Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Intel ARC B570 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220VRAM:10 GBMemory bus width:160 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):150 W

Intel ARC B570 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 57% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–²Better than 70%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.7

Performance

24%

5.2

Memory

12%

9.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

9.5

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 54%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Intel ARC B570

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.7

Performance

24%

5.2

Memory

12%

9.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

9.5

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

6.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Intel ARC B570 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
16,631 points
This graphics card scores 16,631 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 54.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
6,728 points
This graphics card scores 6,728 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 62.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
14,056 points
This graphics card scores 14,056 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 76.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,309 points
This graphics card scores 7,309 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 74.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
11.52 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 11.52 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 72.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
10 GB
This graphics card has 10 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
160 bit
This graphics card uses a 160 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
380 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 380 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 61.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
13.5 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 13.5 Gbps, which is slower than on 60.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
150 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 150 W, which is lower than that of 73.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
187 W
This graphics card draws 187 W under peak load, which is lower than 59.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
150 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 150 W, which is lower than that of 75.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
150 W
Show more
Size
249x 132x 41 mm
This graphics card measures 249x132x 41 mm, which is more compact than 76.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Length
242 mm
This graphics card is 242 mm long, which is shorter than 73.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
115 mm
This graphics card is 115 mm tall, which is shorter than 72.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
720 g
This graphics card weighs 720 g, which is lighter than 77.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

Intel ARC B570 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 9.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2750 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,750 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 30.2% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2500 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,500 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 35.7% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2375 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,375 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 43 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    242 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 2.41x cheaper
    Intel ARC B570 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£220 vs £530).
    £220 vs £530
  • 9.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2750 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,750 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 30.2% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2500 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,500 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 22.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (200 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    200 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 3.4x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (101 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    101 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 3x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.4 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.44 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 35.7% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2375 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,375 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    256 vs 128
  • 7.5x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (30 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    30 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 33.3% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    150 W vs 225 W
  • 10.7 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (24.7 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    24.7 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 43 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    242 mm vs 285 mm
  • 10 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    115 mm vs 125 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (249x132 x 41 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    249x132 x 41 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 96 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (160 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    160 bit vs 256 bit
  • 22 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    18 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 22 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    18 vs 40
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • 2 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (10 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    10 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4.22x less popular
    Intel ARC B570 is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 22 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    18 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 22 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    18 vs 40
  • 43.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (12.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    12.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 38% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (14056 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    14,056 points vs 22,653 points
  • 26.6% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (6728 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    6,728 points vs 9,166 points
  • 39.5% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7309 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,309 points vs 12,074 points
  • 96 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (160 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    160 bit vs 256 bit
  • 2 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (10 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    10 GB vs 12 GB
  • 15.2% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (380 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    380 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 58.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (10 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    10 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3.1).
    2.0 vs 3.1
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2.67x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (32 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    32 W vs 12 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcguide.com
04/02/2025
Summary of the review
M
me.ign.com
17/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
C
cgmagonline.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
14/03/2025
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
27/01/2025
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
N
noticias3d.com
22/01/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Intel ARC B570

  • High VRAM for its price point (10GB vs 8GB on competitors like the RTX 4060 or RX 7600)
  • Strong ray tracing performance compared to AMD's budget offerings
  • Excellent energy efficiency and runs cool/quiet under load
  • Great value at MSRP ($219/£150) for modern 1080p and light 1440p gaming
  • Significant driver improvements since the first-generation Alchemist series
  • Advanced feature set including XeSS Frame Generation and support for DisplayPort 2.1

What we don't like about Intel ARC B570

  • Overshadowed by the Arc B580, which offers roughly 10-20% better performance for only a small price increase (~$30)
  • Higher CPU overhead can lead to performance bottlenecks when paired with older or budget CPUs (e.g., Ryzen 5 5600 or older)
  • Inconsistent performance in legacy (DX11/DX9) or poorly optimised titles
  • Unique frame time pacing issues and occasional stuttering reported in certain games
  • Limited availability at the official MSRP in many regions
  • Significant performance loss on older PCIe 3.0 motherboards

Verdict

The Intel Arc B570 is a budget-oriented graphics card based on the Xe2 Battlemage architecture, featuring 18 Xe-cores, 144 XMX AI engines, and 10GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380 GB/s bandwidth. It operates with a 2500 MHz base clock, a 150W total board power (TBP), and supports modern features like AV1 encoding and DisplayPort 2.1. Its main pros include exceptional value for its $219 MSRP, competitive ray-tracing performance that often surpasses more expensive alternatives like the RTX 4060 in specific titles, and a larger VRAM buffer than most entry-level competitors. However, it suffers from significant performance overhead when paired with older CPUs, high idle power consumption, and inconsistent frame-time pacing in select games compared to established NVIDIA and AMD offerings.

Compare Intel ARC B570 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Intel ARC B570 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found