AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Review | 118 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£110
  • Avg. price in US: ~$100
  • VRAM: 8 GB
  • Memory bus width: 2048 bit
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP): 295 W

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

5.4

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

5.2

Technical Score

10.0%

6.6

User score

Good
5.2

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

4.8

Performance

24.0%

4.2

Memory

12.0%

5.4

Power & Cooling

11.0%

6.2

Platform & Features

5.0%

9.0

Design

4.0%

8.1

Connectivity & Media

Good
6.6

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

8.0

User reviews

30.0%

3.5

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
(25)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.0
(29)

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

Good
  • 4.3
    Gaming

    Score components:

    45.0%

    2.8

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    2.8

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 5.0
    Video editing

    Score components:

    35.0%

    7.0

    AV1 encode

    30.0%

    2.8

    VRAM

    20.0%

    2.8

    Floating-point performance

    15.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 3.8
    1080p

    Score components:

    55.0%

    2.8

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    2.8

    VRAM

    10.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 3.8
    1440p

    Score components:

    50.0%

    2.8

    Floating-point performance

    30.0%

    2.8

    VRAM

    15.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 4.1
    4K

    Score components:

    40.0%

    2.8

    Floating-point performance

    35.0%

    2.8

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • amd-radeon-rx-vega-64
  • amd-radeon-rx-vega-64
  • amd-radeon-rx-vega-64
  • amd-radeon-rx-vega-64
amd-radeon-rx-vega-64
amd-radeon-rx-vega-64
amd-radeon-rx-vega-64
amd-radeon-rx-vega-64

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is a high-end graphics card built on the 14nm FinFET process, featuring 4,096 stream processors, 64 compute units, and 8GB of advanced HBM2 memory on a massive 2048-bit bus that delivers 484 GB/s of bandwidth. With a base clock of 1247 MHz and a boost up to 1546 MHz, the card provides exceptional performance in DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles, making it ideal for enthusiast-level 1440p gaming and compute-heavy tasks like OpenCL rendering. Its main pros include massive memory bandwidth, strong legacy driver maturation, and smooth FreeSync compatibility. However, its significant cons include an excessively high 295W TDP that requires a robust power supply, high operating temperatures, and loud cooling fans on reference blower models.

Technical Specifications of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

4.8

Performance

24.0%

4.2

Memory

12.0%

5.4

Power & Cooling

11.0%

6.2

Platform & Features

5.0%

9.0

Design

4.0%

8.1

Connectivity & Media

5.2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a technical score of 5.24 points, which is lower than that of 75.2% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

8.0

User reviews

30.0%

3.5

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
(25)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.0
(29)

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

6.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a user score of 6.64 points, which is lower than that of 95.4% of products in this category.
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
3.5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a popularity of 3.5 points, which is higher than 55.8% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

5.4

Overall score

40.0%

9.9

Price

6.8
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a quality-to-price ratio of 6.8 points, which is higher than 48% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.
When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?
3DMark Port Royal score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.
When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

N/A
PassMark (G3D) result
What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark
When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests
When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?
Floating-point performance
What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

12.66 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 delivers 12.66 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 74% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

8 GB
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)
When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

HBM2
GDDR version
What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

?
Memory bus width
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

2048 bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 uses a 2048 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 99.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

483.8 GB/s
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 483.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 52.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported
When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

3.0
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports PCIe 3.0, which is older than on 77.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication
When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

x16
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 31.5% of graphics cards and equal to 68.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version
When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

?
Vulkan version
What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version
When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

1.3
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 73.5% of graphics cards and equal to 22.5% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version
When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

4.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 4.8% of graphics cards and equal to 95.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously
When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 7.8% of graphics cards and equal to 89.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution
When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

?
DisplayPort outputs
What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs
When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

3
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 20.9% of graphics cards and equal to 77.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported
When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

1.4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 77.3% of graphics cards and equal to 16.2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections
When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

8.1 Gbps
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 50.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

295 W
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a TDP of 295 W, which is higher than that of 71.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

295 W
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295 W under peak load, which is higher than 71% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply
When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

750 W
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 62.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.5% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

?
PCIe power spec
What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed
When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more
Size
What it is: Physical size of the GPU card
When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?
Length
What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

280 mm
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is 280 mm long, which is shorter than 52.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Height
What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

111 mm
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 89.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.6% of graphics cards.
Slot width
What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card
When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

2 slot/s
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 49.2% of graphics cards and equal in width to 47.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the graphics card
When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs the average graphics card

  • 1,792 bit wider memory bus
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2,048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
    When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2,048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.2048 bit vs 256 bit
  • 24 more compute units
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
    When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.64 vs 40
  • Includes dual BIOS
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
    What it is: Includes dual BIOS for redundancy or overclocking profiles
    When it matters: When you want a safer recovery path after tweaking fan curves or overclock settings, or you need separate quiet and performance profiles.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
  • 72 more TMUs
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
    When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.256 vs 184
  • 16 mm lower card height
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 127 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 127 mm.
    What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
    When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 127 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 127 mm.111 mm vs 127 mm
  • 4.82x cheaper
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£110 vs £530).
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£110 vs £530).£110 vs £530
  • Better FP64 ratio
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    What it is: Ratio of double-precision (FP64) to single-precision (FP32) performance
    When it matters: When you need to know whether FP64 is merely present or genuinely useful.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).1:16 vs 1:64
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
    What it is: Supports NVIDIA SLI or AMD CrossFire multi-GPU setup
    When it matters: When you still run legacy multi-GPU gaming or rendering workflows.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 24 more compute units
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
  • 72 more TMUs
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
  • Better FP64 ratio
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
  • 1,792 bit wider memory bus
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2,048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
  • 8% higher memory bandwidth
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (483.8 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Includes dual BIOS
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
  • 16 mm lower card height
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 127 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 127 mm.
  • 38.2% lower boost clock speed
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,546 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
  • 35.1% lower base clock speed
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,247 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
  • 40.1% lower pixel rate
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (98.9 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
  • 44.6% lower FP32 performance
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (12.7 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.
  • 90.1% slower memory speed
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,890 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
  • 46% slower VRAM clock
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (945 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
  • 2.8x larger process node
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
  • Older PCIe version
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4.0).
  • 6 older
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,017 vs 2,023).
  • No mesh shaders
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
  • Older OpenCL version
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3.0).
  • No sampler feedback
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 62.7% larger GPU die
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (495 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
  • Older shader model
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.4 vs 6.8).
  • No AV1 encoding
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
  • Older HDMI version
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
  • Older HDCP version
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
  • 2 fewer fans
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
  • 37.2% higher TDP
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (295 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
  • 18 °C higher load temperature
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (85 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
  • 7 °C lower thermal ceiling
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 93 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 93 °C.
  • 38.2% lower boost clock speed
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,546 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
    What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
    When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,546 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.1546 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • 2 fewer fans
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    What it is: Total number of cooling fans
    When it matters: When you compare cooler designs and want one more clue about thermal potential.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).1 vs 3
  • 2.8x larger process node
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
    When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.14 nm vs 5 nm
  • 35.1% lower base clock speed
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,247 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
    What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
    When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,247 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.1247 MHz vs 1920 MHz
  • 90.1% slower memory speed
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,890 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    What it is: Effective memory data rate combining clock and bus width
    When it matters: When you compare how quickly each card can push data through its memory subsystem.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,890 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.1890 MHz vs 19000 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
    When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 40.1% lower pixel rate
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (98.9 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
    What it is: Number of pixels the GPU can render per second
    When it matters: When you play at high resolutions or care about older raster-heavy games.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (98.9 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.98.94 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s
  • No AV1 encoding
    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    What it is: Supports hardware encoding of AV1 video codec
    When it matters: When you stream or export video and want efficient AV1 encoding on the GPU.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.No vs yes

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom
United States

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?

  • Competitive performance with the Nvidia GTX 1080, particularly at 4K resolution
  • Strong performance in DirectX 12 and Vulkan-based games
  • High memory bandwidth (483 GB/s) thanks to 8GB of HBM2 memory
  • Support for FreeSync, which offers a more affordable variable refresh rate ecosystem than G-Sync
  • Forward-looking features like the High Bandwidth Cache Controller (HBCC)
  • Includes a dual BIOS feature with a dedicated 'Power Save' profile

What customers dislike about AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?

  • Extremely high power consumption, requiring at least a 750W power supply
  • Reference air-cooled models run very hot and are excessively loud under load
  • Performance often falls behind the GTX 1080 in older DirectX 11 titles
  • Late market release compared to the competition (over a year after the GTX 1080)
  • Significant thermal throttling on reference designs without manual fan curve adjustments
  • Does not compete with the higher-tier GTX 1080 Ti despite high power draw

Expert reviews

D
digitalfoundry.net
05/12/2017

The Digital Foundry AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review positions the graphics card as a powerful but flawed enthusiast-level offering that brings the fight directly to Nvidia's second-tier card, the GeForce GTX 1080, rather than the flagship GTX 1080 Ti. A major pro highlighted in the review is the GPU's state-of-the-art architecture, which includes the most fully featured DirectX 12...Read more

H
hardwarecanucks.com
28/09/2017

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and Vega 56 graphics cards launch as AMD's attempt to challenge NVIDIA’s high-end dominance, with the flagship Vega 64 targeted directly at the GTX 1080 and the cut-down Vega 56 priced at $399 to rival the GTX 1070. Built on the 12.5 billion transistor Vega 10 core using Next Generation Compute Units and innovative HBM2 memory, these cards perform admirably...Read more

T
techadvisor.com
16/09/2017

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is a high-end graphics card that serves as a competitive alternative to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080, significantly outperforming previous "Fury" models and the RX 500-series. Built on a 14nm process with 4096 stream processors, it features 8GB of HBM2 memory and a new High-Bandwidth Cache Controller (HBCC) designed to improve data efficiency by treating...Read more

G
gamespot.com
16/08/2017

The GameSpot review of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 highlights its position as an enthusiast-level GPU, featuring Vega architecture, 8GB HBM2 memory, and 64 compute units, aimed at competing with the Nvidia GTX 1080. Praised for excellent performance at 1440p and 4K resolutions, the card offers competitive value with a $499 launch price. YouTube · However, the review details...Read more

U
uk.pcmag.com
15/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Review Summary The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is an air-cooled flagship graphics card that brings AMD back into the high-end gaming market, offering performance that goes toe-to-toe with Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1080. Built on the AMD Vega 10 processor with 8GB of second-generation High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM2), the card is designed for high-resolution gaming at 1440p,...Read more

H
hothardware.com
14/08/2017

However, the architecture comes with notable cons regarding efficiency and physical design. Both reference cards are characterized by high board power targets, with the air-cooled Vega 64 demanding 295 Watts and the Vega 56 drawing 210 Watts—requiring dual 8-pin PCIe power connectors. This heavy power draw translates directly into significant thermal and noise penalties, as the...Read more

B
bit-tech.net
14/08/2017

The bit-tech review evaluates AMD's re-entry into the high-end GPU market with the 14nm FinFET Vega 10 architecture, focusing on the standalone RX Vega 64 ($499/£499) and RX Vega 56 ($399/£399) reference cards. The pros of this launch center on the architectural advancements and performance-per-dollar value, particularly for the lower-end SKU. Both cards feature second-generation...Read more

T
techradar.com
14/08/2017

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 marks AMD's competitive return to the high-end graphics market, offering performance that is highly comparable to the Nvidia GTX 1080 at a slightly more affordable launch price of $499. Featuring 4,096 stream processors and 8GB of scalable HBM2 video memory, the card matches or exceeds its Nvidia rival in several synthetic and gaming benchmarks,...Read more

T
techpowerup.com
14/08/2017

The TechPowerUp review of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8 GB, based on a 14 nm FinFET architecture with 4,096 stream processors and 8 GB of HBM2 memory, shows the card matching or exceeding the NVIDIA GTX 1080, providing strong performance for high-refresh-rate gaming and entry-level 4K. Pros include robust build quality, a dual-BIOS switch for power limits, and features such as Radeon...Read more

M
mmorpg.com
07/01/2018

The ⁠MMORPG.com review characterizes the AMD Vega 64 Reference Edition as a powerful, yet underwhelming, entry that failed to fully meet immense hype. Boasting 8GB of HBM2 memory, 4,096 cores, and a 1440p-ready performance profile, the card offers a significant architectural upgrade over Polaris, aiming to compete directly with Nvidia’s GTX 1080 at a $499 MSRP. However, the card is...Read more

T
tomshardware.com
25/01/2018

The Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64 Gaming OC 8G is a compact, understated gaming graphics card designed to offer a lighter, more streamlined alternative to heavy third-party implementations like the Sapphire Nitro+. Weighing 1006 grams and measuring 27.8 cm in length, it sheds nearly 600 grams compared to heavier competitors, making it much easier to fit into standard PC chassis. It...Read more

P
pcgamer.com
18/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Review Summary The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is a fast but heavily power-hungry graphics card that marks AMD's return to the high-end GPU discussion, trading performance blows directly with Nvidia’s GTX 1080. Tested on a high-end X99 system at 1440p using the default "Balanced" WattMan profile, the air-cooled reference card delivers a great gaming experience,...Read more

P
pcmag.com
15/08/2017

The PCMag review of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 identifies it as a high-performance, enthusiast-grade graphics card featuring 8GB of HBM2 memory, aiming to compete with Nvidia’s GTX 1080 at a $499 MSRP. Key advantages include strong, stable performance at high resolutions and a high-bandwidth architecture ideal for demanding workloads. Conversely, the review notes the card's delayed...Read more

T
techspot.com
31/08/2022

The ⁠TechSpot review of the AMD Radeon Vega 64 five years post-release highlights its surprising longevity, noting improved performance in modern, low-level API titles like Cyberpunk 2077. While the GCN architecture proved relatively future-proof, the card is heavily hampered by severe power inefficiency and high operational costs. Ultimately, while the Vega 64 became more...Read more

R
rockpapershotgun.com
31/01/2018

In this Rock Paper Shotgun review, James Archer evaluates the Asus ROG Strix RX Vega 64 OC Edition to determine if AMD can successfully challenge the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080. Equipped with 8GB of HBM2 memory, a three-fan air cooler, and a slightly overclocked core (1298MHz base / 1590MHz boost), the card delivers a resounding "yes" when it comes to competing at 1440p and 4K...Read more

T
techspot.com
25/08/2017

The TechSpot review of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 highlights a mixed performance, where the liquid-cooled variant competes with the GTX 1080 and excels in DirectX 12/Vulkan titles like Battlefield 1 and Sniper Elite 4, driven by 8GB HBM2 memory. However, the standard air-cooled model struggles, offering lower performance, higher noise levels, and significantly higher power...Read more

P
pcper.com
14/08/2017

The 2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega review evaluates the architecture's first consumer entries: the Vega 56, the air-cooled Vega 64, and the Vega 64 Liquid. The testing positions the cards against NVIDIA's highly popular Pascal generation, specifically slotting the $399 Vega 56 against the GTX 1070 and the $499 Vega 64 against the GTX 1080. Architecturally, AMD shifted its marketing metrics...Read more

B
bit-tech.net
14/08/2017

The bit-tech.net review of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and RX Vega 56 reference cards highlights a shared, minimal black-and-red design that measures 270mm in length and utilizes dual eight-pin PCIe connectors. A standout feature is the GPUTech LED alignment on the PCB that indicates real-time current levels. Architecturally, the cards incorporate vapor chamber cooling with a single...Read more

H
hardwareluxx.de
14/08/2017

Here is a specific summary of the Hardwareluxx review for the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and Vega 56 graphics cards: The review marks the final evaluation of AMD’s highly anticipated Vega 10 architecture, built on a 14 nm process with 12.5 billion transistors and utilizing advanced High Bandwidth Memory (HBM2). Positioned as direct competitors to NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 1080 and GTX 1070...Read more

H
hardwareluxx.de
26/09/2017

The Hardwareluxx review evaluates the multi-GPU (mGPU) performance of two AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 graphics cards, utilizing the ASUS ROG Strix Radeon Vega 64 OC Edition alongside a reference model, made possible by the release of the Radeon Software Crimson ReLive Edition 17.9.2 driver. This driver officially unlocked mGPU functionality—the term AMD now uses instead of CrossFire. The...Read more

T
tomshardware.fr
05/03/2018

The Asus ROG Strix Vega 64 OC is a custom graphics card built around the 484 mm² Vega 10 GPU, featuring 4,096 shaders, 8 GB of HBM2 memory with a 2,048-bit bus width, and a 295W TDP. Tested on an Intel Core i7-6900K system with an open/closed Lian Li chassis, the card delivers a 10% boost clock advantage over the AMD reference model, resulting in a 5% to 7% gaming performance gain...Read more

H
hardwarecooking.fr
01/09/2017

The HardwareCooking review profiles the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 during its launch phase, outlining a mixed performance reception heavily undermined by market logistics. In terms of performance pros, the card is established as AMD’s most powerful graphics card at the time, delivering solid DirectX 11 benchmarks that allow it to comfortably run modern 3D engines. It positions itself...Read more

H
hardware.fr
28/12/2017

Here is a summary of the hardware review from Hardware.fr: Review Summary The review evaluates the power consumption, clock frequencies, and energy efficiency of the custom Sapphire RX Vega56 and RX Vega64 Nitro+ graphics cards compared to AMD's reference models. Sapphire’s custom design lifts the factory power limits, allowing both cards to sustain higher real-world frequencies,...Read more

P
profesionalreview.com
24/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Review Summary The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is a flagship graphics card powered by the Vega 10 architecture built on a 14nm FinFET process, featuring 8GB of high-performance HBM2 memory with a 2048-bit interface. Operating at a base clock speed of 1247 MHz and a turbo clock speed of 1546 MHz, it offers excellent performance across Full HD, 2K, and 4K resolutions....Read more

C
ct.nl
21/12/2018

The Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64 Gaming OC is a compact graphics card designed to run games smoothly at WQHD resolution (2560×1440) with maximum details, or at 4K with lower graphical settings. Measuring 27.4 cm long, it is notably shorter than many competing Vega 64 cards, making it an excellent choice for space-constrained pc builds. A key feature is its rich array of connectivity...Read more

Video reviews

Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 with

VS
VS

Compare