OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£210PassMark multi-core score:34386N. of physical cores:8CPU boost clock speed:5.3 GHzCPU socket:AM5TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 20 expert and video reviews and 7 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

8.3/10

★Better than 98% of processors

8.7

★Better than 99%

7.9

▲Better than 84%

8.5

★Better than 92%

8.3

★Better than 98%

7.7
Gaming
Gaming
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
8.6
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
9.0
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
9.0
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
4.0
L3 cache
8.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
4.6
Video editing
Video editing
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
2.8
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
20.0%
8.9
CPU threads
15.0%
4.0
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 7 7700

Based on 9 · 6

Reviewers agree it runs cool and frugal with solid gaming, but multi-threaded performance lags behind expectations.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 7 7700

Based on 178 owners sharing their experience in online comments

84%positive8%mixed8%negative

Owners praise its value, gaming performance, and efficient cooling, while some report heat, memory setup, and frame-rate limits.

What owners like

Strong gaming performance with modern GPUs62
Often costs much less than the 7800X3D for only a small performance gap, and many buyers found it a bargain.53
Low power use and manageable temperatures28
Tuning with PBO and Curve Optimizer raises clocks to about 5.2 to 5.5 GHz and improves scores, with stable results at around -30 offsets.23
Its AM5 socket lets owners later upgrade to newer, faster AM5 chips, including future X3D models, without changing the motherboard.10
Its eight cores handle video editing, programming, virtual machines and other multitasking work well, not just gaming.7
Owners moving from older CPUs such as the i7-6700, Ryzen 5 5600 or 5800X report large gains in speed and smoothness.5
Owners report DDR5 at 6000 MT/s running stably with EXPO profiles, especially on Gigabyte B650 boards after BIOS updates.5
The bundled stock cooler is adequate for many owners, who say it keeps temperatures acceptable and includes RGB lighting.4

What owners dislike

In some CPU-heavy games, especially at 1080p or with ray tracing enabled, the CPU limits fps and 1% lows, and the gap to X3D chips can be noticeable.11
With stock or small air coolers, temperatures can climb to 80 to 95°C, so owners recommend a better cooler, especially with PBO enabled.8
Owners compare it with the 7800X3D and 9800X3D and find lower fps in many games, though the difference is often smaller at 1440p and 4K.4
In some regions its price has risen close to the Intel i5-14600K or the Ryzen 5 7600, which weakens its value.4
Some owners report boot problems, unstable EXPO profiles or blue screens above 5200 to 5800 MT/s, which can need BIOS updates or manual tuning.4
With PBO enabled the chip can draw 80 to 140 W, well above its 65 W rating, which raises heat and electricity use.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700

8.3

Show more

Hide

Platform

9.0

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

Performance

7.8

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

7.3

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

8.7

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated graphics

8.6

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

?

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

Power & Thermal

8.0

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 7700 better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

3x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (34,386 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
34,386 vs 11,469
87.4% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,877 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,877 vs 1,535
58.6% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,056 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
4,056 vs 2,558
2.59x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,259 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
7,259 vs 2,804.5
20.5% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
4 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
8 vs 4
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raphael vs Kaby Lake).
Raphael vs Kaby Lake
12 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (28 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
24 usable lanes
28 vs 16

26.9% higher review score
Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
80%
8.3
Average grade
20%
9.2
Popularity
Grades by review (20)
12 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.5 vs 6.7
38.9% higher sentiment score
10.0 vs 7.2
19% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has better value for money than the average processor (8.67 vs 7.3).
8.67 vs 7.29
6.4% higher list score
List score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (7)
List score: in 7 of 85 lists (8%)
8.3 vs 7.8

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM5 vs FP5).
AM5 vs FP5
3 years newer release date
This processor has a newer release date than the average processor (2023 vs 2020).
January 2023
2023 vs 2020
More extensive crypto acceleration
This processor offers more extensive crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA).
AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA

3x higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (34,386 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
34,386 vs 11,469
87.4% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,877 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,877 vs 1,535
58.6% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,056 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
4,056 vs 2,558
2.59x better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,259 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
7,259 vs 2,804.5
20.5% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
4 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
8 vs 4
51.8% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (744 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
744 vs 490
8 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
16 vs 8
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3.8 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
8x3.8 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
2 more CPU cores
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
8 vs 6
4x higher bus transfer rate
This processor has a higher bus transfer rate than the average processor (32 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
32 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
10 higher clock multiplier
This processor has a higher clock multiplier than the average processor (38 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
38 vs 28

More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raphael vs Kaby Lake).
Raphael vs Kaby Lake
2.16x more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (4 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
4 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
58.3% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (5 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
5 nm vs 12 nm
3.56x larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
32 MB vs 9 MB
59.9% smaller die size
This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (71 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
71 mm² vs 177 mm²
2.67x larger L2 cache
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
8 MB vs 3 MB
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 5 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 5 nm vs Intel 14 nm
2x more L2 per core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
33.3% larger L1 cache
This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (512 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
512 KB vs 384 KB

12 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (28 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
24 usable lanes
28 vs 16
Newer PCIe version
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (5 vs 3).
5.0 vs 3.0
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
77.4% higher memory bandwidth
This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
Newer DDR support
This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR5 vs DDR4).
DDR5 vs DDR4
2x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB
62.5% higher memory speed
This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
Supports ECC memory
This processor supports ECC memory, while the average processor does not. 32% of processors support it.
Higher JEDEC memory speed
This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR5-5200 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR5-5,200 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz

Better integrated GPU
This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (AMD Radeon Graphics vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
AMD Radeon Graphics vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
1 more supported displays
This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
4 vs 3

Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 7700 worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

44.8% lower multi-core score
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (2,877 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
2,877 vs 5,209
44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

44.8% lower multi-core score
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (2,877 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
2,877 vs 5,209

Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)

44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0

The Tech Quest

≈ estimated

15/03/2026

Hands-on test · integrated graphics gaming performance

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is surprisingly capable for light gaming on its integrated graphics, but it's no substitute for a dedicated GPU.

7.0

Edgy

≈ estimated

20/11/2025

Gaming test · 23 games at 720p and 1080p

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is only a temporary fallback without a dedicated GPU, fine for older and light games.

9.5

Tech YES City

≈ estimated

26/03/2025

Gaming benchmarks · value comparison and tuning tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a good value for gaming and productivity builds and an easy pick for most buyers.

9.0

TechPowerUp

≈ estimated

11/01/2023

Review · gaming, efficiency and temperature tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is very efficient, runs cool and quiet, and suits small form factor builds, though the platform is costly.

9.0

Tech 5 Production

≈ estimated

10/01/2023

Comparison review · 7700 vs 7700X benchmarks

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 offers a good balance of price and performance, especially for gamers who also do some light video editing.

Not graded

Overview video

Overview video

Not graded

Not graded

Not graded

Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

14/01/2023

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 Review - PCMag

Lab test · Desktop processor

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an efficient eight-core chip that runs cool on its included cooler, but the Core i5-13600K is faster in most tests.

8.0

xda-developers.com

≈ estimated

09/01/2023

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 review: The new best mid-range AMD CPU

Benchmark review · Mid-range desktop chip

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a solid mid-range chip for gaming, with the same eight cores as the 7700X at lower clocks, but it needs a new AM5 board.

10

techpowerup.com

✓ explicit

09/01/2023

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 Review - Affordable Zen 4 Powerhouse

Platform review · AM5 desktop socket

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 uses the new AM5 platform, which brings easier cooler mounting and EXPO memory profiles, but it requires DDR5 memory and a new board.

7.0

kitguru.net

✓ explicit

09/01/2023

AMD Ryzen 9 7900 & Ryzen 7 7700 Review - KitGuru

Benchmark review · Power and gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a low-power eight-core chip whose Precision Boost Overdrive setting brings it close to the 7700X, though it runs warmer and lags in single-threaded work.

8.2

custompc.com

✓ explicit

04/10/2023

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 review - Custom PC

Benchmark review · Low-power 8-core

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a cool, low-power 8-core chip for small builds, but it needs a new AM5 motherboard and DDR5 memory.

10

guru3d.com

✓ explicit

09/01/2023

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review

Hands-on test · 65W desktop chip

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an efficient 8-core chip rated at 65W, trading a little speed against the 7700X for much lower heat and power draw.

9.2

profesionalreview.com

✓ explicit

09/01/2023

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 Review (Full Analysis)

Full review · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an eight-core chip for gaming and everyday work, close to the 7700X when Precision Boost Overdrive is on, though it has less overclocking room.

7.0

tomshw.it

≈ estimated

10/01/2023

AMD Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 5 7600 | Recensione

Lab test · 65W Ryzen 7000 trio

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a 65W chip that matches the 7700X in gaming and draws less power, suiting quiet, efficient PCs.

8.0

notebookcheck.nl

≈ estimated

10/01/2023

AMD - Ryzen - 7 / 7700 /65-W- Ryzen -7000 AMD Ryzen 7 7700 65 W Ryzen 7000 Review: Able Core i9-12900K en

Benchmark review · 65W Ryzen 7000 chip

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a 65W 8-core chip that trails the 7700X by only a few percent in most tests, suited to buyers who want low power draw.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 7 7700

Exceptional energy efficiency with a low 65W TDP
Includes a capable Wraith Prism RGB stock cooler, saving on build costs
Excellent gaming performance, nearly matching the more expensive 7700X
Runs significantly cooler than X-series models, making it ideal for compact builds
Future-proof AM5 platform support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0
Unlocked multiplier allows for easy overclocking to reach 7700X performance levels

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 7 7700

Strong competition from Intel's Core i5-13600K, which often leads in multi-core productivity
The integrated graphics (iGPU) are weak and only suitable for basic display tasks
Platform adoption costs remain high due to mandatory DDR5 and expensive AM5 motherboards
Productivity performance can be outpaced by competitors with higher core counts
Minimal performance gains for pure gamers over the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the 5nm Zen 4 architecture, featuring a 3.8 GHz base clock and a max boost frequency of 5.3 GHz. Key characteristics include a 40 MB total cache (32 MB L3 + 8 MB L2), support for DDR5-5200 memory, and PCIe 5.0 connectivity for high-speed storage and graphics. Its primary pros are its high power efficiency with a 65W TDP, an unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking, and the inclusion of a capable Wraith Prism RGB cooler in the box. However, its main cons include a requirement for newer, more expensive AM5 motherboards and DDR5 RAM, and performance that can be outpaced by higher core-count Intel competitors in multi-threaded productivity tasks.

Best alternatives

Intel Core i5-13600K

Processors

Intel Core i5-14600K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

Processors

Intel Core i5-14400

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

Processors

Intel Core i5-13600

Processors

Intel Core i5-13400

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Processors

Intel Core i7-12700K

Processors

Intel Core i5-14500T

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and other processors

No results found