OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£780VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

8.7

Overall score

Score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

90%

8.7

Technical Score

10%

8.7

User score

▲Better than 77% of graphics-cards
8.7

Technical Score

Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.5

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 77% of graphics-cards
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on 236 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 77% of graphics-cards
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-trinity-black-edition

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 8,448 CUDA cores and a significant memory upgrade to 16GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. It operates with a boost clock of 2610 MHz and a 285W TGP, utilizing the IceStorm 2.0 triple-fan cooling system and Spectra RGB lighting for a balance of thermal efficiency and aesthetics. Main pros include its improved 1440p and entry-level 4K performance over the non-Super variant, quiet operation under load, and the inclusion of a bundled GPU support stand to prevent sag. However, some cons include its large 306.8 mm length which may not fit in smaller cases, and a performance-per-dollar ratio that faces stiff competition from lower-priced AMD alternatives.

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition

Technical Score
Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components:

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.5

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

8.7
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition has a technical score of 8.7 points, which is higher than that of 76.9% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on 236 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition has a user score of 8.73 points, which is higher than that of 76.9% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Popularity:
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition has a popularity score of 7.2 points, which is higher than that of 67.1% of products in this category.
7.2
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition has a popularity score of 7.2 points, which is higher than that of 67.1% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components:

60%

8.7

Overall score

40%

6.4

Price

8.0
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition has a value-for-money score of 8 points, which is higher than that of 88.2% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
22,000 points
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
22,000 points
▲ Better than 71% of models
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 22,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 70.6% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,677 points
3DMark Port Royal score
14,677 points
▲ Better than 70% of models
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 14,677 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 70.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,830 points
PassMark (G3D) result
31,830 points
▲ Better than 77% of models
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,830 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 77% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,259 points
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,259 points
▲ Better than 70% of models
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,259 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 70.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
44.1 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance
44.1 TFLOPS
▲ Better than 73% of models
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 44.1 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 73.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
VRAM
16 GB
▲ Better than 61% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
▲ Better than 57% of models
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Memory bus width
256 bit
▲ Better than 50% of models
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
Maximum memory bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
▲ Better than 73% of models
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 672.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 72.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
PCIe lanes
x16
▲ Better than 23% of models
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
▲ Better than 23% of models
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
▼ Worse than 79% of models
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
OpenGL version
4.6
▲ Better than 2% of models
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Max displays supported
4
▲ Better than 8% of models
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
▲ Better than 9% of models
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
DisplayPort outputs
3
▲ Better than 21% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
DisplayPort version
1.4a
▼ Worse than 33% of models
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
21.6 Gbps
DisplayPort link rates
21.6 Gbps
▲ Better than 51% of models
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 21.6 Gbps, which is faster than on 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 285 W, which is higher than that of 66.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
285 W
Power consumption while under peak load
285 W
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 285 W under peak load, which is higher than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
285 W
Board power limit
285 W
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 285 W, which is higher than that of 63.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
Size
306.8x 119.4x 58.5 mm
Size
306.8x 119.4x 58.5 mm
▼ Worse than 56% of models
This graphics card measures 306.8x119.4x 58.5 mm, which is larger than 56% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Length
306.8 mm
Length
306.8 mm
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 306.8 mm long, which is longer than 66% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
119.4 mm
Height
119.4 mm
▲ Better than 65% of models
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 119.4 mm tall, which is shorter than 64.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
▼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,000 g
Weight
1,000 g
▲ Better than 52% of models
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,000 g, which is lighter than 51.5% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    Base GPU clock
    2,340 MHz
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.1k MHz – >2.3k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4.2% higher boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    2,610 MHz
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1.4k MHz – >2.9k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2610 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,610 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    66
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <15 – >84
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    VRAM
    16 GB
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    66
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <0 – >84
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 80.7% higher texture rate
    Texture rate
    689 GTexel/s
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <107.4 GTexel/s – >879.3 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 50.1% higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    672.3 GB/s
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    Render output units (ROPs)
    96
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <32 – >128
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 9.2% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition
    the average graphics card
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.73 vs 8.000).
    8.73 vs 8
  • 11.7% better value for money
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.04 vs 7.2).
    8.04 vs 7.2
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    Base GPU clock
    2,340 MHz
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.1k MHz – >2.3k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4.2% higher boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    2,610 MHz
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1.4k MHz – >2.9k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2610 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,610 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    66
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <15 – >84
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    66
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <0 – >84
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 80.7% higher texture rate
    Texture rate
    689 GTexel/s
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <107.4 GTexel/s – >879.3 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    Render output units (ROPs)
    96
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <32 – >128
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 53.6% higher pixel rate
    Pixel rate
    250.6 GPixel/s
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <43.71 GPixel/s – >366.9 GPixel/s
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (250.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    250.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 95.4% higher FP32 performance
    FP32 performance
    44.1 TFLOPS
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 80 more TMUs
    Texture mapping units (TMUs)
    264
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <72 – >336
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (264 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    264 vs 184
  • 120 more AI cores
    Tensor/AI cores
    264
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <0 – >336
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (264 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    264 vs 144
  • 40.5% higher PassMark score
    PassMark (G3D) result
    31,830 points
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31830 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,830 points vs 22,653 points
  • 49.9% higher gaming score
    3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
    22,000 points
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <4k points – >34k points
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (22000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    22,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 60.1% higher ray tracing score
    3DMark Port Royal score
    14,677 points
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >25k points
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14677 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,677 points vs 9,166 points
  • 9.94x higher BF16 performance
    BF16 performance
    353 TFLOPS
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 TFLOPS – >209 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    353 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 2.92x higher INT8 performance
    INT8 performance
    706 TOPS
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 TOPS – >988 TOPS
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (706 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    706 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    VRAM
    16 GB
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 50.1% higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    672.3 GB/s
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache size
    48 MB
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <2 MB – >64 MB
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    L3 / Infinity Cache size
    48 MB
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <0 MB – >64 MB
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    Effective memory speed
    21,000 MHz
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 2x more transistors
    Number of transistors
    45,900 million
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <5k million – >53.9k million
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    45,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    HDMI version
    2.1a
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    HDMI FRL rate
    48 Gbps
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <0 Gbps – >48 Gbps
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • More NVENC sessions
    Max concurrent NVENC sessions
    12
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • No dual BIOS
    Dual BIOS
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    285 W
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <60 W – >360 W
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    GPU memory speed
    1,313 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.3k MHz – >2.4k MHz
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    750 W
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <450 W – >850 W
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • Older Vulkan version
    Vulkan version
    1.3
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 21.8 mm longer card length
    Length
    306.8 mm
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (306.8 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    306.8 mm vs 285 mm
  • 26.7% higher board power limit
    Board power limit
    285 W
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <100 W – >400 W
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (285 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    285 W vs 225 W
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    Max monitors per output type
    1
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 47.2% more expensive
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition is more expensive than the average graphics card (£780 vs £530).
    £780 vs £530
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    GPU memory speed
    1,313 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.3k MHz – >2.4k MHz
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older Vulkan version
    Vulkan version
    1.3
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older FSR version
    FSR versions
    3.0
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    Max monitors per output type
    1
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    NVDEC generation
    5
    ▲ Better than 39% of models
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • No dual BIOS
    Dual BIOS
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    285 W
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <60 W – >360 W
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    750 W
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <450 W – >850 W
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 26.7% higher board power limit
    Board power limit
    285 W
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <100 W – >400 W
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (285 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    285 W vs 225 W
  • 6.2 dB noisier under load
    Load noise level
    41.6 dB
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <28.8 dB – >42.9 dB
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41.6 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41.6 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    Max junction temperature (Tjmax)
    100 °C
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <88 °C – >110 °C
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 21.8 mm longer card length
    Length
    306.8 mm
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (306.8 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    306.8 mm vs 285 mm

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 236 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition?

  • Excellent thermal performance, typically maintaining temperatures under 71°C even at full load.
  • Noticeable performance uplift over the original non-Super variant, especially in ray-tracing and 1440p gaming.
  • Increased VRAM (16GB GDDR6X) provides better future-proofing and utility for prosumer tasks like video editing.
  • Relatively quiet operation under standard gaming loads with minimal reported coil whine.
  • Solid build quality featuring a metal backplate and a stylish triple-fan design.

What customers dislike about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition?

  • Higher power consumption compared to the non-Super 4070 Ti, occasionally drawing more power than an RTX 4080 in certain titles.
  • Unfavourable price-to-performance ratio compared to the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, which often costs less.
  • Oversized triple-slot design may not fit in smaller PC cases.
  • Limited overclocking headroom, with some reviews noting negligible performance gains from manual tuning.
  • Includes a bulky 12VHPWR adapter that can be difficult to manage in tight setups.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
au.pcmag.com
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
Zotac GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition Review
T
techpowerup.com
23/01/2024
Summary of the review
Zotac GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Review
H
hardware-mag.de
18/02/2024
Summary of the review
ZOTAC RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Trinity Black Test - Hardware-Mag
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity Black Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)