Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£210Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:595 gBattery life (CIPA):315 shots

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.7

Overall score

Score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.2

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 69% of cameras
4.2

Technical score

Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.1

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

4.8

Video & Audio

14%

5.6

Display & Design

8%

4.3

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 81% of cameras
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 2,881 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 96% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Technical score
Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.1

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

4.8

Video & Audio

14%

5.6

Display & Design

8%

4.3

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.2
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 2,881 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS has a popularity score of 10, which is higher than 91.7% of cameras.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.7

Overall score

40%

9.4

Price

6.1
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.1 MP, which is lower than that of 86.6% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.53 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.53 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.53 µm, which are smaller than those in 64.5% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
21 Mbps
Video bitrate
21 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 21 Mbps which is lower than that of 70.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
bridge
Weight
595 g
Weight
595 g
This camera weighs 595 g which is heavier than 73% of cameras.
Width
122.5 mm
Width
122.5 mm
This camera has a width of 122.5 mm which is wider than 55.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1.2% of cameras.
Height
87.3 mm
Height
87.3 mm
This camera has a height of 87.3 mm which is taller than 65.2% of cameras.
Thickness
105.5 mm
Thickness
105.5 mm
This camera has a thickness of 105.5 mm which is thicker than 94.7% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
315 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
315 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 315 shots, which is shorter than that of 54.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
920 mAh
Battery capacity
920 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 920 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 77% of cameras and equal to those in 0.7% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    Full HD only
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
    Automatic multi-shot focus bracketing available.
  • 15.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
    the average camera
    Canon PowerShot SX50 HS has a higher user score than the average camera (9.26 vs 8.000).
    9.26 vs 8
  • 15.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
    the average camera
    Canon PowerShot SX50 HS has a higher user score than the average camera (9.26 vs 8.000).
    9.26 vs 8
  • 5.18x more popular
    Canon PowerShot SX50 HS is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 0.5 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    4.5 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (4.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    4.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
    Automatic multi-shot focus bracketing available.
  • 7.04x more optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    50 x
    40% more optical zoom: this camera offers 50 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The built-in lens provides 50x optical zoom.
    50 x vs 7.1 x
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    Full HD only
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 2158000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    202,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (202000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    202000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 3.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2.2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2.7 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    20.3 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (20.3 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    20.3 points vs 23.0 points
  • 26 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    47 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (47 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    47 points vs 73 points
  • 1.81 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.53 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.5 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.53 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 2158000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    202,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (202000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    202000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 0.2 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.8 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.8 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.8 in vs 3 in
  • 200 g heavier
    Weight
    595 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (595 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    595 g vs 395 g
  • 59.5 mm thicker
    Thickness
    105.5 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (105.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    105.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • 13.4 mm taller body
    Height
    87.3 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (87.3 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    87.3 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 1.81 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.53 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.5 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.53 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 26 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    47 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (47 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    47 points vs 73 points
  • 2.7 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    20.3 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (20.3 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    20.3 points vs 23.0 points
  • 664 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    179 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (179 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    179 points vs 843 points
  • 1.2 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.2 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.2 points vs 12.4 points
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • 3.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2.2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 9 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    21 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (21 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    21 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 200 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    920 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (920 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    920 mAh vs 1,120 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
16/10/2012
Summary of the review
N
neocamera.com
12/12/2012
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
17/12/2012
Summary of the review
L
luminous-landscape.com
07/01/2013
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
15/01/2013
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
08/02/2013
Summary of the review
B
birdguides.com
19/03/2013
Summary of the review
E
ebonph.wordpress.com
01/04/2013
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
13/08/2013
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
30/10/2012
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
18/11/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
26/11/2012
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
08/03/2016
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
13/11/2012
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
29/04/2014
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
08/03/2016
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
21/12/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/07/2015
Summary of the review
L
lense.fr
26/03/2013
Summary of the review
Q
quechoisir.org
21/08/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/12/2012
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
15/01/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/10/2012
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
10/11/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,881 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

  • Incredible 50x optical zoom range (24-1200mm equivalent)
  • Excellent image stabilisation, even at full telephoto
  • Support for RAW image capture
  • Highly versatile fully articulated (vari-angle) LCD screen
  • Includes a hot shoe for external flash and accessories
  • Fast autofocus and quick buffer clearing for JPEG bursts
  • Lightweight and portable compared to a DSLR with similar reach

What we don't like about Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

  • Disappointing low-light performance with high noise above ISO 800
  • Sluggish cycle times and shot-to-shot delays when shooting in RAW
  • Relatively small and low-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF)
  • Small sensor leads to frequent highlight clipping in high-contrast scenes
  • Below-average battery life compared to its predecessor and peers
  • Slow lens aperture at the telephoto end (f/6.5)
  • Rear control dial/four-way controller can be fiddly and uncomfortable

Verdict

The Canon PowerShot SX50 HS is a versatile bridge camera featuring a 12.1-megapixel 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor, a high-performance DIGIC 5 image processor, and a powerful 50x optical zoom lens with a 24-1200mm equivalent focal length and an aperture range of f/3.4-6.5. Its main characteristics include an advanced 4.5-stop optical image stabiliser, Full HD 1080p video recording, RAW file support, and a 2.8-inch vari-angle LCD display. The main pros of this camera are its massive, silent-focusing telephoto reach, fast continuous shooting up to 13 fps, and effective Zoom Framing Assist. However, the cons include its relatively small sensor size, a narrow f/6.5 maximum aperture at the telephoto end that degrades low-light performance, and a low-resolution electronic viewfinder.

Compare Canon PowerShot SX50 HS with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and other products in the Cameras category

No results found