Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£610VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):317 W

Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT
8.6/10

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.6

Technical score

10%

8.8

User score

▲Better than 76% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

7.3

Price

★Better than 96%
8.6

Technical score

Technical score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.8

Performance

24%

8.7

Memory

12%

7.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

6.6

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 75%
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 80%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT

Technical score
Technical score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.8

Performance

24%

8.7

Memory

12%

7.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

6.6

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

8.6
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.8
Popularity
Popularity
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT has a popularity score of 8.5 points, which is higher than that of 78.9% of products in this category.
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

7.3

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
29,660 points
This graphics card scores 29,660 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 88.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
18,240 points
This graphics card scores 18,240 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 81% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
26,904 points
This graphics card scores 26,904 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 61.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,093 points
This graphics card scores 15,093 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 61.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
49.32 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 49.32 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
644.6 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 67.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1a, which is more advanced than on 75.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 80.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
317 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 317 W, which is higher than that of 79.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
317 W
This graphics card draws 317 W under peak load, which is higher than 76.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
317 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 317 W, which is higher than that of 74.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
317 W
Show more
Size
320x 120x 61.6 mm
Length
320 mm
This graphics card is 320 mm long, which is longer than 73.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.4% of graphics cards.
Height
120.25 mm
This graphics card is 120.25 mm tall, which is shorter than 58.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,233 g
This graphics card weighs 1,233 g, which is heavier than 62.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 20.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (3010 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    3,010 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 25% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2.36x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (385.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    385.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.02x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (770.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    770.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 24 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    64 vs 40
  • 2.16x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (48.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    48.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 10.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.85 vs 8.000).
    8.85 vs 8
  • 14.5% better value for money
    Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.24 vs 7.2).
    8.24 vs 7.2
  • 20.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (3010 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    3,010 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 25% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2.36x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (385.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    385.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.02x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (770.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    770.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 24 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    64 vs 40
  • 24 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (64 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    64 vs 40
  • 2.16x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (48.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    48.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 72 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    256 vs 184
  • 2.02x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (29660 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    29,660 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 99% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (18240 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    18,240 points vs 9,166 points
  • 3.21x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.5 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.54 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3.32x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (98.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    98.63 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 2.15x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (49.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    49.32 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 43.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2518 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 43.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (644.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    644.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 2.35x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (53900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    53,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 1.4a).
    2.1a vs 1.4a
  • 2.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 47.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (317 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    317 W vs 215 W
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (RDNA 4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    RDNA 4 vs 8
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • 35 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (320 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    320 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 16 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (128 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    128 vs 144
  • 75% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (32 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    32 vs 128
  • 66.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (8 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    8 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (RDNA 4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    RDNA 4 vs 8
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3.0
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 47.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (317 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    317 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 40.9% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (317 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    317 W vs 225 W
  • 50% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (18 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    18 W vs 12 W
  • 44.1% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (317 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    317 W vs 220 W
  • 35 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (320 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    320 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
digitalfoundry.net
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
T
techporn.ph
07/05/2026
Summary of the review
L
lowyat.net
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
H
hwcooling.net
17/03/2025
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
05/03/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT

  • Competitive pricing, typically offering better value-per-frame than Nvidia's RTX 5070 series
  • Excellent cooling performance, often staying below 55°C on the GPU core under load
  • Very quiet operation with minimal fan noise and little to no coil whine
  • Sleek all-white aesthetic with a metal backplate and customizable ARGB lighting
  • Strong ray-tracing improvements compared to previous AMD generations
  • High-quality build and robust 8-pin power connectors rather than proprietary 12VHPWR

What we don't like about Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT

  • AI and LLM benchmark performance lags significantly behind Nvidia competitors
  • Large physical size (32cm length, triple-slot) may not fit in smaller cases
  • Minor finish issues reported by some, such as slight radiator warping or paint markings
  • Driver instability, including occasional timeouts and crashes, noted by some early users
  • Limited availability at launch often leads to third-party price markups

Verdict

The Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT is a high-performance graphics card built on the AMD RDNA 4 architecture, featuring 64 Compute Units, 4,096 stream processors, and a substantial 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. This specific factory-overclocked model delivers a boost clock of up to 3,010 MHz and a game clock of 2,460 MHz, utilizing a 14-phase digital power design and a raised 317W power limit for enhanced stability. Its signature white aesthetic is paired with the Tri-X Cooling Technology, which includes three AeroCurve fans and a high-conductivity Honeywell PTM7950 thermal interface to maintain low temperatures, often reaching only 55°C under load. Main pros include its exceptional 1440p and 4K rasterization performance—often rivaling higher-tier competitors—and its support for modern standards like DisplayPort 2.1a and PCIe 5.0. However, cons include ray tracing performance that still lags behind equivalent NVIDIA hardware in intensive titles and reported stability issues when using early versions of frame generation technologies.

Compare Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found