16.7% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has better value for money than the average processor (8.5 vs 7.3).
8.5 vs 7.29

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM5 vs FP5).
AM5 vs FP5
4 years newer release date
This processor has a newer release date than the average processor (2024 vs 2020).
January 2024
2024 vs 2020
More extensive crypto acceleration
This processor offers more extensive crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA).
AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA

2.75x higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (14,326 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
14,326 vs 5,209
2.75x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (31,545 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
31,545 vs 11,469
53.3% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,922 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
3,922 vs 2,558
2.52x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,061 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
7,061 vs 2,804.5
72.4% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,646 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,646 vs 1,535
4 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
8 vs 4
15.9% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
8 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
16 vs 8
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
43.9% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (705 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
705 vs 490
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x4.2 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
8x4.2 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
2 more CPU cores
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
8 vs 6
14 higher clock multiplier
This processor has a higher clock multiplier than the average processor (42 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
42 vs 28

More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Phoenix vs Kaby Lake).
Phoenix vs Kaby Lake
66.7% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (4 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
4 nm vs 12 nm
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 4 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 4 nm vs Intel 14 nm
2.67x larger L2 cache
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
8 MB vs 3 MB
2x more L2 per core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
5.05x more transistors
This processor has more transistors than the average processor (25 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
25 billion vs 4.95 billion
77.8% larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
16 MB vs 9 MB
33.3% larger L1 cache
This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (512 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
512 KB vs 384 KB
8.1% more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core

4x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
256 GB vs 64 GB
Newer PCIe version
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4 vs 3
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
77.4% higher memory bandwidth
This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
4 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (20 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
16 usable lanes
20 vs 16
Newer DDR support
This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR5 vs DDR4).
DDR5 vs DDR4
62.5% higher memory speed
This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
Higher JEDEC memory speed
This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR5-5200 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR5-5,200 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz

Better integrated GPU
This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Radeon 780M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
Radeon 780M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
2.29x higher GPU clock speed
This processor has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (800 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
800 MHz vs 350 MHz
1 more supported displays
This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
4 vs 3

Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 8700G worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

71.9% slower Blender rendering
This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (111.9 vs 398). The average processor needs 398.015 for the Blender BMW27 test.
111.94 vs 398.015
Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
83% slower classroom rendering
This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (57.9 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
57.93 vs 340.075
44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

71.9% slower Blender rendering
This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (111.9 vs 398). The average processor needs 398.015 for the Blender BMW27 test.
111.94 vs 398.015
83% slower classroom rendering
This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (57.9 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
57.93 vs 340.075

Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4

50% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (12 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
12 vs 24

44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0

Adi 4 u

≈ estimated

17/03/2025

Build video · integrated graphics and GPU gaming tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is strong with a discrete GPU, but weak for AAA gaming on integrated graphics alone.

5.0

Adi 4 u

≈ estimated

04/02/2025

Hands-on review · integrated graphics gaming tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is weak without a graphics card and poor value at its price; a discrete GPU makes it better.

7.0

RandomGaminginHD

≈ estimated

23/02/2024

Hands-on review · a week of gaming tests and overclocking

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is impressive for an integrated-graphics chip, but a cheaper CPU and graphics card combo is better value.

6.0

Joshua Davis

✓ explicit

16/02/2024

Game test · Sons of the Forest on integrated graphics

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is not great, but it can run Sons of the Forest, especially on lower settings.

8.0

Hardware Busters

≈ estimated

31/01/2024

Hands-on review · performance, thermals and power tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a strong APU for gaming without a discrete GPU, but it is pricey and limited for upgrades.

9.0

ETA PRIME

≈ estimated

31/01/2024

First look · hands-on iGPU gaming tests · 1080p benchmarks

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a strong iGPU chip for 1080p gaming without a graphics card, though it costs more than expected.

4.0

Hardware Unboxed

≈ estimated

29/01/2024

Hands-on review · gaming, productivity and power tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is technically impressive, but poor value for most buyers; a cheaper CPU and graphics card pairing wins.

7.0

KitGuruTech

≈ estimated

29/01/2024

Hands-on review · gaming and integrated graphics tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is excellent as an APU, but only worth buying for a narrow group of builders.

8.0

Tech Nation

≈ estimated

29/01/2024

Hands-on review · gaming, streaming, editing and price tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is good for basic work and iGPU gaming, but pure gamers should pick a GPU build.

9.0

GPUSpecs

≈ estimated

26/08/2025

Comparison test · integrated graphics gaming at 1080p

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's integrated graphics are surprisingly capable for gaming, especially with fast dual-channel memory.

7.0

goldfries

≈ estimated

01/08/2024

Hands-on review · benchmarks, graphics and software tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a strong chip, but only worth it for a small niche because total build cost is high.

Overview video

Hardware&Computer · 12/02/2024

Build and test · gaming benchmarks and system cost

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a usable stopgap, but it costs too much; a 7800X3D or 7500F with a GPU makes more sense.

Likes

Smooth CS2 performance at 1080p on integrated graphics
Useful as a temporary fallback if the graphics card fails
Fluid Motion Frames make older DirectX 11 and 12 games playable

Dislikes

Noticeable input lag in demanding games like Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Total build cost is too high for the performance it delivers
16 MB L3 cache holds the CPU back

THE SEGA RED · 21/11/2025

Review · 1080p gaming performance and buying advice

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is great value for 1080p builds without a GPU, but a dedicated card is better for higher settings.

Likes

Very good value for budget builds without a graphics card
Strong integrated graphics for 1080p gaming
Good efficiency and upgrade path
Reasonable option if a GPU is bought later

Dislikes

Not worth it if a dedicated graphics card is already owned or planned soon
Not suited to 1440p or 4K gaming
Value depends on finding it at a good price

TUTO-TECNO · 02/06/2025

Buying advice · gaming and productivity hands-on

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is recommended for budget builds without a dedicated GPU, but platform costs add up.

Likes

Strong value for budget gaming without a graphics card
Quiet, cool chip on a 4 nm process, with no exotic cooling needed
AM5 and DDR5 platform leaves room for future upgrades
Integrated RDNA3 graphics should stay relevant for a while

Dislikes

AM5 board and DDR5 memory make the combo costly
Stock cooler performs poorly, so an aftermarket cooler is advised
Not worth it if a dedicated GPU is already owned or planned
Not suited to buyers who want very high frame rates

Sumocomputacion · 05/04/2025

Hands-on review · 16 game tests and Premiere editing

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is an excellent start for gaming, video editing and general use, especially thanks to its integrated graphics.

Likes

Integrated Radeon graphics perform very well
Smooth Premiere Pro editing and export
Strong raw processing power for general tasks
Good results across sixteen tested games

Dislikes

The reviewer names no clear drawbacks

TecnoBit · 14/05/2024

Productivity test · Photoshop, Premiere and AI upscaling

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is good enough for editing and exporting content on integrated graphics alone.

Likes

Runs Photoshop, Premiere and After Effects without a dedicated GPU
Runs AI upscaling tools alongside creative software
Strong value for people starting content creation
Saves the cost of a dedicated graphics card

Dislikes

Exporting a one-minute 4K clip takes almost two minutes
Relies entirely on the CPU, with no dedicated GPU power

TecnoBit · 26/04/2024

Hands-on review · gaming tests without a dedicated GPU

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G delivers strong gaming without a graphics card at a much lower price, but it requires the newer AM5 platform.

Likes

Playable frame rates in demanding games with integrated graphics
Big gains from AMD upscaling and frame generation
Lower total cost than a build with a dedicated GPU
Future upgrade path on the AM5 platform

Dislikes

Needs new-generation components such as an AM5 board and DDR5 memory
Performance ceiling limits upgrades compared with a dedicated-GPU build

LRPC Motors · 20/02/2024

Gaming test · 1080p performance with integrated graphics

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is strong in some games, but still needs a dedicated graphics card for the best results.

Likes

Strong performance in some games at 1080p
Suitable for multimedia work and esports games

Dislikes

Results in other games fall short of expectations
Still needs a dedicated graphics card for demanding games

Profesional Review · 29/01/2024

Hands-on review · gaming, overclocking and temperature tests

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G suits small builds without a dedicated GPU, but the stock cooler and PCIe limits hold it back.

Likes

Solid 1080p gaming on integrated graphics at low settings
Good performance in older games and modern titles that support FSR
CPU overclocks well, reaching about 5.15 GHz
Good value as a platform that needs no graphics card

Dislikes

Stock cooler causes the 8700G to thermal throttle under load
PCIe lanes capped at Gen 4, limiting expansion
Integrated graphics aren't ideal for competitive shooters
Integrated graphics can't be overclocked

IGN Latinoamérica · 06/02/2025

Hands-on review · benchmarks and gaming tests

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is impressive for an integrated-graphics chip and a good pick for low-settings gaming and creative work.

Likes

Strong multicore performance for an integrated-graphics chip
Playable frame rates at low settings in modern games
Built-in NPU for local AI applications
Good for streaming when paired with a dedicated GPU

Dislikes

Combined CPU and GPU load causes heat and lower clock speeds
Gaming needs low settings to run smoothly

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0

tomshardware.com

✓ explicit

30/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Review — 1080p-Capable Gaming Comes to Integrated Graphics

Lab test · Gaming on integrated graphics

Verdict

The Ryzen 7 8700G has the strongest built-in graphics on a desktop chip, handling 720p and reduced-detail 1080p games, though some CPU and graphics card pairings are faster.

7.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

29/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - Review 2024 - PCMag UK(www.techspot.com) | January 29, 2024 | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Review: Most Powerful Integrated Graphics(www.phor...

Hands-on review · Integrated graphics

Verdict

The Ryzen 7 8700G can game on its built-in graphics, but adding a discrete graphics card caused crashes in testing.

7.0

techspot.com

✓ explicit

29/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Review: Most Powerful Integrated Graphics

Benchmark review · Integrated graphics

Verdict

The Ryzen 7 8700G is the most powerful integrated graphics in any desktop CPU, running many games at 1080p low settings, but it can't replace a graphics card.

10

windowscentral.com

✓ explicit

29/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G review: The best choice for budget PC gaming is finally here

Benchmark review · Gaming without a graphics card

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a 1080p gaming option for PCs without a graphics card, but its 65W power limit keeps it slower than the 7800X3D.

9.0

xda-developers.com

✓ explicit

29/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G review: The best gaming CPU for those on a tight budget

Hands-on test · Compact gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G suits compact 1080p gaming PCs built without a graphics card, though it trails faster desktop chips for general computing.

8.0

storagereview.com

≈ estimated

29/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Desktop APU Review - StorageReview.com

Lab benchmarks · Multi-core and gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a strong all-round desktop chip for multi-core work and light gaming, but it can't replace a graphics card for demanding games.

7.0

pcinq.com

≈ estimated

16/04/2024

Will It Game? AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Review

Benchmark test · Integrated graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G suits builders who will never add a graphics card, since its built-in GPU handles 1080p gaming but limits later upgrades.

7.0

gamesradar.com

✓ explicit

06/02/2025

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G review: “There's some really decent performance here” Key Specifications & Notes from Reviews: Architecture: Zen 4 (Phoenix) on TSMC...

Hands-on test · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a cool-running chip that keeps pace with the 7800X3D in single-core tasks but adds little to gaming over the Ryzen 5 8600G.

8.0

galaxus.at

≈ estimated

03/02/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Gaming Benchmark

Gaming test · Built-in graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G reaches 60 FPS at 1080p mainly with FSR upscaling, which suits small PCs without a graphics card.

8.0

galaxus.de

≈ estimated

02/02/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G im Gaming- Test

Gaming test · Built-in graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G runs games at 1080p without a graphics card, but only with AMD's FSR upscaling; it suits small, cool-running PCs.

8.0

clubic.com

✓ explicit

31/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 8600G and 8700G Review: When Processors No Longer Need a Graphics Card

Lab test · Built-in graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G suits small PCs: its Radeon 780M graphics give decent gaming performance without a graphics card, but its CPU trails Ryzen 7000X chips.

8.0

galaxus.fr

≈ estimated

02/02/2024

Testing the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G for Gaming

Gaming test · Built-in graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G plays many games at 1080p without a graphics card, but only with AMD's FSR upscaling; it suits small, low-heat PCs.

8.0

digitec.ch

≈ estimated

03/02/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Gaming Review: Performance and Conclusions

Hands-on test · Built-in graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G runs many games at 1080p without a graphics card, but it needs AMD's FSR upscaling to reach 60 FPS; it suits small, cool PCs.

8.8

profesionalreview.com

✓ explicit

29/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Review (Full Analysis)

Full review · Integrated graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G handles 1080p gaming and multitasking without a graphics card, but its small cache and PCIe 4.0 limit hold it back.

9.4

geeknetic.es

✓ explicit

29/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G Review

Test review · 1080p gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a capable 1080p gaming and multitasking chip for PCs without a graphics card, but Cyberpunk 2077 stays under 60 FPS.

9.0

hwupgrade.it

≈ estimated

07/02/2024

Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 5 8600G: With RDNA 3, Integrated GPUs Allow for 1080p Gaming

Hands-on test · Built-in graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G runs 1080p games without a graphics card, but its CPU trails Ryzen 7000 chips, so buy it only if you need the built-in graphics.

8.0

galaxus.it

≈ estimated

03/02/2024

AMD Ryzen 8700G gaming test: a powerhouse of performance

Hands-on test · Gaming without a GPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a good chip for occasional gaming without a graphics card, but it needs FSR upscaling to hit 60 FPS.

7.0

tweakers.net

≈ estimated

29/01/2024

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 8700G - Fast graphics in a modern processor

Lab test · Built-in graphics

Verdict

The Ryzen 7 8700G's built-in graphics are its main draw, but it falls well behind faster desktop processors in Metro Exodus at Ultra settings.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

Exceptional integrated graphics performance (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming in many AAA titles
Highly power-efficient design with low idle and load power consumption
Strong multi-core performance for an APU, featuring 8 Zen 4 cores and 16 threads
Includes a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI-accelerated tasks
Excellent solution for Small Form Factor (SFF) or mini-PC builds where a dedicated GPU cannot fit
Stays relatively cool even under load, often performing well with the included stock cooler

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

High initial price point makes it a 'hard sell' compared to a budget CPU and discrete GPU combo
Reduced L3 cache (16MB) and lower clock speeds compared to non-G Ryzen 7000 models
Performance is highly sensitive to system memory speeds; requires expensive, fast DDR5 RAM for optimal results
Limited to 16-20 PCIe 4.0 lanes, restricting bandwidth for future high-end discrete GPU upgrades
Lack of PCIe 5.0 support, which is standard on many other AM5 desktop processors
Requires the relatively expensive AM5 platform (motherboard and DDR5), increasing total system cost

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a high-performance desktop APU built on the Zen 4 architecture and TSMC's 4nm process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads with a 4.2GHz base clock and up to 5.1GHz boost. Its defining characteristic is the integrated Radeon 780M graphics with 12 compute units, alongside a dedicated XDNA NPU for AI tasks, all operating within a 65W TDP on the AM5 socket. Main pros include exceptional 1080p gaming performance without a discrete GPU, high energy efficiency, and unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Notable cons include its relatively high price compared to entry-level CPU/GPU combos, a limited 16MB L3 cache, and restricted PCIe 4.0 lane count.

Best alternatives

Intel Core i5-14600K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

Processors

Intel Core i5-13600K

Processors

Intel Core i5-13600

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Processors

Intel Core i7-12700K

Processors

Intel Core i5-13400

Processors

Intel Core i5-14600KF

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Processors

Intel Core i5-14400

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 7 8700G with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and other processors

No results found