Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):304 W

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC
8.6/10

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.5

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

▲Better than 74% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

★Better than 96%
8.5

Technical score

Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.5

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.1

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 73%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 89%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.5

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.1

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

8.5
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
9.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC has a popularity score of 9.8 points, which is higher than that of 90.4% of products in this category.
9.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
23,347 points
This graphics card scores 23,347 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 74.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
18,500 points
This graphics card scores 18,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 81.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
26,904 points
This graphics card scores 26,904 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 61.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,996 points
This graphics card scores 15,996 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 63.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
48.66 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 48.66 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 79.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
640 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 640 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 65.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1a, which is more advanced than on 75.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 80.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
304 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 304 W, which is higher than that of 77.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
330 W
This graphics card draws 330 W under peak load, which is higher than 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
330 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 330 W, which is higher than that of 79% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
320 W
Show more
Size
288x 132x 56 mm
This graphics card measures 288x132x 56 mm, which is larger than 55.9% of graphics cards.
Length
288 mm
This graphics card is 288 mm long, which is longer than 51% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
132 mm
This graphics card is 132 mm tall, which is taller than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,260 g
This graphics card weighs 1,260 g, which is heavier than 63.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 22.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (3060 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    3,060 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 2.06x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (783.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    783.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 2.4x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (391.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    391.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 24 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    64 vs 40
  • 2.22x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (50.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    50.14 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 24 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    64 vs 40
  • 15.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.22 vs 8.000).
    9.22 vs 8
  • 13.4% better value for money
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.16 vs 7.2).
    8.16 vs 7.2
  • 2.32x more popular
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC is more popular than the average graphics card (9.77 vs 4.2).
    9.77 vs 4.22
  • 22.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (3060 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    3,060 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 2.06x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (783.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    783.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 2.4x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (391.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    391.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 24 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    64 vs 40
  • 2.22x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (50.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    50.14 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 24 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    64 vs 40
  • 72 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    256 vs 184
  • 2.02x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (18500 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    18,500 points vs 9,166 points
  • 59.1% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (23347 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    23,347 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 3.27x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.6 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.57 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3.37x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (100.3 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    100.3 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 42.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,500 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 42.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 2.35x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (53900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    53,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 1.4a).
    2.1a vs 1.4a
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 2.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 12 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (55 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    55 °C vs 67 °C
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 41.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (304 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    304 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3 vs 8
  • 13.5% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1660 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,660 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 46.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (330 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    330 W vs 225 W
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 13.5% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1660 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,660 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 16 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (128 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    128 vs 144
  • 66.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (8 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    8 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3 vs 8
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 41.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (304 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    304 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 46.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (330 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    330 W vs 225 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 20 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (57 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    57 °C vs 37 °C
  • 50% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (330 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    330 W vs 220 W
  • 7 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (132 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    132 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techspot.com
21/07/2025
Summary of the review
H
hardwarezone.com.sg
29/05/2025
Summary of the review
H
hwcooling.net
11/03/2025
Summary of the review
E
en.overclocking.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
H
hwcooling.net
12/11/2025
Summary of the review
E
en.overclocking.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
D
digitalcitizen.life
13/08/2025
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
09/03/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC

  • Excellent thermal performance with peak temperatures often staying below 60°C in balanced setups
  • Strong 1440p gaming performance, delivering high frame rates even at max settings
  • Robust build quality featuring a reinforced metal backplate for added durability
  • Appreciated extra features such as dual BIOS (Silent/Performance) and power indicator lights
  • Generally quiet operation, especially when using the Silent BIOS profile

What we don't like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC

  • Large physical dimensions (288mm length) that may require careful clearance checks in mid-tower cases
  • High fan noise (up to 60dB) reported when fans reach 100% speed or are pushed hard
  • Lack of an included support bracket despite the card's significant weight
  • Reports of high hotspot or VRAM temperatures in cases with poor airflow
  • Minor driver stability issues noted by some users, including occasional crashes or timeouts

Verdict

The Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC is a high-performance graphics card built on AMD's RDNA 4 architecture, featuring 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit interface and 4,096 stream processors. It comes factory overclocked with a boost clock up to 3,060 MHz and utilizes the Windforce cooling system with triple alternate-spinning Hawk fans and a large copper vapor chamber for thermal efficiency. Key strengths include excellent 1440p and 4K gaming performance, support for FSR 4 upscaling, and a robust physical build with a dual BIOS switch and reinforced metal backplate. However, the card is quite large at 288mm in length, lacks an included support bracket despite its weight, and can become notably loud under heavy loads in performance mode.

Compare GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found