Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):180 W

MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X
5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

▼Worse than 77% of graphics cards
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

▼Worse than 58%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

3.9

Performance

24%

4.9

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

7.4

Platform & Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

8.3

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 79%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 90%
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #954 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

3.9

Performance

24%

4.9

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

7.4

Platform & Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

8.3

Connectivity & Media

5.4
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X has a popularity score of 9.6 points, which is higher than that of 88.8% of products in this category.
9.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
7,500 points
This graphics card scores 7,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 79% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
1,606 points
This graphics card scores 1,606 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 80.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
15,614 points
This graphics card scores 15,614 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 74% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,628 points
This graphics card scores 7,628 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 71.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
9.33 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 9.33 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 75.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5X
GDDR version
GDDR5X
This graphics card uses GDDR5X memory, which is older than on 84.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
323 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 323 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 65.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12.1
This graphics card supports DirectX 12.1, which is older than on 77.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
180 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 180 W, which is lower than that of 58.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
220 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W, which is lower than that of 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
180 W
Show more
Size
279x 140x 42 mm
This graphics card measures 279x140x 42 mm, which is more compact than 63% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Length
279 mm
This graphics card is 279 mm long, which is shorter than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
140 mm
This graphics card is 140 mm tall, which is taller than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,100 g
This graphics card weighs 1,100 g, which is heavier than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 15.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.26 vs 8.000).
    9.26 vs 8
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 4.82x cheaper
    MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X is cheaper than the average graphics card (£110 vs £530).
    £110 vs £530
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (279x140 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    279x140 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 15.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.26 vs 8.000).
    9.26 vs 8
  • 4.82x cheaper
    MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X is cheaper than the average graphics card (£110 vs £530).
    £110 vs £530
  • 2.29x more popular
    MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X is more popular than the average graphics card (9.65 vs 4.2).
    9.65 vs 4.22
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 16.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (180 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    180 W vs 215 W
  • 50% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    6 W vs 12 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (279x140 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    279x140 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 3.2x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • 26.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1847 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,847 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 26.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1847 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,847 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 33% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (109.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    109.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 61.3% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (8.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    8.74 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 28.3% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (273.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    273.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 16.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1607 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,607 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 82.5% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (1606 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    1,606 points vs 9,166 points
  • 48.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    7,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 31.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (15614 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    15,614 points vs 22,653 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 99.5% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    0.15 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 96.3% lower INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (9 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    9 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 46.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (10100 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    10,100 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 27.8% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1264 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,264 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 27.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (323 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    323 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 3.2x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 7 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2016 vs 2023).
    May 2016
    2,016 vs 2,023
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (6 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    6 vs 8
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12.1 vs 12 Ultimate
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 68.6% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (7200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    7,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    3 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 14 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (51 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    51 °C vs 37 °C
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tweaktown.com
14/06/2016
Summary of the review
H
hexus.net
17/06/2016
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
25/07/2016
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
02/08/2016
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
12/07/2016
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
09/06/2016
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
06/07/2016
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
01/07/2016
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
29/06/2016
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
21/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
13/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
29/03/2017
Summary of the review
N
noticias3d.com
No date provided
Summary of the review
T
tech.everyeye.it
11/08/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
20/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
09/06/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X

  • Superior thermal management with the Twin Frozr VI cooler keeping temperatures typically below 70°C
  • Extremely quiet operation, including a zero RPM fan mode when under 60°C
  • High out-of-the-box performance surpassing the Founders Edition
  • Robust build quality featuring a solid metal backplate
  • Aesthetic design with customizable RGB lighting on the side logo
  • Decent manual overclocking headroom for enthusiasts

What we don't like about MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X

  • Large physical size (dual-slot but very wide) which may cause clearance issues in smaller cases
  • Higher power consumption during gaming compared to reference designs
  • Certain LED elements are fixed to red and cannot be changed via software
  • Positioned at a premium price point compared to some other partner cards
  • Lacks modern features like ray tracing or DLSS found in newer generations

Verdict

The MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X is a high-end Pascal-based graphics card featuring 2,560 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR5X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a 320 GB/s bandwidth. It operates with a factory-overclocked boost clock of up to 1,847 MHz in OC Mode and utilizes a 10-phase PWM design powered by an 8-pin and 6-pin connector. Main pros include its highly efficient Twin Frozr VI cooling system with Torx 2.0 fans that remain silent under 60°C, a sturdy metal backplate, and customizable RGB lighting. However, some users may find the card's significant width problematic for smaller cases or tight SLI configurations, and the fixed-red LED highlights on the shroud limit color-matching flexibility.

Compare MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found