OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Intel ARC A750 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£220
Avg. price in US: ~$310
VRAM: 8 GB
Memory bus width: 256 bit
Thermal Design Power (TDP): 225 W

Intel ARC A750 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

7.0

Very good

6.8

Good

9.0

Exceptional

5.6
Gaming
Score components:
45.0%
?
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
2.1
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
7.3
Video editing
Score components:
35.0%
10
AV1 encode
30.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
?
Floating-point performance
15.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
6.2
1080p
Score components:
55.0%
?
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.8
VRAM
10.0%
2.1
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.6
1440p
Score components:
50.0%
?
Floating-point performance
30.0%
2.8
VRAM
15.0%
2.1
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.0
4K
Score components:
40.0%
?
Floating-point performance
35.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
2.1
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

#1 in Best 8 GB Graphic Cards
#2 in Best Intel Graphic Cards
#4 in Best Budget Graphic Cards
#476 in Best Graphic Cards
#618 in Best Graphic Cards For Video Editing

Verdict

The Intel Arc A750 is a mid-range graphics card based on the Xe HPG 'Alchemist' architecture, featuring 28 Xe-cores, 28 ray tracing units, and 3,584 shading units with a boost clock up to 2,400 MHz. It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit memory bus, delivering a high 512 GB/s bandwidth and supporting modern features like AV1 hardware encoding, XeSS AI upscaling, and DirectX 12 Ultimate. Its main pros include exceptional price-to-performance for 1080p and 1440p gaming, strong ray tracing capabilities for its class, and continuous driver improvements that have significantly boosted stability in modern titles. However, notable cons include high power consumption with a 225W TDP, a mandatory requirement for Resizable BAR to avoid severe performance drops, and inconsistent performance in older games using legacy APIs like DirectX 9 or 11.

Technical Specifications of Intel ARC A750

Overall score

7.0

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.

Performance

6.3

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.

When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?

3DMark Port Royal score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.

When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

?

PassMark (G3D) result

What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark

When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests

When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?

Floating-point performance

What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.

When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Memory

5.6

Show more

Hide

VRAM

What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card

When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

Memory type

What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)

When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

GDDR6

GDDR version

What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

?

Memory bus width

What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

Maximum memory bandwidth

What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory

When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Platform & Features

8.3

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported

When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

PCIe lanes

What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication

When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

DirectX version

What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version

When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

?

Vulkan version

What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version

When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

OpenGL version

What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version

When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity & Media

9.4

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously

When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

Max digital resolution

What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution

When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort outputs

What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs

When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort version

What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported

When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort link rates

What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections

When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.1

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)

When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

Power consumption while under peak load

What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.

When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

?

Recommended PSU wattage

What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply

When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

Board power limit

What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board

When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

PCIe power spec

What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed

When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Design

7.8

Show more

Hide

Size

What it is: Physical size of the GPU card

When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?

Length

What it is: Physical length of the GPU card

When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

Height

What it is: Physical height of the GPU card

When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

?

Slot width

What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card

When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

Weight

What it is: Total weight of the graphics card

When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Intel ARC A750 vs the average graphics card

Why is Intel ARC A750 better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

48 more ROPs
Intel ARC A750 has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
What it is: Total number of render output units on the GPU
When it matters: When you want more context on pixel output capacity, especially for high-resolution play and older raster-heavy engines.
Importance: HIGH
Intel ARC A750 has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.112 vs 64
256 more AI cores
Intel ARC A750 has more AI cores than the average graphics card (448 vs 192). The average graphics card has 192 AI cores.
What it is: Number of tensor or AI processing cores
When it matters: When AI features, frame generation, or creator tools use dedicated matrix hardware.
Importance: MEDIUM
Intel ARC A750 has more AI cores than the average graphics card (448 vs 192). The average graphics card has 192 AI cores.448 vs 192
62.7% higher pixel rate
Intel ARC A750 has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (268.8 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
What it is: Number of pixels the GPU can render per second
When it matters: When you play at high resolutions or care about older raster-heavy games.
Importance: MEDIUM
Intel ARC A750 has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (268.8 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.268.8 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s
Supports ECC memory
Intel ARC A750 supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
What it is: Supports error-correcting code memory for higher reliability
When it matters: When stability and error correction matter more than pure gaming value.
Importance: LOW
Intel ARC A750 supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
42.7% higher texture rate
Intel ARC A750 has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (537.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
What it is: Number of textured pixels the GPU can process per second
When it matters: When fast texture handling matters in high-refresh gaming workloads.
Importance: HIGH
Intel ARC A750 has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (537.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.537.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s
14.3% higher memory bandwidth
Intel ARC A750 has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.
Importance: HIGH
Intel ARC A750 has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
14.3% faster VRAM clock
Intel ARC A750 has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
What it is: Speed at which the GPU memory operates
When it matters: When you want more context on how quickly the card's VRAM can move data.
Importance: LOW
Intel ARC A750 has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz
40 more TMUs
Intel ARC A750 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.
Importance: HIGH
Intel ARC A750 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.224 vs 184
48 more ROPs
Intel ARC A750 has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
256 more AI cores
Intel ARC A750 has more AI cores than the average graphics card (448 vs 192). The average graphics card has 192 AI cores.
62.7% higher pixel rate
Intel ARC A750 has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (268.8 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
42.7% higher texture rate
Intel ARC A750 has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (537.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
40 more TMUs
Intel ARC A750 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
6.8% higher base clock speed
Intel ARC A750 has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,050 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
Better FP64 ratio
Intel ARC A750 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:8 vs 1:64).
4.62x higher FP64 performance
Intel ARC A750 has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (2.2 TFLOPS vs 0.4651 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.4651 TFLOPS.
Supports ECC memory
Intel ARC A750 supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
14.3% higher memory bandwidth
Intel ARC A750 has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
14.3% faster VRAM clock
Intel ARC A750 has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
50% larger L1 cache
Intel ARC A750 has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (192 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
Newer DisplayPort version
Intel ARC A750 supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.0 vs 1.4a).
7.7% lower PSU requirement
Intel ARC A750 has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Why is Intel ARC A750 worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

20 fewer ray tracing cores
Intel ARC A750 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (28 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.
No CUDA support
Intel ARC A750 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
12 fewer compute units
Intel ARC A750 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
4% lower boost clock speed
Intel ARC A750 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
24.8% lower FP32 performance
Intel ARC A750 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (17.2 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.
4 GB less VRAM
Intel ARC A750 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
15.8% slower memory speed
Intel ARC A750 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
50% smaller L2 cache
Intel ARC A750 has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (16 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
No DLSS support
Intel ARC A750 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
20% larger process node
Intel ARC A750 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
Older Vulkan version
Intel ARC A750 supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
1 older
Intel ARC A750 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,022 vs 2,023).
33.4% larger GPU die
Intel ARC A750 has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (406 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
Older shader model
Intel ARC A750 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
Not VR ready
Intel ARC A750 is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
1 fewer fans
Intel ARC A750 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
31.3 dB noisier at idle
Intel ARC A750 has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (31.3 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
9 °C higher idle temperature
Intel ARC A750 has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (47 °C vs 38 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 38 °C.
4.7% higher TDP
Intel ARC A750 has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
No RGB lighting
Intel ARC A750 does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
20 fewer ray tracing cores
Intel ARC A750 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (28 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.
What it is: Number of dedicated ray tracing processing cores or units
When it matters: When you care about ray-traced lighting, reflections, and shadows in newer games.
Importance: HIGH
Intel ARC A750 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (28 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.28 vs 48
1 fewer fans
Intel ARC A750 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
What it is: Total number of cooling fans
When it matters: When you compare cooler designs and want one more clue about thermal potential.
Importance: MEDIUM
Intel ARC A750 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).2 vs 3
No CUDA support
Intel ARC A750 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports CUDA parallel computing platform
When it matters: When your apps or AI tools specifically depend on the CUDA software stack.
Importance: MEDIUM
Intel ARC A750 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
12 fewer compute units
Intel ARC A750 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.
Importance: HIGH
Intel ARC A750 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.28 vs 40
No DLSS support
Intel ARC A750 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA DLSS upscaling technology
When it matters: When you play NVIDIA-supported games and want better frame rates at higher settings.
Importance: LOW
Intel ARC A750 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
4 GB less VRAM
Intel ARC A750 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.
Importance: HIGH
Intel ARC A750 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.8 GB vs 12 GB
4% lower boost clock speed
Intel ARC A750 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.
Importance: HIGH
Intel ARC A750 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.2400 MHz vs 2500 MHz
20% larger process node
Intel ARC A750 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.
Importance: MEDIUM
Intel ARC A750 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.6 nm vs 5 nm

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of Intel ARC A750 and

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

United States

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about Intel ARC A750?

Exceptional price-to-performance ratio for 1080p gaming
Strong ray tracing capabilities for its price class
Effective XeSS AI-upscaling technology
Excellent AV1 hardware encoding support for content creators
Sleek and attractive physical design on the Limited Edition
Solid performance in modern DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles
Regular driver updates that have significantly improved stability over time

What customers dislike about Intel ARC A750?

Inconsistent performance in older titles (DirectX 9 and 11)
Requires Resizable BAR (ReBar) to be enabled for playable performance
High power consumption at idle compared to competitors
Drivers can still be finicky with occasional stutters or crashes
Limited 8GB VRAM can be a bottleneck for 1440p or future games
Occasional software bugs with the Intel Arc Control overlay
Higher power draw and lower energy efficiency than AMD or NVIDIA alternatives

Expert reviews

pcmag.com

20/11/2022

Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition Review - PCMag

The PCMag review of the Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition highlights an attractive, premium-built graphics card that boasts strong synthetic benchmark results and competitive pricing. However, the card is held back by immature, buggy drivers, leading to inconsistent performance across many gaming titles. While showcasing significant physical potential, the unreliable software...Read more

techradar.com

22/05/2023

Intel Arc A750 review: a great budget graphics card with major caveats

The Intel Arc A750 is a highly capable budget graphics card that offers impressive value but comes with noticeable real-world drawbacks. On the positive side, the card delivers stellar 1080p gaming performance and surprisingly robust ray tracing and upscaling capabilities via Intel XeSS. Visually, the Limited Edition reference card stands out with a sleek, premium design featuring a...Read more

tweaktown.com

05/05/2023

Intel Arc A750 Graphics Review - TweakTown

The Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition graphics card is an entry-level and mid-range GPU built on Intel’s Xe HPG architecture, offering competitive performance for 1080p and 1440p gaming. In testing, it functions smoothly with mature drivers, maintaining stable frame rates and showing surprisingly capable results in ray-tracing and synthetic benchmarks, where it often outpaces or...Read more

eurogamer.net

05/10/2022

Intel Arc A770 and A750 review: welcome player three

The Intel Arc A770 and A750 graphics cards offer strong 1080p performance and aggressive price-to-performance value, establishing Intel as a legitimate third player in the enthusiast GPU market. Built on TSMC's 6nm node, the Limited Edition dual-slot models feature a clean metal design, a 256-bit memory interface, and standout support for AV1 encoding—a feature missing from...Read more

techpowerup.com

05/10/2022

Intel Arc A750 Review - Great Value - Value & Conclusion Are you looking for benchmarks for a specific game or productivity software to see how the In...

The TechPowerUp review highlights the Intel Arc A750 as a competitive, budget-friendly midrange GPU ($290 at launch) delivering strong 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, outperforming the RTX 3060 and RX 6600 in key scenarios. Key pros include excellent ray tracing capabilities, AV1 hardware encoding, DisplayPort 2.0/HDMI 2.1 support, and a high-quality, aesthetically pleasing...Read more

gamersnexus.net

20/02/2024

Intel Arc 2024 Revisit & Benchmarks (A750, A770, A580, A380 - Updated GPU Tests)

Performance and Driver Growth Intel has made significant strides in improving its Arc GPU drivers since its initially poor launch, transforming the lineup into a competitive force in the budget market. Purely through software optimizations, cards like the $210 Arc A750 and $290 Arc A770 deliver exceptional value by frequently matching or beating more expensive rivals like the AMD RX...Read more

trustedreviews.com

25/04/2024

Intel Arc A750 Review - Trusted Reviews If you need further details, please let me know if you would like me to compile performance benchmarks, extrac...

The Intel Arc A750, as reviewed by Trusted Reviews, is a competitive budget graphics card utilizing 8GB GDDR6 VRAM, making it a strong candidate for stable 1080p gaming, ray tracing, and Intel XeSS upscaling. Its primary advantages include excellent value for money and solid, consistent performance in modern DX12 titles, along with respectable content creation capabilities. However,...Read more

kitguru.net

05/10/2022

Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition Review - KitGuru

The Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition is a mid-range graphics card priced at $289 that showcases a highly impressive physical design and competitive modern performance. On the positive side, its hardware delivers strong ray tracing capabilities that rival the RTX 3060, alongside standout performances in modern DX12 titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Dying Light 2. Visually, the card...Read more

techpowerup.com

05/10/2022

Intel Arc A750 Review - Great Value | TechPowerUp

The TechPowerUp review identifies the Intel Arc A750 as a disruptive 8 GB budget card offering strong 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, rivaling the RTX 3060 and RX 6600 while supporting AV1 encoding and robust ray tracing. The card is highlighted for its premium design, quiet cooling, and effective XeSS upscaling, making it a competitive option for modern API titles. However, the...Read more

tomshardware.com

18/10/2022

Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition Review: RTX 3050 Takedown

The Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition graphics card targets the budget-to-midrange market with an aggressive launch price of $289, aiming to displace the Nvidia RTX 3050 and compete directly with the RTX 3060. Built on the 6nm ACM-G10 architecture, the card features 28 Xe-Cores, 3,584 GPU shaders, and a 2050 MHz boost clock that delivers 14.7 teraflops of FP32 graphics compute...Read more

lttlabs.com

10/07/2024

Intel Arc A750 | LTT Labs

The LTT Labs review identifies the Intel Arc A750 as a competitive budget GPU offering solid 1080p performance and capable 1440p gaming, provided Resizable BAR is enabled. Key advantages include a sleek, matte black design and significantly improved, mature drivers that enhance its price-to-performance value. Conversely, the card is limited by 8GB of GDDR6 memory, resulting in...Read more

pcper.com

16/08/2023

Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition Graphics Card Review

Intel Arc A750 Review Summary The Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition is a highly compelling, cost-effective graphics card built primarily for mainstream 1080p gaming. Based on the DG2-512 GPU architecture, the card features 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, 3584 shading units, and a 256-bit memory interface that delivers 512 GB/s of bandwidth. In synthetic and real-world benchmarks, the card...Read more

thefpsreview.com

20/02/2023

Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition Video Card Review

The Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition is identified as a highly competitive budget graphics card for 1080p and select 1440p gaming, often outperforming the GeForce RTX 3050 and Radeon RX 6600 in DX12 titles, such as achieving 90 FPS in Dying Light 2. The review highlights the card's premium build quality, robust ray tracing, and effective XeSS upscaling, while noting its capability to...Read more

clubic.com

23/02/2023

Test Intel ARC Alchemist A750 et A770 : les cartes graphiques d'Intel peuvent-elles concurrencer AMD et NVIDIA ?

The review analyzes Intel's return to the dedicated graphics card market with the Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition and the Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC. Positioned as entry-to-mid-range solutions targeting 1080p gaming, both cards deliver satisfactory performance and prove to be competent alternatives to AMD and Nvidia. The Arc A750 offers a sober, compact design and highly...Read more

comptoir-hardware.com

05/10/2022

Preview • Intel ARC A770 LE 16 Go & A750 LE

The Comptoir du Hardware review provides a comprehensive preview evaluation of Intel's first-generation Alchemist architecture, specifically testing the Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition (16 GB) and the Arc A750 Limited Edition across 14 distinct games and 13 synthetic benchmarks. The review highlights severe timing constraints, noting that late hardware and driver deliveries...Read more

profesionalreview.com

01/04/2023

Intel Arc A750 Review en Español (Análisis completo)

Here is a specific summary of the Intel Arc A750 review: Review Summary The Intel Arc A750 is a mid-to-low-end graphics card built on the 6 nm Alchemist Xe HPG architecture, functioning essentially as a streamlined version of the A770. Tested on a high-end system featuring an Intel Core i9-12900K and 32 GB of DDR5 RAM, this card targets stable performance at 1080p resolution. It...Read more

noticias3d.com

12/05/2026

Intel Arc A750 a prueba en Linux contra Windows, ¿es mejor? Geeknetic

The Intel Arc A750 graphics card shows a clear performance advantage when running on Windows 11 compared to CachyOS (Linux). In a recent benchmark review by NJ Tech, the GPU failed to outperform Windows 11 in any of the tested video games. Highly demanding titles exhibited significant performance drops on Linux; for instance, ARC Raiders dropped from 70 FPS on Windows to 51 FPS on...Read more

profesionalreview.com

06/10/2022

Intel Arc A750: Review revela un rendimiento superior a la RTX 3060

The Intel Arc A750 is a mid-range graphics card built on TSMC's 6nm process, featuring 28 Xe cores, 28 Ray Tracing units, and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit interface. Benchmarks show that it delivers strong, budget-friendly performance across various resolutions compared to its competition. In 1080p gaming, it achieves a smooth average of 92.7 FPS, performing on par with the...Read more

hwupgrade.it

28/02/2023

Arc A750 Limited Edition recensione: finalmente Intel nel settore delle GPU dedicate

Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition Review Summary The Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition marks Intel's debut into the dedicated desktop GPU market, targeting an competitive balance between price and performance to break the NVIDIA and AMD duopoly. Built on the 6nm TSMC process with 28 Xe-cores and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, it trades blows closely with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 in modern DirectX...Read more

digitec.ch

19/06/2023

L'Arc A750 di Intel è una buona scheda grafica per budget ridotti

The Intel Arc A750, evaluated eight months post-launch, has evolved into a highly competitive, budget-friendly GPU priced at roughly 269 EUR/CHF, offering strong 1080p performance and excellent productivity utility for Adobe apps. While outperforming or closely trailing more expensive competitors, the card's main limitations include lackluster raw ray tracing performance, which...Read more

tweakers.net

20/09/2023

Videokaart Best Buy Guide - De beste gpu's in september 2023

The September 2023 Tweakers GPU Best Buy Guide recommends the AMD Radeon RX 6600 and 6650 XT for budget 1080p gaming, praising their high rasterization performance per euro while noting weaker ray tracing as a drawback. For high-refresh 1080p, the RX 6700 XT is recommended, with the guide balancing AMD's value against the lack of modern, proprietary upscaling features. For 1440p and...Read more

Video reviews

Best alternatives

ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Super Gaming OC

Graphics cards

SPARKLE ARC A580 Orc OC Edition

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 7600 OC Edition

Graphics cards

Acer Predator Bifrost Radeon RX 7600 OC

Graphics cards

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 7600 Mech 2X Classic OC

Graphics cards

SPARKLE ARC B570 Guardian OC

Graphics cards

Gainward GeForce RTX 5050 Ghost

Graphics cards

ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D

Graphics cards

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 7600 Core Edition

Graphics cards

Compare Intel ARC A750 with

Compare