Scored using VR headsets Methodology v1.0
VR headsets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo VR headsets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v1.0

Lenovo Mirage Solo Review | 89 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350Weight:645 gResolution:1280x1440Refresh rate:75 HzDisplay type:IPS LCDDevice type:standalone

Lenovo Mirage Solo Review: Compare 89 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the VR headset's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best VR headsets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.9

Technical Score

20%

6.0

User score

▼Worse than 73% of vr-headsets
5.9

Technical Score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

58%

5.5

Display & Optics

22%

6.5

Tracking & Sensors

10%

7.4

Controls & Audio

4%

4.7

Hardware

3%

5.7

Connectivity

3%

5.6

Design & Power

▼Worse than 69% of vr-headsets
6.0

User score

User score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 94% of vr-headsets
  • lenovo-mirage-solo
  • lenovo-mirage-solo
  • lenovo-mirage-solo
lenovo-mirage-solo
lenovo-mirage-solo
lenovo-mirage-solo

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of VR headset Lenovo Mirage Solo

Technical Score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

58%

5.5

Display & Optics

22%

6.5

Tracking & Sensors

10%

7.4

Controls & Audio

4%

4.7

Hardware

3%

5.7

Connectivity

3%

5.6

Design & Power

5.9
User score
User score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.0
Popularity
Popularity
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Lenovo Mirage Solo has a popularity score of 4.7 points, which is lower than 53.1% of VR headsets.
4.7
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

8.7

Price

6.7
Resolution
1280x1440
Resolution
1280x1440
This vr headset has a screen resolution of 1280x1440 which is lower than that of 74.4% of VR headsets and equal to that of 7.7% of VR headsets.
Screen size
5.5 inches
Refresh rate
75 Hz
Refresh rate
75 Hz
This vr headset supports a refresh rate of 75 Hz which is lower than in 87.2% of VR headsets and equal to that in 2.6% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (horizontal)
110 °
Visible FoV (horizontal)
110 °
This vr headset offers a horizontal FoV of 110 ° which is wider than that of 71.7% of VR headsets and equal to that of 13% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (vertical)
?
Show more
Tracking type
inside-out
360° head tracking
yes
360° head tracking
yes
This vr headset supports full 360° head tracking. 2% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
2
N. of cameras
2
N. of cameras
2
This vr headset has 2 cameras which is more than in 39.6% of VR headsets and equal to that in 18.8% of VR headsets.
Tracking frequency
?
Show more
Operating system
Android
OpenXR support
no
OpenXR support
no
This vr headset does not support OpenXR. 63.3% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Wireless PC streaming
no
Wireless PC streaming
no
This vr headset does not support wireless PC streaming. 38.8% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Third-party methods only.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This vr headset has Wi-Fi. 63.3% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
802.11ac Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5
This vr headset supports Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5, which is more advanced than 67.4% of VR headsets and equal to 8.2% of VR headsets.
Show more
Touch controllers
yes
Touch controllers
yes
This vr headset includes touch controllers. 28.6% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Includes one 3DoF controller.
Game controller included
yes
Game controller included
yes
This vr headset includes a game controller. 36.7% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
yes
Spatial audio
yes
This vr headset supports spatial audio. 10.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
Daydream spatial audio support.
N. of speakers
0
N. of speakers
0
This vr headset has 0 speakers which is fewer than in 63% of VR headsets and equal to that in 37% of VR headsets.
N. of microphones
2
N. of microphones
2
This vr headset includes 2 microphones, which is more than 46.7% of VR headsets and equal to 46.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Device type
standalone
Chipset
Snapdragon 835
Chipset
Snapdragon 835
This vr headset uses the Snapdragon 835 processor model which is slower than processors in 66.7% of VR headsets and equal to processors in 11.1% of VR headsets.
CPU clock speed
2.45 GHz
CPU clock speed
2.45 GHz
This vr headset has a CPU clock speed of 2.45 GHz which is lower than that of 66.7% of VR headsets and equal to that of 11.1% of VR headsets.
Peak performance-core clock.
GPU model
Adreno 540
GPU model
Adreno 540
This vr headset uses the Adreno 540 GPU model, which is less advanced than that used in 66.7%.
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
This vr headset has 4 GB of RAM, which is less than 66.7% of VR headsets and equal to 11.1% of VR headsets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
This vr headset has a battery capacity of 4,000 mAh which is lower than that of 52.9% of VR headsets and equal to that of 5.9% of VR headsets.
Charging time
2.83 h
Charging time
2.83 h
This vr headset recharges in 2.83 h, which is slower than 86.7% of VR headsets.
170 minutes in standby mode.
Weight
645 g
Weight
645 g
This vr headset weighs 645 g which is heavier than 66.7% of VR headsets and equal to the weight of 4.4% of VR headsets.
Includes halo strap.
Headstrap type
rigid halo
Headstrap type
rigid halo
This vr headset uses a rigid halo headstrap, which is more comfortable than the design on 44.9%.
Body material
plastic
Show more

Lenovo Mirage Solo vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplay & OpticsTracking & SensorsConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • Supports eye relief adjustment
    Eye relief adjustment
    yes
    This vr headset supports eye relief adjustment, the average VR headset does not. 24.5% of VR headsets support eye relief adjustment.
    Quick Release Button.
  • See-through mode
    See-through mode
    yes
    This vr headset supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
    Beta update feature.
  • 10 ° wider horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    110 °
    This vr headset has a higher horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (110 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    110 ° vs 100 °
  • Includes compass
    Compass
    yes
    This vr headset features a compass, the average VR headset does not. 32.7% of VR headsets include a compass sensor.
  • Includes remote control
    Remote control
    yes
    This vr headset includes a remote control, the average VR headset does not.
    Daydream handheld controller.
  • Better lens type
    Lens type
    hybrid
    This vr headset uses hybrid lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    Hybrid Fresnel-aspheric.
    hybrid vs fresnel
  • 74.2% lighter controllers
    Controller weight
    40 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (40 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    Daydream controller.
    40 g vs 155 g
  • Has a memory card slot
    External memory slot
    yes
    This vr headset features a memory card slot, the average VR headset does not. 14.3% of VR headsets support expandable storage.
    microSD slot.
  • Supports eye relief adjustment
    Eye relief adjustment
    yes
    This vr headset supports eye relief adjustment, the average VR headset does not. 24.5% of VR headsets support eye relief adjustment.
    Quick Release Button.
  • 10 ° wider horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    110 °
    This vr headset has a higher horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (110 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    110 ° vs 100 °
  • Better lens type
    Lens type
    hybrid
    This vr headset uses hybrid lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    Hybrid Fresnel-aspheric.
    hybrid vs fresnel
  • See-through mode
    See-through mode
    yes
    This vr headset supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
    Beta update feature.
  • Includes compass
    Compass
    yes
    This vr headset features a compass, the average VR headset does not. 32.7% of VR headsets include a compass sensor.
  • Has Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This vr headset has Wi-Fi, the average VR headset does not. 38% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
    802.11ac Wi-Fi.
  • Includes remote control
    Remote control
    yes
    This vr headset includes a remote control, the average VR headset does not.
    Daydream handheld controller.
  • 74.2% lighter controllers
    Controller weight
    40 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (40 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    Daydream controller.
    40 g vs 155 g
  • Has a memory card slot
    External memory slot
    yes
    This vr headset features a memory card slot, the average VR headset does not. 14.3% of VR headsets support expandable storage.
    microSD slot.
  • 13.8% faster GPU clock
    GPU clock speed
    710 MHz
    This vr headset has a higher GPU clock speed than the average VR headset (710 MHz vs 624 MHz). The average VR headset has a GPU clock speed of 624 MHz.
    710 MHz vs 624 MHz
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    This vr headset has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
  • 5 °C higher maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    40 °C
    This vr headset has a higher maximum operating temperature than the average VR headset (40 °C vs 35 °C). The average VR headset reaches a maximum operating temperature of 35 °C.
    40 °C vs 35 °C
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    This vr headset uses IPS LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    IPS LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • No adjustable IPD
    Adjustable IPD
    no
    This vr headset does not support adjustable IPD, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer adjustable lens spacing.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Resolution
    1280x1440
    This vr headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1280x1440 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    1280x1440 vs 1830x1464
  • 16.7% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    75 Hz
    This vr headset has a lower refresh rate than the average VR headset (75 Hz vs 90 Hz). The average VR headset has a refresh rate of 90 Hz.
    75 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • No haptic feedback
    Haptic feedback
    no
    This vr headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • Smaller tracking area
    Tracking area
    1 x 1 m
    This vr headset has a lower tracking area than the average VR headset (1x1 m vs 10x10 m). The average VR headset supports a tracking area of 10x10 m.
    1x1 m vs 10x10 m
  • 12.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    538 ppi
    This vr headset has a lower pixel density than the average VR headset (538 ppi vs 615.5 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 615.5 ppi.
    538 ppi vs 615.5 ppi
  • Fewer speakers
    N. of speakers
    0
    This vr headset has fewer speakers than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2
  • 32.7% lower user score
    User score
    6.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo Mirage Solo
    the average VR headset
    Lenovo Mirage Solo has a lower user score than the average VR headset (6.03 vs 8.000).
    6.03 vs 8
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    This vr headset uses IPS LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    IPS LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • No adjustable IPD
    Adjustable IPD
    no
    This vr headset does not support adjustable IPD, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer adjustable lens spacing.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Resolution
    1280x1440
    This vr headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1280x1440 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    1280x1440 vs 1830x1464
  • 16.7% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    75 Hz
    This vr headset has a lower refresh rate than the average VR headset (75 Hz vs 90 Hz). The average VR headset has a refresh rate of 90 Hz.
    75 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • 12.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    538 ppi
    This vr headset has a lower pixel density than the average VR headset (538 ppi vs 615.5 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 615.5 ppi.
    538 ppi vs 615.5 ppi
  • Smaller tracking area
    Tracking area
    1 x 1 m
    This vr headset has a lower tracking area than the average VR headset (1x1 m vs 10x10 m). The average VR headset supports a tracking area of 10x10 m.
    1x1 m vs 10x10 m
  • No OpenXR support
    OpenXR support
    no
    This vr headset does not support OpenXR, the average VR headset does. 62% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
  • Old Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This vr headset supports an older Bluetooth version than the average VR headset (5 vs 5.2). The average VR headset uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • No haptic feedback
    Haptic feedback
    no
    This vr headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • Fewer speakers
    N. of speakers
    0
    This vr headset has fewer speakers than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 fewer memory channels
    Memory channels
    2
    This vr headset has fewer memory channels than the average VR headset (2 vs 4). The average VR headset supports 4 memory channels.
    2 vs 4
  • 4 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    4 GB
    This vr headset has a lower RAM capacity than the average VR headset (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average VR headset has a RAM capacity of 8 GB.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3,467 MHz slower memory speed
    RAM speed
    1,866 MHz
    This vr headset has a lower RAM speed than the average VR headset (1866 MHz vs 5333 MHz). The average VR headset has a RAM speed of 5333 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 5,333 MHz
  • 0.39 GHz lower CPU clock speed
    CPU clock speed
    2.45 GHz
    This vr headset has a lower CPU clock speed than the average VR headset (2.5 GHz vs 2.84 GHz). The average VR headset has a CPU clock speed of 2.84 GHz.
    Peak performance-core clock.
    2.45 GHz vs 2.84 GHz
  • 3 nm larger process node
    Process node
    10 nm
    This vr headset has a higher process node than the average VR headset (10 nm vs 7 nm). The average VR headset uses a process node of 7 nm.
    10 nm vs 7 nm
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    This vr headset has a lower internal storage than the average VR headset (64 GB vs 128 GB). The average VR headset offers 128 GB of internal storage.
    Expandable via microSD.
    64 GB vs 128 GB
  • 0.83 h slower charging
    Charging time
    2.83 h
    This vr headset has a higher charging time than the average VR headset (2.8 h vs 2 h). The average VR headset reaches a charging time of 2 h.
    170 minutes in standby mode.
    2.83 h vs 2 h
  • 67.71 mm higher height
    Height
    179.86 mm
    This vr headset is taller than the average VR headset (179.9 mm vs 112.15 mm). The average VR headset has a height of 112.15 mm.
    179.86 mm vs 112.15 mm
  • 10.6% heavier
    Weight
    645 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (645 g vs 583 g). The average VR headset weighs 583 g.
    Includes halo strap.
    645 g vs 583 g
  • 27 mm thicker
    Thickness
    132 mm
    This vr headset is thicker than the average VR headset (132 mm vs 105 mm). The average VR headset has a thickness of 105 mm.
    Without headstrap.
    132 mm vs 105 mm
  • 14.01 mm wider
    Width
    204.01 mm
    This vr headset is wider than the average VR headset (204 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
    204.01 mm vs 190 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
E
engadget.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
R
roadtovr.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
A
androidheadlines.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
S
slashgear.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
19/07/2018
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
20/06/2018
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
A
androidcentral.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
P
pixelatedgamer.com
19/09/2019
Summary of the review
T
thecanadiantechie.com
20/06/2018
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
30/01/2019
Summary of the review
K
krone.at
23/02/2019
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
12/03/2018
Summary of the review
V
video.golem.de
14/11/2018
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
06/07/2018
Summary of the review
R
realite-virtuelle.com
06/07/2018
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
04/08/2018
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
14/02/2018
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
12/01/2018
Summary of the review
E
elespanol.com
01/08/2018
Summary of the review
E
es.digitaltrends.com
09/08/2021
Summary of the review
R
realovirtual.com
17/04/2019
Summary of the review
R
realovirtual.com
07/03/2018
Summary of the review
Q
quasardynamics.com
16/01/2019
Summary of the review
A
afdigitale.it
08/05/2018
Summary of the review
C
ct.nl
31/10/2018
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Lenovo Mirage Solo

  • Fully standalone device requiring no smartphone or PC
  • Inside-out tracking provides six degrees of freedom (6DoF) without external sensors
  • Ergonomic design with adjustable straps and padding for a comfortable fit
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot
  • Good visual quality with reduced ghosting and screen-door effect on the LCD display
  • Compatible with a wide range of Google Daydream VR apps

What we don't like about Lenovo Mirage Solo

  • High price point compared to contemporary standalone rivals like Oculus Go
  • Included controller is limited to 3DoF, which can break immersion for 6DoF movement
  • Lack of integrated speakers; requires external headphones for audio
  • Large and bulky design makes it less portable than other mobile VR options
  • Limited library of apps specifically designed to utilize the 6DoF tracking
  • Can be front-heavy, potentially causing neck fatigue during long sessions

Verdict

The Lenovo Mirage Solo is a pioneer standalone VR headset that operates on the Google Daydream platform, powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 processor and 4GB of RAM. Its main characteristic is the integration of WorldSense technology, which uses dual front-facing cameras to provide 6-degrees-of-freedom (6DoF) inside-out tracking without external sensors. Key technical specs include a 5.5-inch QHD LCD display with a 2560 x 1440 resolution, a 75Hz refresh rate, and a 110-degree field of view. Its primary pros are its completely untethered design, 64GB of internal storage expandable via microSD, and a comfortable halo-style headband with a 4000 mAh battery offering up to 2.5 hours of use. However, notable cons include its relatively heavy weight of 645g, a limited library of 6DoF-compatible apps, and the included handheld controller being restricted to only 3-degrees-of-freedom tracking.

Compare Lenovo Mirage Solo with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Mirage Solo and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found