Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220VRAM:10 GBMemory bus width:160 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):150 W

ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

8.7

User score

▼Worse than 57% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

▲Better than 70%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.7

Performance

24%

5.2

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

8.1

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 60%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.6

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 76%
  • asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
  • asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
  • asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
  • asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
  • asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
  • asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
  • asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
asrock-arc-b570-challenger-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.7

Performance

24%

5.2

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

8.1

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

6.6
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.6

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC has a popularity score of 6.6 points, which is higher than that of 62.7% of products in this category.
6.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
12,300 points
This graphics card scores 12,300 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,600 points
This graphics card scores 7,600 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 60.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
12,471 points
This graphics card scores 12,471 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 80.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,313 points
This graphics card scores 7,313 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 74.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
11.98 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 11.98 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 72.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
10 GB
This graphics card has 10 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
160 bit
This graphics card uses a 160 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
380 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 380 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 61.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 80.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
150 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 150 W, which is lower than that of 73.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
162 W
This graphics card draws 162 W under peak load, which is lower than 71.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
150 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 150 W, which is lower than that of 75.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
150 W
Show more
Size
249x 132x 41 mm
This graphics card measures 249x132x 41 mm, which is more compact than 76.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Length
249 mm
This graphics card is 249 mm long, which is shorter than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Height
132 mm
This graphics card is 132 mm tall, which is taller than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.4 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.4 slot/s, which is slimmer than 51.2% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Weight
720 g
This graphics card weighs 720 g, which is lighter than 77.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 30.2% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2500 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,500 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 3.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2600 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,600 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 35.7% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2375 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,375 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 27.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (208 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    208 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 8.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC
    the average graphics card
    ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.71 vs 8.000).
    8.71 vs 8
  • 2.41x cheaper
    ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£220 vs £530).
    £220 vs £530
  • 30.2% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2500 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,500 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 3.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2600 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,600 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 27.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (208 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    208 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:8 vs 1:64).
    1:8 vs 1:64
  • 3.13x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.5 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.5 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 35.7% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2375 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,375 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    256 vs 128
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 1 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    1 vs 0
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 2.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 33.3% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    150 W vs 225 W
  • 10.7 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (24.7 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    24.7 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 36 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (249 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    249 mm vs 285 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (249x132 x 41 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    249x132 x 41 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 96 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (160 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    160 bit vs 256 bit
  • 22 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    18 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 22 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    18 vs 40
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 46.9% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (12 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    11.98 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 22 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    18 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 22 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    18 vs 40
  • 46.9% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (12 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    11.98 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 44.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (12471 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    12,471 points vs 22,653 points
  • 39.4% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7313 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,313 points vs 12,074 points
  • 16.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (12300 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    12,300 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 17.1% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7600 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    7,600 points vs 9,166 points
  • 96 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (160 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    160 bit vs 256 bit
  • 2 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (10 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    10 GB vs 12 GB
  • 15.2% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (380 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    380 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 45.8% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (13 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    13 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 2.67x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (32 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    32 W vs 12 W
  • 7 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (132 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    132 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
guru3d.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
C
cgmagonline.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
C
club386.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/01/2025
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
16/01/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC

  • Generous 10GB VRAM buffer with 160-bit interface, outclassing 8GB budget rivals in bandwidth
  • Strong ray-tracing performance relative to price, often outperforming equivalent AMD cards
  • Excellent thermal management; runs very cool (approx. 55-60°C) and whisper-quiet under load
  • Compact dual-slot design with a high-quality metal backplate for structural rigidity
  • Modern connectivity including support for DisplayPort 2.1 and HDMI 2.1
  • Competitive entry-level pricing, frequently cited as a 'budget champion' for 1080p gaming

What we don't like about ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC

  • High idle power consumption unless specific BIOS and OS power settings (ASPM) are manually adjusted
  • Poor value proposition compared to the Arc B580, which offers significantly better performance for a small price increase
  • Significant performance 'overhead' issues when paired with older CPUs or PCIe 3.0 systems
  • Mixed or inconsistent performance in non-ray-traced (rasterized) games compared to Nvidia and AMD rivals
  • Lack of a dedicated software suite for game optimization or system monitoring
  • Noticeable performance drop-off at resolutions higher than 1080p due to restricted memory bandwidth

Verdict

The ASRock Intel Arc B570 Challenger OC is a performance-oriented budget graphics card built on the Intel Xe2 Battlemage architecture, featuring 18 Xe-cores and 144 XMX AI engines. It comes factory overclocked with a boost clock of 2600 MHz and is equipped with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus at 19 Gbps, making it a highly capable 1080p gaming solution. Key characteristics include a dual-fan Striped Axial design for efficient cooling, a stylish protective metal backplate, and support for modern features like Ray Tracing and Intel XeSS 2.0 with frame generation. Its main pros are the competitive price-to-performance ratio, compact dual-slot design for high case compatibility, and excellent video encoding capabilities including AV1 support. However, its performance can be significantly bottlenecked on older PCIe 3.0 systems due to its x8 interface, and it may struggle at 1440p resolution in more demanding modern titles compared to its larger sibling, the B580.

Compare ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASRock ARC B570 Challenger OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found