Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ120VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):175 W

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition
5.6/10

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.2

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

â–ĽWorse than 80% of graphics cards
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–ĽWorse than 65%
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

3.1

Performance

24%

5.1

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

7.5

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

7.6

Connectivity & Media

â–ĽWorse than 81%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–˛Better than 89%
  • sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
  • sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
  • sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
  • sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
  • sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
  • sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
  • sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

3.1

Performance

24%

5.1

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

7.5

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

7.6

Connectivity & Media

5.2
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
9.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition has a popularity score of 9.4 points, which is higher than that of 87.2% of products in this category.
9.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

6.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
5,182 points
This graphics card scores 5,182 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 84.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
9,316 points
This graphics card scores 9,316 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 86.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
3,760 points
This graphics card scores 3,760 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 87.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
7.19 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 7.19 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 80.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
268.8 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 268.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 79.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
5
This graphics card supports up to 5 displays, which is more than 97.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
5120x2880
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 5120x2880, which is lower than that of 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
21.6 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 21.6 Gbps, which is faster than on 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
175 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 175 W, which is lower than that of 62.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
240 W
This graphics card draws 240 W under peak load, which is higher than 54.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
175 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 175 W, which is lower than that of 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
175 W
Show more
Size
260x 135x 43 mm
This graphics card measures 260x135x 43 mm, which is more compact than 68.4% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Length
260 mm
This graphics card is 260 mm long, which is shorter than 65.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
135 mm
This graphics card is 135 mm tall, which is taller than 69.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,200 g
This graphics card weighs 1,200 g, which is heavier than 59.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (5 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    5 vs 4
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 20% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2100 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,100 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 15.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.21 vs 8.000).
    9.21 vs 8
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 15.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.21 vs 8.000).
    9.21 vs 8
  • 4.42x cheaper
    Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition is cheaper than the average graphics card (ÂŁ120 vs ÂŁ530).
    ÂŁ120 vs ÂŁ530
  • 2.23x more popular
    Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition is more popular than the average graphics card (9.39 vs 4.2).
    9.39 vs 4.22
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 20% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2100 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,100 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (5 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    5 vs 4
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 18.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (175 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    175 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (260x135 x 43 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    260x135 x 43 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 25 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (260 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    260 mm vs 285 mm
  • 37.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1560 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,560 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 4.4% worse value for money
    Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.89 vs 7.2).
    6.89 vs 7.2
  • 37.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1560 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,560 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 69.4% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (49.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    49.92 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 23.5% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1469 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,469 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 41.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (224.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    224.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 68.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    7.19 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 58.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (9316 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    9,316 points vs 22,653 points
  • 64.7% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (5182 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    5,182 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 4 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    36 vs 40
  • 68.9% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (3760 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    3,760 points vs 12,074 points
  • 75.8% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    7.19 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 68.7% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    7.19 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 55.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (8400 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    8,400 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 40% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (268.8 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    268.8 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    16 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • 5 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2018 vs 2023).
    November 2018
    2,018 vs 2,023
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3.4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3.4 vs 8
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 75.1% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (5700 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    5,700 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 2.3).
    1.4 vs 2.3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (5120x2880 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    5120x2880 vs 7680x4320
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • 41.7% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (17 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    17 W vs 12 W
  • 10 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (135 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    135 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcworld.com
28/11/2018
Summary of the review
W
wccftech.com
28/11/2018
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
31/05/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
15/11/2018
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
15/11/2018
Summary of the review
H
hd-tecnologia.com
12/12/2018
Summary of the review
M
madboxpc.com
28/12/2018
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition

  • Excellent 1080p and capable 1440p gaming performance for its class
  • High-quality construction with a sturdy metal backplate
  • Quiet operation even under heavy gaming load
  • Effective dual-fan cooling system that keeps temperatures stable
  • Removable 'Quick Connect' fans for easy cleaning and maintenance
  • Dual BIOS feature with a dedicated 'Silent' mode switch
  • Unique metallic blue 'Special Edition' aesthetics that stand out
  • Impressive factory overclock on both the GPU core and memory

What we don't like about Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition

  • High power consumption compared to more efficient competitors
  • The metallic blue color may not match many PC build themes
  • Lacks modern features like hardware-accelerated ray tracing
  • Physical size is large (slightly over 2-slot design), requiring extra case clearance
  • High idle and multi-monitor power draw due to overclocked memory clocks
  • Performance uplift over the RX 580 is modest given the increased power requirements

Verdict

The Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 590 Special Edition is a factory-overclocked mid-range graphics card built on the 12nm Polaris 30 architecture, featuring 2,304 stream processors and 8GB of GDDR5 memory. It operates with a boost clock of up to 1560 MHz and an effective memory speed of 8400 MHz on a 256-bit bus, offering robust performance for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming. Main characteristics include a signature metallic blue shroud, LED-lit fans, a reinforced backplate, and a dual BIOS for switching between performance and silent modes. Pros include its excellent build quality, efficient Dual-X cooling system with quick-connect fans for easy cleaning, and performance that consistently outpaces the GTX 1060. However, cons include high power consumption (peaking near 290W in synthetic loads), high multi-monitor power draw, and limited additional overclocking headroom due to its aggressive out-of-the-box settings.

Compare Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found