OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£890VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC
8.7/10

Overall score

Score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

90%

8.7

Technical score

10%

8.8

User score

▲Better than 77% of graphics cards
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

Overall score

30%

5.8

Price

▲Better than 84%
8.7

Technical score

Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

6.6

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 77%
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 78%
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-gaming-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components:

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

6.6

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

8.7
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.8
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC has a popularity score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 69% of products in this category.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models
Score components:

70%

8.7

Overall score

30%

5.8

Price

7.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
24,502 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 24,502 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 77.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
17,180 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 17,180 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 77.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
32,032 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 32,032 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 78.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,319 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,319 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 71.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
44.86 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 44.86 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 76.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 672.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 72.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 285 W, which is higher than that of 66.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
285 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 285 W under peak load, which is higher than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
320 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 320 W, which is higher than that of 74.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
Size
300x 130x 57.6 mm
This graphics card measures 300x130x 57.6 mm, which is larger than 59.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Length
300 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 300 mm long, which is longer than 56.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Height
130 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 130 mm tall, which is taller than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,260 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,260 g, which is heavier than 63.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2655 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,655 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 83.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (700.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    700.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 50.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 9.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.79 vs 8.000).
    8.79 vs 8
  • 9.3% better value for money
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.86 vs 7.2).
    7.86 vs 7.2
  • 6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2655 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,655 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 83.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (700.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    700.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 98.8% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (44.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    44.86 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 53.6% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (250.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    250.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 80 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (264 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    264 vs 184
  • 120 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (264 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    264 vs 144
  • 87.4% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (17180 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    17,180 points vs 9,166 points
  • 41.4% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (32032 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    32,032 points vs 22,653 points
  • 66.9% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (24502 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    24,502 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 9.94x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    353 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 50.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 2x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    45,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 67.9% more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (£890 vs £530).
    £890 vs £530
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 67.9% more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (£890 vs £530).
    £890 vs £530
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 5 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (300 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    300 mm vs 285 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
en.gamegpu.com
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GAMING OC Video Card Review
T
tech-critter.com
20/02/2024
Summary of the review
Review – Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Gaming OC 16G
M
mezha.ua
29/02/2024
Summary of the review
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GAMING OC 16G video card review: Rational progression If you would like to look deeper into this specific model's p...
O
overclockers.com
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC 16G Review
C
club386.com
25/01/2024
Summary of the review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC review: built to impress
T
techpowerup.com
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OCGo to product viewer dialog for this item. Review
H
hardwareluxx.de
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
Custom-Modelle der GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super im Test: Noch näher an die RTX 4080.
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC

  • Excellent cooling: Typically stays under 65°C-70°C even under heavy gaming loads.
  • Very quiet operation: Fans are noted for being barely audible, even with the factory overclock.
  • 16GB VRAM: Significant upgrade for 4K gaming and AI workloads compared to the non-Super model.
  • No/Low coil whine: Users frequently report a lack of annoying electrical noise common in other brands.
  • Extended warranty: Offers a 4-year manufacturer warranty upon registration.
  • Good build quality: Features a solid metal backplate and included anti-sag bracket.

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC

  • Large physical footprint: Its triple-slot thickness and length (336mm) may not fit in smaller cases.
  • Price premium: Costs more than MSRP models for only a slight factory overclock.
  • Plastic shroud: Shroud material is primarily plastic, which some find less premium than metal alternatives.
  • Gigabyte Control Center (GCC): Software is often described as unintuitive, buggy, or difficult to install.
  • Modest generational gain: Performance is roughly 10-15% faster than the base 4070 Ti, which some find underwhelming for the price.

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 8,448 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2,655 MHz. It significantly upgrades the memory subsystem with 16GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 256-bit interface, delivering 672 GB/s of bandwidth to handle demanding 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming. The card utilizes the Windforce cooling system with three 100mm alternate-spinning fans and a large vapor chamber for efficient heat dissipation, while also offering dual BIOS modes for performance or silence. Main pros include its excellent 1440p performance, robust cooling design, and a generous 4-year warranty upon registration; however, it remains quite large at roughly three slots wide, carries a price premium over the base MSRP, and lacks DisplayPort 2.1 support.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found