Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.7

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

â–²Better than 61% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

â–²Better than 70%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.6

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 62%
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 94%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.6

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.7
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super has a popularity score of 5.2 points, which is higher than that of 54.5% of products in this category.
5.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
22,809 points
This graphics card scores 22,809 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 73.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,677 points
This graphics card scores 14,677 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 70.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
29,959 points
This graphics card scores 29,959 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 70.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
17,049 points
This graphics card scores 17,049 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
35.48 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 35.48 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 64.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 53.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
220 W
This graphics card draws 220 W under peak load, which is lower than 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
245 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 245 W, which is higher than that of 53.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
Size
267x 112x 42 mm
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
42 mm
This graphics card is 42 mm tall, which is shorter than 98% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,027 g
This graphics card weighs 1,027 g, which is heavier than 50.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 83 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (42 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    42 mm vs 125 mm
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 45.4% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (554.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    554.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 57.2% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (35.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    35.48 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 45.4% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (554.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    554.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 57.2% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (35.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    35.48 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 55.4% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (22809 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    22,809 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 21.3% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (198 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    198 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 60.1% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14677 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,677 points vs 9,166 points
  • 32.3% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (29959 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    29,959 points vs 22,653 points
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 83 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (42 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    42 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 1.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2475 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,475 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • 9.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.30 vs 8.000).
    7.3 vs 8
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 9.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.30 vs 8.000).
    7.3 vs 8
  • 1.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2475 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,475 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

X
xda-developers.com
28/02/2024
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
17/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
17/01/2024
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
16/02/2024
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
C
club386.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
A
arstechnica.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
17/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
17/01/2024
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
V
vandal.elespanol.com
17/01/2024
Summary of the review
H
hardzone.es
16/01/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super

  • Significant performance increase over the non-Super model, often matching or exceeding the RTX 3090 in 1440p gaming.
  • Exceptional power efficiency, delivering high performance with relatively low power draw compared to previous generations.
  • Strong ray-tracing capabilities and access to NVIDIA's full feature stack, including DLSS 3 Frame Generation and Reflex.
  • Generally excellent thermal performance across most models, maintaining cool and quiet operation even under heavy load.
  • Great value at its launch price, offering nearly RTX 4070 Ti levels of performance for significantly less money.
  • Founders Edition features a popular, sleek all-black 'stealth' design that fits well in various case aesthetics.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super

  • VRAM capacity is still limited to 12GB, which many users feel may be a bottleneck for future games at 4K resolution.
  • The 192-bit memory bus is seen as narrow for a card in this price tier, limiting its high-resolution bandwidth potential.
  • Higher power consumption (220W TGP) compared to the original RTX 4070's 200W.
  • Stiff competition from AMD's Radeon RX 7800 XT, which often provides better pure rasterisation value for a lower price.
  • The 16-pin (12VHPWR) power connector requires an adapter for most older power supplies, which can make cable management difficult.
  • While performance is high, some reviewers note that the raw rasterisation uplift isn't as revolutionary as the software-assisted gains (DLSS).

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Super is a high-performance mid-to-high-end graphics card built on the 5nm Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 7,168 CUDA cores, 224 Tensor cores, 56 Ray Tracing cores, and 12GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 192-bit interface with a 504 GB/s bandwidth. Operating with a 1980 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost clock, its main strengths include significant performance gains of roughly 15-20% over the original RTX 4070, excellent energy efficiency at a 220W TGP, and a strong value proposition for 1440p gaming with access to DLSS 3 Frame Generation. Its primary drawbacks are the lack of a VRAM increase over its predecessor, staying at 12GB, and the shift to the newer 16-pin 12VHPWR power connector which may require an adapter for older power supplies.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found