Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS M Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190Sensor size:APS-CWeight:298 gBattery life (CIPA):230 shots

Canon EOS M Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

▲Better than 67% of cameras
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.1

Sensor & Image

25%

5.0

Photo Features

18%

5.3

Video & Audio

14%

7.1

Display & Design

8%

3.3

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 61% of cameras
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 1,680 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 97% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS M

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.1

Sensor & Image

25%

5.0

Photo Features

18%

5.3

Video & Audio

14%

7.1

Display & Design

8%

3.3

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

5.4
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 1,680 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS M has a popularity score of 10, which is higher than 91.7% of cameras.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

6.9
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 18 MP, which is higher than that of 55.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.31 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.31 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.31 µm, which are larger than those in 72.3% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 12800 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 12,800
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 12,800, which is higher than that of 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF-M
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
31
N. of focus points
31
This camera has 31 focus points, more than the number offered by 55.5% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 1.3% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
42 Mbps
Video bitrate
42 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 42 Mbps which is higher than that of 64.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
298 g
Weight
298 g
This camera weighs 298 g which is lighter than 62.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.3% of cameras.
Width
108.6 mm
Width
108.6 mm
This camera has a width of 108.6 mm which is narrower than 69.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
66.5 mm
Height
66.5 mm
This camera has a height of 66.5 mm which is shorter than 63.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Thickness
32.3 mm
Thickness
32.3 mm
This camera has a thickness of 32.3 mm which is thinner than 73.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
230 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
230 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 230 shots, which is shorter than that of 79.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
875 mAh
Battery capacity
875 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 875 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 80.7% of cameras and equal to those in 0.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS M vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • Phase-detect AF in video
    Phase-detection autofocus (video)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus in video, the average camera does not.
  • 0.97 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.31 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.31 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 16.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS M
    the average camera
    Canon EOS M has a higher user score than the average camera (9.30 vs 8.000).
    9.3 vs 8
  • 5.18x more popular
    Canon EOS M is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • 11.2% better value for money
    Canon EOS M has a better value-for-money score than the average camera (6.89 vs 6.2).
    6.89 vs 6.2
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 2 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    2
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (2 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • 97 g lighter
    Weight
    298 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (298 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    298 g vs 395 g
  • 13.7 mm thinner
    Thickness
    32.3 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (32.3 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    32.3 mm vs 46 mm
  • 11.3 mm narrower
    Width
    108.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (108.6 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    108.6 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • 0.97 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.31 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.31 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 6,400 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    18 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 8 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    31
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (31 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    31 vs 23
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF in video
    Phase-detection autofocus (video)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus in video, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 12 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    42 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (42 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    42 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    1 vs -4
  • 100 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    230 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (230 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    230 shots vs 330 shots
  • 1.2 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.2 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.2 points vs 12.4 points
  • 245 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    875 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (875 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    875 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 1.4 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4.3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4.3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4.3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 0.9 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.1 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.1 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.1 points vs 23.0 points
  • 8 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    65 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (65 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    65 points vs 73 points
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
    Bundled external flash, not built in.
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
    Bundled external flash, not built in.
  • 1.2 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.2 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.2 points vs 12.4 points
  • 8 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    65 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (65 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    65 points vs 73 points
  • 0.9 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.1 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.1 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.1 points vs 23.0 points
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    July 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    1 vs -4
  • 1.4 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4.3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4.3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4.3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 100 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    230 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (230 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    230 shots vs 330 shots
  • 245 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    875 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (875 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    875 mAh vs 1,120 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
23/07/2012
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
14/01/2013
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
03/06/2013
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
19/08/2013
Summary of the review
L
lonelyspeck.com
04/09/2013
Summary of the review
D
dylanmhowell.com
12/05/2022
Summary of the review
P
photographylife.com
01/05/2023
Summary of the review
J
jonmullin.com
12/06/2025
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
01/08/2013
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
24/12/2012
Summary of the review
D
dustinabbott.net
11/09/2013
Summary of the review
D
davelawrence.photo
29/08/2013
Summary of the review
S
sansmirror.com
2018 (Updated)
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
05/10/2015
Summary of the review
C
canonwatch.com
21/11/2012
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
21/11/2012
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
04/02/2013
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
04/02/2013
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
01/03/2013
Summary of the review
G
guide2wdw.com
20/08/2014
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
23/12/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
30/11/2012
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
22/11/2012
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
25/01/2013
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
12/11/2012
Summary of the review
R
reisezoom.com
14/07/2015
Summary of the review
S
slashcam.de
05/05/2026
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/06/2016
Summary of the review
Q
quechoisir.org
03/01/2013
Summary of the review
B
benairprod.com
04/02/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
23/07/2012
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
01/07/2012
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
23/07/2012
Summary of the review
C
clipset.com
01/04/2013
Summary of the review
C
camaras.uno
20/08/2019
Summary of the review
Q
quesabesde.com
16/10/2012
Summary of the review
D
dslrmagazine.com
25/10/2012
Summary of the review
A
albedomedia.com
30/10/2012
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
13/12/2012
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
24/11/2014
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
06/12/2012
Summary of the review
R
riflessifotografici.com
13/04/2014
Summary of the review
F
fotografiaprofessionale.it
07/12/2012
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
30/06/2015
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
10/12/2012
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
03/01/2015
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
16/12/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,680 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EOS M

  • Excellent image quality comparable to Canon DSLRs with a large APS-C sensor
  • Highly responsive and intuitive 3-inch touchscreen interface
  • Solid, high-quality build with magnesium alloy and stainless steel frame
  • Very compact and portable, making it ideal for travel and landscape photography
  • Compatibility with EF and EF-S lenses via an adapter
  • Good low-light performance and 14-bit RAW file support
  • Support for Magic Lantern firmware to unlock advanced video features

What we don't like about Canon EOS M

  • Infamously slow autofocus system, even after firmware updates
  • Lack of a built-in or optional electronic viewfinder (EVF)
  • Limited selection of native EF-M lenses available at launch
  • Short battery life, typically only reaching 200–250 shots per charge
  • Slow operation with noticeable 'lock-up' times while writing to the memory card
  • Fixed LCD screen that does not tilt or rotate
  • Small handgrip can make the camera feel unstable with larger lenses

Verdict

The Canon EOS M is a compact mirrorless camera featuring an 18-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor and the DIGIC 5 processor, capable of an ISO range up to 12,800 (expandable to 25,600) and 1080p Full HD video recording at 30fps. Its main characteristics include a minimalist design with a 3-inch ClearView II touchscreen interface and compatibility with the EF-M lens mount, or EF/EF-S lenses via an adapter. The primary pros are its DSLR-sized sensor providing excellent image quality in a pocketable frame and a highly intuitive touch-to-focus system; however, it is frequently criticised for its sluggish contrast-detect autofocus speeds and the lack of a built-in electronic viewfinder or integrated flash.

Compare Canon EOS M with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS M and other products in the Cameras category

No results found