Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£230VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):215 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

9.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 59% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

â–²Better than 64%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.2

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 63%
9.5

User score

User score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.5

User ratings

30%

9.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 97%
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-super
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.2

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

6.4
User score
User score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.5

User ratings

30%

9.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super has a popularity score of 9.5 points, which is higher than that of 88.2% of products in this category.
9.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,500 points
This graphics card scores 9,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 72.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
5,345 points
This graphics card scores 5,345 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 71.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
18,156 points
This graphics card scores 18,156 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 66.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,504 points
This graphics card scores 7,504 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 73.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
9.06 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 9.06 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 77% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
215 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 215 W, which is lower than that of 50% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
215 W
This graphics card draws 215 W under peak load, which is lower than 52.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
260 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 260 W, which is higher than that of 59.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
75 W
Show more
Size
267x 116x 35 mm
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
116 mm
This graphics card is 116 mm tall, which is shorter than 70% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.4% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,421 g
This graphics card weighs 1,421 g, which is heavier than 70.8% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 18.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.49 vs 8.000).
    9.49 vs 8
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 9 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (116 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    116 mm vs 125 mm
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 18.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.49 vs 8.000).
    9.49 vs 8
  • 2.3x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super is cheaper than the average graphics card (£230 vs £530).
    £230 vs £530
  • 2.26x more popular
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super is more popular than the average graphics card (9.52 vs 4.2).
    9.52 vs 4.22
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 9 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (116 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    116 mm vs 125 mm
  • 29.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1770 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,770 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 30.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (113.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    113.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 59.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 29.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1770 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,770 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 30.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (113.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    113.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 59.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 25.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (283.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    283.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 16.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1605 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,605 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 35.3% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 19.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (18156 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    18,156 points vs 22,653 points
  • 41.7% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (5345 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    5,345 points vs 9,166 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 60.6% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    9.06 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 37.8% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7504 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,504 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    July 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (6 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    6 vs 8
  • 84.7% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (545 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    545 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 30 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (30 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    30 dB vs 0 dB
  • 15.6% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (260 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    260 W vs 225 W
  • 39.2% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1421 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,421 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techpowerup.com
24/10/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
04/09/2019
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
04/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
21/09/2020
Summary of the review
R
rockpapershotgun.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
11/03/2020
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
20/01/2020
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.at
23/04/2020
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.net
25/07/2019
Summary of the review
P
pk.ign.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
M
me.pcmag.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio, offering near-RTX 2080 speeds for significantly less.
  • Highly effective for 1440p gaming and high-refresh 1080p builds.
  • Solid overclocking potential, with some users reaching stable 2,050MHz clocks.
  • Features dedicated RT and Tensor cores for ray tracing and DLSS 2 support.
  • Generally quiet and efficient cooling on most partner models.
  • Includes a high-quality NVENC encoder, which is a major benefit for streamers and video editors.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Limited to 8GB of VRAM, which can struggle with high-resolution textures in modern AAA games.
  • Lacks support for newer NVIDIA features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation.
  • Can be power-hungry, requiring both 8-pin and 6-pin connectors and a reliable 600W+ PSU.
  • Ray tracing performance, while present, can significantly tank frame rates in more demanding titles.
  • Inconsistent quality between manufacturers, with some reports of coil whine or reliability issues in specific brands.
  • Struggles to maintain a consistent 60 FPS in 4K at maximum settings without significant compromises.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a high-end graphics card built on the 12nm Turing architecture, featuring 2,560 CUDA cores, 40 Ray Tracing cores, and 320 Tensor cores. It operates with a base clock of 1605 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit bus that delivers 448 GB/s of bandwidth. Main pros include excellent 1440p gaming performance, support for real-time ray tracing and DLSS 2.0, and an NVLink connector for multi-GPU setups. However, it carries a relatively high TDP of 215W requiring a 650W power supply, and the 8 GB of memory may face limitations in the most demanding modern AAA titles at maximum settings.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found