OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£950VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):320 W

MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White
9.2/10

Overall score

Score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components

90%

9.3

Technical score

10%

9.0

User score

★Better than 95% of graphics cards
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

Overall score

30%

5.5

Price

★Better than 92%
9.3

Technical score

Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.0

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

5.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 95%
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 85%
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-gaming-x-slim-white
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White

Technical score
Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components:

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.0

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

5.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

9.3
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.0
Popularity
Popularity
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White has a popularity score of 9.1 points, which is higher than that of 85.2% of products in this category.
9.1
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

9.2

Overall score

30%

5.5

Price

8.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
28,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 28,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 82.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
17,600 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 17,600 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
34,238 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 34,238 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 83.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,500 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 15,500 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 62.8% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
53.45 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 53.45 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 86.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
736 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 736 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 77.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
320 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 320 W, which is higher than that of 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
320 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 320 W under peak load, which is higher than 76.3% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
320 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 320 W, which is higher than that of 74.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
320 W
Show more
Size
307x 125x 46 mm
This graphics card measures 307x125x 46 mm, which is more compact than 57.6% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Length
322 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 322 mm long, which is longer than 74.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Height
136 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 136 mm tall, which is taller than 71.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,628 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,628 g, which is heavier than 79.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 64.3% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (736 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    736 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 79.1% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (292.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    292.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 13% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.04 vs 8.000).
    9.04 vs 8
  • 12.7% better value for money
    MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.11 vs 7.2).
    8.11 vs 7.2
  • 2.16x more popular
    MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White is more popular than the average graphics card (9.09 vs 4.2).
    9.09 vs 4.22
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 79.1% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (292.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    292.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2.37x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (53.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    53.45 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 90.8% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (28000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    28,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 51.1% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (34238 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    34,238 points vs 22,653 points
  • 92% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (17600 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    17,600 points vs 9,166 points
  • 3.45x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (836 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    836 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 5,888 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,240 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,240 vs 4,352
  • 2.33x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (53.5 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    53.45 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 64.3% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (736 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    736 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 21.1% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (23000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    23,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 3.33x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (76300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    76,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (307x125 x 46 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    307x125 x 46 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 37 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (322 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    322 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 11 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (136 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    136 mm vs 125 mm
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 17.8% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 79.3% more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White is more expensive than the average graphics card (£950 vs £530).
    £950 vs £530
  • 17.8% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 45.5% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (320 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    320 W vs 220 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 37 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (322 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    322 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 11 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (136 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    136 mm vs 125 mm
  • 59.5% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1628 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,628 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

F
funkykit.com
06/12/2024
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 16G GAMING X SLIMGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. Review
G
gamesradar.com
28/03/2024
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 SuperGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. review: "the 4K GPU most players should opt for"

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White

  • High aesthetic appeal with a clean white design and silver backplate, ideal for themed builds
  • Excellent cooling performance with typical load temperatures ranging from 60°C to 67°C
  • Remarkably quiet operation, often described as 'whisper-quiet' even under load
  • Slimmer physical profile compared to other 4080 Super models, improving airflow and case compatibility
  • Strong out-of-the-box performance with boost clocks reaching 2670-2715 MHz
  • Minimal performance and temperature difference between GPU core and hotspot
  • Includes useful accessories like a GPU support bracket to prevent sagging

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White

  • High price point that some users find difficult to justify for the performance gains over the non-Super model
  • Possibility of audible coil whine in some units, though it may diminish over time
  • Despite the 'Slim' branding, it remains a large triple-slot card that requires careful case measurement
  • The included anti-sag bracket has been criticised by some as having a poor or 'silly' design
  • Negligible performance increase (typically 1-3%) compared to the original RTX 4080

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White is a high-performance graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 10,240 CUDA cores, 16GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 256-bit bus, and an effective memory speed of 23Gbps. This factory-overclocked model reaches a boost clock of 2610MHz and features a more compact 'Slim' triple-slot design (322 x 136 x 62 mm) equipped with the Tri Frozr 3 thermal system and Torx Fan 5.0 for efficient cooling. Main pros include its exceptional 4K gaming performance with DLSS 3 support, striking white and silver aesthetic with a metal backplate, and a dual BIOS for choosing between silent or gaming performance. However, some cons include a substantial 320W power draw that recommends at least an 850W PSU, potential for coil whine at high loads, and a high price point compared to reference models.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim White and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found