Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£910VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

9.0/10

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 84% of graphics cards
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

5.7

Price

▲Better than 88%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

6.1

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 83%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

6.1

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

5.7

Price

8.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
24,000 points
This graphics card scores 24,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 74.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
19,160 points
This graphics card scores 19,160 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 84.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
32,482 points
This graphics card scores 32,482 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 80.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,806 points
This graphics card scores 15,806 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 63.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
43.94 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 72.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
896 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 896 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 82.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
300 W
This graphics card draws 300 W under peak load, which is higher than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 67.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
Size
331.9x 145.6x 69.9 mm
This graphics card measures 331.9x145.6x 69.9 mm, which is larger than 86.7% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Length
331.9 mm
This graphics card is 331.9 mm long, which is longer than 84.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Height
69.9 mm
This graphics card is 69.9 mm tall, which is shorter than 92.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.5 slot/s, which is wider than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 5.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
?
Show more

Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 80.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 11.3% better value for money
    Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.01 vs 7.2).
    8.01 vs 7.2
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 80.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 136 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (280 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    280 vs 144
  • 94.7% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (43.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    43.94 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 44.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (235.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    235.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.09x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19160 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    19,160 points vs 9,166 points
  • 43.4% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (32482 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    32,482 points vs 22,653 points
  • 63.5% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (24000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    24,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 2.96x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (716 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    716 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    February 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 55.1 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (69.9 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    69.9 mm vs 125 mm
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2452 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,452 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 46.9 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (331.9 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    331.9 mm vs 285 mm
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 4.22x less popular
    Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 4.22x less popular
    Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 71.7% more expensive
    Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom is more expensive than the average graphics card (£910 vs £530).
    £910 vs £530
  • 2.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2452 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,452 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 15 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (52 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    52 °C vs 37 °C
  • 6.1 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41.5 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41.5 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 36.4% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 46.9 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (331.9 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    331.9 mm vs 285 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

What we like about Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom

  • Excellent thermal performance with temperatures typically staying between 57°C and 70°C even under heavy loads
  • Extremely quiet operation, with users describing it as nearly silent or the quietest card they have used
  • Solid 1440p and respectable 4K gaming performance with 16GB of GDDR7 VRAM
  • Sophisticated all-black aesthetics and build quality that feels solid and premium
  • Advanced cooling features including a dedicated vapor chamber and dust-resistant Cyclone fans
  • Support for DLSS 4 and multi-frame generation significantly boosts frame rates in compatible titles

What we don't like about Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom

  • Large physical footprint (3.5-slot design) requires significant space in the PC case
  • Modest generational performance uplift over the previous RTX 4070 Ti Super (roughly 13%)
  • Retail pricing often exceeds MSRP due to market volatility and scalping
  • Potential for minor fan motor grinding noise reported by some users at low RPMs
  • High power requirements, typically necessitating a high-quality 750W power supply

Verdict

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom is an enthusiast-class graphics card featuring the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture with 8,960 CUDA cores and 16GB of high-speed GDDR7 VRAM on a 256-bit bus. It operates with a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, delivering a massive 896 GB/s memory bandwidth for 1440p and 4K gaming. Key advantages include its sophisticated all-black 'stealth' design, advanced thermal solutions for low operating temperatures (averaging 57°C to 65°C under load), and support for cutting-edge AI features like DLSS 4. However, notable drawbacks include its large triple-slot physical footprint, reported issues with grinding fan motor noise at low RPMs, and potential coil whine during intensive workloads.

Compare Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phantom and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found