Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£880Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:469 gBattery life (CIPA):310 shots

Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 82% of cameras
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.6

Sensor & Image

25%

7.1

Photo Features

18%

6.3

Video & Audio

14%

8.2

Display & Design

8%

5.0

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 83% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus OM-D E-M5 II

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.6

Sensor & Image

25%

7.1

Photo Features

18%

6.3

Video & Audio

14%

8.2

Display & Design

8%

5.0

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

6.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

5.9

Price

6.4
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16 MP, which is lower than that of 61.9% of cameras and equal to that of 10.1% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.76 µm, which are larger than those in 55.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 5.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
81
N. of focus points
81
This camera has 81 focus points, more than the number offered by 72.9% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 1% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
77 Mbps
Video bitrate
77 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 77 Mbps which is higher than that of 71.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
HDMI
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
HDMI
Video codecs
H.264, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
469 g
Weight
469 g
This camera weighs 469 g which is heavier than 58.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
123.7 mm
Width
123.7 mm
This camera has a width of 123.7 mm which is wider than 58.5% of cameras.
Height
85 mm
Height
85 mm
This camera has a height of 85 mm which is taller than 61.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Thickness
44.5 mm
Thickness
44.5 mm
This camera has a thickness of 44.5 mm which is thinner than 51.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
310 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
310 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 310 shots, which is shorter than that of 55.2% of cameras and equal to that of 2.3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,220 mAh
Battery capacity
1,220 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,220 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 55.9% of cameras and equal to those in 0.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus OM-D E-M5 II vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Combined stabilization
    Combined image stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports combined stabilization, the average camera does not.
    Sync IS supported.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 0.7 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.48 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1.5 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.48 x vs 0.78 x
  • 6 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    6
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (6 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    6 vs 0
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 2 newer
    Release date
    2015
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2015 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    February 2015
    2,015 vs 2,013
  • 0.42 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.76 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.76 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Combined stabilization
    Combined image stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports combined stabilization, the average camera does not.
    Sync IS supported.
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 58 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    81
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (81 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    81 vs 23
  • 1 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    5 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    ORF RAW uses lossless compression.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Pixel shift shooting
    Pixel shift shot
    yes
    This camera supports pixel shift shooting, the average camera does not.
    Tripod high-resolution mode supported.
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
  • 50,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    150,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (150,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    unofficial estimate
    150,000 vs 100,000
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    HDMI
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Supports timecode
    Timecode support
    yes
    This camera supports timecode, the average camera does not.
  • Clean HDMI output
    Clean HDMI output
    yes
    This camera offers clean HDMI output, the average camera does not.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
  • 47 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    77 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (77 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    77 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
    Up to 999 shots
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via OI.Share
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
    Bundled external flash, not built in.
  • 3.03x more expensive
    Olympus OM-D E-M5 II is more expensive than the average camera (£880 vs £290).
    £880 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M5 II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 74 g heavier
    Weight
    469 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (469 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    469 g vs 395 g
  • 3.03x more expensive
    Olympus OM-D E-M5 II is more expensive than the average camera (£880 vs £290).
    £880 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M5 II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
    Bundled external flash, not built in.
  • 74 g heavier
    Weight
    469 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (469 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    469 g vs 395 g
  • 11.1 mm taller body
    Height
    85 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (85 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    85 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • 20 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    310 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (310 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    310 shots vs 330 shots

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
18/03/2015
Summary of the review
M
mirrorlessons.com
05/02/2015
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
18/02/2015
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
05/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
thecotswoldphotographer.com
12/11/2017
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
05/02/2015
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
24/02/2015
Summary of the review
N
neunzehn72.de
19/02/2015
Summary of the review
F
fotomagazin.de
20/04/2015
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
11/06/2017
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
13/05/2015
Summary of the review
N
neunzehn72.de
11/02/2015
Summary of the review
K
klecker.de
22/08/2017
Summary of the review
Z
zielfoto.com
12/03/2015
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/02/2015
Summary of the review
P
phototrend.fr
02/05/2016
Summary of the review
C
cachem.fr
02/11/2015
Summary of the review
Q
quechoisir.org
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/02/2015
Summary of the review
U
unsacsurledos.com
15/06/2016
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
17/02/2015
Summary of the review
P
photo-review.com
03/06/2015
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
09/03/2015
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
17/05/2015
Summary of the review
P
patatofriendly.com
20/03/2019
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
No date
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
05/02/2015
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
11/02/2015
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
04/06/2015
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
20/04/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Olympus OM-D E-M5 II

  • Exceptional 5-axis image stabilization (best in class)
  • Compact, solid and tropicalized machine body (weatherproof)
  • Large, bright electronic viewfinder (EVF).
  • Fully articulating screen, great for videos and difficult angles
  • Advanced creative features like High Res Mode 40MP, Live Time and Live Composite
  • Fast and precise autofocus
  • Wide selection of Micro Four Thirds lenses

What we don't like about Olympus OM-D E-M5 II

  • Complex and difficult to master menus
  • Smaller sensor than APS-C, with lower higher ISO performance
  • Default configuration of controls sometimes not very intuitive
  • Continuous autofocus not at the levels of current sports-oriented cameras
  • High Res mode requires a tripod

Verdict

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II is a compact, weather-sealed Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 16.1MP Live MOS sensor and a powerful 5-axis in-body image stabilization system providing up to 5 stops of compensation. Key specifications include a high-resolution 40MP multi-shot mode for static subjects, 10 fps continuous shooting, a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder, and a 3-inch fully articulating touchscreen. Main pros are its exceptionally robust, splash-proof build, class-leading stabilization that enables handheld long exposures, and highly customizable controls. Notable cons include a complex and unintuitive menu system, the absence of 4K video recording, and limited continuous autofocus performance for fast-moving subjects.

Compare Olympus OM-D E-M5 II with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and other products in the Cameras category

No results found