Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£930VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):360 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
9.3/10

Overall score

Score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.4

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

★Better than 96% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.3

Overall score

30%

5.6

Price

★Better than 96%
9.4

Technical score

Technical score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

6.6

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.5

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 96%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 72%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Technical score
Technical score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

6.6

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.5

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.4
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has a popularity score of 7 points, which is higher than that of 65.6% of products in this category.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.3

Overall score

30%

5.6

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
32,701 points
This graphics card scores 32,701 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 92.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
26,000 points
This graphics card scores 26,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 93.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
35,880 points
This graphics card scores 35,880 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 89.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
19,343 points
This graphics card scores 19,343 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 76.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
56.28 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 56.28 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 87.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 960 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 88% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to 13.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 360 W, which is higher than that of 88.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
360 W
This graphics card draws 360 W under peak load, which is higher than 85.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
360 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 360 W, which is higher than that of 83.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
360 W
Show more
Size
304x 137x 2 mm
Length
304 mm
This graphics card is 304 mm long, which is longer than 62.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Height
137 mm
This graphics card is 137 mm tall, which is taller than 73.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,635 g
This graphics card weighs 1,635 g, which is heavier than 80.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2.31x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (879.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    879.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 4.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 57.9% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (30000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    30,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 13.5% better value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.17 vs 7.2).
    8.17 vs 7.2
  • 6.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.54 vs 8.000).
    8.54 vs 8
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.31x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (879.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    879.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 4.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 192 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (336 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    336 vs 144
  • 79.8% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (293.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    293.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.49x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (56.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    56.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2.84x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (26000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    26,000 points vs 9,166 points
  • 2.23x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (32701 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    32,701 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 58.4% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (35880 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    35,880 points vs 22,653 points
  • 7.44x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (1801 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    1,801 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 6,400 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,752 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,752 vs 4,352
  • 2.45x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (56.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    56.28 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 57.9% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (30000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    30,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 7.1% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1875 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,875 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 4x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 67.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (360 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    360 W vs 215 W
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 60% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (360 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    360 W vs 225 W
  • 12 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (137 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    137 mm vs 125 mm
  • 75.5% more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is more expensive than the average graphics card (£930 vs £530).
    £930 vs £530
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm
  • 75.5% more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is more expensive than the average graphics card (£930 vs £530).
    £930 vs £530
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 67.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (360 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    360 W vs 215 W
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 60% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (360 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    360 W vs 225 W
  • 31 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (31 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    31 dB vs 0 dB
  • 63.6% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (360 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    360 W vs 220 W
  • 66.7% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (20 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    20 W vs 12 W
  • 12 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (137 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    137 mm vs 125 mm
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm
  • 60.1% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1635 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,635 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
digitalfoundry.net
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
15/04/2026
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
06/03/2026
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
12/08/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
08/08/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
11/04/2025
Summary of the review
P
pugetsystems.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
30/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
30/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
30/01/2025
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
30/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
31/01/2025
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
30/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
J
jonpeddie.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
S
storagereview.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
C
club386.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
29/01/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

  • Exceptional 4K gaming performance with high frame rates in modern titles
  • Strong AI and ray tracing capabilities, significantly outpacing previous generations and competitors like AMD
  • Exclusive support for DLSS 4 and Multi Frame Generation, providing substantial FPS boosts in supported games
  • Efficient thermal design that keeps the card cool (often below 70°C) and quiet under heavy load
  • Includes updated DisplayPort 2.1 support for ultra-high resolution and refresh rate monitors
  • Smaller physical footprint compared to the RTX 5090, typically utilizing a two-slot design

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

  • Modest generational performance uplift over the RTX 4080 Super (approx. 7–15%) in raw rasterization
  • High MSRP ($999/£979) makes it a questionable value for users already owning high-end 40-series cards
  • VRAM capacity remains capped at 16GB, which some users feel is insufficient for future-proofing
  • Increased power draw (360W TGP) compared to the previous generation
  • Reported early driver stability issues and compatibility quirks in certain applications and games
  • Performance scaling is less impressive at lower resolutions like 1080p and 1440p due to architecture and potential CPU bottlenecks

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080, launched in January 2025, is a high-end graphics card based on the Blackwell architecture (GB203 chip) featuring 10,752 CUDA cores, 84 fourth-generation Ray Tracing cores, and 336 fifth-generation Tensor cores. It is equipped with 16GB of ultra-fast GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 960 GB/s and a boost clock speed of 2.617 GHz. Main characteristics include support for DLSS 4.5 with multi-frame generation, PCIe 5.0, and DisplayPort 2.1b connectivity. Its primary pros are exceptional 4K and 1440p gaming performance, industry-leading AI and ray tracing capabilities, and significantly improved power efficiency with a 360W TDP. However, notable cons include a relatively modest generational performance uplift in traditional rasterization (roughly 10-15% over the 4080 Super), a high retail price around $999, and a VRAM capacity that remains capped at 16GB, which some enthusiasts find limiting for future-proofing.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found