Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus PEN E-PL2 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:362 gBattery life (CIPA):280 shots

Olympus PEN E-PL2 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 60% of cameras
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.0

Sensor & Image

25%

5.1

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

6.2

Display & Design

8%

4.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 53% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus PEN E-PL2

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.0

Sensor & Image

25%

5.1

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

6.2

Display & Design

8%

4.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus PEN E-PL2 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.9

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

6.4
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.3 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.3 MP, which is lower than that of 83.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.7% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.29 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.29 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.29 µm, which are larger than those in 69.7% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
11
N. of focus points
11
This camera has 11 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 60.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 6.5% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
31 Mbps
Video bitrate
31 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 31 Mbps which is higher than that of 52.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
362 g
Weight
362 g
This camera weighs 362 g which is lighter than 54% of cameras.
Width
114 mm
Width
114 mm
This camera has a width of 114 mm which is narrower than 58% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Height
72.7 mm
Height
72.7 mm
This camera has a height of 72.7 mm which is shorter than 51.1% of cameras.
Thickness
42 mm
Thickness
42 mm
This camera has a thickness of 42 mm which is thinner than 54.3% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
280 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
280 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 280 shots, which is shorter than that of 66.6% of cameras and equal to that of 1.3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,150 mAh
Battery capacity
1,150 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,150 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 50.6% of cameras and equal to those in 1.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus PEN E-PL2 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    Accessory port via SEMA-1 adapter.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 0.95 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.29 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.29 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Olympus PEN E-PL2 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 0.95 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.29 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.29 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    Accessory port via SEMA-1 adapter.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2.2 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.2 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.2 points vs 12.4 points
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus PEN E-PL2 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 2.2 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.2 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.2 points vs 12.4 points
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 18 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    55 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (55 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    55 points vs 73 points
  • 1.6 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.4 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21.4 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.4 points vs 23.0 points
  • 270 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    573 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (573 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    573 points vs 843 points
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    3 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (3 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    3 stops vs 4 stops
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 16 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    14 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (14 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    14 min vs 30 min
  • 50 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    280 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (280 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    280 shots vs 330 shots
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
12/02/2011
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
25/01/2011
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
02/02/2011
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
14/04/2011
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
05/05/2011
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
15/02/2011
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
08/05/2013
Summary of the review
N
neocamera.com
05/01/2011
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
06/07/2011
Summary of the review
A
alexcoghe.com
18/11/2023
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
20/04/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
04/04/2011
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
25/02/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
10/02/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/03/2011
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
26/04/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/02/2011
Summary of the review
P
priice.fr
29/04/2013
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
11/02/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/02/2011
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
01/01/2011
Summary of the review
J
juancmmartin.wordpress.com
14/05/2011
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
24/07/2011
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
09/02/2011
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
03/03/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Olympus PEN E-PL2

  • Excellent image quality with sharp details and vibrant colors
  • Compact, light and well-made case
  • Great sensor in a handy package
  • Responsive operation and improved live guide for beginners
  • Large 3-inch high-resolution screen
  • Support for a wide range of lenses and accessories

What we don't like about Olympus PEN E-PL2

  • Video files are very large due to inefficient formats
  • The exposure control via the rear dial is a bit complicated when changing settings frequently
  • The integrated pop-up flash is a bit underpowered
  • No position sensor available; Portrait images must be rotated manually
  • The video record button is awkwardly placed and can easily be pressed accidentally
  • Compared to modern standards, the ISO range is somewhat limited

Verdict

The Olympus PEN E-PL2 is a Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 12.3-megapixel Live MOS sensor, a TruePic V image processor, and a built-in sensor-shift image stabilisation system. Key technical specifications include a 3-inch 460k-dot LCD screen, an ISO range of 200–6400, a maximum shutter speed of 1/4000s, and 720p HD video recording at 30fps. Its main characteristics are a compact, portable design with a built-in pop-up flash and an updated 'Live Wheel' control dial for easier navigation. Primary pros include excellent out-of-camera JPEG quality, a versatile range of creative 'Art Filters,' and compatibility with a vast ecosystem of Micro Four Thirds lenses and accessories via its AP2 port. However, it faces some drawbacks, such as a lack of 1080p Full HD video, relatively slow continuous shooting at 3fps, a somewhat complex menu system, and the absence of a built-in electronic viewfinder.

Compare Olympus PEN E-PL2 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus PEN E-PL2 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found