OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Suction power (AW):150 AWBattery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:2.5 LWeight:3.72 kg

Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 98% of vacuum-cleaners
5.7

Technical Score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

28%

6.5

Performance

22%

3.5

Battery

18%

7.9

Filtration

14%

5.7

Attachments

10%

6.0

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

▼Worse than 95% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £60
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F is a corded, bagless canister vacuum cleaner powered by a 960-watt, 8-amp motor featuring a cyclonic filtration system with washable disk filters. Weighing a lightweight 8.2 pounds, it features a 2.5-litre dustbin, a 16-foot power cord with automatic rewind, and a telescoping metal wand providing 9 feet of extended reach. Its core strengths include excellent maneuverability with 3-wheel swivel steering, an integrated 2-in-1 crevice tool/dusting brush on the handle, and effective multi-surface cleaning across hard floors and upholstery via fingertip airflow controls. However, significant drawbacks include subpar deep-cleaning performance on thick carpets due to the lack of a motorized brush roller, unsealed filtration that can exhaust fine dust, and a short power cable that restricts cleaning range.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F

Technical Score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

28%

6.5

Performance

22%

3.5

Battery

18%

7.9

Filtration

14%

5.7

Attachments

10%

6.0

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

5.7
Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F has a technical score of 5.7 points, which is lower than 95% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

5.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.0
Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F has a value-for-money score of 7 points, which is lower than 96.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
150 AW
Suction power (AW)
150 AW
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 150 AW, which is higher than that of 43.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 11.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
20.34 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
20.34 kPa
▲ Better than 59% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 20.34 kPa, which is higher than that of 59.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
?
Motor type
Universal motor
Power consumption
960 W
Power consumption
960 W
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 960 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 94.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
standard
Filter class
standard
▼ Worse than 93% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class standard, which is less advanced than the class used by 93.2% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 6.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
?
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
▲ Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
2.5 L
Capacity
2.5 L
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 2.5 L, which is larger than that of 76% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
▲ Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
▼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
▼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
3.72 kg
Weight
3.72 kg
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 3.72 kg, which is greater than the weight of 52.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.3% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
▼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.5 L
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 L vs 1 L).
    2.5 L vs 1 L
  • 2.5x cheaper
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£60 vs £150).
    £60 vs £150
  • 0.34 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    20.34 kPa
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (20.3 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    20.34 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 2.5x cheaper
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£60 vs £150).
    £60 vs £150
  • 0.34 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    20.34 kPa
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (20.3 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    20.34 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 1.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.5 L
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 L vs 1 L).
    2.5 L vs 1 L
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    82-82 dB
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (82-82 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    82-82 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    standard
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (standard vs hepa).
    standard vs hepa
  • 1.6 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    4.9 m
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (4.9 m vs 6.5 m).
    4.9 m vs 6.5 m
  • 360 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    960 W
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (960 W vs 600 W).
    960 W vs 600 W
  • 9% worse value for money
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.01 vs 7.6).
    7.01 vs 7.65
  • 94.9 mm deeper body
    Depth
    359.9 mm
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (359.9 mm vs 265 mm).
    359.9 mm vs 265 mm
  • 9% worse value for money
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.01 vs 7.6).
    7.01 vs 7.65
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    82-82 dB
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (82-82 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    82-82 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 360 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    960 W
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (960 W vs 600 W).
    960 W vs 600 W
  • 1.6 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    4.9 m
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (4.9 m vs 6.5 m).
    4.9 m vs 6.5 m
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    standard
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (standard vs hepa).
    standard vs hepa
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 94.9 mm deeper body
    Depth
    359.9 mm
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (359.9 mm vs 265 mm).
    359.9 mm vs 265 mm

Graphic comparison of Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F?

  • Extremely lightweight and easy to carry up stairs
  • Highly affordable budget-friendly price point
  • Excellent suction and cleaning performance on hardwood floors
  • Convenient one-button automatic retractable power cord
  • Bagless design with zero recurring costs for replacement bags
  • Washable and easily reusable filters
  • Integrated 2-in-1 crevice and dusting brush tool that won't get lost
  • Smooth swivel steering for nimble maneuvering under furniture

What customers dislike about Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F?

  • Lacks a motorized brush roller, making it struggle on high-pile carpets
  • Poor performance when tackling embedded pet hair
  • Tends to push around larger debris like cereal rather than sucking it up
  • Relatively short power cord length and cleaning reach
  • The body and parts feel somewhat cheap and plasticky
  • Dust container has a limited capacity and requires frequent emptying
  • Subpar filtration allows fine dust particles to escape back into the air

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
12/08/2020
Summary of the review
Eureka Whirlwind Bagless Canister Review - RTINGS.com
T
techgearlab.com
28/11/2024
Summary of the review
Eureka WhirlWind Review | Tested & Rated
R
rtings.com
12/08/2020
Summary of the review
Eureka Whirlwind vs BISSELL Zing Bagless Canister - RTINGS.com
R
rtings.com
12/08/2020
Summary of the review
Eureka Mighty Mite vs Whirlwind Bagless Canister - RTINGS.com

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Eureka WhirlWind NEN110F with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)