OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

DJI Avata 360 Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£830Max flight time:18 minVideo resolution:8K/60 fpsMax transmission distance:20 km

DJI Avata 360 Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 60 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.2

▲Better than 86% of drones

8.2

▲Better than 86% of drones

8.3

▲Better than 64% of drones

9.5
Aerial photography
Aerial photography
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Rewards a large camera sensor, high photo resolution, a high megapixel count and a wide aperture.
When it matters
When image quality, high display fidelity, and reliable cameras are essential for your daily workflow.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
9.2
Sensor size
25.0%
10
Photo resolution
20.0%
10
Main camera megapixels
20.0%
8.9
Aperture
8.4
Filmmaking
Filmmaking
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Rewards high video resolution, wide dynamic range, a high bitrate, gimbal stabilization and flat color profiles.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this drones meets your specific filmmaking needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
25.0%
10
Video resolution
20.0%
8.2
Video dynamic range
20.0%
10
Max movie bitrate
20.0%
4.0
Gimbal axes
15.0%
9.4
Color profiles
9.6
Beginners
Beginners
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Rewards obstacle detection, automatic return to home, stable hovering and intelligent flight modes that make first flights safer.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this drones meets your specific beginners needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
10
Hover accuracy (horizontal)
25.0%
10
Obstacle detection
25.0%
10
Return to Home (RTH)
20.0%
?
N. of intelligent flight modes
7.0
Travel
Travel
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Rewards low weight, long flight time and short charging time.
When it matters
When prioritizing long battery endurance, compact weight, and dependable on-the-go connectivity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
7.3
Weight
30.0%
4.2
Max flight time
25.0%
10
Charging time
8.9
Long range
Long range
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Rewards long transmission and flight distance, low video latency and a sharp live view.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this drones meets your specific long range needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
10
Max transmission distance
30.0%
7.7
Max flight distance
20.0%
8.6
Live view quality
15.0%
9.3
Transmission latency
9.5
Sports tracking
Sports tracking
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Rewards subject tracking, high flight speed, obstacle sensing in many directions and wind resistance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this drones meets your specific sports tracking needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
10
Subject tracking
25.0%
8.9
Max flight speed
20.0%
10
Obstacle sensing directions
15.0%
8.7
Max wind resistance

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone DJI Avata 360

8.2

Show more

Hide

Flight

7.4

Show more

Hide

Max flight time

Max flight distance

Max flight speed

Max wind resistance

Max service ceiling (ASL)

Show more

What reviewers say

Max flight speed, Max wind resistance

trustedreviews.com: Stays quick and precise in breezy coastal wind, reaching about 40mph in Sport Mode
notebookcheck.net: Smooth, easy handling with the RC 2 across Cine, Normal and Sport modes
cgmagonline.com: Stayed controllable while flying low in winds of about 20 km/h
photographylife.com: Much livelier and faster than a Mini Pro, hitting 18 m/s in Sport mode
basic-tutorials.com: Normal mode speed can be raised from 12 to 16 m/s in the settings
eftm.com: Easy to learn even with almost no drone experience
tg24.sky.it: Beginners can fly it easily after about an hour of practice
techprincess.it: Quick and responsive, up to 18 m/s for chasing sports
focustech.it: Can take off without GPS and return from tight spots like balconies
global.techradar.com: Agile and responsive, even in strong seaside wind
drone-technologie.fr: Easy step into immersive shots for those new to FPV
connect.de: Easy to learn, since it holds position when you let go of the sticks
netzwelt.de: Return-to-home route is shown on the remote screen
MichasWelt: Beginner flights show how easy it is to learn
DM Productions: Fun to fly and capture unusual angles
Mark McGee Photos: Fun to fly, with camera angles no other drone can match
Gadget Pilipinas: Easy to fly, even without FPV experience
Pavel Kaplun: Suitable for beginners and professionals alike
iBordelais: Easy to fly with predictable behaviour, a good entry point for beginners
Mac4Ever: Easy to fly, with low-speed modes
Monsport06: Smart return-to-home that works without satellite connection
Gianmarco Palazzo: Very fun to fly

trustedreviews.com: No landing gear, so you need flat ground or the landing mat to take off; No full acro mode for experienced FPV pilots, and DJI has no plans to add one
cgmagonline.com: Top speed of 18 m/s, down from 27 m/s on the Avata 2, and only Easy Acro instead of full acro
basic-tutorials.com: No acro flying without stabilization, only Easy ACRO
reparation-drone.com: Flies with more assistance than a true FPV drone
smartworld.it: Struggled in wind that didn't seem strong, though it stayed stable; Not one for people who mainly enjoy flying
tech.everyeye.it: Heavier and slower to react than the Neo 2, so it needs more experience; Can't take off from your hand, so you need a clear take-off spot
dronezine.it: Rocks noticeably in a light breeze and while hovering; Crashed twice in Acro mode on beta firmware, and Acro has since been removed
tg24.sky.it: Return to Home sometimes landed up to 20 cm off the take-off point
hwupgrade.it: No full Acro mode at launch
tuttotech.net: Drifts several centimeters with every gust of wind
global.techradar.com: No landing gear, so it needs flat ground or the landing pad from the Fly More Combo; No fully unassisted FPV flying mode
basic-tutorials.de: No full Acro flying, only the simpler Easy ACRO
Hubert Aile: No acro mode yet for pure stick flying
Mattia Antonelli: No acro mode yet, so pure stick flying is not possible
Hugh Hou: Not a true FPV drone, so it is a poor pick for FPV flying
Amok Time Flies: FPV feels a little slow; No full-control mode for power loops and split S's
DM Productions: Not the right first drone for a beginner
VeloTOTAL-TV: Landing is tricky in windy conditions
iBordelais: Not suited to experienced FPV pilots, as acro mode was removed
Mac4Ever: Less responsive than expected for freestyle flying
Monsport06: No acro mode, and the FPV acro feel falls well short of an Avata 2; Sensitive to wind, and a lot of inertia in flight
Drone Technology: Odd wind resistance from its flat shape, and no full-control mode
Tecnoandroid: Landing does not always hit the intended spot
DronEzine: Crashes during acro FPV flying and beta firmware problems

Camera

8.0

Show more

Hide

Video resolution

4K camera

Sensor size

Main camera megapixels

Max movie bitrate

Show more

What reviewers say

Video resolution, Field of view

firstquadcopter.com: Camera turns forward for normal 4K 60fps video when you don't need 360°
notebookcheck.net: Switches between 360° capture and forward-facing 4K
space.com: Single-lens 4K 60fps mode needs no reframing
cgmagonline.com: Lets you get shots that were impossible before, like a low reverse shot along a river just by flying forward
projectgo.pro: Fly first and choose the angle later for YouTube, Instagram or TikTok
reparation-drone.com: Films 8K 360° at 60fps, so you can choose the framing after the flight
techprincess.it: Cut 8K 360° footage into 16:9 or 9:16 clips for TikTok and Instagram
cined.com: Lets you film dynamic moving subjects that other drones can't manage
chip.de: Single-lens mode films normal UHD video you can share without editing
slashcam.de: Just fly past a subject and choose the framing later
drohnen.de: One flight gives many camera angles to pick from later; FPV flying and 360 recording in one drone; 8K 360 footage leaves lots of room for reframing in editing; More usable clips per flight for social media creators
maclife.de: Switches between 360° and a single-lens mode with 4K/60fps HDR
dronewatch.nl: No need to watch the framing while flying, since everything is captured
frankwandelt.nl: Single-lens mode films ordinary video in 4K/60fps or 2.7K/120fps
Mads Tech: Single-lens mode holds up well compared with the Avata 2
MichasWelt: Single-lens mode flies like a classic drone
Mattia Antonelli: Strong video quality, with framing chosen in post
Albert Bermejo: Reframing 360 footage for vertical and horizontal formats
Bright: Reframes shots after flying, thanks to full 360° capture; Good results for skilled pilots who know the 360 workflow
Air Photography: Full 360 preview of footage in the app and goggles
fabreezy: Punch-in reframing of 360 footage without losing quality; Single-lens mode works like a standard drone for quick shots
Learn Online Video: Powerful creative tool that lets you reframe shots after flying; Single-lens mode gives ready-to-use clips without importing into DJI Studio
Stewart and Alina: Reframing in post allows shots that no other drone can match
Unbox PH: Reframe 360 footage in post for a second chance at the shot
Gadget Pilipinas: 360 recording lets you edit the footage later in DJI Studio
VeloTOTAL-TV: Shoot 360° footage now and choose the framing later; 360° shots that other drones cannot easily capture
Pavel Kaplun: 360 footage lets you reframe shots in many formats later
iBordelais: One flight gives many shots in horizontal or vertical formats
Drone Technology: Much more comfortable for a few very specific shots
Tecnoandroid: Three flying modes in one: 360, FPV and classic; Reframing 360 footage after the flight gives plenty of creative freedom
Vincenzo Langella - Vince Tech: Full 360 capture lets you choose the framing after the flight; HDR video in single-lens mode up to 4K at 60 fps
DronEzine: Choice of 360 mode or single front lens for classic footage
Gianmarco Palazzo: Unique footage, since every shot is different
Aprende Video en Línea: Reframing freedom after filming, so no need to aim while flying; Cinematic shots possible from a single clip

projectgo.pro: FPV pilots lose the fun of framing shots live
focustech.it: Single-lens mode is limited to 4K 60fps
tuttotech.net: Tops out at 60fps, so no slow motion
Mattia Antonelli: No hyperlapse feature yet
fabreezy: Single-lens mode is limited to 4K 60 and has no ND filters

Sensor size, Main camera megapixels, Video dynamic range, Photo resolution

trustedreviews.com: Strong 8K 60fps 10-bit 360° video from two 64MP sensors
projectgo.pro: 8K 360° video in 10-bit D-Log M leaves lots of room for color editing
smartworld.it: Two 1/1.1-inch sensors give 8K 60fps HDR footage that still looks sharp after cropping
tomshw.it: Tilt gimbal plus electronic stabilization keeps footage steady
dronezine.it: Footage stays smooth even when the drone sways
tg24.sky.it: Well-stabilized footage with balanced colors
hwupgrade.it: Two 64MP 1/1.1-inch sensors record 8K 60fps and stitch the drone out of the shot; 10-bit D-Log M for color grading
focustech.it: Still gives 1080p 60fps after cropping to a 100° view
tuttotech.net: 8K HDR handles strong contrast well and copes in fading light
global.techradar.com: Two 1/1.1-inch sensors give detailed 10-bit footage
dronexperts.io: 8K 360 video at up to 60 fps, with 10-bit D-Log M
chip.de: 8K 360 video at 60 fps, twice the Antigravity A1's frame rate
gamestar.de: No ugly lens flare when flying toward the sun; 120MP photos look sharp and lively
frankwandelt.nl: 8K/60fps 360° video with the drone hidden from the shot
MichasWelt: Video quality is good, especially in low light
Hubert Aile: Best image quality the creator has tested on a 360 drone
Flying Filmmaker: 10-bit colour and footage that looks better than the Anti-Gravity A1
fabreezy: 8K 60 footage with 10-bit D-Log that grades easily
Learn Online Video: 8K 60 footage with 10-bit D-Log colour
Hugh Hou: The only 360 drone offering 8K 60fps in 10-bit colour; Clean image capture that suits careful grading and upscaling
Mark McGee Photos: 8K 60fps footage with D-Log M colour and 120 megapixel photos
Gautier Veltri: Good 360 camera for its class
Mac4Ever: Pro-level 8K sensor and 42 GB of internal storage
Monsport06: Clearly better image than the Antigravity A1 at dusk and dawn
Tecnoandroid: Image quality with HDR recovers detail in shadows and highlights
Aprende Video en Línea: 8K 360 footage with 10-bit D-Log colour

trustedreviews.com: Air 3S and Mavic 4 Pro produce better image quality
firstquadcopter.com: Fisheye lenses lack the fine detail of Air and Mini drones
notebookcheck.net: Image gets softer when you reframe or zoom in on the 8K footage; Noise and flicker indoors and under cloudy skies
space.com: Image quality falls short of standard camera drones
projectgo.pro: Reframed shots have lower resolution than an Avata 2 or Mini 4 Pro
basic-tutorials.com: Image quality drops when you crop heavily into the 360° footage
eftm.com: Photos look odd because still shots only come from the 360° lenses
reparation-drone.com: Image quality is a bit behind the best regular camera drones
global.techradar.com: Other DJI drones still give better image quality
cined.com: Reframed 8K footage loses detail compared with regular filming
connect.de: Image quality is only fair
netzwelt.de: Bright areas of the footage blow out to white
drone-zone.de: Fixed focus starts at 1.5 m, so very close subjects can look soft
maclife.de: 360° video looks fairly coarse, for example when watched on a Vision Pro
gamestar.de: Grain at the edges in leaves, grass and shadows, even with D-Log M; The 8K figure combines two 4K lenses, so cropping to a normal frame lowers sharpness further
frankwandelt.nl: Video quality falls behind other DJI drones, especially in low light
Hubert Aile: Image quality trails stabilized drones such as the Mini 5 Pro
Albert Bermejo: Image quality trails 1-inch sensor drones such as the Mini 5 Pro; Less suited to professional filmmaking
Air Photography: Not the best choice for cinematography or aerial photos
Flying Filmmaker: 360 image quality still trails single-direction drones
Hugh Hou: Looks softer than the rival drone at first glance
Stewart and Alina: Reframed image quality falls short of the Mini 5 Pro
Amok Time Flies: A 16:9 crop looks well short of 4K, despite the 8K claim
Mark McGee Photos: Image quality trails the Mavic 4 Pro and Air for cinematic work
VeloTOTAL-TV: Not a replacement for a conventional drone with a mechanical gimbal for top video quality
Gautier Veltri: Image quality is not exceptional next to dedicated cameras
iBordelais: Pure image quality falls short of the Mavic 4 Pro or R3S
Monsport06: Final render from the 360 footage cannot match a stabilized drone such as the Mini 5 Pro
Drone Technology: Image quality clearly trails the Mini and Flip drones

Safety

9.3

Show more

Hide

Obstacle detection

Return to Home (RTH)

GPS

GNSS systems supported

Obstacle sensing directions

Show more

What reviewers say

Propeller guards, Weather sealing (splashproof)

digitalcameraworld.com: Guarded frame survived bumps into trees; Camera block turns on landing, so the lenses never touch the ground
firstquadcopter.com: Scratched front lenses can be swapped at home without sending the drone in for repair
notebookcheck.net: Solid, well-made body
space.com: Strong cinewhoop build that copes with flying through forests
cgmagonline.com: Took several crashes in Sport mode without damage, even to the original propellers
photographylife.com: Spray from a waterfall didn't cause any problems
basic-tutorials.com: Lenses are user-replaceable, so no repair trip is needed for scratches
eftm.com: Robust build that feels ready for minor crashes
reparation-drone.com: Built-in propeller guards plus obstacle sensing in every direction; Lenses can be replaced if damaged, so repairs are simpler
tech.everyeye.it: Damaged lenses can be swapped at home with a spare kit, with no repair shop trip
techprincess.it: Built-in propeller guards for flying close to things
cined.com: Lens cover included, and scratched lenses can be swapped at home with a kit; Propeller guards make indoor flying safer
netzwelt.de: Lenses and propellers can be replaced at home after a crash
slashcam.de: Sturdy propeller guards turned collisions into small wobbles instead of crashes
basic-tutorials.de: Camera module turns automatically after takeoff, so the lenses never rest on the ground; Front lenses can be swapped by the owner, no need to send the drone in for repair
dronewatch.nl: Prop guards and a sturdy frame let you fly close to objects
MichasWelt: Prop guards protect the propellers and camera
Mattia Antonelli: Sturdy: survived bumps into objects and the camera stayed intact
Albert Bermejo: Tough build suited to extreme sports
Flying Filmmaker: Compact, and tough enough to survive hitting bare branches
Hugh Hou: Sealed ports make it safer to fly in varied weather; Lens cover is convenient to pack
Mark McGee Photos: Integrated propeller guard for safer close-range shots
Mac4Ever: Very well protected against crashes
Monsport06: Protected propellers make it reassuring and allow closer flying

photographylife.com: Not waterproof, so rain and clouds are a risk
cined.com: Lenses stick out and scratch easily
dronewatch.nl: Protruding lenses look vulnerable, so a landing pad comes in the box
Bright: Lenses scratch and break too easily
Learn Online Video: Exposed lenses need wiping before every flight
Gautier Veltri: Lens more exposed to damage, and regulation is stricter abroad
Drone Technology: Crashes as easily as a Neo 2 when pushed, and lacks turtle mode
Aprende Video en Línea: Exposed lenses need careful cleaning, as dust and water show

Obstacle detection, Obstacle sensing directions

smartworld.it: LiDAR obstacle sensing keeps working down to 1 lux, almost dark
tech.everyeye.it: APAS steers around obstacles while you keep control in Cine and Normal modes
hwupgrade.it: LiDAR and infrared sensors detect obstacles even in low light
focustech.it: Front LiDAR spots obstacles and brakes even at 1 lux
chip.de: Omnidirectional obstacle detection with forward LiDAR
connect.de: Omnidirectional obstacle detection warns you and brakes automatically
netzwelt.de: Obstacle detection worked reliably, even in the dark
drone-zone.de: LiDAR obstacle detection proved very reliable in testing
maclife.de: All-round obstacle sensing plus a front LiDAR that still brakes for obstacles in the dark
gamestar.de: Obstacle sensing braked in time when flying toward thick branches at 16 m/s
frankwandelt.nl: All-round obstacle sensing helped by LiDAR and infrared sensors
Mattia Antonelli: Advanced obstacle avoidance helps beginners fly with less worry
Stewart and Alina: Obstacle avoidance gives confidence for adventurous tracking
Gadget Pilipinas: Sensors around the body make flying feel safer
VeloTOTAL-TV: Obstacle detection makes flying feel safer
Pavel Kaplun: Obstacle detection makes flying feel safe for beginners
iBordelais: Omnidirectional obstacle detection feels reassuring near people and indoors

photographylife.com: Obstacle sensing missed thin branches and the drone hit a spruce; Obstacle detection switches off in Sport mode
basic-tutorials.com: All-round obstacle sensing works only in 360° mode, and none at all in Sport mode
tech.everyeye.it: Obstacle sensing only works forward in single-lens 4K mode
chip.de: Obstacle detection missed glass in testing
netzwelt.de: Sensors are oversensitive: overhanging branches stopped it following a bike
slashcam.de: Thin branches still fool the obstacle sensors
drone-zone.de: All-round obstacle detection works only in 360 mode, not single-lens
basic-tutorials.de: Obstacle sensing works all round only in 360° mode and switches off in Sport mode

Connectivity

8.8

Show more

Hide

Max transmission distance

Transmission latency

Video transmission system

Live view quality

Remote control

Show more

What reviewers say

Remote control, Controller model

trustedreviews.com: Fly alone with the RC 2 or put on Goggles N3 for first-person flying
digitalcameraworld.com: Goggles are optional because the RC 2 works for solo flying
firstquadcopter.com: Older Goggles 3 worked fine after a firmware update
notebookcheck.net: Head tracking in the goggles lets you look around freely while flying
space.com: Works with RC 2, RC-N2, RC-N3 or goggles with a motion controller
cgmagonline.com: RC 2 support adds subject tracking and a built-in training simulator
projectgo.pro: Uses the same controller and goggles as the Avata 2
photographylife.com: Flying with goggles feels like sitting in a 3D cinema; RC Motion 3 steering by tilting your hand felt natural quickly
basic-tutorials.com: Flies like any DJI Mini or Air with the RC 2, with no spotter needed; More precise head tracking than the Avata 2
reparation-drone.com: Immersive, intuitive flying with FPV goggles and the motion controller
tomshw.it: Fly with the DJI RC 2 or with Goggles N3 and RC Motion 3
dronezine.it: Flies with Motion Controller 3, RC 2, RC N3 or FPV Remote Controller 3
tg24.sky.it: Goggles work fine for people who wear glasses
hwupgrade.it: Picture In Picture with Motion Controller 3 shows the side and rear views
techprincess.it: Goggles N3 are comfortable with bright, sharp screens
global.techradar.com: Fly with the RC 2 two-stick remote or with Goggles N3 and RC Motion 3
dronexperts.io: Head Tracking in the goggles lets you look around while the drone flies on
drone-technologie.fr: Works with classic RC-N3, RC-N2 and RC 2 remotes; Also flies with goggles, motion controller or FPV remote
cined.com: Flies on the RC 2 like a normal drone, so no observer is needed
slashcam.de: Head tracking in the goggles gives a full look-around view, like flying as a bird
drone-zone.de: Works with RC 2 and RC-N3, so it can fly like a regular camera drone; Head tracking with Goggles N3 shows a small forward view when you look back
basic-tutorials.de: Flies like any DJI Mini or Air with the RC 2, no goggles or spotter needed; Head tracking with Goggles and RC Motion 3 is more precise than on the Avata 2
gamestar.de: Can be flown with a normal remote, so no second person is needed
dronewatch.nl: Flies just like other DJI camera drones with the RC 2 Smart Controller
frankwandelt.nl: Fly with FPV goggles or with a standard two-stick remote
Mads Tech: 360 mode gives a full view with no head-tracking yaw problems; Works with existing goggles and with the RC 2 remote
Hubert Aile: Flies with radio control or goggles, very versatile
Albert Bermejo: Fun first-person flying with goggles and simple controls
Air Photography: Can be flown with a standard controller, not only with goggles
Flying Filmmaker: Can be flown with regular sticks, so goggles are not needed; Head tracking in the goggles adds to the motion controller
fabreezy: Enjoyable to fly, especially with the motion controller
DM Productions: Immersive live preview lets you look around a location
Unbox PH: Works with the RC 2 for a more traditional flying experience
Gadget Pilipinas: Goggles give a first-person view of what the drone sees
Tecnoandroid: Several controller options, including Goggles N3 with Motion 3
Vincenzo Langella - Vince Tech: Several controllers, including RC2 and Goggles N3 with Motion Controller 3

firstquadcopter.com: Many older DJI controllers and goggles won't work, including RC-N1, RC Pro and Goggles 2
notebookcheck.net: Takeoff was blocked by a skipped firmware update, and pairing the gear is frustrating
eftm.com: Pairing the goggles was finicky and needed a reset
techprincess.it: RC Motion 3 takes a few calm flights to get used to
tuttotech.net: Goggles only work with Motion Controller 3, not with RC 2 or RC-N3
dronexperts.io: Goggle flying still requires a visual observer
chip.de: Flying with goggles while recording 360 is tricky for beginners
connect.de: RC 2 screen is hard to read in bright sunlight
slashcam.de: Looking backward in the goggles can make you lose track of direction
dronewatch.nl: Motion Controller took time to get used to, and the more precise FPV Remote Controller is not included
Mads Tech: Some features only work with Goggles 3 or N3, not with the RC 2
MichasWelt: Goggles and motion controller require a spotter for commercial pilots
Flying Filmmaker: Goggles are less comfortable than the Goggles 3 or Insta360 goggles; Motion controller feels less intuitive than the Anti-Gravity one; Goggle menus feel less refined than on the Anti-Gravity A1
Gadget Pilipinas: Goggles and FPV controller setup feel intimidating at first
Pavel Kaplun: Flying with goggles is safer with a spotter present; Beginners are better off starting with the controller
Tecnoandroid: Better suited to users already in the DJI ecosystem

Companion app

tech.everyeye.it: Keyframe editing in DJI Studio is easy to learn if you've edited video before
tomshw.it: One Tap Edit in DJI Fly makes share-ready clips in seconds
focustech.it: Virtual ACRO adds flips in editing without the drone actually rolling
dronexperts.io: DJI Studio keyframes, subject tracking and Little Planet effects for reframing
maclife.de: One take gives many different clips in DJI Studio, such as Tiny Planet, tunnel view or spinning shots; Firmware update added 4K at 100fps in 360°, photos in single-lens mode and no more sideways drift on slopes
Learn Online Video: Phone app for quick edits on the go and desktop app for more control
Amok Time Flies: Reframing in post is fun, especially with editing software
DM Productions: Editing 360 footage is now simple, with a couple of keyframes
Mac4Ever: Free DJI Studio software that is well designed
Gianmarco Palazzo: Keyframe editing in the software described as intuitive and easy to learn

digitalcameraworld.com: DJI Studio feels clunky and its export works oddly
firstquadcopter.com: Editing in DJI Studio feels complicated at first
space.com: DJI Studio is clunky and takes time to learn
projectgo.pro: Every clip must be reframed and exported before normal editing
reparation-drone.com: You need editing time afterwards to get the most from 360° footage
smartworld.it: Editing afterwards is basically required
tomshw.it: 360° editing takes some practice
hwupgrade.it: Records in DJI's own OSV format, which needs DJI Studio to edit
focustech.it: All framing happens afterwards, so every flight needs editing time
dronexperts.io: Reframing in DJI Studio takes a lot of time
drone-technologie.fr: Every clip must go through DJI Studio to stitch and convert
connect.de: Lag when changing photo and video settings
drohnen.de: Stitching and editing work flagged as hurdles
maclife.de: Every 360° video has to go through DJI Studio, and a 1-minute clip took about 3 minutes to export
frankwandelt.nl: 360° recordings always need editing before use
Mads Tech: 360 footage has a learning curve and needs different editing
Mattia Antonelli: 360 editing takes more time than standard footage
Bright: Software is still immature for DJI's first 360 drone
Air Photography: 360 editing needs extra steps and takes some getting used to
fabreezy: Reframing 360 footage takes learning a new workflow
VeloTOTAL-TV: Software still needs some work
Mac4Ever: Editing in DJI Studio is required before using the footage
Gianmarco Palazzo: Smooth SD editing only works if the LRF and SRT companion data is kept

Battery & Design

7.8

Show more

Hide

Battery capacity

Battery energy

Charging time

Weight

Removable battery

Show more

What reviewers say

Weight, Length, Width, Height

global.techradar.com: UK1/C1 class allows flying over uninvolved people and in residential areas
Mark McGee Photos: Slim, flat profile slips easily into a bag

digitalcameraworld.com: At 455g it's over 250g, so stricter flying rules apply; Bigger than the Avata 2 and too wide for some tight gaps
space.com: Large and doesn't fold, at 455g
projectgo.pro: At about 450g it's above 250g, which brings registration and travel restrictions
photographylife.com: Too bulky for a camera bag because the arms don't fold
smartworld.it: At 455g it is C1 class in Europe, so more rules apply
tomshw.it: At 455g it is over 250g, so it is less portable and more rules apply
dronezine.it: Large and doesn't fold, so it is awkward to fit in a backpack; 455g weight means an A1-A3 certificate, registration and insurance
tg24.sky.it: C1 class means an A1-A3 certificate, insurance and D-Flight registration
hwupgrade.it: No position lights, so night flying isn't allowed under EASA rules
techprincess.it: Over 250g, so you need a drone certificate; Too big to slip into a jacket pocket for travel
dronexperts.io: At 455 g it needs the A1/A3 online training in the EU
chip.de: At 455 g it requires the A1/A3 drone licence
netzwelt.de: At 455 g it needs registration, a competence certificate and insurance
drone-zone.de: At about 455 g it is heavier than the Avata 2
maclife.de: At 455g it falls in class C1, so Germany requires a drone licence, registration and insurance
basic-tutorials.de: At 455g with full prop guards it is much bulkier than a DJI Neo 2 or Mini
gamestar.de: Over 250g, so EU pilots need the A1/A3 drone certificate
Bright: Large body, and batteries that drain quickly
Learn Online Video: C1-class size brings more flight restrictions than sub-249 g drones
Stewart and Alina: Big, heavy and noisy compared with the other drones
DM Productions: Does not fold down, so it is bulky to carry; Needs a modified backpack unless you get the dedicated bag
Mark McGee Photos: Big and cumbersome compared with smaller DJI drones
Unbox PH: Heavier at 455 g, so registration is needed in many places
Mac4Ever: Heavy at about 450 grams, requiring paperwork in France
DronEzine: Large and bulky, with a heavy transport bag
Gianmarco Palazzo: Cannot fly in the specific category because it is a C1 drone; Insurance, operator QR code and competence certificate required
Aprende Video en Línea: A heavier C1-class drone, harder to carry and with more flight restrictions

DJI Avata 360 vs the average drone

Why is DJI Avata 360 better than the average drone?

Show more

Hide

19 km longer transmission range
Max transmission distance
20 km
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a longer max transmission distance than the average drone (20 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
About 10 km in CE/SRRC/MIC regions.
20 km vs 1 km
12.5 km longer flight distance
Max flight distance
13.5 km
▲ Better than 82% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a longer max flight distance than the average drone (13.5 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
13.5 km vs 1 km
Supports obstacle detection
Obstacle detection
yes
▲ Better than 70% of models
This drone supports obstacle detection, while the average drone does not.
Larger sensor size
Sensor size
1/1.1"
▲ Better than 83% of models
This drone has a larger sensor than the average drone (1/1.1" vs 1/2.3"). The average drone uses a sensor of 1/2.3".
1/1.1" vs 1/2.3"
80 Mbps higher video bitrate
Max movie bitrate
180 Mbps
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <40 Mbps – >180 Mbps
This drone supports a higher maximum video bitrate than the average drone (180 Mbps vs 100 Mbps). The average drone supports a maximum video bitrate of 100 Mbps.
180 Mbps vs 100 Mbps
ADS-B In (AirSense)
ADS-B In (AirSense)
yes
★ Better than 92% of models
This drone includes ADS-B In (AirSense), while the average drone does not.
More color profile options
Color profiles
Normal, D-Log M, HDR
★ Better than 92% of models
This drone supports Normal, D-Log M, HDR color profiles, while the average drone supports Normal.
Normal, D-Log M, HDR vs Normal
5 m/s faster ascent speed
Max ascent speed
10 m/s
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <3 m/s – >8 m/s
This drone climbs faster than the average drone (10 m/s vs 5 m/s). The average drone climbs at 5 m/s.
Value reflects maximum ascent speed in higher-performance flight mode.
10 m/s vs 5 m/s

7.4% better value for money
DJI Avata 360 has better value for money than the average drone (7.58 vs 7.1).
7.58 vs 7.06

12.5 km longer flight distance
Max flight distance
13.5 km
▲ Better than 82% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a longer max flight distance than the average drone (13.5 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
13.5 km vs 1 km
5 m/s faster ascent speed
Max ascent speed
10 m/s
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <3 m/s – >8 m/s
This drone climbs faster than the average drone (10 m/s vs 5 m/s). The average drone climbs at 5 m/s.
Value reflects maximum ascent speed in higher-performance flight mode.
10 m/s vs 5 m/s
6 m/s faster descent speed
Max descent speed
10 m/s
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <2 m/s – >8 m/s
This drone descends faster than the average drone (10 m/s vs 4 m/s). The average drone descends at 4 m/s.
Value reflects maximum descent speed in higher-performance flight mode.
10 m/s vs 4 m/s
3 m/s faster flight speed
Max flight speed
18 m/s
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone reaches a higher max flight speed than the average drone (18 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
Value reflects maximum supported mode speed for this package.
18 m/s vs 15 m/s
3 years newer release date
Release date
2026
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <2k – >2k
This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
March 2026
2026 vs 2023
1,500 m higher service ceiling
Max service ceiling (ASL)
5,000 m
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone can fly at a higher max service ceiling than the average drone (5000 m vs 3500 m). The average drone reaches 3500 m.
5,000 m vs 3,500 m

Larger sensor size
Sensor size
1/1.1"
▲ Better than 83% of models
This drone has a larger sensor than the average drone (1/1.1" vs 1/2.3"). The average drone uses a sensor of 1/2.3".
1/1.1" vs 1/2.3"
80 Mbps higher video bitrate
Max movie bitrate
180 Mbps
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <40 Mbps – >180 Mbps
This drone supports a higher maximum video bitrate than the average drone (180 Mbps vs 100 Mbps). The average drone supports a maximum video bitrate of 100 Mbps.
180 Mbps vs 100 Mbps
More color profile options
Color profiles
Normal, D-Log M, HDR
★ Better than 92% of models
This drone supports Normal, D-Log M, HDR color profiles, while the average drone supports Normal.
Normal, D-Log M, HDR vs Normal
More video codec options
Video codecs supported
H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC
▲ Better than 70% of models
This drone supports H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC video codecs, while the average drone supports H.264/AVC.
H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC vs H.264/AVC
108 MP more camera resolution
Main camera megapixels
120 MP
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has more main camera megapixels than the average drone (120 MP vs 12 MP). The average drone has 12 MP on the main camera.
Total 360 still resolution from dual cameras.
120 MP vs 12 MP
Captures RAW photos
RAW photo capture
yes
▲ Better than 67% of models
This drone can capture RAW photos, while the average drone cannot.
Supports RAW 360 still images.
Richer manual controls
Manual camera controls
full
▲ Better than 68% of models
This drone offers full manual camera controls, while the average drone offers no.
full vs no
42 GB more internal storage
Internal storage
42 GB
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >8 GB
This drone has more internal storage than the average drone (42 GB vs 0 GB). The average drone has 0 GB of internal storage.
42 GB vs 0 GB
Supports slow-motion mode
Slow-motion mode
yes
▲ Better than 71% of models
This drone supports slow-motion mode, while the average drone does not.
Up to 120fps in supported modes.
270 ° wider field of view
Field of view
360 °
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (360 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
360 stitched capture.
360 ° vs 90 °
Higher video resolution
Video resolution
8K/60 fps
★ Better than 100% of models
This drone offers higher video resolution than the average drone (8K/60 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
8K/60fps applies to 360 mode.
8K/60 fps vs 4K/100 fps
19,200 ISO higher max ISO
Max ISO
25,600 ISO
▲ Better than 82% of models
Market range: <3.2k ISO – >25.6k ISO
This drone reaches a higher max ISO than the average drone (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average drone reaches 6400 ISO.
Higher ISO is available in D-Cinelike mode.
25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
FPV camera
FPV camera
yes
★ Better than 90% of models
This drone has an FPV camera, while the average drone does not.
Dedicated FPV flight system.
Higher photo resolution
Photo resolution
15520 x 7760 px
★ Better than 100% of models
This drone offers higher photo resolution than the average drone (15520x7760 px vs 4096x3072 px). The average drone offers a photo resolution of 4096x3072 px.
120 MP 360 still images.
15520x7760 px vs 4096x3072 px
Supports HDR mode
HDR mode
yes
▲ Better than 72% of models
This drone supports HDR mode, while the average drone does not.
HDR video is supported.
1 more gimbal axes
Gimbal axes
1
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This drone has more gimbal axes than the average drone (1 vs 0). The average drone has 0 gimbal axes.
1 vs 0
Wider tilt range
Camera tilt range
-180 to 180 °
★ Better than 100% of models
This drone has a wider tilt range than the average drone (-180 to 180 ° vs -90 to 20 °).
-180 to 180 ° vs -90 to 20 °
More advanced stabilization
Image stabilization type
1-Axis Mechanical + EIS
▲ Better than 53% of models
This drone uses 1-Axis Mechanical + EIS image stabilization, while the average drone uses EIS (Digital).
1-Axis Mechanical + EIS vs EIS (Digital)
Wider aperture
Aperture
f/1.9
▲ Better than 76% of models
This drone has a wider aperture than the average drone (f/1.9 vs f/2). The average drone uses an aperture of f/2.
f/1.9 vs f/2
Supports panorama mode
Panorama mode
yes
▲ Better than 54% of models
This drone supports panorama mode, while the average drone does not.
872 GB higher memory card limit
Max external memory supported
1,000 GB
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >512 GB
This drone supports more external storage than the average drone (1000 GB vs 128 GB). The average drone supports up to 128 GB of external storage.
1,000 GB vs 128 GB

Supports obstacle detection
Obstacle detection
yes
▲ Better than 70% of models
This drone supports obstacle detection, while the average drone does not.
ADS-B In (AirSense)
ADS-B In (AirSense)
yes
★ Better than 92% of models
This drone includes ADS-B In (AirSense), while the average drone does not.
Supports dual-band GPS
Dual GPS frequency support
yes
★ Better than 96% of models
This drone supports dual-band GPS, while the average drone does not.
Supports waypoint flight
Waypoint flight
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
Supports QuickShots
QuickShots
yes
▲ Better than 68% of models
This drone supports QuickShots, while the average drone does not.
Includes propeller guards
Propeller guards
yes
▲ Better than 67% of models
This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
Remote ID
Remote ID
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This drone supports Remote ID, while the average drone does not.
Less restrictive EU class
EU class marking
C1
▲ Better than 74% of models
This drone is rated as C1 under the EU drone class system, while the average drone is rated as None.
C1 vs None

19 km longer transmission range
Max transmission distance
20 km
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a longer max transmission distance than the average drone (20 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
About 10 km in CE/SRRC/MIC regions.
20 km vs 1 km
Better live view quality
Live view quality
1080p@100 fps
★ Better than 93% of models
This drone has better live view quality than the average drone (1080p@100 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
Standard 360 mode is lower; 100 fps applies in single-lens mode with compatible DJI goggles.
1080p@100 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
More polished companion app
Companion app
DJI Fly
▲ Better than 84% of models
This drone uses the DJI Fly companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
DJI Fly vs HS FPV
More frequency bands
Operating frequency bands
2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz
▲ Better than 84% of models
This drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
More capable transmission system
Video transmission system
O4
★ Better than 92% of models
This drone uses O4 for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
O4 vs SkyLink 2.0
Supports 4G / LTE
4G / LTE support
yes
★ Better than 90% of models
This drone supports 4G / LTE connectivity, while the average drone does not.

More modern charging port
Charging interface
USB-C
▲ Better than 61% of models
This drone uses USB-C for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
USB-C vs micro-USB
43 min shorter charging time
Charging time
47 min
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <55 min – >180 min
This drone charges faster than the average drone (47 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
47 min vs 90 min
21.49 Wh more battery energy
Battery energy
38.67 Wh
▲ Better than 74% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has higher battery energy than the average drone (38.7 Wh vs 17.18 Wh). The average drone battery has 17.18 Wh of energy.
38.67 Wh vs 17.18 Wh
500 mAh more battery capacity
Battery capacity
2,700 mAh
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a larger battery capacity than the average drone (2700 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
2,700 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
42 mm narrower width
Width
199 mm
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
This drone is narrower than the average drone (199 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
199 mm vs 241 mm

Why is DJI Avata 360 worse than the average drone?

Show more

Hide

85% higher weight
Weight
455 g
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone is heavier than the average drone (455 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
455 g vs 246 g
Fewer GNSS systems
GNSS systems supported
GPS, Galileo, BeiDou
▲ Better than 73% of models
This drone supports GPS, Galileo, BeiDou GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
GPS, Galileo, BeiDou vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
Non-foldable design
Foldable design
no
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
4.15x more expensive
DJI Avata 360 is more expensive than the average drone (£830 vs £200).
£830 vs £200
3 x lower digital zoom
Digital zoom
0 x
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <0 x – >16 x
This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
Cropping is done after capture.
0 x vs 3 x
No headless mode
Headless mode
no
▼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support headless mode, while the average drone does.
2 min shorter flight time
Max flight time
18 min
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (18 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
Up to 23 minutes flying forward in ideal conditions.
18 min vs 20 min

4.15x more expensive
DJI Avata 360 is more expensive than the average drone (£830 vs £200).
£830 vs £200

Non-foldable design
Foldable design
no
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
2 min shorter flight time
Max flight time
18 min
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (18 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
Up to 23 minutes flying forward in ideal conditions.
18 min vs 20 min

3 x lower digital zoom
Digital zoom
0 x
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <0 x – >16 x
This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
Cropping is done after capture.
0 x vs 3 x

Fewer GNSS systems
GNSS systems supported
GPS, Galileo, BeiDou
▲ Better than 73% of models
This drone supports GPS, Galileo, BeiDou GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
GPS, Galileo, BeiDou vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
No headless mode
Headless mode
no
▼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support headless mode, while the average drone does.

85% higher weight
Weight
455 g
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone is heavier than the average drone (455 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
455 g vs 246 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0

Learn Online Video

≈ estimated

21/08/2026

Hands-on review · cinematic shots and 360 footage

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 is among the most exciting drones to fly, though lens care, noise and flight restrictions are real drawbacks.

9.0

Unbox PH

≈ estimated

22/05/2026

Hands-on review · car tracking tests and battery life

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 is quite possibly the best 360 drone available, with a few trade-offs in detail and flight time.

6.0

Flying Filmmaker

≈ estimated

20/04/2026

Hands-on review · first flights, active track and comparison

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 is a solid drone with a few advantages over rivals, but we cannot yet give a firm recommendation.

9.0

fabreezy

≈ estimated

29/03/2026

Hands-on review · flight, battery and footage tests

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 is small and robust, suiting both entry-level pilots and professional 360 creators.

9.0

Mark McGee Photos

≈ estimated

26/03/2026

Hands-on review · first FPV flights and 360 editing workflow

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 does not replace traditional drones, but it is probably the most fun drone you can fly.

8.0

DM Productions

≈ estimated

26/03/2026

Hands-on review · flying experience, editing and travel

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 is great fun with fresh 360 shots, but it is bulky to travel with and works best as a second drone.

9.0

Mads Tech

≈ estimated

26/03/2026

Hands-on review · 360 and single-lens footage tests

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 is a very good drone and easy to recommend, though stitch-line glitches still happen.

8.0

Hugh Hou

≈ estimated

09/05/2026

Head-to-head review · side-by-side flight and image tests

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 is harsher than expected, but it is still a strong 360 drone for immersive creators who know post-production.

7.0

Amok Time Flies

≈ estimated

03/05/2026

First impressions · flight modes, tracking and real 8K footage

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 makes a decent first impression, with strong tracking and fun reframing, but its footage is not cinema-grade.

8.0

Stewart and Alina

≈ estimated

01/04/2026

Tracking test · comparison with two other drones

Verdict

DJI Avata 360 is very capable for tracking shots and creative work, though it is big, heavy and noisy.

What reviewers agree on

Based on 35 · 29

Reviewers love the 360° capture and goggle experience but fault its bulk, buggy software and short battery life; image quality divides opinion.

Praised

Likes (36)

trustedreviews.com: Fly alone with the RC 2 or put on Goggles N3 for first-person flying
digitalcameraworld.com: Goggles are optional because the RC 2 works for solo flying
firstquadcopter.com: Older Goggles 3 worked fine after a firmware update
notebookcheck.net: Head tracking in the goggles lets you look around freely while flying
space.com: Works with RC 2, RC-N2, RC-N3 or goggles with a motion controller
cgmagonline.com: RC 2 support adds subject tracking and a built-in training simulator
projectgo.pro: Uses the same controller and goggles as the Avata 2
photographylife.com: Flying with goggles feels like sitting in a 3D cinema; RC Motion 3 steering by tilting your hand felt natural quickly
basic-tutorials.com: Flies like any DJI Mini or Air with the RC 2, with no spotter needed; More precise head tracking than the Avata 2
reparation-drone.com: Immersive, intuitive flying with FPV goggles and the motion controller
tomshw.it: Fly with the DJI RC 2 or with Goggles N3 and RC Motion 3
dronezine.it: Flies with Motion Controller 3, RC 2, RC N3 or FPV Remote Controller 3
tg24.sky.it: Goggles work fine for people who wear glasses
hwupgrade.it: Picture In Picture with Motion Controller 3 shows the side and rear views
techprincess.it: Goggles N3 are comfortable with bright, sharp screens
global.techradar.com: Fly with the RC 2 two-stick remote or with Goggles N3 and RC Motion 3
dronexperts.io: Head Tracking in the goggles lets you look around while the drone flies on
drone-technologie.fr: Works with classic RC-N3, RC-N2 and RC 2 remotes; Also flies with goggles, motion controller or FPV remote
cined.com: Flies on the RC 2 like a normal drone, so no observer is needed
slashcam.de: Head tracking in the goggles gives a full look-around view, like flying as a bird
drone-zone.de: Works with RC 2 and RC-N3, so it can fly like a regular camera drone; Head tracking with Goggles N3 shows a small forward view when you look back
basic-tutorials.de: Flies like any DJI Mini or Air with the RC 2, no goggles or spotter needed; Head tracking with Goggles and RC Motion 3 is more precise than on the Avata 2
gamestar.de: Can be flown with a normal remote, so no second person is needed
dronewatch.nl: Flies just like other DJI camera drones with the RC 2 Smart Controller
frankwandelt.nl: Fly with FPV goggles or with a standard two-stick remote
Mads Tech: 360 mode gives a full view with no head-tracking yaw problems; Works with existing goggles and with the RC 2 remote
Hubert Aile: Flies with radio control or goggles, very versatile
Albert Bermejo: Fun first-person flying with goggles and simple controls
Air Photography: Can be flown with a standard controller, not only with goggles
Flying Filmmaker: Can be flown with regular sticks, so goggles are not needed; Head tracking in the goggles adds to the motion controller
fabreezy: Enjoyable to fly, especially with the motion controller
DM Productions: Immersive live preview lets you look around a location
Unbox PH: Works with the RC 2 for a more traditional flying experience
Gadget Pilipinas: Goggles give a first-person view of what the drone sees
Tecnoandroid: Several controller options, including Goggles N3 with Motion 3
Vincenzo Langella - Vince Tech: Several controllers, including RC2 and Goggles N3 with Motion Controller 3

Dislikes (16)

firstquadcopter.com: Many older DJI controllers and goggles won't work, including RC-N1, RC Pro and Goggles 2
notebookcheck.net: Takeoff was blocked by a skipped firmware update, and pairing the gear is frustrating
eftm.com: Pairing the goggles was finicky and needed a reset
techprincess.it: RC Motion 3 takes a few calm flights to get used to
tuttotech.net: Goggles only work with Motion Controller 3, not with RC 2 or RC-N3
dronexperts.io: Goggle flying still requires a visual observer
chip.de: Flying with goggles while recording 360 is tricky for beginners
connect.de: RC 2 screen is hard to read in bright sunlight
slashcam.de: Looking backward in the goggles can make you lose track of direction
dronewatch.nl: Motion Controller took time to get used to, and the more precise FPV Remote Controller is not included
Mads Tech: Some features only work with Goggles 3 or N3, not with the RC 2
MichasWelt: Goggles and motion controller require a spotter for commercial pilots
Flying Filmmaker: Goggles are less comfortable than the Goggles 3 or Insta360 goggles; Motion controller feels less intuitive than the Anti-Gravity one; Goggle menus feel less refined than on the Anti-Gravity A1
Gadget Pilipinas: Goggles and FPV controller setup feel intimidating at first
Pavel Kaplun: Flying with goggles is safer with a spotter present; Beginners are better off starting with the controller
Tecnoandroid: Better suited to users already in the DJI ecosystem

Likes (34)

firstquadcopter.com: Camera turns forward for normal 4K 60fps video when you don't need 360°
notebookcheck.net: Switches between 360° capture and forward-facing 4K
space.com: Single-lens 4K 60fps mode needs no reframing
cgmagonline.com: Lets you get shots that were impossible before, like a low reverse shot along a river just by flying forward
projectgo.pro: Fly first and choose the angle later for YouTube, Instagram or TikTok
reparation-drone.com: Films 8K 360° at 60fps, so you can choose the framing after the flight
techprincess.it: Cut 8K 360° footage into 16:9 or 9:16 clips for TikTok and Instagram
cined.com: Lets you film dynamic moving subjects that other drones can't manage
chip.de: Single-lens mode films normal UHD video you can share without editing
slashcam.de: Just fly past a subject and choose the framing later
drohnen.de: One flight gives many camera angles to pick from later; FPV flying and 360 recording in one drone; 8K 360 footage leaves lots of room for reframing in editing; More usable clips per flight for social media creators
maclife.de: Switches between 360° and a single-lens mode with 4K/60fps HDR
dronewatch.nl: No need to watch the framing while flying, since everything is captured
frankwandelt.nl: Single-lens mode films ordinary video in 4K/60fps or 2.7K/120fps
Mads Tech: Single-lens mode holds up well compared with the Avata 2
MichasWelt: Single-lens mode flies like a classic drone
Mattia Antonelli: Strong video quality, with framing chosen in post
Albert Bermejo: Reframing 360 footage for vertical and horizontal formats
Bright: Reframes shots after flying, thanks to full 360° capture; Good results for skilled pilots who know the 360 workflow
Air Photography: Full 360 preview of footage in the app and goggles
fabreezy: Punch-in reframing of 360 footage without losing quality; Single-lens mode works like a standard drone for quick shots
Learn Online Video: Powerful creative tool that lets you reframe shots after flying; Single-lens mode gives ready-to-use clips without importing into DJI Studio
Stewart and Alina: Reframing in post allows shots that no other drone can match
Unbox PH: Reframe 360 footage in post for a second chance at the shot
Gadget Pilipinas: 360 recording lets you edit the footage later in DJI Studio
VeloTOTAL-TV: Shoot 360° footage now and choose the framing later; 360° shots that other drones cannot easily capture
Pavel Kaplun: 360 footage lets you reframe shots in many formats later
iBordelais: One flight gives many shots in horizontal or vertical formats
Drone Technology: Much more comfortable for a few very specific shots
Tecnoandroid: Three flying modes in one: 360, FPV and classic; Reframing 360 footage after the flight gives plenty of creative freedom
Vincenzo Langella - Vince Tech: Full 360 capture lets you choose the framing after the flight; HDR video in single-lens mode up to 4K at 60 fps
DronEzine: Choice of 360 mode or single front lens for classic footage
Gianmarco Palazzo: Unique footage, since every shot is different
Aprende Video en Línea: Reframing freedom after filming, so no need to aim while flying; Cinematic shots possible from a single clip

Dislikes (5)

projectgo.pro: FPV pilots lose the fun of framing shots live
focustech.it: Single-lens mode is limited to 4K 60fps
tuttotech.net: Tops out at 60fps, so no slow motion
Mattia Antonelli: No hyperlapse feature yet
fabreezy: Single-lens mode is limited to 4K 60 and has no ND filters

Likes (24)

digitalcameraworld.com: Guarded frame survived bumps into trees; Camera block turns on landing, so the lenses never touch the ground
firstquadcopter.com: Scratched front lenses can be swapped at home without sending the drone in for repair
notebookcheck.net: Solid, well-made body
space.com: Strong cinewhoop build that copes with flying through forests
cgmagonline.com: Took several crashes in Sport mode without damage, even to the original propellers
photographylife.com: Spray from a waterfall didn't cause any problems
basic-tutorials.com: Lenses are user-replaceable, so no repair trip is needed for scratches
eftm.com: Robust build that feels ready for minor crashes
reparation-drone.com: Built-in propeller guards plus obstacle sensing in every direction; Lenses can be replaced if damaged, so repairs are simpler
tech.everyeye.it: Damaged lenses can be swapped at home with a spare kit, with no repair shop trip
techprincess.it: Built-in propeller guards for flying close to things
cined.com: Lens cover included, and scratched lenses can be swapped at home with a kit; Propeller guards make indoor flying safer
netzwelt.de: Lenses and propellers can be replaced at home after a crash
slashcam.de: Sturdy propeller guards turned collisions into small wobbles instead of crashes
basic-tutorials.de: Camera module turns automatically after takeoff, so the lenses never rest on the ground; Front lenses can be swapped by the owner, no need to send the drone in for repair
dronewatch.nl: Prop guards and a sturdy frame let you fly close to objects
MichasWelt: Prop guards protect the propellers and camera
Mattia Antonelli: Sturdy: survived bumps into objects and the camera stayed intact
Albert Bermejo: Tough build suited to extreme sports
Flying Filmmaker: Compact, and tough enough to survive hitting bare branches
Hugh Hou: Sealed ports make it safer to fly in varied weather; Lens cover is convenient to pack
Mark McGee Photos: Integrated propeller guard for safer close-range shots
Mac4Ever: Very well protected against crashes
Monsport06: Protected propellers make it reassuring and allow closer flying

Dislikes (8)

photographylife.com: Not waterproof, so rain and clouds are a risk
cined.com: Lenses stick out and scratch easily
dronewatch.nl: Protruding lenses look vulnerable, so a landing pad comes in the box
Bright: Lenses scratch and break too easily
Learn Online Video: Exposed lenses need wiping before every flight
Gautier Veltri: Lens more exposed to damage, and regulation is stricter abroad
Drone Technology: Crashes as easily as a Neo 2 when pushed, and lacks turtle mode
Aprende Video en Línea: Exposed lenses need careful cleaning, as dust and water show

Likes (17)

smartworld.it: LiDAR obstacle sensing keeps working down to 1 lux, almost dark
tech.everyeye.it: APAS steers around obstacles while you keep control in Cine and Normal modes
hwupgrade.it: LiDAR and infrared sensors detect obstacles even in low light
focustech.it: Front LiDAR spots obstacles and brakes even at 1 lux
chip.de: Omnidirectional obstacle detection with forward LiDAR
connect.de: Omnidirectional obstacle detection warns you and brakes automatically
netzwelt.de: Obstacle detection worked reliably, even in the dark
drone-zone.de: LiDAR obstacle detection proved very reliable in testing
maclife.de: All-round obstacle sensing plus a front LiDAR that still brakes for obstacles in the dark
gamestar.de: Obstacle sensing braked in time when flying toward thick branches at 16 m/s
frankwandelt.nl: All-round obstacle sensing helped by LiDAR and infrared sensors
Mattia Antonelli: Advanced obstacle avoidance helps beginners fly with less worry
Stewart and Alina: Obstacle avoidance gives confidence for adventurous tracking
Gadget Pilipinas: Sensors around the body make flying feel safer
VeloTOTAL-TV: Obstacle detection makes flying feel safer
Pavel Kaplun: Obstacle detection makes flying feel safe for beginners
iBordelais: Omnidirectional obstacle detection feels reassuring near people and indoors

Dislikes (8)

photographylife.com: Obstacle sensing missed thin branches and the drone hit a spruce; Obstacle detection switches off in Sport mode
basic-tutorials.com: All-round obstacle sensing works only in 360° mode, and none at all in Sport mode
tech.everyeye.it: Obstacle sensing only works forward in single-lens 4K mode
chip.de: Obstacle detection missed glass in testing
netzwelt.de: Sensors are oversensitive: overhanging branches stopped it following a bike
slashcam.de: Thin branches still fool the obstacle sensors
drone-zone.de: All-round obstacle detection works only in 360 mode, not single-lens
basic-tutorials.de: Obstacle sensing works all round only in 360° mode and switches off in Sport mode

Mixed views

Likes (26)

trustedreviews.com: Strong 8K 60fps 10-bit 360° video from two 64MP sensors
projectgo.pro: 8K 360° video in 10-bit D-Log M leaves lots of room for color editing
smartworld.it: Two 1/1.1-inch sensors give 8K 60fps HDR footage that still looks sharp after cropping
tomshw.it: Tilt gimbal plus electronic stabilization keeps footage steady
dronezine.it: Footage stays smooth even when the drone sways
tg24.sky.it: Well-stabilized footage with balanced colors
hwupgrade.it: Two 64MP 1/1.1-inch sensors record 8K 60fps and stitch the drone out of the shot; 10-bit D-Log M for color grading
focustech.it: Still gives 1080p 60fps after cropping to a 100° view
tuttotech.net: 8K HDR handles strong contrast well and copes in fading light
global.techradar.com: Two 1/1.1-inch sensors give detailed 10-bit footage
dronexperts.io: 8K 360 video at up to 60 fps, with 10-bit D-Log M
chip.de: 8K 360 video at 60 fps, twice the Antigravity A1's frame rate
gamestar.de: No ugly lens flare when flying toward the sun; 120MP photos look sharp and lively
frankwandelt.nl: 8K/60fps 360° video with the drone hidden from the shot
MichasWelt: Video quality is good, especially in low light
Hubert Aile: Best image quality the creator has tested on a 360 drone
Flying Filmmaker: 10-bit colour and footage that looks better than the Anti-Gravity A1
fabreezy: 8K 60 footage with 10-bit D-Log that grades easily
Learn Online Video: 8K 60 footage with 10-bit D-Log colour
Hugh Hou: The only 360 drone offering 8K 60fps in 10-bit colour; Clean image capture that suits careful grading and upscaling
Mark McGee Photos: 8K 60fps footage with D-Log M colour and 120 megapixel photos
Gautier Veltri: Good 360 camera for its class
Mac4Ever: Pro-level 8K sensor and 42 GB of internal storage
Monsport06: Clearly better image than the Antigravity A1 at dusk and dawn
Tecnoandroid: Image quality with HDR recovers detail in shadows and highlights
Aprende Video en Línea: 8K 360 footage with 10-bit D-Log colour

Dislikes (29)

trustedreviews.com: Air 3S and Mavic 4 Pro produce better image quality
firstquadcopter.com: Fisheye lenses lack the fine detail of Air and Mini drones
notebookcheck.net: Image gets softer when you reframe or zoom in on the 8K footage; Noise and flicker indoors and under cloudy skies
space.com: Image quality falls short of standard camera drones
projectgo.pro: Reframed shots have lower resolution than an Avata 2 or Mini 4 Pro
basic-tutorials.com: Image quality drops when you crop heavily into the 360° footage
eftm.com: Photos look odd because still shots only come from the 360° lenses
reparation-drone.com: Image quality is a bit behind the best regular camera drones
global.techradar.com: Other DJI drones still give better image quality
cined.com: Reframed 8K footage loses detail compared with regular filming
connect.de: Image quality is only fair
netzwelt.de: Bright areas of the footage blow out to white
drone-zone.de: Fixed focus starts at 1.5 m, so very close subjects can look soft
maclife.de: 360° video looks fairly coarse, for example when watched on a Vision Pro
gamestar.de: Grain at the edges in leaves, grass and shadows, even with D-Log M; The 8K figure combines two 4K lenses, so cropping to a normal frame lowers sharpness further
frankwandelt.nl: Video quality falls behind other DJI drones, especially in low light
Hubert Aile: Image quality trails stabilized drones such as the Mini 5 Pro
Albert Bermejo: Image quality trails 1-inch sensor drones such as the Mini 5 Pro; Less suited to professional filmmaking
Air Photography: Not the best choice for cinematography or aerial photos
Flying Filmmaker: 360 image quality still trails single-direction drones
Hugh Hou: Looks softer than the rival drone at first glance
Stewart and Alina: Reframed image quality falls short of the Mini 5 Pro
Amok Time Flies: A 16:9 crop looks well short of 4K, despite the 8K claim
Mark McGee Photos: Image quality trails the Mavic 4 Pro and Air for cinematic work
VeloTOTAL-TV: Not a replacement for a conventional drone with a mechanical gimbal for top video quality
Gautier Veltri: Image quality is not exceptional next to dedicated cameras
iBordelais: Pure image quality falls short of the Mavic 4 Pro or R3S
Monsport06: Final render from the 360 footage cannot match a stabilized drone such as the Mini 5 Pro
Drone Technology: Image quality clearly trails the Mini and Flip drones

Likes (22)

trustedreviews.com: Stays quick and precise in breezy coastal wind, reaching about 40mph in Sport Mode
notebookcheck.net: Smooth, easy handling with the RC 2 across Cine, Normal and Sport modes
cgmagonline.com: Stayed controllable while flying low in winds of about 20 km/h
photographylife.com: Much livelier and faster than a Mini Pro, hitting 18 m/s in Sport mode
basic-tutorials.com: Normal mode speed can be raised from 12 to 16 m/s in the settings
eftm.com: Easy to learn even with almost no drone experience
tg24.sky.it: Beginners can fly it easily after about an hour of practice
techprincess.it: Quick and responsive, up to 18 m/s for chasing sports
focustech.it: Can take off without GPS and return from tight spots like balconies
global.techradar.com: Agile and responsive, even in strong seaside wind
drone-technologie.fr: Easy step into immersive shots for those new to FPV
connect.de: Easy to learn, since it holds position when you let go of the sticks
netzwelt.de: Return-to-home route is shown on the remote screen
MichasWelt: Beginner flights show how easy it is to learn
DM Productions: Fun to fly and capture unusual angles
Mark McGee Photos: Fun to fly, with camera angles no other drone can match
Gadget Pilipinas: Easy to fly, even without FPV experience
Pavel Kaplun: Suitable for beginners and professionals alike
iBordelais: Easy to fly with predictable behaviour, a good entry point for beginners
Mac4Ever: Easy to fly, with low-speed modes
Monsport06: Smart return-to-home that works without satellite connection
Gianmarco Palazzo: Very fun to fly

Dislikes (24)

trustedreviews.com: No landing gear, so you need flat ground or the landing mat to take off; No full acro mode for experienced FPV pilots, and DJI has no plans to add one
cgmagonline.com: Top speed of 18 m/s, down from 27 m/s on the Avata 2, and only Easy Acro instead of full acro
basic-tutorials.com: No acro flying without stabilization, only Easy ACRO
reparation-drone.com: Flies with more assistance than a true FPV drone
smartworld.it: Struggled in wind that didn't seem strong, though it stayed stable; Not one for people who mainly enjoy flying
tech.everyeye.it: Heavier and slower to react than the Neo 2, so it needs more experience; Can't take off from your hand, so you need a clear take-off spot
dronezine.it: Rocks noticeably in a light breeze and while hovering; Crashed twice in Acro mode on beta firmware, and Acro has since been removed
tg24.sky.it: Return to Home sometimes landed up to 20 cm off the take-off point
hwupgrade.it: No full Acro mode at launch
tuttotech.net: Drifts several centimeters with every gust of wind
global.techradar.com: No landing gear, so it needs flat ground or the landing pad from the Fly More Combo; No fully unassisted FPV flying mode
basic-tutorials.de: No full Acro flying, only the simpler Easy ACRO
Hubert Aile: No acro mode yet for pure stick flying
Mattia Antonelli: No acro mode yet, so pure stick flying is not possible
Hugh Hou: Not a true FPV drone, so it is a poor pick for FPV flying
Amok Time Flies: FPV feels a little slow; No full-control mode for power loops and split S's
DM Productions: Not the right first drone for a beginner
VeloTOTAL-TV: Landing is tricky in windy conditions
iBordelais: Not suited to experienced FPV pilots, as acro mode was removed
Mac4Ever: Less responsive than expected for freestyle flying
Monsport06: No acro mode, and the FPV acro feel falls well short of an Avata 2; Sensitive to wind, and a lot of inertia in flight
Drone Technology: Odd wind resistance from its flat shape, and no full-control mode
Tecnoandroid: Landing does not always hit the intended spot
DronEzine: Crashes during acro FPV flying and beta firmware problems

Criticised

Likes (2)

global.techradar.com: UK1/C1 class allows flying over uninvolved people and in residential areas
Mark McGee Photos: Slim, flat profile slips easily into a bag

Dislikes (27)

digitalcameraworld.com: At 455g it's over 250g, so stricter flying rules apply; Bigger than the Avata 2 and too wide for some tight gaps
space.com: Large and doesn't fold, at 455g
projectgo.pro: At about 450g it's above 250g, which brings registration and travel restrictions
photographylife.com: Too bulky for a camera bag because the arms don't fold
smartworld.it: At 455g it is C1 class in Europe, so more rules apply
tomshw.it: At 455g it is over 250g, so it is less portable and more rules apply
dronezine.it: Large and doesn't fold, so it is awkward to fit in a backpack; 455g weight means an A1-A3 certificate, registration and insurance
tg24.sky.it: C1 class means an A1-A3 certificate, insurance and D-Flight registration
hwupgrade.it: No position lights, so night flying isn't allowed under EASA rules
techprincess.it: Over 250g, so you need a drone certificate; Too big to slip into a jacket pocket for travel
dronexperts.io: At 455 g it needs the A1/A3 online training in the EU
chip.de: At 455 g it requires the A1/A3 drone licence
netzwelt.de: At 455 g it needs registration, a competence certificate and insurance
drone-zone.de: At about 455 g it is heavier than the Avata 2
maclife.de: At 455g it falls in class C1, so Germany requires a drone licence, registration and insurance
basic-tutorials.de: At 455g with full prop guards it is much bulkier than a DJI Neo 2 or Mini
gamestar.de: Over 250g, so EU pilots need the A1/A3 drone certificate
Bright: Large body, and batteries that drain quickly
Learn Online Video: C1-class size brings more flight restrictions than sub-249 g drones
Stewart and Alina: Big, heavy and noisy compared with the other drones
DM Productions: Does not fold down, so it is bulky to carry; Needs a modified backpack unless you get the dedicated bag
Mark McGee Photos: Big and cumbersome compared with smaller DJI drones
Unbox PH: Heavier at 455 g, so registration is needed in many places
Mac4Ever: Heavy at about 450 grams, requiring paperwork in France
DronEzine: Large and bulky, with a heavy transport bag
Gianmarco Palazzo: Cannot fly in the specific category because it is a C1 drone; Insurance, operator QR code and competence certificate required
Aprende Video en Línea: A heavier C1-class drone, harder to carry and with more flight restrictions

Likes (10)

tech.everyeye.it: Keyframe editing in DJI Studio is easy to learn if you've edited video before
tomshw.it: One Tap Edit in DJI Fly makes share-ready clips in seconds
focustech.it: Virtual ACRO adds flips in editing without the drone actually rolling
dronexperts.io: DJI Studio keyframes, subject tracking and Little Planet effects for reframing
maclife.de: One take gives many different clips in DJI Studio, such as Tiny Planet, tunnel view or spinning shots; Firmware update added 4K at 100fps in 360°, photos in single-lens mode and no more sideways drift on slopes
Learn Online Video: Phone app for quick edits on the go and desktop app for more control
Amok Time Flies: Reframing in post is fun, especially with editing software
DM Productions: Editing 360 footage is now simple, with a couple of keyframes
Mac4Ever: Free DJI Studio software that is well designed
Gianmarco Palazzo: Keyframe editing in the software described as intuitive and easy to learn

Dislikes (23)

digitalcameraworld.com: DJI Studio feels clunky and its export works oddly
firstquadcopter.com: Editing in DJI Studio feels complicated at first
space.com: DJI Studio is clunky and takes time to learn
projectgo.pro: Every clip must be reframed and exported before normal editing
reparation-drone.com: You need editing time afterwards to get the most from 360° footage
smartworld.it: Editing afterwards is basically required
tomshw.it: 360° editing takes some practice
hwupgrade.it: Records in DJI's own OSV format, which needs DJI Studio to edit
focustech.it: All framing happens afterwards, so every flight needs editing time
dronexperts.io: Reframing in DJI Studio takes a lot of time
drone-technologie.fr: Every clip must go through DJI Studio to stitch and convert
connect.de: Lag when changing photo and video settings
drohnen.de: Stitching and editing work flagged as hurdles
maclife.de: Every 360° video has to go through DJI Studio, and a 1-minute clip took about 3 minutes to export
frankwandelt.nl: 360° recordings always need editing before use
Mads Tech: 360 footage has a learning curve and needs different editing
Mattia Antonelli: 360 editing takes more time than standard footage
Bright: Software is still immature for DJI's first 360 drone
Air Photography: 360 editing needs extra steps and takes some getting used to
fabreezy: Reframing 360 footage takes learning a new workflow
VeloTOTAL-TV: Software still needs some work
Mac4Ever: Editing in DJI Studio is required before using the footage
Gianmarco Palazzo: Smooth SD editing only works if the LRF and SRT companion data is kept

Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about DJI Avata 360

Intuitive flight control with the RC Motion 3 allows beginners to fly within minutes
Stunning 8K/60fps HDR spherical video capture provides total creative flexibility in post-production
Robust cinewhoop-style frame with integrated propeller guards makes it durable for tight spaces
Replaceable lenses and modular design allow for quick field repairs after crashes
Goggles N3/Goggles 3 provide an immersive, low-latency FPV experience with features like real-world passthrough
Eliminates the pressure to frame shots perfectly during flight since everything is captured in 360 degrees

What we don't like about DJI Avata 360

Noticeable loss of sharpness and presence of stitching artefacts when reframing 8K 360 footage
Limited real-world battery life typically lasting between 16 and 20 minutes
Slower post-production workflow due to the extra steps required for stitching and reframing
Heavier than the 250g weight limit (approx. 466g), leading to stricter regulations in some regions
Weaker low-light performance compared to dedicated standard camera drones like the Mavic 3 Pro
Lenses are exposed and require careful handling to avoid scratches when on the ground

Verdict

The DJI Avata 360 is a flagship FPV drone featuring two 1/1.1-inch square CMOS sensors capable of capturing 8K/60fps HDR 360° video and 120MP photos, or switching to Single Lens mode for 4K/60fps footage. Weighing 455g, it offers 23 minutes of flight time, 42GB of internal storage, and the O4+ video transmission system with a range of up to 20km (FCC). Key pros include its unique 'shoot first, reframe later' capability, omnidirectional obstacle sensing with night-vision LiDAR, and a high-speed 100MB/s Wi-Fi 6 transfer. However, users should note the heavier weight compared to the Avata 2, a potentially complex reframing workflow that can slow down content delivery, and the fact that 360° sensors typically lose some effective resolution when cropped into standard formats.

Best alternatives

Drones

Drones

Drones

DJI Mavic Air 2

Drones

Drones

Drones

Autel EVO Lite Plus

Drones

Autel EVO Nano Plus

Drones

Drones

Drones

HOVERAir X1 PROMAX

Drones

Drones

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare DJI Avata 360 with other drones

Graphic comparison of DJI Avata 360 and other drones

No results found