OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using VR headsets Methodology v1.0
VR headsets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo VR headsets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v1.0

DPVR M2 Pro Review | 89 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350Weight:398 gResolution:1280x1440Refresh rate:72 HzDisplay type:OLEDDevice type:standalone

DPVR M2 Pro Review: Compare 89 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the VR headset's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best VR headsets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

80%

5.3

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 82% of vr-headsets
5.3

Technical Score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

58%

5.3

Display & Optics

22%

5.1

Tracking & Sensors

10%

5.6

Controls & Audio

4%

3.9

Hardware

3%

6.7

Connectivity

3%

5.8

Design & Power

▼Worse than 80% of vr-headsets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £350

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of VR headset DPVR M2 Pro

Technical Score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

58%

5.3

Display & Optics

22%

5.1

Tracking & Sensors

10%

5.6

Controls & Audio

4%

3.9

Hardware

3%

6.7

Connectivity

3%

5.8

Design & Power

5.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
DPVR M2 Pro has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 65.3% of VR headsets.
1.0
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

8.7

Price

6.3
Resolution
1280x1440
Resolution
1280x1440
▼ Worse than 74% of models
This vr headset has a screen resolution of 1280x1440 which is lower than that of 74.4% of VR headsets and equal to that of 7.7% of VR headsets.
Screen size
5.7 inches
Refresh rate
72 Hz
Refresh rate
72 Hz
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <72 Hz – >120 Hz
This vr headset supports a refresh rate of 72 Hz which is lower than in 92.3% of VR headsets and equal to that in 5.1% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (horizontal)
96 °
Visible FoV (horizontal)
96 °
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <87 ° – >120 °
This vr headset offers a horizontal FoV of 96 ° which is narrower than that of 69.6% of VR headsets and equal to that of 6.5% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (vertical)
60 °
Visible FoV (vertical)
60 °
▼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <88 ° – >105 °
This vr headset offers a vertical FoV of 60 ° which is narrower than that of 100% of VR headsets.
Show more
Tracking type
3DoF internal sensors
360° head tracking
yes
360° head tracking
yes
▲ Better than 2% of models
This vr headset supports full 360° head tracking. 2% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
1
N. of cameras
0
N. of cameras
0
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <0 – >6
This vr headset has 0 cameras which is fewer than in 64.6% of VR headsets and equal to that in 35.4% of VR headsets.
Tracking frequency
?
Show more
Operating system
Android
OpenXR support
no
OpenXR support
no
▼ Worse than 63% of models
This vr headset does not support OpenXR. 63.3% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Wireless PC streaming
yes
Wireless PC streaming
yes
▲ Better than 63% of models
This vr headset supports wireless PC streaming. 63.3% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
▲ Better than 63% of models
This vr headset has Wi-Fi. 63.3% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi 5.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5
▲ Better than 67% of models
This vr headset supports Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5, which is more advanced than 67.4% of VR headsets and equal to 8.2% of VR headsets.
Show more
Touch controllers
no
Touch controllers
no
▼ Worse than 73% of models
This vr headset does not include touch controllers. 73.5% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Game controller included
no
Game controller included
no
▼ Worse than 65% of models
This vr headset does not include a game controller. 65.3% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
?
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▲ Better than 39% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This vr headset has 2 speakers which is more than in 39.1% of VR headsets and equal to that in 60.9% of VR headsets.
Integrated stereo speakers.
N. of microphones
?
Show more
Device type
standalone
Chipset
Exynos 7420
Chipset
Exynos 7420
▼ Worse than 89% of models
This vr headset uses the Exynos 7420 processor model which is slower than processors in 88.9% of VR headsets and equal to processors in 11.1% of VR headsets.
CPU clock speed
2.1 GHz
CPU clock speed
2.1 GHz
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <2.1 GHz – >3.3 GHz
This vr headset has a CPU clock speed of 2.1 GHz which is lower than that of 88.9% of VR headsets and equal to that of 11.1% of VR headsets.
Peak performance-core clock.
GPU model
Mali-T760 MP8
GPU model
Mali-T760 MP8
▼ Worse than 89% of models
This vr headset uses the Mali-T760 MP8 GPU model, which is less advanced than that used in 88.9%.
RAM capacity
3 GB
RAM capacity
3 GB
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <3 GB – >16 GB
This vr headset has 3 GB of RAM, which is less than 83.3% of VR headsets and equal to 16.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <3k mAh – >7k mAh
This vr headset has a battery capacity of 3,000 mAh which is lower than that of 88.2% of VR headsets and equal to that of 5.9% of VR headsets.
Charging time
3 h
Charging time
3 h
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <1 h – >3 h
This vr headset recharges in 3 h, which is slower than 93.3% of VR headsets and equal to 6.7% of VR headsets.
Weight
398 g
Weight
398 g
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <295 g – >800 g
This vr headset weighs 398 g which is lighter than 77.8% of VR headsets.
Headstrap type
rigid halo
Headstrap type
rigid halo
▲ Better than 45% of models
This vr headset uses a rigid halo headstrap, which is more comfortable than the design on 44.9%.
Body material
plastic
Show more

DPVR M2 Pro vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplay & OpticsTracking & SensorsConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • Adjustable diopter
    Adjustable diopter
    yes
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    This vr headset supports adjustable diopter, the average VR headset does not. 20% of VR headsets offer built-in diopter adjustment.
  • Includes remote control
    Remote control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    This vr headset includes a remote control, the average VR headset does not.
    3DoF handheld controller.
  • Wireless PC VR streaming
    Wireless PC streaming
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This vr headset supports wireless PC streaming, the average VR headset does not.
  • 31.7% lighter
    Weight
    398 g
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <295 g – >800 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (398 g vs 583 g). The average VR headset weighs 583 g.
    398 g vs 583 g
  • Has a memory card slot
    External memory slot
    yes
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    This vr headset features a memory card slot, the average VR headset does not. 14.3% of VR headsets support expandable storage.
    microSD slot.
  • Has Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This vr headset has Wi-Fi, the average VR headset does not. 38% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
    Wi-Fi 5.
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    This vr headset has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
    Battery pack LEDs.
  • Integrated LTE
    Integrated LTE
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This vr headset includes integrated LTE, the average VR headset does not. 4% of VR headsets include cellular connectivity.
  • Adjustable diopter
    Adjustable diopter
    yes
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    This vr headset supports adjustable diopter, the average VR headset does not. 20% of VR headsets offer built-in diopter adjustment.
  • Wireless PC VR streaming
    Wireless PC streaming
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This vr headset supports wireless PC streaming, the average VR headset does not.
  • Has Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This vr headset has Wi-Fi, the average VR headset does not. 38% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
    Wi-Fi 5.
  • Integrated LTE
    Integrated LTE
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This vr headset includes integrated LTE, the average VR headset does not. 4% of VR headsets include cellular connectivity.
  • Includes remote control
    Remote control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    This vr headset includes a remote control, the average VR headset does not.
    3DoF handheld controller.
  • Has a memory card slot
    External memory slot
    yes
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    This vr headset features a memory card slot, the average VR headset does not. 14.3% of VR headsets support expandable storage.
    microSD slot.
  • 12.2% faster GPU clock
    GPU clock speed
    700 MHz
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <587 MHz – >772 MHz
    This vr headset has a higher GPU clock speed than the average VR headset (700 MHz vs 624 MHz). The average VR headset has a GPU clock speed of 624 MHz.
    700 MHz vs 624 MHz
  • 31.7% lighter
    Weight
    398 g
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <295 g – >800 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (398 g vs 583 g). The average VR headset weighs 583 g.
    398 g vs 583 g
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    This vr headset has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
    Battery pack LEDs.
  • 25 mm thinner
    Thickness
    80 mm
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >167.3 mm
    This vr headset is thinner than the average VR headset (80 mm vs 105 mm). The average VR headset has a thickness of 105 mm.
    80 mm vs 105 mm
  • 35.5 ° narrower vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    60 °
    ▼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <88 ° – >105 °
    This vr headset has a lower vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (60 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    60 ° vs 95.5 °
  • Lower screen resolution
    Resolution
    1280x1440
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    This vr headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1280x1440 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    1280x1440 vs 1830x1464
  • 11.4 mm smaller lens diameter
    Lens diameter
    38.6 mm
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <34 mm – >50 mm
    This vr headset has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (38.6 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.
    38.6 mm vs 50 mm
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    OLED
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This vr headset uses OLED for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    OLED vs Micro-OLED
  • 20% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    72 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <72 Hz – >120 Hz
    This vr headset has a lower refresh rate than the average VR headset (72 Hz vs 90 Hz). The average VR headset has a refresh rate of 90 Hz.
    72 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • No touch controllers
    Touch controllers
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vr headset does not include touch controllers, the average VR headset does. 72% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
  • No haptic feedback
    Haptic feedback
    no
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    This vr headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • 16.3% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    515 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <456 ppi – >1.2k ppi
    This vr headset has a lower pixel density than the average VR headset (515 ppi vs 615.5 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 615.5 ppi.
    515 ppi vs 615.5 ppi
  • 35.5 ° narrower vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    60 °
    ▼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <88 ° – >105 °
    This vr headset has a lower vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (60 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    60 ° vs 95.5 °
  • Lower screen resolution
    Resolution
    1280x1440
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    This vr headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1280x1440 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    1280x1440 vs 1830x1464
  • 11.4 mm smaller lens diameter
    Lens diameter
    38.6 mm
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <34 mm – >50 mm
    This vr headset has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (38.6 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.
    38.6 mm vs 50 mm
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    OLED
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This vr headset uses OLED for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    OLED vs Micro-OLED
  • 20% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    72 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <72 Hz – >120 Hz
    This vr headset has a lower refresh rate than the average VR headset (72 Hz vs 90 Hz). The average VR headset has a refresh rate of 90 Hz.
    72 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • 16.3% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    515 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <456 ppi – >1.2k ppi
    This vr headset has a lower pixel density than the average VR headset (515 ppi vs 615.5 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 615.5 ppi.
    515 ppi vs 615.5 ppi
  • 4 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    96 °
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <87 ° – >120 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (96 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    96 ° vs 100 °
  • 2 fewer cameras
    N. of cameras
    0
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0 – >6
    This vr headset has fewer cameras than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    0 vs 2
  • No OpenXR support
    OpenXR support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This vr headset does not support OpenXR, the average VR headset does. 62% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
  • Old Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This vr headset supports an older Bluetooth version than the average VR headset (4 vs 5.2). The average VR headset uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    4.0 vs 5.2
  • No touch controllers
    Touch controllers
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vr headset does not include touch controllers, the average VR headset does. 72% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
  • No haptic feedback
    Haptic feedback
    no
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    This vr headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • No game controller included
    Game controller included
    no
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    This vr headset does not include a game controller, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
  • 5 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <3 GB – >16 GB
    This vr headset has a lower RAM capacity than the average VR headset (3 GB vs 8 GB). The average VR headset has a RAM capacity of 8 GB.
    3 GB vs 8 GB
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
    This vr headset has a lower internal storage than the average VR headset (32 GB vs 128 GB). The average VR headset offers 128 GB of internal storage.
    Expandable via microSD.
    32 GB vs 128 GB
  • 0.74 GHz lower CPU clock speed
    CPU clock speed
    2.1 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2.1 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This vr headset has a lower CPU clock speed than the average VR headset (2.1 GHz vs 2.84 GHz). The average VR headset has a CPU clock speed of 2.84 GHz.
    Peak performance-core clock.
    2.1 GHz vs 2.84 GHz
  • 2 fewer memory channels
    Memory channels
    2
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This vr headset has fewer memory channels than the average VR headset (2 vs 4). The average VR headset supports 4 memory channels.
    2 vs 4
  • 7 nm larger process node
    Process node
    14 nm
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >14 nm
    This vr headset has a higher process node than the average VR headset (14 nm vs 7 nm). The average VR headset uses a process node of 7 nm.
    14 nm vs 7 nm
  • 3,781 MHz slower memory speed
    RAM speed
    1,552 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.6k MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This vr headset has a lower RAM speed than the average VR headset (1552 MHz vs 5333 MHz). The average VR headset has a RAM speed of 5333 MHz.
    1,552 MHz vs 5,333 MHz
  • 1 h slower charging
    Charging time
    3 h
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1 h – >3 h
    This vr headset has a higher charging time than the average VR headset (3 h vs 2 h). The average VR headset reaches a charging time of 2 h.
    3 h vs 2 h
  • 27.9% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,000 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3k mAh – >7k mAh
    This vr headset has a lower battery capacity than the average VR headset (3000 mAh vs 4162 mAh). The average VR headset has a battery capacity of 4162 mAh.
    3,000 mAh vs 4,162 mAh
  • 2 older release date
    Release date
    2016
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vr headset is older than the average VR headset (2016 vs 2018). The average VR headset was released in 2018.
    August 2016
    2016 vs 2018
  • 10 mm wider
    Width
    200 mm
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <159 mm – >207.1 mm
    This vr headset is wider than the average VR headset (200 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
    200 mm vs 190 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

What we like about DPVR M2 Pro

  • High-resolution AMOLED display (2560 x 1440) offering vibrant colors and deep blacks
  • Standalone wireless operation with a built-in 3000 mAh battery
  • Adjustable interpupillary distance (IPD) and diopter, allowing use without glasses for some users
  • Lightweight and portable design similar to the Oculus Go
  • Wide content compatibility via the Viveport platform and external SD card support

What we don't like about DPVR M2 Pro

  • Lower 75Hz refresh rate compared to more modern competitors like the Quest 2/3
  • Tracking is limited to 3DOF (Degrees of Freedom), which may restrict movement in complex games
  • Battery life is relatively short for extended sessions
  • Narrower field of view (96°) compared to many contemporary PCVR headsets
  • Software interface may feel aimed at the Asian market, though Viveport integration helps

Verdict

The DPVR M2 Pro is a standalone All-in-One VR headset originally released in 2017, featuring a 5.7-inch Samsung AMOLED display with a QHD resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a 96° field of view. Powered by an Exynos 7420 processor and 3GB of RAM, its main characteristics include a lightweight 398g design, 32GB of internal storage, and a 3000 mAh battery supporting approximately 3 hours of use. Its primary pros are the vibrant contrast of the AMOLED screen, physical IPD and lens-to-face adjustments for user comfort, and its portable, wireless nature. However, notable cons include its outdated 3DOF (Degrees of Freedom) tracking limited to rotational movement, a relatively low 75Hz refresh rate compared to modern standards, and a legacy Android-based ecosystem that lacks the extensive library of newer standalone competitors.

Compare DPVR M2 Pro with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of DPVR M2 Pro and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found