OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£980VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):320 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

9.3

Overall score

Score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

90%

9.3

Technical Score

10%

8.6

User score

★Better than 96% of graphics-cards
9.3

Technical Score

Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

44%

9.9

Performance

24%

9.1

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.5

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 96% of graphics-cards
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 307 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 74% of graphics-cards
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4080-super-trinity-oc-white-edition

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 10,240 CUDA cores and 16GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. This factory-overclocked model reaches a boost clock speed of 2565 MHz and utilizes the IceStorm 2.0 advanced cooling system with triple 90mm fans to maintain stable temperatures under heavy loads. Main characteristics include support for DLSS 3.5, 3rd-gen ray tracing, and customizable SPECTRA RGB lighting on its distinct white, aerodynamic shroud. Its primary pros are its exceptional 4K gaming performance, striking white aesthetic, and effective thermal management that keeps the card quiet. However, some users have reported cons such as the bundled power adapter being black rather than matching the white card, the lack of a dual BIOS switch on this specific model, and occasional instability with the FireStorm utility software.

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition

Technical Score
Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

44%

9.9

Performance

24%

9.1

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.5

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

9.3
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition has a technical score of 9.3 points, which is higher than that of 95.8% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 307 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.6
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition has a user score of 8.65 points, which is higher than that of 74.3% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Popularity:
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 70% of products in this category.
7.5
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 70% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

9.3

Overall score

40%

5.3

Price

8.1
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition has a value-for-money score of 8.1 points, which is higher than that of 92.4% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
23,700 points
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
23,700 points
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 23,700 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 74.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
19,177 points
3DMark Port Royal score
19,177 points
▲ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 19,177 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 85.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
34,237 points
PassMark (G3D) result
34,237 points
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 34,237 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 83.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
19,684 points
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
19,684 points
▲ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 19,684 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 78.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
52.53 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance
52.53 TFLOPS
▲ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 52.53 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 85.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
VRAM
16 GB
▲ Better than 61% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
▲ Better than 57% of models
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Memory bus width
256 bit
▲ Better than 50% of models
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
736.3 GB/s
Maximum memory bandwidth
736.3 GB/s
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 78.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
PCIe lanes
x16
▲ Better than 23% of models
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
▲ Better than 23% of models
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
Vulkan version
1.4
▲ Better than 21% of models
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
OpenGL version
4.6
▲ Better than 2% of models
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Max displays supported
4
▲ Better than 8% of models
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
▲ Better than 9% of models
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
DisplayPort outputs
3
▲ Better than 21% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
DisplayPort version
1.4a
▼ Worse than 33% of models
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
25.92 Gbps
DisplayPort link rates
25.92 Gbps
▲ Better than 53% of models
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 25.92 Gbps, which is faster than on 52.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
320 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
320 W
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 320 W, which is higher than that of 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
320 W
Power consumption while under peak load
320 W
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 320 W under peak load, which is higher than 76.3% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
352 W
Board power limit
352 W
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 352 W, which is higher than that of 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
320 W
Show more
Size
306.8x 119.4x 58.5 mm
Size
306.8x 119.4x 58.5 mm
▼ Worse than 56% of models
This graphics card measures 306.8x119.4x 58.5 mm, which is larger than 56% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Length
306.8 mm
Length
306.8 mm
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 306.8 mm long, which is longer than 66% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
119.4 mm
Height
119.4 mm
▲ Better than 65% of models
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 119.4 mm tall, which is shorter than 64.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
▼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,000 g
Weight
1,000 g
▲ Better than 52% of models
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,000 g, which is lighter than 51.5% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    80
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <15 – >84
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    80
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <0 – >84
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.15x higher texture rate
    Texture rate
    820.8 GTexel/s
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <107.4 GTexel/s – >879.3 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (820.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    820.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 48 more ROPs
    Render output units (ROPs)
    112
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <32 – >128
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    Texture mapping units (TMUs)
    320
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <72 – >336
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 64.4% higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    736.3 GB/s
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 176 more AI cores
    Tensor/AI cores
    320
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >336
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2.33x higher FP32 performance
    FP32 performance
    52.53 TFLOPS
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (52.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    52.53 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 8.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition
    the average graphics card
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.65 vs 8.000).
    8.65 vs 8
  • 12.3% better value for money
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.08 vs 7.2).
    8.08 vs 7.2
  • 40 more compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    80
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <15 – >84
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    80
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <0 – >84
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.15x higher texture rate
    Texture rate
    820.8 GTexel/s
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <107.4 GTexel/s – >879.3 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (820.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    820.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 48 more ROPs
    Render output units (ROPs)
    112
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <32 – >128
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    Texture mapping units (TMUs)
    320
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <72 – >336
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 176 more AI cores
    Tensor/AI cores
    320
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >336
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2.33x higher FP32 performance
    FP32 performance
    52.53 TFLOPS
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (52.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    52.53 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 76% higher pixel rate
    Pixel rate
    287.3 GPixel/s
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <43.71 GPixel/s – >366.9 GPixel/s
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (287.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    287.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    Base GPU clock
    2,295 MHz
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <1.1k MHz – >2.3k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2.4% higher boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    2,565 MHz
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1.4k MHz – >2.9k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2565 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,565 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2.09x higher ray tracing score
    3DMark Port Royal score
    19,177 points
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >25k points
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19177 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    19,177 points vs 9,166 points
  • 51.1% higher PassMark score
    PassMark (G3D) result
    34,237 points
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (34237 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    34,237 points vs 22,653 points
  • 61.5% higher gaming score
    3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
    23,700 points
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <4k points – >34k points
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (23700 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    23,700 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 3.45x higher INT8 performance
    INT8 performance
    836 TOPS
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <0 TOPS – >988 TOPS
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (836 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    836 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 5,888 more FP32 units
    FP32 ALUs (count)
    10,240
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <1.3k – >10.8k
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,240 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,240 vs 4,352
  • 2.29x higher compute throughput
    FP32 performance
    52.53 TFLOPS
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (52.5 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    52.53 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 64.4% higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    736.3 GB/s
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    VRAM
    16 GB
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    ECC memory
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache size
    64 MB
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <2 MB – >64 MB
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 21.1% faster memory speed
    Effective memory speed
    23,000 MHz
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (23000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    23,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    L3 / Infinity Cache size
    64 MB
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 MB – >64 MB
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x more transistors
    Number of transistors
    45,900 million
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <5k million – >53.9k million
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    45,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    HDMI version
    2.1a
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    HDMI FRL rate
    48 Gbps
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <0 Gbps – >48 Gbps
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 6.6 dB quieter under load
    Load noise level
    28.8 dB
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <28.8 dB – >42.9 dB
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (28.8 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    28.8 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    320 W
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <60 W – >360 W
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 56.4% higher board power limit
    Board power limit
    352 W
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <100 W – >400 W
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (352 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    352 W vs 225 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    750 W
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <450 W – >850 W
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 17.8% slower VRAM clock
    GPU memory speed
    1,438 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <1.3k MHz – >2.4k MHz
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 21.8 mm longer card length
    Length
    306.8 mm
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (306.8 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    306.8 mm vs 285 mm
  • Narrower decode codec support
    HW decode codecs
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2
    Category Benchmark
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 84.9% more expensive
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition is more expensive than the average graphics card (£980 vs £530).
    £980 vs £530
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    Max junction temperature (Tjmax)
    105 °C
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <88 °C – >110 °C
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 84.9% more expensive
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition is more expensive than the average graphics card (£980 vs £530).
    £980 vs £530
  • 17.8% slower VRAM clock
    GPU memory speed
    1,438 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <1.3k MHz – >2.4k MHz
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Narrower decode codec support
    HW decode codecs
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2
    Category Benchmark
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older NVDEC generation
    NVDEC generation
    5
    ▲ Better than 39% of models
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    320 W
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <60 W – >360 W
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 56.4% higher board power limit
    Board power limit
    352 W
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <100 W – >400 W
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (352 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    352 W vs 225 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    750 W
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <450 W – >850 W
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    Max junction temperature (Tjmax)
    105 °C
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <88 °C – >110 °C
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 10 °C higher load temperature
    Load GPU temperature
    77 °C
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <59 °C – >77 °C
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (77 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    77 °C vs 67 °C
  • 45.5% higher peak power draw
    Power consumption while under peak load
    320 W
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <100 W – >400 W
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (320 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    320 W vs 220 W
  • 21.8 mm longer card length
    Length
    306.8 mm
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (306.8 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    306.8 mm vs 285 mm

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 307 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition?

  • Clean white aesthetic with a unique, curvaceous shroud design
  • Excellent thermal performance, often staying between 60°C and 70°C under load
  • Smaller, slimmer dimensions compared to many other 4080 Super models, improving case compatibility
  • Remarkably quiet operation, especially when using the stock fan profile or quiet mode
  • Strong performance at 1440p and 4K resolutions, often on par with more expensive flagship models
  • Includes a bundled GPU support stand to help manage its weight

What customers dislike about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition?

  • High price tag can be difficult to justify compared to lower-tier cards
  • Large overall size (triple-slot) still requires a spacious case despite being 'slimmer' than competitors
  • Exposed fan design may prevent the installation of slim fans directly underneath in some compact builds
  • Lacks a 90-degree power connector, which can lead to cable strain against case side panels
  • Fan noise can become noticeable if pushed manually to high speeds (above 70%)

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
overclock3d.net
25/05/2024
Summary of the review
Zotac RTX 4080 Super Trinity White Review - Overclock 3D
O
overclock3d.net
25/05/2024
Summary of the review
Zotac RTX 4080 Super Trinity White Review - OC3D

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity OC White Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)