OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price: ~£110
VRAM: 8 GB
Memory bus width: 2048 bit
Thermal Design Power (TDP): 295 W

Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Good

5.7

Good

?

3.5
Gaming
Score components:
45.0%
2.9
Floating-point performance
25.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.6
Video editing
Score components:
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
2.9
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.7
1080p
Score components:
55.0%
2.9
Floating-point performance
25.0%
4.9
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.4
1440p
Score components:
50.0%
2.9
Floating-point performance
30.0%
4.9
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.4
4K
Score components:
40.0%
2.9
Floating-point performance
35.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £110

Best rankings

#33 in Best Sapphire Graphic Cards
#229 in Best Budget Graphic Cards
#331 in Best AMD Radeon Graphic Cards
#438 in Best 8 GB Graphic Cards
#1457 in Best Graphic Cards For Video Editing
#1564 in Best Graphic Cards For 1080p Gaming
#1689 in Best Graphic Cards For 1440p Gaming
#1698 in Best Graphic Cards
#1779 in Best Graphic Cards For Gaming

Verdict

The Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 is an enthusiast-level graphics card based on the 14nm Vega 10 architecture, featuring 4,096 stream processors, 64 compute units, and a 2048-bit memory interface. It is equipped with 8GB of second-generation High Bandwidth Memory (HBM2) clocked at 945 MHz, delivering 484 GB/s of bandwidth, with factory-overclocked boost speeds reaching up to 1611 MHz on the Nitro+ model. Main characteristics include a robust 14-phase digital power design, dual UEFI BIOS for switching between performance and efficiency modes, and Sapphire’s Tri-X cooling system with a vapor chamber and three dual-ball bearing fans. Key pros are its excellent 1440p and 4K gaming performance, high build quality, and significantly improved thermal management over reference designs. However, main cons include extremely high power consumption (often requiring an 850W PSU and three 8-pin connectors), a massive triple-slot form factor, and noticeable fan noise under heavy turbo loads.

Technical Specifications of graphics card Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64

Overall score

5.7

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.

Performance

4.4

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.

When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

3DMark Port Royal score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.

When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

PassMark (G3D) result

What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark

When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests

When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

Floating-point performance

What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.

When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Memory

5.1

Show more

Hide

VRAM

What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card

When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

Memory type

What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)

When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

HBM2

GDDR version

What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

Memory bus width

What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

Maximum memory bandwidth

What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory

When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Platform & Features

7.7

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported

When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

PCIe lanes

What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication

When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

DirectX version

What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version

When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

Vulkan version

What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version

When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

OpenGL version

What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version

When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity & Media

8.3

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously

When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

Max digital resolution

What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution

When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort outputs

What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs

When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort version

What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported

When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort link rates

What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections

When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Cooling

7.8

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)

When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

Power consumption while under peak load

What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.

When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

Recommended PSU wattage

What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply

When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

Board power limit

What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board

When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

PCIe power spec

What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed

When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

295 W

Show more

Design

9.1

Show more

Hide

Size

What it is: Physical size of the GPU card

When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

272 x 112 x 40 mm

Length

What it is: Physical length of the GPU card

When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

Height

What it is: Physical height of the GPU card

When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

Slot width

What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card

When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

Weight

What it is: Total weight of the graphics card

When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 vs the average graphics card

Why is Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

1,792 bit wider memory bus
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.
Importance: HIGH
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.2048 bit vs 256 bit
24 more compute units
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.
Importance: HIGH
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.64 vs 40
72 more TMUs
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.
Importance: HIGH
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.256 vs 184
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card
When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.
Importance: LOW
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
13 mm lower card height
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.
Importance: LOW
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.112 mm vs 125 mm
4 more GPUs supported
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
What it is: Maximum number of GPUs supported in a multi-GPU setup
When it matters: When you are planning a rendering or compute setup with more than one card.
Importance: LOW
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.4 vs 0
4.82x cheaper
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£110 vs £530).
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£110 vs £530).£110 vs £530
Supports multi-GPU linking
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA SLI or AMD CrossFire multi-GPU setup
When it matters: When you still run legacy multi-GPU gaming or rendering workflows.
Importance: LOW
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
24 more compute units
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
72 more TMUs
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
Better FP64 ratio
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
1,792 bit wider memory bus
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
8% higher memory bandwidth
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (484 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
4 more GPUs supported
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
Supports multi-GPU linking
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
13 mm lower card height
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.

Platform & Features

Why is Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

36.9% lower boost clock speed
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,580 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
40 fewer ray tracing cores
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
No CUDA support
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
35.1% lower base clock speed
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,247 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
144 fewer AI cores
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
39.4% lower pixel rate
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (98.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
43.9% lower FP32 performance
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (12.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
38.4% lower PassMark score
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (13,956 points vs 22,653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,653 points.
48.2% lower gaming score
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7,600 points vs 14,678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,678.5 points.
52.9% lower compute score
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (5,684 points vs 12,074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,074 points.
4 GB less VRAM
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
90.1% slower memory speed
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,890 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
46% slower VRAM clock
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (945 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
83.3% smaller L2 cache
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
87.5% smaller L1 cache
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
2.8x larger process node
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
No DLSS support
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
Older PCIe version
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4.0).
6 older
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2017 vs 2023).
December 2017
No mesh shaders
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
Worse SAM support
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Older Vulkan version
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
Older DirectX version
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
No sampler feedback
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
Older encoder generation
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
67.8% larger GPU die
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (495 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
Older shader model
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
45.4% fewer transistors
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (12,500 million vs 22,900 million). The average graphics card has 22,900 million transistors.
No AV1 encoding
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No AV1 decoding
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No DSC support
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
Narrower encode codec support
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
Older DisplayPort version
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
Narrower decode codec support
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
Older HDMI version
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
Older HDCP version
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
No fan stop
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
37.2% higher TDP
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (295 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
15.4% higher PSU requirement
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
15 °C lower thermal ceiling
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
31.1% higher board power limit
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (295 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
75% higher peak power draw
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (385 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
4.4 dB noisier under load
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (39.8 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
58.3% higher idle power draw
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (19 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
36.9% lower boost clock speed
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,580 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.
Importance: HIGH
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,580 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.1580 MHz vs 2505 MHz
40 fewer ray tracing cores
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
What it is: Number of dedicated ray tracing processing cores or units
When it matters: When you care about ray-traced lighting, reflections, and shadows in newer games.
Importance: HIGH
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.0 vs 40
2.8x larger process node
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.
Importance: MEDIUM
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.14 nm vs 5 nm
No CUDA support
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports CUDA parallel computing platform
When it matters: When your apps or AI tools specifically depend on the CUDA software stack.
Importance: MEDIUM
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
4 GB less VRAM
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.
Importance: HIGH
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.8 GB vs 12 GB
35.1% lower base clock speed
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,247 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.
Importance: HIGH
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,247 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.1247 MHz vs 1920 MHz
90.1% slower memory speed
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,890 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
What it is: Effective memory data rate combining clock and bus width
When it matters: When you compare how quickly each card can push data through its memory subsystem.
Importance: MEDIUM
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,890 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.1890 MHz vs 19000 MHz
No DLSS support
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA DLSS upscaling technology
When it matters: When you play NVIDIA-supported games and want better frame rates at higher settings.
Importance: LOW
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 and other products in the Graphics cards category

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64?

Competitive high-end performance similar to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, especially at 1440p and 4K resolutions.
Superior build quality and thermal design on custom models like the Sapphire Nitro+, which features a robust vapor chamber and triple-fan cooling.
Significant performance benefits for compute-heavy tasks and professional workloads due to high HBM2 memory bandwidth.
Excellent driver support for Linux and features like AMD FreeSync for smooth, tear-free gaming.
High potential for performance optimization through undervolting and overclocking (tweaking).
Aesthetic appeal with features like illuminated logos and LED load indicators.

What customers dislike about Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64?

Extremely high power consumption, often requiring a high-wattage power supply (750W–1000W recommended).
Reference 'blower' models are reported to be excessively loud and prone to thermal throttling under heavy load.
Large physical footprint; custom Sapphire cards are often '2.5 slot' designs and very heavy, sometimes requiring the included support bracket.
Noticeable coil whine reported by some users, particularly at high frame rates.
Requires manual 'undervolting' and tuning to reach its full efficiency and performance potential, making it less 'plug-and-play' than competitors.
Runs significantly hotter than contemporary NVIDIA equivalents.

Expert reviews

modders-inc.com

01/11/2017

Summary of the review

Sapphire RX VEGA 64 Limited Edition Review - Modders Inc KitGuru

The Modders Inc review of the Sapphire RX Vega 64 Limited Edition highlights it as a capable high-end graphic card options, leveraging AMD’s 5th generation GCN architecture and 8GB of HBM2 memory. In real-world performance, the card functions as an excellent choice for 1080p gaming and handles 1440p well. It successfully maintains over 60 FPS in demanding titles like Shadow of War and Battlefield 1, and even manages to exceed 60 FPS at 4K resolution in Rise of the Tomb Raider. Hardware enthusiasts will appreciate its physical design features, which include an attractive brushed aluminum backplate, a dual BIOS switch for easy profile swapping, and a unique LED GPU tachometer that visually tracks graphics utilization. Additionally, the reviewer noted that the core clock overclocks impressively well compared to previous AMD generations, MHz boost up to 1840 MHz using ASUS GPU Tweak II. However, the card suffers from notable drawbacks regarding price-to-performance value, thermal efficiency, and software stability. Performance-wise, it scores similarly to a standard Nvidia GTX 1070 while carrying a higher retail price tag ($569.99 at the time of review),...

pcworld.com

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 64 Limited Edition review

The Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition is a premium, custom-engineered card that successfully resolves the thermal and noise issues of AMD’s reference design, utilizing a massive vapor chamber, triple-fan cooling system, and a factory overclock. It features a robust, thick design with added features like a GPU support bracket, dual BIOS, and dedicated fan headers for improved system airflow. YouTube · However, the card requires substantial physical space, high power consumption due to its triple 8-pin configuration, and, at $659, faces steep competition from the superior NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti. While praised for being among the best air-cooled Vega 64 implementations, its high power draw and price limit its appeal to, specifically, enthusiasts seeking maximum Vega performance. YouTube

eteknix.com

17/12/2017

Summary of the review

Sapphire Nitro+ VEGA 64 Graphics Card Review

The Sapphire Nitro+ VEGA 64 is a massive, high-performance graphics card designed to maximize the potential of AMD’s VEGA architecture through custom cooling and factory overclocking. Taking up three expansion slots and measuring significantly longer than the reference design, this hefty GPU relies on an innovative vapor chamber cooling solution. The cooling array features two 92 mm counter-clockwise outer fans and a single 80 mm clockwise middle fan to target operating temperatures of 70°C. Physically, it utilizes a 14 nm FinFET architecture with 4096 stream processors, a 1423 MHz engine clock, a 1611 MHz boost clock, and 8 GB of HBM2 memory across a 2048-bit bus. Due to the card's heavy weight, Sapphire explicitly bundles a custom metal support bracket in the box to prevent system droop. A major pro of this graphics card is its exceptional thermal design, which yields a 5°C temperature drop over standard copper bases and delivers up to 7% better framerates compared to reference AMD models. It also includes high-utility hardware features like a Dual BIOS, robust VRM cooling, Black Diamond Chokes, and a quick-connect...

tweaktown.com

17/12/2017

Summary of the review

SAPPHIRE Radeon RX Vega 64 NITRO+ Review: 3 x 8-pin PCIe?!

The SAPPHIRE Radeon RX Vega 64 NITRO+ is a highly capable, custom-engineered flagship graphics card that excels at cooling AMD's historically hot Vega 10 architecture. Built with a massive 3-slot design, a custom PCB featuring a 14-phase VDDC, and a unique triple-fan Turbine-X cooler, the card easily handles demanding thermal loads. In testing, the enhanced TRI-X cooling system kept the GPU and its 8GB of HBM2 memory at an impressive maximum temperature of 70°C under full load, which is vastly cooler and quieter than AMD's reference air-cooled model. Performance-wise, the card thrives at high-resolution gaming and achieves an Ethereum mining rate of 37MH/s when its HBM2 is overclocked to 1100MHz. It serves as an excellent pairing for gamers who own cost-effective FreeSync monitors, making it the definitive custom Vega 64 variant on the market. Despite its premium engineering, the graphics card suffers from notable drawbacks regarding physical footprint, power requirements, and gaming efficiency. The card is an exceptionally thick and hefty component that demands an aggressive triple 8-pin PCIe power configuration. Under full system load, it draws a massive 390W...

kitguru.net

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

Sapphire RX Vega 64 Nitro+ Limited EditionGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. - KitGuru

The KitGuru review evaluates the Sapphire RX Vega 64 Nitro+ Limited Edition, a massive enthusiast aftermarket graphics card designed to improve upon AMD's reference architecture. The review highlights several hardware pros, praising its exceptional engineering, which features a robust 14-phase power delivery design, a premium color-neutral aesthetic with subtle RGB lighting, and an advanced cooling system utilizing a massive heatsink with eight heatpipes. In terms of performance advantages, this custom iteration succeeds in delivering significantly lower operating temperatures and much better performance than AMD's standard reference card. It also appeals directly to users deeply invested in the AMD ecosystem, particularly those utilizing FreeSync monitors. KitGuru KitGuru

tomshardware.com

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ Review - Tom's Hardware

The Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ is a massive, highly customized graphics card that addresses many of the cooling and noise flaws found in AMD's reference design. Weighing nearly 1.6kg and spanning a 2.5-slot footprint, this premium board features a bespoke PCB, an included support bracket to combat sagging, and three 8-pin power connectors. It features an advanced cooling system with vertically oriented fins and configurable RGB lighting, alongside a dual-BIOS switch that lets users opt for a secondary profile to lower power consumption and noise at the cost of a slightly slower clock rate. Testing indicates that while it delivers fast out-of-the-box performance, it faces stiff competition due to its $660 launch price and high power draw relative to competing options. The graphics card has distinct advantages and drawbacks. On the positive side, it is significantly faster, much quieter, and runs much cooler than AMD's reference version, plus it offers straightforward software for adjusting its visual lighting. Conversely, its primary downsides include its massive physical size and weight, high pricing compared to Nvidia alternatives, and uncertain market availability...

hexus.net

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

Review: Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+Go to product viewer dialogue for this item.

The Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ is a massive, custom-engineered graphics card designed to fix the severe heat and noise issues found in AMD’s original reference design. This 1,604-gram behemoth takes up nearly three expansion slots and spans 310mm in length, requiring an included reinforcing bracket to prevent system sag. To tame the GPU's high power draw, Sapphire utilizes a heavy-duty cooling solution consisting of two large heatsinks interconnected by five heatpipes, a 14-phase power delivery system, and a unique triple-fan configuration where the outer 95mm fans spin in the opposite direction of the center 80mm fan. It pushes performance further with a factory overclock that raises the core clock speed to 1,611MHz, while offering a dual-BIOS switch for a quieter, power-optimized profile. Pros and Cons

kitguru.net

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

Sapphire RX Vega 64 Nitro+ Limited Edition

The KitGuru review evaluates the Sapphire RX Vega 64 Nitro+ Limited Edition, a massive 2.5-slot graphics card measuring 31cm long that heavily improves upon AMD’s reference design by maintaining a stable boost clock of around 1570MHz out of the box. In terms of pros, the card is significantly faster than the reference version, delivering at least 8 more frames on average at 1440p and 4K resolutions in titles like Ashes of the Singularity. Its custom heatsink with a triple-fan configuration provides excellent thermal results, keeping the GPU core at a peak temperature of just 68°C under load. Additionally, it features a stylish, colour-neutral monochrome backplate, an extra HDMI port tailored for VR headsets, and works brilliantly for gamers using 1080p or 1440p FreeSync monitors. However, the card suffers from severe cons regarding power efficiency and value, making it a very tough sell against Nvidia's competition. It is incredibly power-hungry, consuming roughly 40 Watts more than the reference design and requiring three 8-pin PCIe power connectors—prompting a hefty 850W power supply recommendation. Furthermore, at its launch retail price of £749.99 from...

m.hexus.net

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

Review: Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+

The Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ is a massive, custom-designed graphics card built to address the severe heat and noise issues plaguing AMD's stock reference design. To achieve this, Sapphire implemented a colossal three-slot, triple-fan cooling system featuring a pair of 95mm outer fans, an 80mm reverse-spinning centre fan, and five extensive heatpipes. The card boosts the maximum core clock to 1,611MHz out of the box, relies on 14 power phases, and features unique additions like dual Bios profiles and two external fan headers to sync system airflow with GPU temperatures. Pros and Cons Pro: Outstanding thermal and noise management via a robust, highly-engineered custom air cooler. Pro: Premium build quality with customisable RGB lighting and dual Bios performance profiles. Pro: Factory overclocked core speed (1,611MHz) backed by a strong 14-phase power delivery. Con: Massive physical size (310mm length, 1,604g weight) that occupies three slots and requires a support bracket. Con: High power demands, requiring three 8-pin PCIe power connectors to run. Con: Un-overclocked HBM2 memory and a high launch price tag of £650.

hardwareluxx.de

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ im Test If you want to read general reviews or comparisons of this GPU architecture, I can look for reference model...

The Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ is a massive triple-slot graphics card featuring a robust cooling solution equipped with three axial fans and a specialized structural bracket designed to prevent motherboard PCIe slot sagging due to its immense weight. A standout feature of the card is its dual-BIOS functionality. BIOS 1 maximizes performance with a 264W power limit, enabling clock speeds to sustain around 1,510 MHz at a target temperature of 67°C. Meanwhile, BIOS 2 scales the power limit down to 210W for a quieter, more efficient operation, dropping temperatures to roughly 63°C while slightly reducing clock speeds to about 1,420–1,430 MHz. A major pro of the card is its exceptional custom cooling design, which manages the notorious thermal and power demands of the Vega 10 architecture far better than the restrictive AMD reference cooler. The dual-BIOS feature also provides excellent flexibility, allowing users to choose between higher frame rates or a cooler, quieter system. However, the card suffers from notable cons, including a steep price tag exceeding €700 at launch and highly volatile market availability. Furthermore, the review...

igorslab.de

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

Always stay cool: Sapphire RX Vega64 Nitro+ in review

The igor'sLAB review of the Sapphire RX Vega64 Nitro+ highlights a highly engineered custom graphics card that successfully corrects many design shortcomings of AMD's stock reference models. Pros include its phenomenal, monumental cooling solution featuring semi-passive fans and angled vertical fins that dramatically improve airflow and keep temperatures well-regulated even under stress. This superb thermal performance enables the GPU to sustain more stable boost clocks and deliver minimum frame rates that consistently beat the reference model in WQHD (1440p) gaming. Additionally, the inclusion of a dual-BIOS switch with a dedicated low-power "Quiet" mode provides valuable flexibility, while the built-in custom RGB lighting software and a free bundled support bracket add great physical and aesthetic utility. igor´ However, the card carries significant physical and electrical cons that potential buyers must accommodate. It is an absolute "battleship" of a card, weighing an immense 1,596 grams and measuring 31 cm in length and 4.8 cm in depth (occupying 2.5 slots), which severely restricts its compatibility with smaller PC cases and can block adjacent motherboard slots. Power consumption is another major drawback; the card...

hardware.fr

28/12/2017

Summary of the review

Sapphire RX Vega56 et RX Vega64 Nitro+ en test

The Sapphire RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 Nitro+ graphics cards are heavily customized, high-performance variants of AMD’s Vega architecture that focus on extreme cooling and power delivery. On the positive side, Sapphire has integrated a premium, robust cooling solution featuring a vapor chamber, eight heat pipes, and a unique triple-fan layout where the middle 80mm fan rotates in reverse to optimize airflow. They also offer a highly reinforced 14-phase power delivery system and a dual-BIOS switch that unlocks significantly higher power targets than reference models—adding an extra 45W for the Vega 64 and a massive 75W for the Vega 56 to boost performance. Additionally, the cards feature custom external features like addressable RGB lighting and dual 4-pin PWM fan headers to sync case fans directly to the GPU's workload. However, these custom enhancements result in substantial physical and logistical drawbacks. The primary cons are their massive size and weight; weighing around 1.5 kg and measuring 31.4 cm in length and 5.4 cm in thickness, these cards occupy three expansion slots and require an included support bracket to prevent motherboard...

elchapuzasinformatico.com

14/08/2017

Summary of the review

Review: Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 (Actualizada)

The El Chapuzas Informático review of the Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 highlights a reference-style card featuring 4,096 Stream Processors, 8 GB of HBM2 memory, and high memory bandwidth of 484 GB/s, with turbo clocks up to 1546 MHz. Pros include this robust architectural design and the 8 GB HBM2 memory, which offers a future-proof configuration for handling high-resolution textures. Significant cons stem from the reference blower-style cooler, resulting in high power consumption, elevated operating temperatures, and loud fan noise under heavy loads. The card often struggles to consistently outperform its direct competition, the Nvidia GTX 1080, in standard benchmarks despite its massive 12.5 billion transistor count.

hwready.it

15/12/2017

Summary of the review

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon™ RX Vega64 8G HBM2 Limited Edition Recensione Hardware Ready

The HWReady review of the Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 64 8G HBM2 Limited Edition describes a robust, factory-overclocked GPU designed to tame AMD’s Vega 10 architecture. Its standout pros include a massive 2.5-to-3-slot cooling solution, 8GB of HBM2 memory, and integrated Nitro Glow RGB lighting, which keeps the card cool while maintaining high boost clocks. YouTube · Conversely, the review identifies significant cons regarding its massive size, 31 cm length, and heavy 1.6 kg weight that requires a custom support bracket. Furthermore, the card exhibits very high power consumption (exceeding 300W-400W) and low overclocking headroom, limiting its competitiveness against rival GPUs of the time.

hardware.info

14/02/2018

Summary of the review

Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ review: kleurrijk edelsteen stroomverbruik

The Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ 8GB is reviewed as a premium, highly durable custom graphics card that successfully tames the problematic heat and noise issues of AMD's original reference design. Built on a massive 14nm Vega 10 XT architecture with a factory boost clock of 1611 MHz, it delivers smooth performance well-suited for high-end 1440p (WQHD) gaming. Key pros highlighted across benchmarks include its exceptional build quality, tasteful integration of customizable RGB lighting, and an incredibly robust triple-fan cooling system. This heavy-duty cooler keeps both GPU and HBM2 temperatures remarkably low while maintaining quiet acoustics under full gaming loads—far outclassing competing custom variants like the ASUS Strix. However, achieving this level of acoustic and thermal stability demands significant trade-offs. Key cons of the card revolve around its massive physical footprint, occupying nearly three expansion slots and measuring 310mm in length, which forces buyers to carefully verify PC chassis compatibility. Furthermore, power efficiency is a major drawback; under full load, the card pulls a massive 297.06 watts—consuming roughly 15 watts (5%) more than the ASUS Strix and requiring up...

Video reviews

Best alternatives

ASUS ROG Strix RX Vega 64 Gaming OC

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1080 G1 Gaming

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1080 WINDFORCE OC

Graphics cards

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Graphics cards

ASUS Turbo GeForce GTX 1080

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB

Graphics cards

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon RX 590

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 Gaming 8GB

Graphics cards

Compare Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 with other products in the Graphics cards category

Compare