Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:264 gBattery life (CIPA):340 shots

Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.4

Technical score

10%

7.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 67% of cameras
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

3.6

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

6.7

Display & Design

8%

4.7

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 73% of cameras
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

6.8

Number of reviews

Based on 89 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 81% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

3.6

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

6.7

Display & Design

8%

4.7

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.4
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

6.8

Number of reviews

Based on 89 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 has a popularity score of 6.8, which is higher than 66.5% of cameras.
6.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.3
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.1 MP, which is lower than that of 86.6% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.33 µm, which are larger than those in 73.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
160
Base ISO
160
This camera has a base ISO of 160 which is higher than that of 80.6% of cameras and equal to that of 4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
23
N. of focus points
23
This camera has 23 focus points, more than the number offered by 44.6% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 5.7% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 17 Mbps which is lower than that of 77.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
264 g
Weight
264 g
This camera weighs 264 g which is lighter than 67.3% of cameras.
Width
108 mm
Width
108 mm
This camera has a width of 108 mm which is narrower than 69.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Height
67.1 mm
Height
67.1 mm
This camera has a height of 67.1 mm which is shorter than 59.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Thickness
32.5 mm
Thickness
32.5 mm
This camera has a thickness of 32.5 mm which is thinner than 73.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
340 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
340 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 340 shots, which is longer than that of 52.2% of cameras and equal to that of 2.3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
940 mAh
Battery capacity
940 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 940 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 74% of cameras and equal to those in 0.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 131 g lighter
    Weight
    264 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (264 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    264 g vs 395 g
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 13.5 mm thinner
    Thickness
    32.5 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (32.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    32.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 131 g lighter
    Weight
    264 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (264 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    264 g vs 395 g
  • 13.5 mm thinner
    Thickness
    32.5 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (32.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    32.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 11.9 mm narrower
    Width
    108 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (108 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    108 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 60 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    160
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (160 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    160 vs 100
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 23 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    50 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (50 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    50 points vs 73 points
  • 2.4 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    20.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (20.6 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    20.6 points vs 23.0 points
  • 2.3 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.1 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.1 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.1 points vs 12.4 points
  • 1.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3
    the average camera
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.88 vs 8.000).
    7.88 vs 8
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 23 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    50 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (50 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    50 points vs 73 points
  • 2.3 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.1 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.1 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.1 points vs 12.4 points
  • 2.4 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    20.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (20.6 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    20.6 points vs 23.0 points
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 384 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    459 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (459 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    459 points vs 843 points
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    June 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • 1.9 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.8 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 13 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    17 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 180 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    940 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (940 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    940 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
whatdigitalcamera.com
19/07/2011
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
29/07/2011
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
11/08/2011
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
31/10/2011
Summary of the review
S
sansmirror.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
08/07/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
25/10/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
26/07/2011
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
04/08/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
30/09/2011
Summary of the review
A
avguide.ch
26/09/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
15/08/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
16/08/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
30/09/2011
Summary of the review
A
avguide.ch
29/08/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/08/2011
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
08/08/2011
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
11/08/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/08/2011
Summary of the review
J
juancmmartin.wordpress.com
05/09/2011
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
12/06/2011
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
17/06/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 89 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3

  • Extremely compact and lightweight design, often described as 'pocketable' with pancake lenses
  • Fast and responsive autofocus system with a helpful 'touch-to-focus' feature
  • User-friendly for beginners transitioning from point-and-shoot cameras, especially with the iAuto (Intelligent Auto) mode
  • Capable of producing high-quality 12MP images that far exceed standard compact cameras
  • Solid build quality and refined, curvy aesthetics compared to its predecessors
  • Highly affordable on the used market, making it an excellent budget-friendly entry into the Micro Four Thirds system

What we don't like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3

  • Lacks a flash hotshoe and an accessory port for an external viewfinder
  • Limited physical controls and dials, requiring heavy reliance on the touchscreen menus for manual adjustments
  • Lower video specifications including mono-only sound and lack of external microphone support
  • Battery life is relatively short due to the smaller battery size used for the compact body
  • Struggles with dynamic range in bright light, often resulting in clipped highlights
  • High-ISO performance shows noticeable noise beyond ISO 1600

Verdict

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 is an ultra-compact Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 12.1-megapixel Live MOS sensor, a Venus Engine FHD processor, and a 3-inch 460k-dot resistive touchscreen. Key specifications include an ISO range of 160–6400, a maximum shutter speed of 1/4000 second, and 1080i full HD video recording in AVCHD format at 60i/50i. Its main strengths are its remarkably small and lightweight 222g body, exceptionally fast contrast-detect 'Light Speed' autofocus, and the inclusion of a built-in pop-up flash in a pocket-sized design. However, significant drawbacks include the lack of a hot shoe or accessory port for an external viewfinder/flash, mono-only audio recording for video, and mediocre low-light performance with noticeable noise at higher ISO settings.

Compare Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Panasonic LUMIX DMC GF3 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found