OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£210VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):130 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge

5.7/10

▼Worse than 79% of graphics cards

6.8

▼Worse than 68%

5.3

▼Worse than 80%

9.4

★Better than 94%

3.8
Gaming
Gaming
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for gaming performance.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
2.2
Floating-point performance
25.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
3.3
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.7
Video editing
Video editing
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for video editing performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
2.2
Floating-point performance
15.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.7
1080p
1080p
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1080p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
2.2
Floating-point performance
25.0%
4.9
VRAM
10.0%
3.3
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.5
1440p
1440p
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1440p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
2.2
Floating-point performance
30.0%
4.9
VRAM
15.0%
3.3
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.7
4K
4K
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 4k performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
2.2
Floating-point performance
35.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
3.3
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge

5.7

Show more

Hide

Performance

3.5

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

Floating-point performance

Show more

Memory

3.4

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

GDDR6

GDDR version

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Show more

Platform & Features

9.4

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity & Media

9.2

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.6

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

130 W

Show more

Design

9.4

Show more

Hide

Size

224.1x 116.3x 39.2 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge vs the average graphics card

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

39.5% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
130 W vs 215 W
60.9 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (224.1 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
224.1 mm vs 285 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
15.4% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
550 W vs 650 W
17.4% higher user score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge
the average graphics card
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.39 vs 8.000).
9.39 vs 8
36.4% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (143 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
143 W vs 225 W
Includes LHR limiter
This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
8.7 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (116.3 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
116.3 mm vs 125 mm

17.4% higher user score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge
the average graphics card
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.39 vs 8.000).
9.39 vs 8
2.37x more popular
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
10 vs 4.22
2.52x cheaper
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge is cheaper than the average graphics card (£210 vs £530).
£210 vs £530

Includes LHR limiter
This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.

4x higher HDMI bandwidth
This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps

39.5% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
130 W vs 215 W
15.4% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
550 W vs 650 W
36.4% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (143 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
143 W vs 225 W
50% lower idle power draw
This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
6 W vs 12 W

60.9 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (224.1 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
224.1 mm vs 285 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
8.7 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (116.3 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
116.3 mm vs 125 mm
41.2% lighter card weight
This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (600 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
600 g vs 1,021 g

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
29.1% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1777 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,777 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
20 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
20 vs 40
4 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
8 GB vs 12 GB
104 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (80 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
80 vs 184
1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3
62.7% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (142.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
142.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
20 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
20 vs 40

5.8% worse value for money
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.8 vs 7.2).
6.8 vs 7.2

29.1% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1777 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,777 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
20 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
20 vs 40
104 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (80 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
80 vs 184
62.7% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (142.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
142.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
20 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
20 vs 40
65.2% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (56.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
56.86 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
32 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
32 vs 64
19.2% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1552 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,552 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
59.7% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
64 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
80 vs 144
44.7% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (12528 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
12,528 points vs 22,653 points
59.1% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (6005 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
6,005 points vs 14,678.5 points
63.5% lower ray tracing score
This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (3343 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
3,343 points vs 9,166 points
69.4% lower FP16 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
9.1 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
70.8% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.14 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
60.4% lower compute throughput
This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
43.9% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6771 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
6,771 points vs 12,074 points

128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
4 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
8 GB vs 12 GB
50% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (224 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
224 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
26.3% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
91.7% smaller L2 cache
This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
2 MB vs 24 MB

60% larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
8 nm vs 5 nm
Fewer PCIe lanes
This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
x8 vs x16
Older encoder generation
This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
7 vs 8
1 older
This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
January 2022
2,022 vs 2,023
47.6% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (12000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
12,000 million vs 22,900 million

No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
Narrower encode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
5 vs 6

1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
6 dB noisier under load
This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41.4 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
41.4 dB vs 35.4 dB

No RGB lighting
This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

thefpsreview.com

01/11/2022

Summary of the review

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC Video Card Review

The ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC is a dual-slot, factory-overclocked video card targeted at 1080p gaming with a boost clock of 1807 MHz, an 8GB GDDR6 memory bus, and a 130W power requirement. Built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, this card highlights an impressive IceStorm 2.0 dual-fan cooling system featuring 11-blade fans with "FREEZE fan stop" technology, a direct contact heatpipe heatsink, and a durable full metal backplate. The review notes excellent physical construction, utilizing a single 8-pin PCIe power connector and offering broad connectivity with three DisplayPort 1.4a ports and one HDMI 2.1 port, making it highly compatible with modern displays. In terms of market reception, the review presents mixed results, granting the card a modest overall score of 7.8 out of 10. On the positive side, its major pros include phenomenal cooling performance (scoring a perfect 10), solid efficiency, and the integration of NVIDIA's robust Ray Tracing and DLSS upscaling technologies. However, the card suffers from a weak performance-to-price ratio; its raw gameplay performance falls significantly below its direct competition, earning a low performance sub-score of...

tech-critter.com

28/02/2022

Summary of the review

Review - ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC

The ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC is a compact, dual-fan graphics card optimized for entry-level 1080p gaming, making it especially well-suited for small form factor ITX builds. In terms of raw rasterization performance, the card outperforms the older GTX 1660 SUPER but falls short of matching the RTX 2060. It features 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM and operates with a low 130W TDP, requiring just a 550W power supply and a single 8-pin PCIe connector. During heavy testing, the GPU maintained reasonable thermal and acoustic performance, peaking at a temperature of 71°C with quiet fan operations. Pros and Cons The card's main advantages (pros) include its capable 1080p gaming performance, a generous 8GB VRAM buffer, low power requirements, and a compact design. Furthermore, its access to ray tracing and NVIDIA DLSS technology provides a significant framerate boost in supported titles compared to competing alternatives like the AMD Radeon RX 6500XT. On the downside, the primary disadvantage (con) highlighted in the review is market pricing, as its actual retail cost at the time of evaluation remained higher than NVIDIA's...

tomshardware.com

03/02/2022

Summary of the review

Zotac GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC Review

The Zotac GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC review highlights a graphics card that struggles to justify its steep price premium over Nvidia's baseline specifications. Officially launched with a suggested price of $399, the card demands a massive 60% premium ($150 extra) over the hypothetical $249 reference MSRP. For this steep financial increase, buyers only receive a minor 1.7% factory overclock, bumping the boost clock up by 30MHz to 1807MHz, which results in negligible real-world gaming performance gains over reference models. While users can achieve better results through manual overclocking—pushing the MHz and the GDDR6 memory to an effective 16Gbps via software like MSI Afterburner—the card itself represents a broader trend of board partners inflating prices during market shortages. On the positive side, the review notes that the Twin Edge OC runs cool and efficiently, and because of its higher price point, it is far more likely to actually be in stock compared to standard MSRP models. However, these practical advantages are heavily outweighed by several notable downsides. The core drawbacks include a massive 60% MSRP increase for a virtually...

techpowerup.com

10/03/2022

Summary of the review

Zotac GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC Review

The Zotac GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC is a compact, budget-friendly card designed for 1080p gaming, featuring 8GB GDDR6 memory and supporting DLSS and ray tracing. It offers a robust build with a metal backplate, quiet operation via idle fan-stop, and excellent compatibility due to its small dual-fan design. Cons include a minimal 30 MHz factory overclock, a spartan heatsink, lack of RGB, and a PCI-Express 4.0 x8 interface that may cause bottlenecks. Furthermore, while ray tracing is supported, raw performance often requires DLSS in demanding titles to maintain high frame rates. YouTube ·Mike's unboxing, reviews

thumbculture.co.uk

10/03/2022

Summary of the review

Zotac GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge Review

The Thumb Culture Review describes the Zotac GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge as an entry-level, budget-friendly graphics card that makes gaming highly accessible during a market plagued by massive price inflation. Built on the Nvidia Ampere architecture, this compact card features a length of 221.1mm and dual-fan Ice Storm 2.0 cooling technology. It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, 2560 CUDA cores, a 128-bit memory bus, a boost clock of 1777 MHz, and standard support for Ray Tracing and DLSS. In benchmarking tests like Unigine SuperPosition, the card pushed a solid 74.29 FPS on 1080p high settings but struggled heavily on extreme settings and 4K loads. During casual, real-world testing on titles like Call of Duty: Warzone, the reviewer noted it played smoothly and looked great, delivering a very similar experience to a previous-generation 2060 Super. The card's main pros include its highly affordable MSRP compared to higher-end models, its sturdy and compact form factor that fits into small cases, its dual-fan Ice Storm cooling system, and the updated, modern user interface of the free Zotac Firestorm companion software....

xda-developers.com

13/03/2022

Summary of the review

Zotac GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC Edition Review

The XDA Developers review highlights the Zotac GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge OC Edition as a highly available, compact graphics card optimized primarily for stable 1080p casual gaming. Built on the GA106 Ampere architecture with 8GB GDDR6 memory, it reliably delivers over 60 FPS in demanding modern titles like Far Cry 6 and Red Dead Redemption 2 when running on medium settings. The card's standout design features include its low-profile, non-RGB visual approach, space-saving 222mm layout, and a protective metal backplate—a premium inclusion often missing from competitor variants. Equipped with dual 88mm cooling fans, it maintains low operational acoustics and peak temperatures around 65°C under intensive heavy loads. However, the card struggles with several definitive performance and financial constraints. Its primary drawback is its steep pricing structure; at a suggested retail price of $399, it demands a massive $150 premium over the reference baseline design while only providing a minor 2% factory overclock boost (1807MHz vs. 1777MHz). While the integration of NVIDIA DLSS effectively preserves playable frame rates, the standalone hardware ray-tracing performance is underwhelming on its own. Furthermore, the...

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge

Excellent for 1080p gaming, maintaining smooth performance (60+ FPS) in most titles
Highly compact design that easily fits into small form factor (SFF) and ITX builds
Quiet cooling system with 'Freeze Fan Stop' technology that keeps the card silent during idle
Support for DLSS and Ray Tracing provides a significant performance boost and visual upgrade in supported games
Low power requirements, making it compatible with budget-friendly 550W power supplies
Solid build quality for an entry-level card, often including a metal backplate for added protection

What we don't like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge

Struggles significantly with 1440p resolution or ultra settings in highly demanding AAA games
Underwhelming value compared to competing AMD cards (like the RX 6600) which may offer better raw rasterization performance for the price
The 'OC' (overclocked) edition offers only a marginal 2-3% performance gain over the standard model
Lacks premium aesthetics such as RGB lighting, which may disappoint some enthusiasts
Ray tracing performance is limited and often requires lower settings to remain playable

Verdict

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge is an entry-level graphics card based on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture, featuring 2560 CUDA cores, 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, and a 128-bit memory bus. It operates with a boost clock of 1777 MHz (or 1807 MHz for the OC edition) and utilizes IceStorm 2.0 cooling with dual 80mm fans and a FREEZE fan-stop feature to maintain low noise and temperatures. Its main pros include a compact dual-slot design for small form factor builds, a sturdy metal backplate, and support for DLSS and ray tracing, making it a solid choice for 1080p gaming with a low 130W TDP. However, its performance is significantly lower than the RTX 3060, and it may face a slight performance penalty on older PCIe 3.0 systems due to its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Best alternatives

Graphics cards

SPARKLE ARC A580 Orc OC Edition

Graphics cards

SPARKLE ARC B570 Guardian OC

Graphics cards

Graphics cards

ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC

Graphics cards

Graphics cards

Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 7600 OC Edition

Graphics cards

ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Super Ventus OC

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Twin Edge and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found