OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Dyson V8 Animal Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£370Suction power (AW):115 AWBattery runtime:40 minutesCapacity:0.54 LWeight:2.61 kg

Dyson V8 Animal Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

80%

6.5

Technical Score

20%

9.3

User score

â–²Better than 62% of vacuum-cleaners
6.5

Technical Score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

28%

6.7

Performance

22%

5.9

Battery

18%

6.9

Filtration

14%

7.1

Attachments

10%

7.4

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 57% of vacuum-cleaners
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 20,428 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 98% of vacuum-cleaners
  • dyson-v8-animal
dyson-v8-animal

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Dyson V8 Animal is a bagless, 2.6 kg cordless stick vacuum powered by a digital motor spinning at 110,000 RPM, delivering up to 115 air watts of suction power and utilizing 15 cyclones alongside a 5-stage HEPA filtration system to trap 99.99% of microscopic particles down to 0.3 microns. Key advantages include a versatile 2-in-1 design that converts into a handheld, a hygienic 0.54-liter dustbin ejection mechanism, de-tangling brush bar technology tailored for pet hair, and up to 40 minutes of fade-free runtime in powerful mode. However, significant drawbacks include a restricted 7-minute battery life when operating in MAX mode, a lengthy 5-hour full recharge time, the inconvenience of a non-swappable battery structure, and a continuous hold trigger design that can cause hand fatigue.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Dyson V8 Animal

Technical Score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

28%

6.7

Performance

22%

5.9

Battery

18%

6.9

Filtration

14%

7.1

Attachments

10%

7.4

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.5
Dyson V8 Animal has a technical score of 6.5 points, which is lower than 57.3% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 20,428 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Dyson V8 Animal has a user score of 9.32 points, which is higher than 98.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Dyson V8 Animal has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than 91.9% of vacuum cleaners.
10
Dyson V8 Animal has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than 91.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

8.6

Price

7.5
Dyson V8 Animal has a value-for-money score of 7.5 points, which is lower than 60.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
115 AW
Suction power (AW)
115 AW
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 115 AW, which is lower than that of 70.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
brushless
Power consumption
425 W
Power consumption
425 W
â–² Better than 64% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 425 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 64.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
40 minutes
Battery runtime
40 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 40 minutes, which is shorter than that of 64.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 18.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2,800 mAh
Battery capacity
2,800 mAh
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2,800 mAh, which is larger than that of 76.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
21.6 V
Battery voltage
21.6 V
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 21.6 V, which is lower than that of 59.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 16.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.99%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.99%
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.99% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 84.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 9.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.54 L
Capacity
0.54 L
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.54 L, which is smaller than that of 79.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
yes
Mini motorized brush
yes
â–² Better than 73% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.61 kg
Weight
2.61 kg
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.61 kg, which is lower than the weight of 74.4% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Dyson V8 Animal vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes mini motorized brush
    Mini motorized brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 0.04 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.99 %
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.99 % vs 99.95 %
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 27.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.61 kg
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.6 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.61 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 300 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,800 mAh
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2800 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,800 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 175 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    425 W
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (425 W vs 600 W).
    425 W vs 600 W
  • 16.4% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Dyson V8 Animal
    the average vacuum cleaner
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Dyson V8 Animal has a higher user score than the average vacuum cleaner (9.32 vs 8.000).
    9.32 vs 8
  • 175 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    425 W
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (425 W vs 600 W).
    425 W vs 600 W
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 300 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,800 mAh
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2800 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,800 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 0.04 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.99 %
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.99 % vs 99.95 %
  • Includes mini motorized brush
    Mini motorized brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 27.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.61 kg
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.6 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.61 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 44 mm shallower body
    Depth
    221 mm
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (221 mm vs 265 mm).
    221 mm vs 265 mm
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    70-82 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (70-82 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    70-82 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 10 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    40 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (40 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    40 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 0.46 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.54 L
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.5 L vs 1 L).
    0.54 L vs 1 L
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 35 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    115 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (115 AW vs 150 AW).
    115 AW vs 150 AW
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 2.47x more expensive
    Dyson V8 Animal is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£370 vs £150).
    £370 vs £150
  • 2.1% worse value for money
    Dyson V8 Animal offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.49 vs 7.6).
    7.49 vs 7.65
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    70-82 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (70-82 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    70-82 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 35 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    115 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (115 AW vs 150 AW).
    115 AW vs 150 AW
  • 10 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    250 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (250 mm vs 260 mm).
    250 mm vs 260 mm
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 10 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    40 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (40 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    40 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 5 minutes shorter turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    7 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (7 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    7 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 0.6 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    21.6 V
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (21.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    21.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • 0.46 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.54 L
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.5 L vs 1 L).
    0.54 L vs 1 L
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2016
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2016 vs 2021).
    2016 vs 2021
  • 144 mm taller body
    Height
    1,244 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1244 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,244 mm vs 1,100 mm

Graphic comparison of Dyson V8 Animal and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 20,428 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Dyson V8 Animal?

  • Powerful suction on carpets, particularly for extracting embedded dirt and fine dust.
  • Highly effective pet hair removal without frequent tangling on the redesigned motorbar.
  • Lightweight and compact design makes it very easy to maneuver around furniture and tight spaces.
  • Transforms easily into a handheld vacuum for versatile cleaning of cars, stairs, and upholstery.
  • Relatively quiet operation on the standard power setting compared to older or corded models.
  • Hygienic, touch-free bin emptying mechanism prevents contact with collected debris.
  • Excellent whole-machine HEPA filtration system that securely seals in microscopic allergens.

What customers dislike about Dyson V8 Animal?

  • Disappointing battery life on 'MAX' power mode, lasting only about 7 to 8 minutes.
  • Long battery recharge time, requiring up to 5 hours for a full charge.
  • The internal battery is not easily swappable, preventing the use of a spare battery to extend run time.
  • Standard floor head tends to push larger debris forward on hard floors rather than sucking it up.
  • Trigger-style power button requires constant holding down during use, which can cause hand fatigue.
  • Relatively small dust bin capacity requires frequent emptying during larger cleaning sessions.
  • Suction power and overall efficiency drop significantly when using the low-power standard setting.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
trustedreviews.com
06/10/2016
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 Animal Review - Trusted Reviews
E
expertreviews.co.uk
01/12/2021
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 Animal review: The most affordable Dyson V8
S
self.com
06/04/2022
Summary of the review
The Dyson V8 Animal Is the Best Vacuum I've Ever Owned
H
homesandgardens.com
28/01/2025
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 cordless vacuum review | Homes and Gardens
P
petmycarpet.com
19/12/2017
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 Animal Review & V8 Absolute Comparison | Pet My Carpet
W
whichvac.com
09/11/2023
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 Review: Animal & Total Clean Tested - which vac?
S
smarthomeassistent.de
17/12/2020
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 Animal+ - Smart Home Assistant
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
09/04/2019
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 Animal+ Review: A Lighter Version of the V8 Absolute
(Translated)Show original
Q
quel-aspirateur.com
11/10/2026
Summary of the review
Review & Test: Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Stick Vacuum
(Translated)Show original
A
altroconsumo.it
Sconosciuta
Summary of the review
Review of the DYSON V8 ANIMAL Cordless Vacuum Cleaner + Archive
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/05/2020
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 Animal+ - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
14/11/2025
Summary of the review
Dyson V8 Cyclone Review – The Reliable Entry-Level Model
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Dyson V8 Animal with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)