OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,023 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Antigravity A1 Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,050Max flight time:24 minVideo resolution:8KMax transmission distance:10 km

Antigravity A1 Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 58 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

85%

7.6

Technical score

15%

8.1

Review score ( 16 · 42)

Review score 15% · 8.1 · based on 58 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 15%, technical score 85%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
▲Better than 80% of drones
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

26%

7.3

Flight

24%

7.4

Camera

20%

8.6

Safety

16%

7.5

Connectivity

14%

6.9

Battery & Design

▲Better than 80% of drones
8.1

Review score

Review score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Grades by review (58)
16 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 10 estimated from the review. 42 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
4

3.6%

9.0

digitalcameraworld.com

3.6%

7.0

pcmag.com

2.8%

9.0

shotkit.com

2.3%

7.0

jvn.photo

Video reviews 9

1.4%

9.0

Greg Toope

1.4%

9.0

DM Productions

1.4%

9.0

Denis Barbas

1.4%

8.0

Drone On

1.4%

8.0

Learn Online Video

1.4%

8.0

Nick Kendall

1.4%

8.0

Mary Bautista

0.7%

9.0

Drone Camps RC

0.7%

8.0

51 Drones

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▲Better than 51% of drones
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
  • insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1
insta360-antigravity-a1

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Antigravity A1

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components:

26%

7.3

Flight

24%

7.4

Camera

20%

8.6

Safety

16%

7.5

Connectivity

14%

6.9

Battery & Design

7.6
Review score
Review score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Grades by review (58)
16 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 10 estimated from the review. 42 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
4

3.6%

9.0

digitalcameraworld.com

3.6%

7.0

pcmag.com

2.8%

9.0

shotkit.com

2.3%

7.0

jvn.photo

Video reviews 9

1.4%

9.0

Greg Toope

1.4%

9.0

DM Productions

1.4%

9.0

Denis Barbas

1.4%

8.0

Drone On

1.4%

8.0

Learn Online Video

1.4%

8.0

Nick Kendall

1.4%

8.0

Mary Bautista

0.7%

9.0

Drone Camps RC

0.7%

8.0

51 Drones

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Popularity:
Antigravity A1 has a popularity score of 6.8 points, which is higher than that of 53.5% of products in this category.
6.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

60%

7.7

Overall score

40%

5.0

Price

6.8
Max flight time
24 min
Max flight time
24 min
▲ Better than 54% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 24 min, longer than 54% of drones.
39 minutes with the high-capacity battery.
Max flight distance
10 km
Max flight distance
10 km
▲ Better than 73% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 10 km, farther than 72.9% of drones and equal to 5.5% of drones.
Limited by the controller range.
Max flight speed
16 m/s
Max flight speed
16 m/s
▲ Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 16 m/s, faster than 54.4% of drones and equal to 10.8% of drones.
Value reflects maximum mode speed (for example Sport/Manual mode).
Max wind resistance
10.7 m/s
Max wind resistance
10.7 m/s
▲ Better than 49% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 10.7 m/s, higher than 48.9% of drones and equal to 23.7% of drones.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
4,000 m
Max service ceiling (ASL)
4,000 m
▲ Better than 51% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone has a max service ceiling of 4,000 m, higher than 50.8% of drones and equal to 13.4% of drones.
Show more
Video resolution
8K
Video resolution
8K
★ Better than 96% of models
This drone records video at 8K, higher than 96% of drones and equal to 0.5% of drones.
8K applies to 360 mode.
4K camera
yes
4K camera
yes
▲ Better than 46% of models
This drone supports 4K video. 46% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
1/1.28"
Sensor size
1/1.28"
▲ Better than 79% of models
This drone has a sensor size of 1/1.28", larger than 78.7% of drones and equal to 3.7% of drones.
Main camera megapixels
55 MP
Main camera megapixels
55 MP
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has a main camera resolution of 55 MP, higher than 98.7% of drones.
Total 360 still resolution from dual cameras.
Max movie bitrate
170 Mbps
Max movie bitrate
170 Mbps
▲ Better than 89% of models
Market range: <40 Mbps – >180 Mbps
This drone has a max movie bitrate of 170 Mbps, higher than 89.5% of drones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Obstacle detection
yes
Obstacle detection
yes
▲ Better than 70% of models
This drone supports obstacle detection. 69.5% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
?
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 35% of models
This drone supports GPS. 35.3% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
GPS, Galileo, BeiDou
GNSS systems supported
GPS, Galileo, BeiDou
▲ Better than 73% of models
This drone supports GPS, Galileo, BeiDou GNSS systems, which are more comprehensive than those of 73.4% and the same as those of 8.5%.
Obstacle sensing directions
omnidirectional
Obstacle sensing directions
omnidirectional
▲ Better than 83% of models
This drone senses obstacles in omnidirectional directions, which is more comprehensive than that of 83.4% and the same as that of 16.6%.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max transmission distance
10 km
Max transmission distance
10 km
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 10 km, farther than 75.5% of drones and equal to 9.2% of drones.
About 6 km in CE mode.
Transmission latency
150 ms
Transmission latency
150 ms
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <100 ms – >220 ms
This drone has transmission latency of 150 ms, higher than 59.2% of drones and equal to 1.4% of drones.
Video transmission system
Digital Transmission
Video transmission system
Digital Transmission
▲ Better than 58% of models
This drone uses Digital Transmission for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 58.5% and the same as that used by 8.7%.
Live view quality
2560x2560@30 fps
Live view quality
2560x2560@30 fps
★ Better than 100% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 2560x2560@30 fps, higher-quality than 100% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
▲ Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
2,360 mAh
Battery capacity
2,360 mAh
▲ Better than 59% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 2,360 mAh, larger than 59.1% of drones.
Battery energy
16.9 Wh
Battery energy
16.9 Wh
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has battery energy of 16.9 Wh, lower than 52.4% of drones.
Charging time
45 min
Charging time
45 min
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <55 min – >180 min
This drone charges in 45 min, faster than 95% of drones and equal to 1.9% of drones.
Weight
249 g
Weight
249 g
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 249 g, heavier than 51% of drones and equal to 11.3% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Antigravity A1 vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • Supports obstacle detection
    Obstacle detection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    This drone supports obstacle detection, while the average drone does not.
  • Larger sensor size
    Sensor size
    1/1.28"
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This drone has a larger sensor than the average drone (1/1.28" vs 1/2.3"). The average drone uses a sensor of 1/2.3".
    1/1.28" vs 1/2.3"
  • 70 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Max movie bitrate
    170 Mbps
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <40 Mbps – >180 Mbps
    This drone supports a higher maximum video bitrate than the average drone (170 Mbps vs 100 Mbps). The average drone supports a maximum video bitrate of 100 Mbps.
    170 Mbps vs 100 Mbps
  • 9 km longer transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    10 km
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a longer max transmission distance than the average drone (10 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    About 6 km in CE mode.
    10 km vs 1 km
  • 9 km longer flight distance
    Max flight distance
    10 km
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a longer max flight distance than the average drone (10 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    Limited by the controller range.
    10 km vs 1 km
  • Supports low-light mode
    Low light mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This drone supports low-light mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Better live view quality
    Live view quality
    2560x2560@30 fps
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    This drone has better live view quality than the average drone (2560x2560@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    2560x2560@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • More video codec options
    Video codecs supported
    H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    This drone supports H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC video codecs, while the average drone supports H.264/AVC.
    H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC vs H.264/AVC
  • 9 km longer flight distance
    Max flight distance
    10 km
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a longer max flight distance than the average drone (10 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    Limited by the controller range.
    10 km vs 1 km
  • 3 m/s faster ascent speed
    Max ascent speed
    8 m/s
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <3 m/s – >8 m/s
    This drone climbs faster than the average drone (8 m/s vs 5 m/s). The average drone climbs at 5 m/s.
    Value reflects maximum ascent speed in higher-performance flight mode.
    8 m/s vs 5 m/s
  • 4 m/s faster descent speed
    Max descent speed
    8 m/s
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <2 m/s – >8 m/s
    This drone descends faster than the average drone (8 m/s vs 4 m/s). The average drone descends at 4 m/s.
    Value reflects maximum descent speed in higher-performance flight mode.
    8 m/s vs 4 m/s
  • 2 years newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2025 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    December 2025
    2025 vs 2023
  • 4 min longer flight time
    Max flight time
    24 min
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers longer max flight time than the average drone (24 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    39 minutes with the high-capacity battery.
    24 min vs 20 min
  • 1 m/s faster flight speed
    Max flight speed
    16 m/s
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a higher max flight speed than the average drone (16 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    Value reflects maximum mode speed (for example Sport/Manual mode).
    16 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • Larger sensor size
    Sensor size
    1/1.28"
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This drone has a larger sensor than the average drone (1/1.28" vs 1/2.3"). The average drone uses a sensor of 1/2.3".
    1/1.28" vs 1/2.3"
  • 70 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Max movie bitrate
    170 Mbps
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <40 Mbps – >180 Mbps
    This drone supports a higher maximum video bitrate than the average drone (170 Mbps vs 100 Mbps). The average drone supports a maximum video bitrate of 100 Mbps.
    170 Mbps vs 100 Mbps
  • Supports low-light mode
    Low light mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This drone supports low-light mode, while the average drone does not.
  • More video codec options
    Video codecs supported
    H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    This drone supports H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC video codecs, while the average drone supports H.264/AVC.
    H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC vs H.264/AVC
  • 43 MP more camera resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    55 MP
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
    This drone has more main camera megapixels than the average drone (55 MP vs 12 MP). The average drone has 12 MP on the main camera.
    Total 360 still resolution from dual cameras.
    55 MP vs 12 MP
  • Captures RAW photos
    RAW photo capture
    yes
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    This drone can capture RAW photos, while the average drone cannot.
    Supports DNG RAW photos.
  • Richer manual controls
    Manual camera controls
    full
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    This drone offers full manual camera controls, while the average drone offers no.
    full vs no
  • 20 GB more internal storage
    Internal storage
    20 GB
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >8 GB
    This drone has more internal storage than the average drone (20 GB vs 0 GB). The average drone has 0 GB of internal storage.
    20 GB vs 0 GB
  • Supports slow-motion mode
    Slow-motion mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This drone supports slow-motion mode, while the average drone does not.
    4K slow motion is supported at up to 100fps.
  • 270 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    360 °
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (360 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    360 stitched capture.
    360 ° vs 90 °
  • Supports HDR mode
    HDR mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This drone supports HDR mode, while the average drone does not.
    HDR is supported for photos.
  • Higher photo resolution
    Photo resolution
    10496 x 5248 px
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This drone offers higher photo resolution than the average drone (10496x5248 px vs 4096x3072 px). The average drone offers a photo resolution of 4096x3072 px.
    10496x5248 px vs 4096x3072 px
  • Higher video resolution
    Video resolution
    8K
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    This drone offers higher video resolution than the average drone (8K vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    8K applies to 360 mode.
    8K vs 4K/100 fps
  • More color profile options
    Color profiles
    Normal, Vivid
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    This drone supports Normal, Vivid color profiles, while the average drone supports Normal.
    Normal, Vivid vs Normal
  • Supports burst mode
    Burst mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone supports burst mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This drone supports panorama mode, while the average drone does not.
  • 872 GB higher memory card limit
    Max external memory supported
    1,000 GB
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >512 GB
    This drone supports more external storage than the average drone (1000 GB vs 128 GB). The average drone supports up to 128 GB of external storage.
    1,000 GB vs 128 GB
  • Supports obstacle detection
    Obstacle detection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    This drone supports obstacle detection, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports waypoint flight
    Waypoint flight
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports QuickShots
    QuickShots
    yes
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    This drone supports QuickShots, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • Remote ID
    Remote ID
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This drone supports Remote ID, while the average drone does not.
  • 9 km longer transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    10 km
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a longer max transmission distance than the average drone (10 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    About 6 km in CE mode.
    10 km vs 1 km
  • Better live view quality
    Live view quality
    2560x2560@30 fps
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    This drone has better live view quality than the average drone (2560x2560@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    2560x2560@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • More frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • 45 min shorter charging time
    Charging time
    45 min
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges faster than the average drone (45 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    45 min vs 90 min
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    USB-C
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses USB-C for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    USB-C vs micro-USB
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    fixed °
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (fixed ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    fixed ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    DNG (RAW)
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This drone supports DNG (RAW) photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    DNG (RAW) vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Digital Transmission
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This drone uses Digital Transmission for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Digital Transmission vs SkyLink 2.0
  • 141.3 mm wider width
    Width
    382.3 mm
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (382.3 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    382.3 mm vs 241 mm
  • 107.3 mm longer body length
    Length
    382.3 mm
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is longer than the average drone (382.3 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    382.3 mm vs 275 mm
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    GPS, Galileo, BeiDou
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This drone supports GPS, Galileo, BeiDou GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    GPS, Galileo, BeiDou vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • 5.25x more expensive
    Antigravity A1 is more expensive than the average drone (£1,050 vs £200).
    £1,050 vs £200
  • 26.7 mm taller body height
    Height
    89.2 mm
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is taller than the average drone (89.2 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    89.2 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 5.25x more expensive
    Antigravity A1 is more expensive than the average drone (£1,050 vs £200).
    £1,050 vs £200
  • 3.1% worse value for money
    Antigravity A1 has worse value for money than the average drone (6.85 vs 7.1).
    6.85 vs 7.06
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    DNG (RAW)
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This drone supports DNG (RAW) photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    DNG (RAW) vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    fixed °
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (fixed ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    fixed ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • Narrower aperture
    Aperture
    f/2.2
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This drone has a narrower aperture than the average drone (f/2.2 vs f/2). The average drone uses an aperture of f/2.
    f/2.2 vs f/2
  • 3 x lower digital zoom
    Digital zoom
    0 x
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >16 x
    This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
    Reframing is done after capture.
    0 x vs 3 x
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    GPS, Galileo, BeiDou
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This drone supports GPS, Galileo, BeiDou GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    GPS, Galileo, BeiDou vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No headless mode
    Headless mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support headless mode, while the average drone does.
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Digital Transmission
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This drone uses Digital Transmission for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Digital Transmission vs SkyLink 2.0
  • 20 ms higher latency
    Transmission latency
    150 ms
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <100 ms – >220 ms
    This drone has higher transmission latency than the average drone (150 ms vs 130 ms). The average drone has transmission latency of 130 ms.
    150 ms vs 130 ms
  • Basic companion app
    Companion app
    Antigravity
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This drone uses the Antigravity companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    Antigravity vs HS FPV
  • More basic controller
    Controller model
    Grip
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This drone uses the Grip controller, while the average drone uses LiteRadio 4 SE.
    Grip vs LiteRadio 4 SE
  • 141.3 mm wider width
    Width
    382.3 mm
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (382.3 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    382.3 mm vs 241 mm
  • 107.3 mm longer body length
    Length
    382.3 mm
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is longer than the average drone (382.3 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    382.3 mm vs 275 mm
  • 26.7 mm taller body height
    Height
    89.2 mm
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is taller than the average drone (89.2 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    89.2 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 1.2% higher weight
    Weight
    249 g
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is heavier than the average drone (249 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    249 g vs 246 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Drone On
≈ estimated
25/08/2026
Long-term review · 8 months of owner flying
Verdict
Antigravity A1 is not a DJI replacement, but it is a fun, different 360 drone worth owning for creative shots.
9.0
Greg Toope
≈ estimated
23/08/2026
Long-term review · 3 months of regular flying
Verdict
Antigravity A1 won't replace every drone, but it is fun and worth owning if you like flying.
8.0
Learn Online Video
≈ estimated
29/05/2026
Hands-on review · 360 footage, flight feel and wind test
Verdict
Antigravity A1 delivers on its 360 promise and creative freedom, though image quality, low light and wind are limits.
8.0
Nick Kendall
≈ estimated
31/03/2026
Hands-on review · a month of flying in two countries
Verdict
Antigravity A1 is not a cinematic drone, but it is a fun way to capture reframeable shots on holiday.
9.0
DM Productions
≈ estimated
27/01/2026
Long-term review · 10 weeks of real flying
Verdict
Antigravity A1 is not perfect, but it is a unique, fun 360 drone that should keep improving with firmware updates.
9.0
Denis Barbas
≈ estimated
26/12/2025
Long-term review · flight experience, image quality and battery
Verdict
Antigravity A1 is recommended for its immersive flying, though image quality is modest and battery options are limited.
8.0
Mary Bautista
≈ estimated
04/12/2025
Beginner hands-on review · flight, app and footage
Verdict
Antigravity A1 is a first-generation drone with a few rough edges, but still a solid 360 drone.
9.0
Drone Camps RC
≈ estimated
26/08/2026
First flight · wind test and first impressions
Verdict
Antigravity A1 is worth the money, with a flying experience unlike any other drone.
8.0
51 Drones
≈ estimated
04/12/2025
First flight · flight experience and menu walkthrough
Verdict
Antigravity A1 is very fun to fly, with the experience as its main appeal, and detailed testing is promised for later videos.
Brand video

What reviewers agree on

Based on 19 · 44

Reviewers love the all-around recording and immersive flying, but image quality disappoints, it feels pricey, and the goggles divide opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Antigravity A1

  • Unmatched immersive flying experience through real-time 360-degree vision goggles.
  • Post-flight reframing allows users to choose any camera angle after the flight has ended.
  • Ultra-lightweight design (under 249g) avoids registration requirements in many regions.
  • Intuitive 'point-to-fly' motion controller is beginner-friendly and feels natural.
  • Replaceable camera lenses provide peace of mind for an exposed dual-lens system.
  • Onboard 20GB storage reduces reliance on external microSD cards.

What we don't like about Antigravity A1

  • Higher price point compared to traditional drones of a similar size.
  • Image quality becomes noticeably soft and grainy when cropping tightly into 360-degree footage.
  • Transmission range and signal stability can be poor in environments with obstacles or interference.
  • Goggles setup is somewhat cumbersome, requiring a wired external battery pack worn around the neck.
  • Lack of traditional 'stick' controller options may frustrate experienced drone pilots.
  • Battery life varies significantly, requiring the more expensive 'High-Capacity' battery to reach advertised 39-minute flight times.

Verdict

The Antigravity A1 is a revolutionary 8K 360-degree drone incubated by Insta360, featuring a dual-lens top-and-bottom configuration that captures spherical footage with a seamless 'invisible drone' effect. Weighing under 249g with its standard battery to meet regulatory thresholds, it boasts 1/1.28-inch sensors capable of 8K video at 30fps and 4K slow-motion at 100fps, alongside an immersive live-view experience via Vision goggles and a gesture-based Grip motion controller. Its main pros include the 'fly first, reframe later' creative freedom, high-resolution 360 capture, and intuitive controls that make it accessible for beginners. However, it faces some drawbacks, such as a high premium price tag, a steeper learning curve for spherical video editing, and noticeable image softening when significantly zoomed or cropped compared to traditional camera drones.

Compare Antigravity A1 with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Antigravity A1 and other drones

No results found