Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:336 gBattery life (CIPA):270 shots

Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.7

Technical score

10%

6.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 65% of cameras
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

3.6

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

7.7

Display & Design

8%

4.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 63% of cameras
6.1

User score

User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

Based on 13 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 98% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

3.6

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

7.7

Display & Design

8%

4.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.7
User score
User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

Based on 13 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.1
Popularity
Popularity
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3 has a popularity score of 4.5, which is higher than 56.1% of cameras.
4.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.8

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

6.4
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.05 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.05 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.05 MP, which is lower than that of 61.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.77 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.77 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.77 µm, which are larger than those in 60.8% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
160
Base ISO
160
This camera has a base ISO of 160 which is higher than that of 80.6% of cameras and equal to that of 4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
23
N. of focus points
23
This camera has 23 focus points, more than the number offered by 44.6% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 5.7% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 17 Mbps which is lower than that of 77.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
336 g
Weight
336 g
This camera weighs 336 g which is lighter than 58.3% of cameras.
Width
115 mm
Width
115 mm
This camera has a width of 115 mm which is narrower than 57.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Height
83.6 mm
Height
83.6 mm
This camera has a height of 83.6 mm which is taller than 60.4% of cameras.
Thickness
46.7 mm
Thickness
46.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 46.7 mm which is thicker than 50.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
270 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
270 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 270 shots, which is shorter than that of 68% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,010 mAh
Battery capacity
1,010 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,010 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 68.8% of cameras and equal to those in 0.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    2.5 mm mic/remote jack; adapter required for 3.5 mm mics.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 2 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    2
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (2 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • 0.43 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.77 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.77 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 2 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    2
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (2 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • 59 g lighter
    Weight
    336 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (336 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    336 g vs 395 g
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 0.43 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.77 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.77 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 60 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    160
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (160 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    160 vs 100
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 90 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    120 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (120 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    120 s vs 30 s
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    2.5 mm mic/remote jack; adapter required for 3.5 mm mics.
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 2 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.0 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.0 points vs 23.0 points
  • 1.8 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.6 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.6 points vs 12.4 points
  • 17 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    56 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (56 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    56 points vs 73 points
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 30.7% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3
    the average camera
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3 has a lower user score than the average camera (6.12 vs 8.000).
    6.12 vs 8
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 9.7 mm taller body
    Height
    83.6 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (83.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    83.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 1.8 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.6 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.6 points vs 12.4 points
  • 2 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.0 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.0 points vs 23.0 points
  • 17 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    56 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (56 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    56 points vs 73 points
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    May 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.05 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.05 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 176 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    667 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (667 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    667 points vs 843 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 13 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    17 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 60 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    270 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (270 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    270 shots vs 330 shots
  • 110 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,010 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (1010 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,010 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
08/07/2011
Summary of the review
P
popphoto.com
27/07/2011
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
24/11/2011
Summary of the review
L
luminous-landscape.com
05/07/2011
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
14/10/2011
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
12/09/2011
Summary of the review
G
gstylemag.com
17/04/2012
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
24/11/2011
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
11/06/2011
Summary of the review
S
sansmirror.com
26/06/2018
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
10/08/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
18/05/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
12/05/2011
Summary of the review
K
kurier.at
05/12/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
28/07/2011
Summary of the review
T
thomas-elsner.de
2012/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/05/2011
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
22/07/2011
Summary of the review
L
lense.fr
19/10/2011
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
Undated (Sensor Data)
Summary of the review
P
priice.fr
25/06/2013
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
11/07/2011
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
10/03/2012
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
29/08/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
12/02/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 13 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3

  • Compact and lightweight body, significantly smaller than the previous G2
  • Very responsive and well-implemented touchscreen interface
  • High-resolution, fully articulated LCD screen
  • Fast and reliable autofocus system for its class
  • Good overall image quality with sharp detail at low to moderate ISO settings
  • Includes a high-quality built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF)

What we don't like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3

  • Removal of some physical controls, such as the AF/AE lock and dedicated eye sensor
  • Small hand grip (often called a 'finger nubbin') compared to the deeper grip on the G2
  • Noticeable noise levels when shooting at high ISO settings (above ISO 1600)
  • Battery life is relatively short, rated for approximately 270 shots per charge
  • Lack of an external microphone jack for video recording
  • Slow buffer clearing speeds when shooting in RAW mode

Verdict

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 is a compact Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 16-megapixel Live MOS sensor and a Venus Engine FHD processor capable of Full HD 1080i video recording. Its main characteristics include a 3.0-inch fully articulated 460k-dot touchscreen, a high-resolution 1.44 million-dot electronic viewfinder, and a 'Light Speed' contrast-detect autofocus system with 23 points. Key pros are its remarkably lightweight 336g aluminium body, fast 0.1-second focus speeds, and responsive touch interface that allows for pinpoint AF selection anywhere on the frame. However, notable cons include below-average battery life (rated at approximately 270 shots), the absence of an external microphone input, and the lack of an eye sensor for automatic switching between the viewfinder and LCD screen.

Compare Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Panasonic LUMIX DMC G3 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found