Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ750VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC
8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.9

Technical score

10%

9.1

User score

â–˛Better than 68% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

6.6

Price

â–˛Better than 70%
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.3

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

5.5

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–˛Better than 67%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.3

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–˛Better than 86%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.3

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

5.5

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.9
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.3

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.1
Popularity
Popularity
8.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC has a popularity score of 8.4 points, which is higher than that of 78.1% of products in this category.
8.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

6.6

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
23,000 points
This graphics card scores 23,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 73.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,457 points
This graphics card scores 14,457 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 69.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,526 points
This graphics card scores 31,526 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 75.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,283 points
This graphics card scores 18,283 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 71% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
40.55 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 40.55 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 71.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 285 W, which is higher than that of 66.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
351 W
This graphics card draws 351 W under peak load, which is higher than 84.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
320 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 320 W, which is higher than that of 74.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
Size
336x 140x 58 mm
Length
336 mm
This graphics card is 336 mm long, which is longer than 87.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 2% of graphics cards.
Height
140 mm
This graphics card is 140 mm tall, which is taller than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,580 g
This graphics card weighs 1,580 g, which is heavier than 77% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 5.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2640 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 37.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2640 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,640 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 64.3% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (626.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    626.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 79.7% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (40.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    40.55 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 13.3% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.06 vs 8.000).
    9.06 vs 8
  • 5.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2640 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 37.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2640 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,640 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 64.3% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (626.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    626.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 79.7% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (40.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    40.55 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 56 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (240 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    240 vs 184
  • 29.4% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (211.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    211.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 39.2% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31526 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,526 points vs 22,653 points
  • 56.7% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (23000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    23,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 57.7% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14457 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,457 points vs 9,166 points
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 51 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    336 mm vs 285 mm
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 41.5% more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (ÂŁ750 vs ÂŁ530).
    ÂŁ750 vs ÂŁ530
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 59.5% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (351 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    351 W vs 220 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 3.1 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (38.5 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    38.5 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 51 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    336 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 54.8% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1580 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,580 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

X
xda-developers.com
02/01/2024
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
08/06/2023
Summary of the review
T
tech-critter.com
24/03/2023
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
14/04/2023
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
04/01/2023
Summary of the review
E
en.gamegpu.com
28/02/2023
Summary of the review
P
popzara.com
11/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
14/04/2023
Summary of the review
M
me.ign.com
04/01/2023
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
04/01/2023
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
04/01/2023
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
28/03/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
04/01/2023
Summary of the review
L
lowyat.net
06/01/2023
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
04/01/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/01/2023
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
04/01/2023
Summary of the review
I
it.ign.com
05/01/2023
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
04/01/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC

  • Exceptional 1440p gaming performance with triple-digit frame rates in most titles
  • Efficient WindForce cooling system keeping temperatures under 65°C under load
  • Commendable power efficiency compared to previous generation flagships like the 3090 Ti
  • Dual BIOS switch allows for a choice between 'OC' performance and 'Silent' modes
  • Extended 4-year warranty available upon registration (higher than the industry standard 3 years)
  • Includes a functional anti-sag bracket to prevent PCB strain
  • Access to DLSS 3 and Frame Generation for significant performance boosts in supported games

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC

  • Premium price point that sits significantly above the base MSRP
  • Performance scaling at 4K resolution can be inconsistent in highly demanding titles
  • Large physical dimensions (336mm length) may not fit in smaller mid-tower cases
  • Gigabyte's RGB Fusion software is frequently cited as buggy or difficult to use
  • Lacks DisplayPort 2.1 support, being limited to DisplayPort 1.4a
  • Default 'OC' BIOS fan settings can be audible under heavy load compared to rivals

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC is a high-performance graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 7,680 CUDA cores and 12GB of high-speed GDDR6X VRAM on a 192-bit memory interface. It delivers a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2640 MHz and utilizes the WindForce cooling system with three 100mm fans, a vapor chamber, and seven composite copper heat pipes for superior thermal management. Main pros include exceptional 1440p gaming performance with DLSS 3 support, efficient power consumption at a 285W TGP, and a dual BIOS switch for a 'Silent' mode option. Notable cons include its large 3-slot physical footprint that may not fit all cases, the controversial 12VHPWR power connector requirement, and a significantly higher price point compared to its predecessor.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found