Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£300Sensor size:APS-HWeight:1390 gBattery life (CIPA):1500 shots

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 68% of cameras
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.7

Sensor & Image

25%

5.7

Photo Features

18%

4.3

Video & Audio

14%

5.0

Display & Design

8%

8.9

Battery & Power

7%

4.2

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 69% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.7

Sensor & Image

25%

5.7

Photo Features

18%

4.3

Video & Audio

14%

5.0

Display & Design

8%

8.9

Battery & Power

7%

4.2

Connectivity & Storage

5.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 1D Mark IV has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

8.9

Price

6.7
Sensor size
APS-H
Sensor size
APS-H
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-H; it is larger than the sensor in 83.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 0.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.1 MP, which is lower than that of 53.3% of cameras and equal to that of 7.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
5.7 µm
Main camera pixel size
5.7 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 5.7 µm, which are larger than those in 88.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 12800 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 12,800
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 12,800, which is higher than that of 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
45
N. of focus points
45
This camera has 45 focus points, more than the number offered by 59.7% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 0.9% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
44 Mbps
Video bitrate
44 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 44 Mbps which is higher than that of 65.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
1,390 g
Weight
1,390 g
This camera weighs 1,390 g which is heavier than 98.2% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
156 mm
Width
156 mm
This camera has a width of 156 mm which is wider than 96.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Height
156.6 mm
Height
156.6 mm
This camera has a height of 156.6 mm which is taller than 98.8% of cameras.
Thickness
79.9 mm
Thickness
79.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 79.9 mm which is thicker than 77.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
1,500 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
1,500 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 1,500 shots, which is longer than that of 98.7% of cameras.
Battery capacity
2,300 mAh
Battery capacity
2,300 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 2,300 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 96.1% of cameras and equal to those in 0.3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 1,170 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,500 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1500 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,500 shots vs 330 shots
  • 2.36 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.7 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.7 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.7 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    1x CompactFlash, 1x SD/SDHC
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • 1,180 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,300 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (2300 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    2,300 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 77,100 ISO higher extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    102,400 ISO
    This camera has a higher expanded ISO than the average camera (102400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 10 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    10
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (10 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    10 vs 0
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 2.36 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.7 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.7 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.7 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 77,100 ISO higher extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    102,400 ISO
    This camera has a higher expanded ISO than the average camera (102400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Ultrasonic vibration cleaning.
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    APS-H
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (APS-H vs APS-C).
    APS-H vs APS-C
  • 6,400 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 477 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,320 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1320 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,320 points vs 843 points
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 200,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    300,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (300,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    300,000 vs 100,000
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 22 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    45
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (45 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    45 vs 23
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 14 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    44 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (44 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    44 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 1,170 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,500 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1500 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,500 shots vs 330 shots
  • 1,180 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,300 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (2300 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    2,300 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    1x CompactFlash, 1x SD/SDHC
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF vs SD
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 995 g heavier
    Weight
    1,390 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (1390 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    1,390 g vs 395 g
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    single-shot AF only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 82.7 mm taller body
    Height
    156.6 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (156.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    156.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 36.1 mm wider
    Width
    156 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (156 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    156 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 93% less popular
    Canon EOS 1D Mark IV is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 995 g heavier
    Weight
    1,390 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (1390 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    1,390 g vs 395 g
  • 82.7 mm taller body
    Height
    156.6 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (156.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    156.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 36.1 mm wider
    Width
    156 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (156 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    156 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 33.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    79.9 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (79.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    79.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 4 older
    Release date
    2009
    This camera is older than the average camera (2009 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    December 2009
    2,009 vs 2,013
  • 0.7 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.7 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.7 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.7 points vs 12.4 points
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 2 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    71 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (71 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    71 points vs 73 points
  • 0.2 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.8 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.8 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.8 points vs 23.0 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    single-shot AF only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
22/02/2010
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
17/02/2010
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
25/10/2010
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
25/10/2010
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
25/10/2010
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
24/03/2010
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
23/06/2025
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
24/03/2010
Summary of the review
M
martinbaileyphotography.com
15/02/2010
Summary of the review
V
videomaker.com
Not dated
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
29/09/2010
Summary of the review
S
slashcam.de
18/03/2010
Summary of the review
B
bird-lens.com
22/04/2013
Summary of the review
D
digicammuseum.de
24/02/2026
Summary of the review
D
digicamclub.de
17/07/2019
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
01/03/2011
Summary of the review
S
shots.fr
19/04/2010
Summary of the review
S
shots.fr
01/09/2010
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
22/02/2010
Summary of the review
J
juliogm.wordpress.com
04/03/2010
Summary of the review
O
osservatoriodigitale.it
N/A
Summary of the review
T
tapatalk.com
09/08/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

  • Rugged build with extensive weather sealing (76 rubber seals) for professional durability
  • High-speed performance with 10 frames per second burst shooting and minimal shutter lag
  • Advanced 45-point autofocus system (including 39 cross-type points) suitable for sports and wildlife
  • APS-H sensor (1.3x crop) provides extra reach for full-frame lenses without needing teleconverters
  • Dual card slots (CF and SD) allow for backup or overflow storage during shoots
  • Excellent ergonomics with a comfortable grip for both horizontal and vertical orientations

What we don't like about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

  • Noticeable image noise at high ISO settings above 12,800, with extreme settings like 102,400 being largely unusable
  • Large and heavy body weight (over 1.2kg) makes it cumbersome for casual or all-day hand-held use
  • Fixed, non-tilt LCD screen is inconvenient for modern video shooting or odd-angle compositions
  • Complex autofocus menu and customization options require a significant learning curve to master
  • Outdated APS-H sensor format is no longer supported by modern Canon lens lineups (EF-S lenses do not fit)

Verdict

The Canon EOS-1D Mark IV is a high-speed professional DSLR featuring a 16.1-megapixel APS-H CMOS sensor and dual DIGIC 4 processors. It is defined by its 45-point Area AF system and rapid 10 fps continuous shooting, making it a powerhouse for sports and wildlife photography. Key strengths include an expansive ISO range expandable to 102,400 for exceptional low-light performance, 1080p Full HD video recording, and a rugged, weather-sealed magnesium alloy body. However, its 1.3x crop factor limits ultra-wide-angle lens options compared to full-frame sensors, and the fixed LCD screen lacks the modern convenience of touch or articulation.

Compare Canon EOS 1D Mark IV with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 1D Mark IV and other products in the Cameras category

No results found