Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£620VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super
8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

7.7

Technical score

25%

8.5

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

9.0

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 71% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

â–²Better than 86%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.8

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.6

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

6.0

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

â–²Better than 63%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.4

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
8 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 92%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet

What reviewers say about the ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super

Based on 8 · 5

Reviewers praise the cool, quiet running and solid build, but it's a tight fit in many cases and value disappoints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.8

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.6

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

6.0

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

7.7
Reviews score
8.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
20,891 points
This graphics card scores 20,891 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 68.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,378 points
This graphics card scores 14,378 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 68.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
29,960 points
This graphics card scores 29,960 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 71.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
16,858 points
This graphics card scores 16,858 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 65.4% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
35.48 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 65.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 46% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 22.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 31.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
21,000 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 21,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 61.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
225 W
This graphics card draws 225 W under peak load, which is higher than 52.5% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
220 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W, which is lower than that of 49.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
301x 139x 63 mm
Length
301 mm
This graphics card is 301 mm long, which is longer than 60.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
139 mm
This graphics card is 139 mm tall, which is taller than 78.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.15 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.15 slot/s, which is wider than 89.2% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,179 g
This graphics card weighs 1,179 g, which is heavier than 58.9% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 3.6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,595 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,595 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 52% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (574.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    574.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 18.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    8 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 57% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (35.5 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    35.48 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 27.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (205.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    205.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 18.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    8 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 15.4% higher sentiment score
    9.0 vs 7.8
  • 4.8% better value for money
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.77 vs 7.4).
    7.77 vs 7.41
  • 3.6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,595 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,595 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 52% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (574.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    574.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 27.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (205.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    205.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 57% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (35.5 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    35.48 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 32.3% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (29,960 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    29,960 points vs 22,638 points
  • 57.2% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14,378 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    14,378 points vs 9,148 points
  • 41.4% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (20,891 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    20,891 points vs 14,779 points
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 6.3 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (29.1 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    29.1 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 0.65 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.15 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 14 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (139 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    139 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 18.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (301 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    301 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 0.65 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.15 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 14 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (139 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    139 mm vs 125 mm
  • 18.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (301 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    301 mm vs 282.2 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
The Tech Tank
≈ estimated
12/06/2024
Hands-on review · benchmarks, temperatures and power
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super is a solid, cool-running card, but its price and the upcoming next generation make it a tough sell.
8.0
GLITCHED
≈ estimated
17/01/2024
Hands-on review · 1440p benchmarks, temperatures and noise
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super is worth the extra money over the standard 4070 for 1440p, though some games need DLSS for playable frame rates.
10
Solo Gamer Chile
✓ explicit
17/01/2024
Hands-on review · game tests, cooling and noise
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super is an excellent card at the same price as the RTX 4070, but not worth upgrading from an RTX 4070.
7.0
A2K
≈ estimated
17/01/2024
Comparison · unboxing and test results
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super runs cooler but louder than the Founders Edition, so an ASUS TUF-level model is the minimum worth buying.
8.0
eTeknix
≈ estimated
17/01/2024
Comparison review · temperatures, noise and clock speeds
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super is cool and quiet with a premium look, though the Gigabyte card performs slightly better.
Overview video
Not graded
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

10
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
17/01/2024
Review · Factory-overclocked card
Verdict
ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER OC suits buyers who want a quiet mode and a factory overclock, though it is just over three slots thick.
7.0
guru3d.com
≈ estimated
17/01/2024
Review · Quiet triple-fan card
Verdict
ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER OC is a quiet, well-built card that performs close to the Founders Edition and suits buyers who want low noise.
8.0
en.overclocking.com
≈ estimated
17/01/2024
Benchmark review · 1440p game tests
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 SUPER OC sits between the RTX 4070 and RTX 4070 Ti, strong at 1440p but behind the Ti in several tests.
9.5
thefpsreview.com
✓ explicit
08/04/2024
Review · Overclocked triple-fan card
Verdict
ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER OC is a well-built card about 20% faster than the plain RTX 4070, but is large and needs a 750 W power supply.
9.0
en.gamegpu.com
≈ estimated
17/01/2024
Review · Appearance and cooling
Verdict
ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Gaming OC has a handy BIOS switch for quiet or performance mode, but it is bulky and suits only buyers with roomy cases.
10
hardzone.es
✓ explicit
17/01/2024
Lab review · Cooling and games
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 SUPER runs cool and quiet, hits over 100 FPS at Full HD, but is only slightly faster than the Founders Edition.
9.0
elchapuzasinformatico.com
≈ estimated
17/01/2024
Lab review · Temperature and noise
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 SUPER OC stays silent at idle and runs near 57°C under load, but its 301 mm length needs a roomy case.
8.0
tech.everyeye.it
≈ estimated
18/01/2024
Hands-on test · Cooling and noise
Verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 4070 SUPER stays quiet and cool under load, but its very large body only suits owners with big cases.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super

  • Exceptional thermal performance with low operating temperatures even under heavy load
  • Extremely quiet operation due to high-quality axial-tech fans
  • Rugged and sturdy build quality featuring a metal shroud and backplate
  • Significant performance boost over the standard RTX 4070, capable of smooth 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming
  • Excellent power efficiency relative to its performance level
  • Subtle and tasteful RGB lighting that doesn't overwhelm the aesthetic

What customers don't like about ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super

  • Large physical dimensions (3.15-slot thickness) may make it difficult to fit in smaller cases
  • Priced at a premium compared to base MSRP models and some AMD competitors
  • Memory is limited to 12GB, which some users find low for a card in this price tier
  • Requires a 16-pin 12VHPWR power connector, necessitating an adapter for older power supplies
  • Software like Armoury Crate can be cumbersome to use for controlling lighting

Verdict

The ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a high-performance 1440p graphics card built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 7,168 CUDA cores and 12GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus. This model is engineered with a 3.15-slot design, utilizing three Axial-tech fans for 21% more airflow and military-grade 20K capacitors for enhanced durability. Key advantages include its robust all-metal shroud, efficient thermal performance with sub-60°C operating temperatures under load, and exceptional support for DLSS 3.5 and advanced ray tracing. However, some users may find its large 301mm physical footprint challenging for smaller cases, and it carries a price premium over MSRP models despite having relatively limited VRAM for long-term 4K gaming.

Compare ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found