OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£880VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

9.0/10

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 86% of graphics cards
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

5.9

Price

★Better than 92%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models
Score components

44%

9.0

Performance

24%

9.7

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

5.3

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 84%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #114 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models
Score components:

44%

9.0

Performance

24%

9.7

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

5.3

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

5.9

Price

8.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
11,305 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 11,305 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 65.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
19,400 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 19,400 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 86.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
32,435 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 32,435 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,056 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,056 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 68.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
45.55 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 45.55 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 78.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
896 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 896 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 82.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to 13.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
350 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 350 W under peak load, which is higher than 83.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
350 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 350 W, which is higher than that of 81.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
315 W
Show more
Size
336x 145x 63 mm
Length
336 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 336 mm long, which is longer than 87.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 2% of graphics cards.
Height
145 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 145 mm tall, which is taller than 88.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
2100 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 2100 g, which is heavier than 91.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 86.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (711.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    711.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 12.1% better value for money
    COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.07 vs 7.2).
    8.07 vs 7.2
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 86.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (711.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    711.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 136 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (280 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    280 vs 144
  • 49.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (244 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    244 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 94.5% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (43.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    43.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.12x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19400 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    19,400 points vs 9,166 points
  • 1.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2542 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,542 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 43.2% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (32435 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    32,435 points vs 22,653 points
  • 2.95x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (715 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    715 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    February 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 51 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    336 mm vs 285 mm
  • 20 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (145 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    145 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 55.6% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (350 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    350 W vs 225 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 4.22x less popular
    COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 66% more expensive
    COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (£880 vs £530).
    £880 vs £530
  • 4.22x less popular
    COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 66% more expensive
    COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (£880 vs £530).
    £880 vs £530
  • 23% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (11305 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    11,305 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 55.6% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (350 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    350 W vs 225 W
  • 59.1% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 3.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (39 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    39 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 51 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    336 mm vs 285 mm
  • 20 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (145 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    145 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.06x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2100 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,100 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcgamer.com
21/03/2025
Summary of the review
Colorful iGame RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC review - PC Gamer
H
hardwareluxx.de
19/02/2025
Summary of the review
Auf Niveau der GeForce RTX 4080: Die GeForce RTX 5070 Ti im Test
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC

  • Excellent 1440p and competitive 4K gaming performance, often matching or exceeding the RTX 4080 Super in titles with frame generation.
  • Customizable Vulcan LCD screen that displays real-time system stats (temps, clocks) or custom GIFs/animations.
  • Highly efficient 'Vortex' triple-fan cooling system that keeps peak temperatures as low as 61°C–65°C under heavy load.
  • Premium build quality with a mainly metal construction and a stylish 'cyberpunk' aesthetic.
  • Convenient 'One-Key Turbo' button on the I/O bracket for easy, stable factory overclocking.
  • Future-proof features including 16GB of high-speed GDDR7 VRAM and support for DLSS 4 and DisplayPort 2.1b.

What we don't like about COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC

  • Aggressive fan noise under heavy load compared to some competing models, though it can be manually tuned.
  • Large 2.5-slot physical footprint (336mm length) requires a spacious case for proper fitment.
  • Significant price premium over the base MSRP, often pushing it into the territory of higher-tier cards like the RTX 5080.
  • High power requirements, with a 300W-315W TDP requiring at least a 750W power supply.
  • Limited availability and potential for scalper pricing in many regions.

Verdict

The Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC is an enthusiast-grade graphics card based on the Blackwell architecture, featuring 8,960 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2,542 MHz. It is equipped with 16 GB of high-speed GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit interface, delivering 896 GB/s of bandwidth to handle demanding 4K gaming and AI-enhanced neural rendering with DLSS 4. Its standout characteristics include a customizable magnetic 'Vulcan' LCD screen for real-time monitoring and a robust Vortex cooling system with a vacuum copper plate and triple scythe fans. Main pros include its premium thermal performance, one-key physical overclocking, and unique aesthetics with swappable RGB attachments. However, its significant 300W power draw requires a 750W+ power supply, and its large triple-slot design may not fit in compact chassis.

Compare COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found