OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v3.0
Cameras Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Cameras Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Cameras Methodology v3.0

AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 review: 112 specs compared

Avg. price:~£80Sensor size:1/3.2"Weight:96 gBattery life (CIPA):?

AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 Review: Compare 112 technical specifications and 2 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200
5.4/10

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

35%

4.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

4.0

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 85% of cameras
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 58%
4.0

Technical score

Technical score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

3.8

Video & Audio

14%

4.2

Display & Design

8%

5.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.5

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 84%
4.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

4.0

Mark 6.9 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.3

Average grade

20%

5.7

Popularity

Grades by review (2)
2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 88%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
  • agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
  • agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
  • agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
  • agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
  • agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
  • agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
agfaphoto-realishot-dc8200
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Cameras model ranking

Ranked #372 of 975 models in Cameras (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of camera AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200

Technical score
Technical score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

3.8

Video & Audio

14%

4.2

Display & Design

8%

5.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.5

Connectivity & Storage

4.0
Reviews score
4.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.8
Sensor size
1/3.2"
This camera has a sensor size of 1/3.2", which is smaller than 99.1% of cameras and the same as 0.2% of cameras.
Sensor resolution
18 MP
This camera captures images at 18 MP, which is higher than 55.5% of cameras and equal to 1.8% of cameras.
Sensor pixel size
?
Base ISO
50
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 50, which is lower than 99.2% of cameras and equal to 0.8% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
This camera reaches ISO 1,600, which is lower than 85.6% of cameras and equal to 13.3% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
N/A
N. of focus points
1
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has a focus-point count of 1, which is lower than 94.8% of cameras and equal to 5.2% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 36.6% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 87.4% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera records at 1920 px, which is higher than the resolution in 28.7% of cameras and the same as in 46.7% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera records in 8 bit, which is higher than the colour depth in 8.2% of cameras and the same as in 79.8% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera records with 4:2:0, which is better than the chroma sampling in 8.2% of cameras and the same as in 70% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
96 g
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 96 g, which is lighter than 99.4% of cameras and equal to 0.1% of cameras.
Width
100 mm
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera is 100 mm wide, which is narrower than 82.6% of cameras and equal to 0.5% of cameras.
Height
60 mm
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera is 60 mm tall, which is shorter than 77.8% of cameras and equal to 1.7% of cameras.
Thickness
25 mm
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera is 25 mm thick, which is thinner than 85.5% of cameras and equal to 0.5% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
?
Battery capacity
700 mAh
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has 700 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 87.9% of cameras and equal to 4.1% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 97.8% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.6% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 48.2% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 24.1% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 16.4% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 293.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (96 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    96 g vs 389.5 g
  • More advanced viewfinder
    This camera has a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • 20.9 mm thinner
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (25 mm vs 45.9 mm). The average camera is 45.9 mm thick.
    25 mm vs 45.9 mm
  • 19 mm narrower
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (100 mm vs 119 mm). The average camera is 119 mm wide.
    100 mm vs 119 mm
  • 3.63x cheaper
    AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 is cheaper than the average camera (£80 vs £290).
    £80 vs £290
  • 13.7 mm shorter body
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (60 mm vs 73.7 mm). The average camera is 73.7 mm tall.
    60 mm vs 73.7 mm
  • 50 stops lower base ISO
    This camera has a lower base ISO than the average camera (50 vs 100). The average camera's base ISO is 100.
    50 vs 100
  • More megapixels
    This camera has more megapixels than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 3.63x cheaper
    AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 is cheaper than the average camera (£80 vs £290).
    £80 vs £290
  • 293.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (96 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    96 g vs 389.5 g
  • More advanced viewfinder
    This camera has a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • 19 mm narrower
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (100 mm vs 119 mm). The average camera is 119 mm wide.
    100 mm vs 119 mm
  • 20.9 mm thinner
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (25 mm vs 45.9 mm). The average camera is 45.9 mm thick.
    25 mm vs 45.9 mm
  • 13.7 mm shorter body
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (60 mm vs 73.7 mm). The average camera is 73.7 mm tall.
    60 mm vs 73.7 mm
  • 50 stops lower base ISO
    This camera has a lower base ISO than the average camera (50 vs 100). The average camera's base ISO is 100.
    50 vs 100
  • More megapixels
    This camera has more megapixels than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Smaller image sensor
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/3.2" vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    1/3.2" vs 2/3"
  • 38.5% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    4.0

    Mark 6.9 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.3

    Average grade

    20%

    5.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.0 vs 6.5
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 0.3 in smaller screen
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • No continuous video AF
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has a microphone count of 2.
    1 vs 2
  • 22 fewer focus points
    This camera has a lower focus-point count than the average camera (1 vs 23). The average camera has a count of 23.
    1 vs 23
  • 38.5% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    4.0

    Mark 6.9 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.3

    Average grade

    20%

    5.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.0 vs 6.5
  • 0.3 in smaller screen
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller image sensor
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/3.2" vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    1/3.2" vs 2/3"
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity
    This camera reaches a lower maximum ISO than the average camera (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO). The average camera's maximum ISO is 6,400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 22 fewer focus points
    This camera has a lower focus-point count than the average camera (1 vs 23). The average camera has a count of 23.
    1 vs 23
  • No RAW photo capture
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 61% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.4% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 71.5% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • No continuous video AF
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has a microphone count of 2.
    1 vs 2
  • 420 mAh less battery capacity
    This camera has a smaller battery than the average camera (700 mAh vs 1,120 mAh). The average camera has 1,120 mAh battery capacity.
    700 mAh vs 1,120 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

3.0
digitalcameraworld.com
✓ explicit
03/01/2025
Hands-on review · Pocket zoom camera
Verdict
The AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 is a slim pocket camera with an 8x zoom, but its image quality trails most phones.
7.0
techsonar.de
≈ estimated
07/08/2025
Hands-on test · Retro compact
Verdict
The AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 suits beginners and casual shooters who want simple daytime snaps, not low-light or fast-moving subjects.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200

  • An optical viewfinder lets you frame shots without relying on the screen.
  • At 96 g it is light enough for a day of walking.
  • Base ISO 50 keeps noise low in bright light.
  • The 18 MP sensor gives plenty of detail for prints.
  • The two-stage shutter button helps you focus before a shot.
  • HDMI output lets you show photos and clips on a TV.

What customers don't like about AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200

  • The 700 mAh battery is small, so spare batteries are worth carrying.
  • The top setting of 1600 ISO makes indoor shots grainy.
  • The 2.7 in screen is small for checking shots.
  • There is no touchscreen, so every setting is changed with buttons.
  • Transfers run over the slower USB 2.0 connection.

Verdict

An optical viewfinder is the first thing to notice on the AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200, a small compact that lets you frame shots through an eyepiece. The 96 g body is light, and at 100 mm wide it fits a jacket pocket. The 18 MP sensor and base ISO of 50 give clean, detailed pictures in good light, while the top setting of 1600 ISO leaves indoor shots grainy. The 2.7 in screen is modest, but the two-stage shutter helps you lock focus before shooting. Video reaches 1920 px, and HDMI output lets you show clips on a TV. The trade-off is the small 700 mAh battery, so a spare is worth carrying on a day out. It suits a buyer who wants a light, traditional compact for daylight trips and does not mind grain indoors.

Compare AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AgfaPhoto Realishot DC8200 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found