Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£740VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition
8.2/10

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

7.9

Technical score

25%

8.5

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

10

Sentiment score

▲Better than 78% of graphics cards
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

6.6

Price

▲Better than 75%
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.3

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.3

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

5.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

▲Better than 68%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.4

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
9 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 92%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet

What reviewers say about the ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition

Based on 9 · 4

Efficient, cool and quiet with good DLSS, but reviewers split on performance and criticise its value and limited video memory.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition

Based on 214 owners sharing their experience in online comments

83%positive9%mixed8%negative

Owners praise its fast, efficient gaming, while limited memory can constrain demanding 4K play.

What owners dislike

  • Some owners get lower-than-expected frame rates, with results depending on the CPU, settings and whether DLSS is on; one reported GPU use stuck at 0%.12
  • At 4K with ray tracing and frame generation, the 12 GB VRAM fills, causing frame drops after leaving menus in games like Alan Wake 2.8
  • Some owners report freezes during intense scenes, forced game closes, full PC shutdowns, and brief black screens with lasting performance drops.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #276 of 2,260 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.3

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.3

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

5.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

7.9
Reviews score
8.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

6.6

Price

7.7
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
22,467 points
This graphics card scores 22,467 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 72.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,000 points
This graphics card scores 14,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 66.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
39,569 points
This graphics card scores 39,569 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 98.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
21,262 points
This graphics card scores 21,262 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 84.6% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
40.09 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 72.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 46% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 22.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 31.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
21,000 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 21,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 61.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 56.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 285 W, which is higher than that of 67.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
220 W
This graphics card draws 220 W under peak load, which is lower than 47.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
285 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 285 W, which is higher than that of 64.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
305x 138x 65 mm
Length
305 mm
This graphics card is 305 mm long, which is longer than 65.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Height
138 mm
This graphics card is 138 mm tall, which is taller than 77.2% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.25 slot/s, which is wider than 89.9% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,300 g
This graphics card weighs 1,300 g, which is heavier than 65.5% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 10.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,760 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,760 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 73.3% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (655.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    655.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 77.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (40.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    40.09 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 74.8% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (39,569 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    39,569 points vs 22,638 points
  • 18.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    9 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 18.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    9 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 28.2% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.8
  • 10.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,760 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,760 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 73.3% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (655.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    655.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 74.8% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (39,569 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    39,569 points vs 22,638 points
  • 77.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (40.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    40.09 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 35.4% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (218.4 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    218.4 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 56 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (240 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    240 vs 184
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 52% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (22,467 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    22,467 points vs 14,779 points
  • 9.02x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (320 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    320 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 53% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14,000 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    14,000 points vs 9,148 points
  • 76.1% higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (21,262 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    21,262 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 12 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (55 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    55 °C vs 67 °C
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 0.75 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.25 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 13 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (138 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    138 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 22.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (305 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    305 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 29.5% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (285 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    285 W vs 220 W
  • 42.3% more expensive
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition is more expensive than the average graphics card (£740 vs £520).
    £740 vs £520
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 29.5% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (285 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    285 W vs 220 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 0.75 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.25 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (138 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    138 mm vs 125 mm
  • 22.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (305 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    305 mm vs 282.2 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Jordan Ash
≈ estimated
02/06/2023
Unboxing and overview · game benchmarks and temperatures
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition is very strong at 1440p and high refresh rates, but 4K is best kept to medium-high settings.
7.0
Top3Entertainment
≈ estimated
03/03/2023
Unboxing · benchmarks · power draw and value thoughts
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition performs well and suits ray tracing fans, but low VRAM and older DisplayPort make a rival the safer pick.
8.0
We Do Tech
≈ estimated
11/01/2023
Hands-on review · game benchmarks and value thoughts
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition performs very well and is not a bad deal, but it is not worth upgrading from a 3080.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
hothardware.com
✓ explicit
04/01/2023
Lab test · Ada Lovelace GPU
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 Ti OC is a strong gaming card that runs cool and quiet with modest power draw, but its oversized build is a drawback.
8.5
cgmagonline.com
✓ explicit
07/03/2023
Benchmark test · Triple-fan GPU
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 Ti OC is a strong 1440p card whose ray tracing edges the RX 7900 XT, but its 12GB memory limits 4K ray tracing.
10
digitalcitizen.life
✓ explicit
11/10/2025
Benchmark test · Ray tracing and 4K
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 Ti OC is a strong 1440p card that beats AMD in ray tracing and draws less power, but demanding 4K games need DLSS.
8.0
gamingtrend.com
≈ estimated
04/01/2023
Hands-on test · Ada Lovelace card
Verdict
The ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a mid-range Ada card with DLSS 3 frame generation, but its three-slot body blocks a second PCIe slot.
8.0
babeltechreviews.com
≈ estimated
04/01/2023
Benchmark test · DLSS 3 frame generation
Verdict
The ASUS TUF RTX 4070 Ti OC is quiet and cool, with DLSS 3 frame generation boosting ray-traced games, but gains over an RTX 3080 are modest.
8.0
notebookcheck.com
≈ estimated
13/01/2023
Lab test · Quiet idle and BIOS modes
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 Ti OC matches the RTX 3090 Ti and stops its fans at idle, suiting 1440p buyers who don't plan to overclock.
9.0
tuttotech.net
≈ estimated
20/02/2023
Hands-on test · Custom-design card
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 Ti OC suits 1440p gamers with low power draw and strong DLSS 3 results, but only matches the RTX 3090 Ti in productivity tests.
9.0
tech.everyeye.it
≈ estimated
04/01/2023
Hands-on test · Compact card
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 Ti stays cool and quiet, matches the RTX 3090 Ti in benchmarks, but has half the video memory.
9.0
techtesters.eu
≈ estimated
04/01/2023
Lab test · Compact GPU
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 Ti OC is recommended: it's the smallest of five cards tested, yet edges out the RTX 3090 Ti while drawing less power.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition

  • Exceptional thermal management, maintaining very low temperatures even under high stress
  • Robust build quality featuring an all-metal shroud and backplate for added durability
  • Highly efficient power consumption, often drawing significantly less than its 285W TDP rating during gaming
  • Operates very quietly, especially when using the integrated Quiet BIOS mode
  • Top-tier 1440p gaming performance, frequently matching or exceeding previous-gen flagships like the RTX 3090 Ti
  • Includes two HDMI 2.1 ports, whereas most competitive models only offer one
  • Nifty included accessories, such as a GPU support bracket that doubles as a screwdriver

What customers don't like about ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition

  • High price point relative to the performance gains over previous generations, leading to poor value sentiment
  • 12GB of VRAM and a 192-bit memory bus are seen as limiting factors for long-term 4K gaming
  • Large physical footprint, requiring 3.25 slots of space which may not fit in smaller cases
  • Requirement for the 16-pin (12VHPWR) power connector can be cumbersome for those with older power supplies
  • Lacks DisplayPort 2.1 support, which some competitors in the same price range offer

Verdict

The ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition is a performance-oriented graphics card featuring 7,680 CUDA cores, 12GB of high-speed GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, and an increased factory boost clock of 2,730 MHz (up to 2,760 MHz in OC mode). Built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, it excels in 1440p and ultra-settings gaming with advanced features like DLSS 3.0 frame generation and improved 3rd Gen Ray Tracing cores. Its robust triple-axial-fan cooling system and 3.25-slot all-metal design ensure exceptional thermal management and quiet operation even under heavy loads. Main pros include its superior power efficiency (285W TDP), military-grade durability, and dual HDMI 2.1 ports for flexible connectivity. However, notable cons include its significant physical footprint requiring a large case, the use of the 16-pin 12VHPWR power connector which may necessitate adapters, and a relatively high price point compared to previous-generation cards in its class.

Compare ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found