Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):150 W

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.6

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 76% of graphics cards
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 58%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

3.5

Performance

24%

4.9

Memory

12%

9.6

Power & Cooling

11%

7.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 78%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 91%
  • gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
  • gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
  • gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
  • gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
  • gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
  • gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

3.5

Performance

24%

4.9

Memory

12%

9.6

Power & Cooling

11%

7.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity & Media

5.6
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming has a popularity score of 9.7 points, which is higher than that of 89.7% of products in this category.
9.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
6,264 points
This graphics card scores 6,264 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 82.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
3,000 points
This graphics card scores 3,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 78.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
11,317 points
This graphics card scores 11,317 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 82.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,125 points
This graphics card scores 7,125 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 75.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
6.85 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 6.85 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 81.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 256.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 79.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
21.6 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 21.6 Gbps, which is faster than on 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
150 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 150 W, which is lower than that of 73.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
183 W
This graphics card draws 183 W under peak load, which is lower than 61% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
200 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 200 W, which is lower than that of 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
150 W
Show more
Size
280x 114x 41 mm
Length
280 mm
This graphics card is 280 mm long, which is shorter than 52.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Height
114 mm
This graphics card is 114 mm tall, which is shorter than 74.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
797 g
This graphics card weighs 797 g, which is lighter than 72.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 14.4% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2002 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,002 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 15.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.28 vs 8.000).
    9.28 vs 8
  • 11 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (114 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    114 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 15.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.28 vs 8.000).
    9.28 vs 8
  • 4.82x cheaper
    GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming is cheaper than the average graphics card (£110 vs £530).
    £110 vs £530
  • 2.31x more popular
    GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming is more popular than the average graphics card (9.75 vs 4.2).
    9.75 vs 4.22
  • 14.4% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2002 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,002 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 11 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (114 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    114 mm vs 125 mm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 3.2x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • 25 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (15 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    15 vs 40
  • 27.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1822 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,822 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 57.9% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (8008 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    8,008 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 25 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (15 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    15 vs 40
  • 27.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1822 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,822 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 64 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (120 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    120 vs 184
  • 43.8% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (214.1 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    214.1 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 74.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (5.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    5.78 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 36.5% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (103.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    103.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 17% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1594 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,594 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 50% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (11317 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    11,317 points vs 22,653 points
  • 57.3% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (6264 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    6,264 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 67.3% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (3000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    3,000 points vs 9,166 points
  • 99.6% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    0.11 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 62.5% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.18 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2,432 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1920 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    1,920 vs 4,352
  • 70.2% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (6.9 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    6.85 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 41% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7125 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,125 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 57.9% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (8008 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    8,008 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 42.8% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (256.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    256.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 3.2x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 7 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2016 vs 2023).
    June 2016
    2,016 vs 2,023
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4 vs 8
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.4 vs 6.8).
    6.4 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 68.6% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (7200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    7,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    3 vs 6
  • 5.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41 dB vs 35.4 dB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

V
vortez.net
23/09/2016
Summary of the review
L
legitreviews.com
21/07/2016
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
12/07/2016
Summary of the review
L
legitreviews.com
21/07/2016
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
08/07/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
01/06/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
22/08/2016
Summary of the review
L
legitreviews.com
21/07/2016
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
07/07/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming

  • Excellent value for money, offering performance comparable to the more expensive GTX 980 Ti at the time of release.
  • Effective Windforce 3X cooling system with a triple-fan design that keeps load temperatures around 65°C.
  • 0dB fan technology allows for completely silent operation during low usage or idle states.
  • High factory overclocking with a boost clock of up to 1822 MHz and significant manual overclocking headroom.
  • Robust build quality featuring a solid metal backplate for structural rigidity and protection.
  • Comprehensive display output options, including 3x DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, and a DVI-D port.
  • Customizable RGB lighting on the side logo and fan stop indicator via Gigabyte software.

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming

  • The plastic shroud can feel somewhat cheap compared to more premium reinforced models.
  • Triple-fan design makes the card quite long (280mm), which may not fit in some smaller cases.
  • Fans can become audibly loud when running at 100% speed or during heavy overclocking sessions.
  • Thermal design uses only two 8mm heat pipes in a direct touch configuration, which some reviewers found uninspired.
  • Minor reports of coil whine, though often negligible in a closed chassis.
  • Lacks the newer GDDR5X memory found on the higher-end GTX 1080, sticking with standard GDDR5.

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming is a high-performance graphics card built on NVIDIA's Pascal architecture, featuring 8GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 1822 MHz in OC mode. Its primary characteristics include the Windforce 3X cooling system with three 80mm blade fans, customizable 16.8M color RGB lighting, and a 6+2 power phase design for enhanced stability. The main pros are its excellent 1440p gaming performance, quiet 0dB semi-passive fans that stop under light loads, and a solid metal backplate for durability. However, potential cons include the predominantly plastic shroud which can feel less premium than metal alternatives and its significant physical length of 280mm which may not fit in smaller PC cases.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found