OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Nikon COOLPIX L31 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:160 gBattery life (CIPA):200 shots

Nikon COOLPIX L31 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.9

Overall score

Score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

90%

3.4

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 95% of cameras
3.4

Technical score

Technical score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

28%

4.3

Sensor & Image

25%

1.7

Photo Features

18%

4.4

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

3.2

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 97% of cameras
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 386 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 79% of cameras
  • nikon-coolpix-l31
  • nikon-coolpix-l31
  • nikon-coolpix-l31
  • nikon-coolpix-l31
  • nikon-coolpix-l31
  • nikon-coolpix-l31
nikon-coolpix-l31
nikon-coolpix-l31
nikon-coolpix-l31
nikon-coolpix-l31
nikon-coolpix-l31
nikon-coolpix-l31

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Nikon COOLPIX L31

Technical score
Technical score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

28%

4.3

Sensor & Image

25%

1.7

Photo Features

18%

4.4

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

3.2

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

3.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 386 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Popularity:
Nikon COOLPIX L31 has a popularity score of 8.8, which is higher than 82.8% of cameras.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

60%

3.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

5.7
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.1 MP, which is lower than that of 53.3% of cameras and equal to that of 7.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.33 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.33 µm
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.33 µm, which are smaller than those in 88.2% of cameras and the same size as those in 3.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 1,600
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 1,600, which is lower than that of 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 13.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
1
N. of focus points
1
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has 1 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 95.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 4.6% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
â–² Better than 78% of models
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
160 g
Weight
160 g
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 160 g which is lighter than 86.7% of cameras.
Width
96.4 mm
Width
96.4 mm
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 96.4 mm which is narrower than 89.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Height
59.4 mm
Height
59.4 mm
â–² Better than 81% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 59.4 mm which is shorter than 80.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Thickness
28.9 mm
Thickness
28.9 mm
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 28.9 mm which is thinner than 79.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 200 shots, which is shorter than that of 90.5% of cameras and equal to that of 3.8% of cameras.
750 with lithium AA.
Battery capacity
N/A
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Nikon COOLPIX L31 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 235 g lighter
    Weight
    160 g
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (160 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    160 g vs 395 g
  • 23.5 mm narrower
    Width
    96.4 mm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (96.4 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    96.4 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 4.83x cheaper
    Nikon COOLPIX L31 is cheaper than the average camera (£60 vs £290).
    £60 vs £290
  • 14.5 mm shorter body
    Height
    59.4 mm
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (59.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    59.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 17.1 mm thinner
    Thickness
    28.9 mm
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (28.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    28.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • 2 newer
    Release date
    2015
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2015 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2015
    2,015 vs 2,013
  • 0.02 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.017 GB
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.017 GB vs 0 GB
  • 4.83x cheaper
    Nikon COOLPIX L31 is cheaper than the average camera (£60 vs £290).
    £60 vs £290
  • 4.57x more popular
    Nikon COOLPIX L31 is more popular than the average camera (8.82 vs 1.9).
    8.82 vs 1.93
  • 235 g lighter
    Weight
    160 g
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (160 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    160 g vs 395 g
  • 23.5 mm narrower
    Width
    96.4 mm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (96.4 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    96.4 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 14.5 mm shorter body
    Height
    59.4 mm
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (59.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    59.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 17.1 mm thinner
    Thickness
    28.9 mm
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (28.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    28.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • 2 newer
    Release date
    2015
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2015 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2015
    2,015 vs 2,013
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 0.02 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.017 GB
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.017 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 2.01 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.33 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 4.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.2 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 8.2% worse value for money
    Nikon COOLPIX L31 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.73 vs 6.2).
    5.73 vs 6.2
  • 0.5% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nikon COOLPIX L31
    the average camera
    Nikon COOLPIX L31 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.96 vs 8.000).
    7.96 vs 8
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.01 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.33 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    1,600 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (1600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 4.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.2 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 22 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <9 – >399
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (1 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    1 vs 23
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 26 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    4 s
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <4 s – >1.8k s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (4 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    4 s vs 30 s
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 130 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    200 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    750 with lithium AA.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
27/02/2015
Summary of the review
Nikon Coolpix L31 Review | ePHOTOzine
S
sequinsandsammy.wordpress.com
30/03/2016
Summary of the review
Nikon Coolpix L31 Review - Sequins & Sammy
F
fotocamerapro.it
04/06/2016
Summary of the review
Nikon Coolpix L31 Review, Opinions, Value for Money
(Translated)Show original
C
camerarace.com
N/D
Summary of the review
Nikon Coolpix L31 - Review and Specifications - Camerarace
(Translated)Show original
R
reway.nl
n.v.t.
Summary of the review
Nikon Coolpix L31 Digital Compact Camera - Product Specifications
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 386 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Nikon COOLPIX L31

  • Extremely affordable and offers high value for money for beginners or children.
  • Highly portable, lightweight (approx. 160g), and fits easily into pockets or small bags.
  • Simple button layout and intuitive interface make it very easy to use for novices.
  • Runs on standard, universally available AA batteries.
  • Features a 5x optical zoom lens, providing better versatility than many basic smartphones.
  • Reasonable startup and focus speeds for its class.

What we don't like about Nikon COOLPIX L31

  • Subpar image quality by modern standards, particularly in low light where grain noise and blur are common.
  • Short battery life, with some users reporting as few as 200 shots per set of batteries.
  • Slow processing speed and shutter lag, especially when using the flash.
  • Lacks modern features like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or RAW shooting capability.
  • Video recording is limited to a maximum of 720p HD resolution.
  • Build is not weather-sealed (not tropicalized), making it vulnerable in adverse conditions.

Verdict

The Nikon Coolpix L31 is a compact, entry-level digital camera featuring a 16.1-megapixel CCD sensor and a 5x optical zoom NIKKOR lens with a 26-130mm equivalent focal range and an f/3.2-6.5 aperture. It captures 720p HD video and features a 2.7-inch, 230k-dot TFT LCD screen, making it incredibly lightweight at 160g and simple for beginners to use with its automated shooting modes. Key advantages include its extreme portability, pocket-friendly size, and the convenience of running on readily available AA batteries. However, it lacks manual controls (including manual ISO adjustment), has poor low-light performance due to a limited ISO 80-1600 range, lacks optical image stabilisation, and suffers from slow processing speeds.

Compare Nikon COOLPIX L31 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nikon COOLPIX L31 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found