Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Fujifilm XF1 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Sensor size:2/3"Weight:225 gBattery life (CIPA):300 shots

Fujifilm XF1 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.5

Overall score

Score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.2

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

▼Worse than 77% of cameras
4.2

Technical score

Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

3.7

Sensor & Image

25%

4.0

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

4.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 81% of cameras
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 416 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 91% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Fujifilm XF1

Technical score
Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

3.7

Sensor & Image

25%

4.0

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

4.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

4.2
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 416 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Fujifilm XF1 has a popularity score of 8.8, which is higher than 82.8% of cameras.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.2
Sensor size
2/3"
Sensor size
2/3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 2/3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 56.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 0.5% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12 MP
Main camera megapixels
12 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12 MP, which is lower than that of 93.6% of cameras and equal to that of 1.7% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
2.2 µm
Main camera pixel size
2.2 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 2.2 µm, which are smaller than those in 56.5% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
49
N. of focus points
49
This camera has 49 focus points, more than the number offered by 60.7% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 8% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
225 g
Weight
225 g
This camera weighs 225 g which is lighter than 73.5% of cameras.
Width
108 mm
Width
108 mm
This camera has a width of 108 mm which is narrower than 69.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Height
61.5 mm
Height
61.5 mm
This camera has a height of 61.5 mm which is shorter than 74.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Thickness
33 mm
Thickness
33 mm
This camera has a thickness of 33 mm which is thinner than 71.1% of cameras and equal to that of 1.2% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
300 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
300 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 300 shots, which is shorter than that of 57.8% of cameras and equal to that of 6.7% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,000 mAh
Battery capacity
1,000 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 69.5% of cameras and equal to those in 2.4% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Fujifilm XF1 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 170 g lighter
    Weight
    225 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (225 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    225 g vs 395 g
  • 26 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    49
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (49 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    49 vs 23
  • 5.27x cheaper
    Fujifilm XF1 is cheaper than the average camera (£55 vs £290).
    £55 vs £290
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 0.03 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.025 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.025 GB vs 0 GB
  • 1.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    7 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (7 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    7 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
    Motion Panorama
  • 12.4 mm shorter body
    Height
    61.5 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (61.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    61.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 5.27x cheaper
    Fujifilm XF1 is cheaper than the average camera (£55 vs £290).
    £55 vs £290
  • 4.54x more popular
    Fujifilm XF1 is more popular than the average camera (8.77 vs 1.9).
    8.77 vs 1.93
  • 170 g lighter
    Weight
    225 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (225 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    225 g vs 395 g
  • 12.4 mm shorter body
    Height
    61.5 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (61.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    61.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 11.9 mm narrower
    Width
    108 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (108 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    108 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 13 mm thinner
    Thickness
    33 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (33 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    33 mm vs 46 mm
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 26 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    49
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (49 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    49 vs 23
  • 1.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    7 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (7 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    7 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
    Motion Panorama
  • 0.03 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.025 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.025 GB vs 0 GB
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0.5 vs -4
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    2/3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (2/3" vs APS-C).
    2/3" vs APS-C
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 2.5 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    20.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (20.5 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    20.5 points vs 23.0 points
  • 24 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    49 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (49 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    49 points vs 73 points
  • 8.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fujifilm XF1
    the average camera
    Fujifilm XF1 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.35 vs 8.000).
    7.35 vs 8
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    2/3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (2/3" vs APS-C).
    2/3" vs APS-C
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 24 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    49 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (49 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    49 points vs 73 points
  • 2.5 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    20.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (20.5 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    20.5 points vs 23.0 points
  • 644 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    199 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (199 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    199 points vs 843 points
  • 1.2 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.2 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.2 points vs 12.4 points
  • 1.14 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    2.2 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (2.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    2.2 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 12,500 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    Reduced resolution only.
    12,800 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0.5 vs -4
  • 120 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,000 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (1000 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,000 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 30 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    300 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (300 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    300 shots vs 330 shots

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
17/09/2012
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
09/11/2012
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
01/12/2012
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
09/12/2012
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
01/02/2013
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
07/03/2013
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
25/04/2013
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
20/05/2013
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
28/06/2013
Summary of the review
S
surfacedstudio.com
12/02/2014
Summary of the review
N
neocamera.com
Undated
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
19/12/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
04/01/2013
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
08/12/2012
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
07/01/2013
Summary of the review
D
dasfotoportal.de
29/01/2013
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
14/12/2012
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
29/04/2014
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
27/11/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/07/2015
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
15/02/2013
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
01/10/2012
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
16/01/2013
Summary of the review
C
clipset.com
16 de noviembre de 2012
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
27/11/2012
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
14/11/2012
Summary of the review
T
tvtech.it
12/11/2012
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
14/11/2012
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
28/11/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 416 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Fujifilm XF1

  • Stylish retro design with a premium, high-quality build
  • Fast f/1.8 maximum aperture at the wide-angle end
  • Tactile manual zoom lens that also serves as the power switch
  • Pocket-friendly, compact form factor
  • Fast autofocus performance and minimal shutter lag
  • Excellent customisation options, including the E-Fn button
  • Strong image quality at low ISOs with unique EXR sensor modes

What we don't like about Fujifilm XF1

  • High failure rate due to the notorious 'Lens Control Error'
  • Maximum aperture drops significantly to f/4.9 when zoomed in
  • Short battery life compared to competitors
  • Lack of a built-in viewfinder or hot shoe
  • Slow write speeds when shooting in RAW format
  • Potential for 'white orb' artifacts in high-contrast highlights
  • Fiddly multi-step process required to turn the camera on

Verdict

The Fujifilm XF1 is a premium compact camera featuring a unique retro-styled aluminum body with a 12-megapixel 2/3-inch EXR CMOS sensor and a fast f/1.8-4.9 manually operated 4x optical zoom lens (25-100mm equivalent). It is distinguished by its innovative lens-based power switch, full manual controls, and the ability to shoot in RAW, all while offering optical image stabilisation and 1080p HD video recording at 30fps. Main pros include its pocketable design, impressive low-light performance at wide angles due to the bright f/1.8 aperture, and quick, accurate autofocus. However, notable cons include significant edge softness in images, aggressive noise reduction at higher ISO settings, and a disappointing f/4.9 maximum aperture when fully zoomed.

Compare Fujifilm XF1 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fujifilm XF1 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found