OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200VRAM:10 GBMemory bus width:160 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):150 W

Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 58% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–²Better than 70%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

44%

5.8

Performance

24%

5.2

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 59%
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 91%
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
  • acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
acer-nitro-arc-b570-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

44%

5.8

Performance

24%

5.2

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

6.6
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
1.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Popularity:
Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC has a popularity score of 1.9 points, which is lower than that of 55.9% of products in this category.
1.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
16,631 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 16,631 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 54.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,280 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 7,280 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 61.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
14,064 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 14,064 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,309 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 7,309 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 74.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
12.4 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 12.4 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 71.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
10 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 10 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
160 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 160 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
380 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 380 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 61.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
40 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 40 Gbps, which is faster than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
150 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 150 W, which is lower than that of 73.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
150 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 150 W under peak load, which is lower than 75.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
150 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 150 W, which is lower than that of 75.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
150 W
Show more
Size
268x 113x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 268x113x 40 mm, which is more compact than 84.2% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Length
268 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 268 mm long, which is shorter than 59.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
113 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 113 mm tall, which is shorter than 75.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
650 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 650 g, which is lighter than 84.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 7.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2690 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,690 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 37.1% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 31.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (215.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    215.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 2.65x cheaper
    Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£200 vs £530).
    £200 vs £530
  • 7.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2690 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,690 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 31.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (215.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    215.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:8 vs 1:64).
    1:8 vs 1:64
  • 3x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.4 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.44 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 37.1% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    256 vs 128
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 33.3% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    150 W vs 225 W
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 12 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (113 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    113 mm vs 125 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (268x113 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    268x113 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 96 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (160 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    160 bit vs 256 bit
  • 22 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    18 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 22 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    18 vs 40
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 5.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC
    the average graphics card
    Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.57 vs 8.000).
    7.57 vs 8
  • 22 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    18 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 22 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    18 vs 40
  • 45.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (12.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    12.26 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 37.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (14064 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    14,064 points vs 22,653 points
  • 20.6% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7280 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    7,280 points vs 9,166 points
  • 39.5% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7309 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,309 points vs 12,074 points
  • 96 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (160 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    160 bit vs 256 bit
  • 2 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (10 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    10 GB vs 12 GB
  • 15.2% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (380 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    380 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2 vs 8
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3.1).
    2.0 vs 3.1
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 2.67x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (32 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    32 W vs 12 W
  • 8 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (45 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    45 °C vs 37 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
profesionalreview.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
Intel Arc B570 Review en Español (Análisis completo)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC

  • Excellent value for money, frequently priced lower than RTX 4060 and RX 7600 alternatives
  • Generous 10GB VRAM is superior to the 8GB found on most competing budget cards
  • Strong performance in modern games utilizing Ray Tracing and XeSS upscaling
  • Efficient and quiet Nitro FrostBlade dual-fan cooling system that maintains low operating temperatures
  • Compact 2-slot design (268 mm length) makes it ideal for smaller PC builds
  • Significant driver improvements have made the card much more stable than previous generations
  • Great performance-to-price ratio for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming

What we don't like about Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC

  • High CPU overhead means performance can be significantly bottlenecked when paired with older or lower-end processors
  • Noticeable performance gap compared to the slightly more expensive Arc B580 model
  • Some users report instances of audible coil whine during high-load gaming
  • Driver quirks still persist in some specific titles, occasionally leading to stuttering or visual glitches
  • Virtual Reality (VR) support remains inconsistent and may not work with all headsets
  • Limited availability in some regions can lead to inflated prices that diminish its value proposition

Verdict

The Acer Nitro Intel Arc B570 OC is a budget-oriented graphics card featuring the Intel Xe2 'Battlemage' architecture with 18 Xe-cores and 10GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 160-bit memory bus. It operates with a factory-overclocked boost frequency of 2690 MHz and a 150W TDP, utilizing a dual FrostBlade fan cooling system and a single 8-pin power connector. Main advantages include its 10GB memory capacity, which exceeds standard 8GB competitors for 1080p and light 1440p gaming, strong AV1 encoding performance, and effective AI-enhanced upscaling via Intel XeSS. However, it faces drawbacks such as high CPU overhead on older systems, inconsistent frame-time pacing in certain titles, and relatively high power consumption compared to its NVIDIA rivals.

Compare Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Nitro ARC B570 OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found