OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v3.0
Cameras Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Cameras Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Cameras Methodology v3.0

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 review: 112 specs compared

Avg. price:~£90Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:125 gBattery life (CIPA):200 shots

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 Review: Compare 112 technical specifications and 8 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800
4.9/10

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

35%

3.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

3.7

Reviews score

10%

3.7

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 96% of cameras
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 81%
3.7

Technical score

Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

28%

4.6

Sensor & Image

25%

3.4

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

3.9

Display & Design

8%

2.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 90%
3.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models

3.7

Mark 7.4 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.5

Average grade

20%

7.2

Popularity

Grades by review (8)
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 94%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
  • sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w800
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800

Based on 1 · 7

Reviewers like how small, light and easy to use it is, but video quality and low-light shots disappoint.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800

Based on 93 owners sharing their experience in online comments

23%positive39%mixed38%negative

Owners value its sharp, attractive photos and easy operation, but focus problems, weak video, and power faults keep reviews mixed.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the focus keeps going in and out while filming video, making footage blurry, and they ask how to stop it.8
  • Owners say the camera won't charge or turn on, the charging light doesn't show, and the screen can freeze while charging.8
  • Owners say photos often come out blurry or fuzzy, especially photos of people, because the camera focuses poorly.6
  • Owners say the camera gets stuck in easy mode or shows a language screen, and they cannot change the setting or reach other buttons.5
  • Owners say video looks grainy and noisy, especially in low light, and not as sharp as expected in HD.5
  • Owners say photo quality is weaker than older or competing cameras, with oversaturated, unnatural colours and limited editing options.4
  • Owners say the flash doesn't fire, or fires only red, with no white flash, even when turned on.4
  • Owners say a line appears across the screen or in photos, especially in direct light or morning shots.4
  • Owners say photos and videos will not show up on their computer when connected by USB, leaving them unable to transfer files.3
  • Owners say the camera shows a memory card error or 'cannot read card' message even with new cards, blocking access to photos.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Cameras model ranking

Ranked #455 of 975 models in Cameras (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of camera Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800

Technical score
Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

28%

4.6

Sensor & Image

25%

3.4

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

3.9

Display & Design

8%

2.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

3.7
Reviews score
3.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components:

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.4
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera has a sensor size of 1/2.3", which is smaller than 59.1% of cameras and the same as 39.1% of cameras.
Sensor resolution
20.1 MP
This camera captures images at 20.1 MP, which is higher than 61.5% of cameras and equal to 4.4% of cameras.
Sensor pixel size
1.19 µm
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.19 µm, which are smaller than those in 94.6% of cameras and the same size as those in 2.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 100, which is lower than 26.7% of cameras and equal to 53.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
This camera reaches ISO 3,200, which is lower than 61.5% of cameras and equal to 23.8% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
N/A
N. of focus points
8
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has a focus-point count of 8, which is lower than 92.5% of cameras and equal to 0.1% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 36.6% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 87.4% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera records at 1,280 px, which is lower than the resolution in 71.4% of cameras and the same as in 18.4% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera records in 8 bit, which is higher than the colour depth in 8.2% of cameras and the same as in 79.8% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera records with 4:2:0, which is better than the chroma sampling in 8.2% of cameras and the same as in 70% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
What reviewers say
Type
compact
Weight
125 g
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 125 g, which is lighter than 93.4% of cameras and equal to 0.7% of cameras.
Width
96.8 mm
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera is 96.8 mm wide, which is narrower than 88.4% of cameras and equal to 0.3% of cameras.
Height
55.5 mm
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera is 55.5 mm tall, which is shorter than 95.2% of cameras.
Thickness
20.8 mm
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera is 20.8 mm thick, which is thinner than 92.2% of cameras and equal to 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera lasts for 200 shots per charge, which is shorter than 89.6% of cameras and equal to 4.4% of cameras.
Battery capacity
630 mAh
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has 630 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 96.6% of cameras and equal to 2.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 97.8% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.6% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 48.2% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 24.1% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 16.4% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more
What reviewers say

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 264.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (125 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    125 g vs 389.5 g
  • 18.2 mm shorter body
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (55.5 mm vs 73.7 mm). The average camera is 73.7 mm tall.
    55.5 mm vs 73.7 mm
  • More megapixels
    This camera has more megapixels than the average camera (20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 25.1 mm thinner
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (20.8 mm vs 45.9 mm). The average camera is 45.9 mm thick.
    20.8 mm vs 45.9 mm
  • 22.2 mm narrower
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (96.8 mm vs 119 mm). The average camera is 119 mm wide.
    96.8 mm vs 119 mm
  • 0.03 GB more internal storage
    This camera has more internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera has 0 GB internal storage.
    0.029 GB vs 0 GB
  • 3.22x cheaper
    Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 is cheaper than the average camera (£90 vs £290).
    £90 vs £290
  • In-camera panorama mode
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 3.22x cheaper
    Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 is cheaper than the average camera (£90 vs £290).
    £90 vs £290
  • 264.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (125 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    125 g vs 389.5 g
  • 18.2 mm shorter body
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (55.5 mm vs 73.7 mm). The average camera is 73.7 mm tall.
    55.5 mm vs 73.7 mm
  • 22.2 mm narrower
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (96.8 mm vs 119 mm). The average camera is 119 mm wide.
    96.8 mm vs 119 mm
  • 25.1 mm thinner
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (20.8 mm vs 45.9 mm). The average camera is 45.9 mm thick.
    20.8 mm vs 45.9 mm
  • More megapixels
    This camera has more megapixels than the average camera (20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • In-camera panorama mode
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 0.03 GB more internal storage
    This camera has more internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera has 0 GB internal storage.
    0.029 GB vs 0 GB
  • More advanced card slot
    This camera has a more advanced card slot than the average camera (Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD). The average camera's card slot is SD.
    Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD
  • 43.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    3.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models

    3.7

    Mark 7.4 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    7.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    3.7 vs 6.5
  • Smaller image sensor
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    1/2.3" vs 2/3"
  • 1.85 µm smaller sensor pixels
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.2 µm vs 3.04 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.04 µm.
    1.19 µm vs 3.04 µm
  • 4.6 fps slower mechanical burst
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1 fps vs 5.6 fps). The average camera reaches 5.6 fps.
    1 fps vs 5.6 fps
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 0.3 in smaller screen
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lower video resolution
    This camera records at lower resolution than the average camera (1,280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No hot shoe
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 43.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    3.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models

    3.7

    Mark 7.4 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    7.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    3.7 vs 6.5
  • 48.6% lower sentiment score
    3.7 vs 7.2
  • 7.5% worse value for money
    Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (6.41 vs 6.9).
    6.41 vs 6.88
  • 0.3 in smaller screen
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller image sensor
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    1/2.3" vs 2/3"
  • 1.85 µm smaller sensor pixels
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.2 µm vs 3.04 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.04 µm.
    1.19 µm vs 3.04 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity
    This camera reaches a lower maximum ISO than the average camera (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO). The average camera's maximum ISO is 6,400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 4.6 fps slower mechanical burst
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1 fps vs 5.6 fps). The average camera reaches 5.6 fps.
    1 fps vs 5.6 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 61% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 15 fewer focus points
    This camera has a lower focus-point count than the average camera (8 vs 23). The average camera has a count of 23.
    8 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.4% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 71.5% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 28 s shorter exposure
    This camera allows shorter exposures than the average camera (2 s vs 30 s). The average camera allows exposures up to 30 s.
    2 s vs 30 s
  • Lower video resolution
    This camera records at lower resolution than the average camera (1,280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has a microphone count of 2.
    1 vs 2
  • 130 shots shorter battery life
    This camera lasts shorter per charge than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera lasts for 330 shots.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • 490 mAh less battery capacity
    This camera has a smaller battery than the average camera (630 mAh vs 1,120 mAh). The average camera has 1,120 mAh battery capacity.
    630 mAh vs 1,120 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
OMNITECH
≈ estimated
08/03/2023
Hands-on review · photo samples, modes and street use
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 works for street photography at a low price, and its 20 megapixels are adequate.
7.0
ShotFusion
≈ estimated
20/08/2026
Hands-on review · photo, video and zoom tests
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 is still fun to shoot, but its video, screen and build let it down.
6.0
Eddy Umoren
≈ estimated
09/01/2026
Video test · filmed on the camera, limits noted
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 has very limited dynamic range and weak autofocus, but it is usable if you know what you're doing.
5.0
Scott J. Waldron ~ Photo Video Audio
≈ estimated
10/05/2021
Hands-on review · image samples, zoom and modes
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 has clear image quality trade-offs, but it is worth a look if you want a small point-and-shoot with optical zoom.
9.0
John Knowles a wildlife Photographer
≈ estimated
24/12/2017
Hands-on review · pocket use and photo editing
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 has limited dynamic range, but it is a fun, pocket-sized camera for the money.
9.0
Christopher Kenyatta Sese-Khalid Jr.
≈ estimated
06/07/2015
Short review · vlogs, fireworks and photo modes
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 is tiny and affordable, a clear pick among pocket cameras, though weak in low light.
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
sterlingwong.com
≈ estimated
05/09/2021
Long-term review · Family travel camera
Verdict
The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 is a pocket camera with a 5x zoom and an EASY mode for family trips, but its video tops out at 720p.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800

  • At 125 g it is easy to carry all day in a jacket.
  • The slim body, 20.8 mm thick, fits a coat pocket.
  • AF tracking follows a moving subject.
  • A 20.1 MP sensor gives enough detail for prints and screens.
  • A top ISO of 3200 helps in dim rooms.
  • Point-and-shoot use needs no setup to get started.

What customers don't like about Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800

  • No manual focus means you cannot choose the focus yourself.
  • No manual exposure takes away control of aperture and shutter.
  • Continuous shooting at 1 fps misses fast action.
  • Battery life of 200 shots is short for a long day out.
  • No Wi-Fi or Bluetooth means photos must move by memory card or cable.

Verdict

At 125 g, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 slips into a jacket pocket without a second thought. It is a simple point-and-shoot with a 20.1 MP sensor, and it can keep a moving subject in focus once you lock on. The body is slim, at 20.8 mm thick, so it is easy to carry on a day out. Internal memory is tiny, at 0.029 GB, so you will need a memory card. The trade-off is control. There is no manual focus and no manual exposure, so you cannot set the shutter yourself. The screen is small at 2.7 in, and battery life is 200 shots, so pack a spare for longer trips. It suits a beginner or a relaxed traveller who wants a small camera for everyday snaps and does not need to adjust settings.

Compare Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found