OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£570RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:12.4 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 55 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB)
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

35%

7.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

9.9

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 87% of tablets
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

7.5

Price

â–²Better than 64%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

7.6

Camera

14%

8.8

Battery

12%

8.4

Connectivity

8%

7.8

Software

5%

7.3

Design

3%

6.4

Audio

â–²Better than 80%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

9.3

Popularity

Grades by review (55)
42 reviews: 23 with a printed score, 19 estimated from the review. 13 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 68%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-s7-fe-8gb-256gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-s7-fe-8gb-256gb-lte
Where to buy
    N/A~ £570
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GBCheck price
Other versions:
8GB + 256GB6GB + 128GB

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB)

Based on 40 · 13

Reviewers praise the S Pen and sound, but many find the screen underwhelming and struggle with gaming, unlocking and multitasking.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB)

Based on 192 owners sharing their experience in online comments

71%positive10%mixed19%negative

Owners most enjoy the expansive screen, capable pen and battery life, while some find the price high and performance limited.

What owners dislike

  • Performance can feel slow or underpowered13
  • Owners say the price is high at full retail, and it is only good value when bought on a deal or discount.8
  • Owners with the 4GB RAM version say it limits multitasking; RAM Plus virtual memory helps somewhat, and the 6GB version performs better.4
  • Owners say the LCD screen looks less vivid and has lower contrast than OLED screens on phones or other tablets.4
  • Owners find the tablet large and heavy, which can be tiring to hold for long periods or uncomfortable to use in bed.4
  • Owners worry that security updates have stopped or been infrequent, with some reporting none for several months.3
  • Owners report wireless display or second-screen connections that lag, fail to show video, or only play sound; some USB-C to HDMI cables do not work.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

7.6

Camera

14%

8.8

Battery

12%

8.4

Connectivity

8%

7.8

Software

5%

7.3

Design

3%

6.4

Audio

7.7
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

7.5

Price

7.8
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 8 GB of RAM, which is more than 72.1% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Process node
8 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 8 nm process, which is smaller than 69.2% of tablets and equal to 0.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 256 GB of internal storage, which is more than 76.4% of tablets and equal to 15.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
823 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 823 points in single-core tests, which is higher than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G, which is more advanced than 63.2% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2560×1600
This tablet has a 2560×1600 screen, which is sharper than 77.5% of tablets and equal to 10% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
243 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 243 ppi, which is higher than 66.3% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 3, which is more durable than 80.2% of tablets and the same as 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
10,090 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 10,090 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 90.9% of tablets and equal to 1% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 45 W, which is faster than 83.8% of tablets and equal to 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
internet usage
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
yes
This tablet supports 5G. 91.9% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
608 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 608 g, which is heavier than 78.1% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
2.8 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 2.8 ms, which is lower than that of 76.8% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 3, which is more than 87.8% of tablets and equal to 5.3% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
?
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.7% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 222 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (623 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    623 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2.3 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 52.9% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (10,090 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    10,090 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 619 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 619 vs Mali-G51
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 68% of models

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    9.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (55)
    42 reviews: 23 with a printed score, 19 estimated from the review. 13 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • 32.0% higher sentiment score
    9.9 vs 7.5
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 619 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 619 vs Mali-G51
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.6% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 42.9% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (8 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    8 nm vs 14 nm
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 300 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (2,166 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    2,166 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 222 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (623 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    623 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2.3 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200).
    2,560×1,600 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    96% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1550:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,550:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports HDR10+
    This tablet supports HDR10+, while the average tablet does not. 8% of tablets support HDR10+.
  • Supports HDR10
    This tablet supports HDR10, while the average tablet does not. 21.7% of tablets support HDR10.
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 10% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (243 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    243 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 52.9% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (10,090 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    10,090 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    internet usage
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • Supports 5G
    This tablet supports 5G, while the average tablet does not. 8.1% of tablets support 5G.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.3% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Faster USB ports
    This tablet has faster USB ports than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2).
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1.7 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    6.3 mm vs 8 mm
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 6.2 ms lower pen latency
    This tablet has lower pen latency than the average tablet (2.8 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    2.8 ms vs 9 ms
  • 2 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (3 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    3 vs 1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.3% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 24.1% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (608 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    608 g vs 490 g
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 2.19x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£570 vs £260).
    £570 vs £260
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 84.8 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (284.8 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    284.8 mm vs 200 mm
  • 2.19x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£570 vs £260).
    £570 vs £260
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 24.1% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (608 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    608 g vs 490 g
  • 84.8 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (284.8 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    284.8 mm vs 200 mm
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
06/10/2023
Expert review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is worth it only with a big discount, since its 60Hz screen and phone-style software trail newer Samsung models.
7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
30/09/2021
Hands-on review · Productivity tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a good, affordable Android tablet for streaming and light work, but weak multitasking makes it a poor laptop replacement.
8.0
gizmodo.com
≈ estimated
13/09/2021
Hands-on review · DeX productivity
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE suits light work on the road thanks to its big screen, DeX desktop mode and long battery, but its mid-range chip shows its limits.
8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
06/08/2021
Hands-on review · Work tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a solid large-screen tablet for productivity, with a strong battery and included S Pen, but it won't replace a PC.
8.0
sammobile.com
≈ estimated
23/09/2021
Hands-on review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE suits light use and binge-watching thanks to its huge screen and battery, but heavy multitasking shows the limits of its mid-range chip.
8.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
19/01/2022
Hands-on review · Media tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a bright 12.4-inch tablet with excellent battery life for streaming and light work, held back by a weak processor.
6.5
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
08/01/2022
Hands-on review · Everyday tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE has a great build and big screen, but 4GB RAM, no fingerprint sensor and a slow charger make rivals more attractive.
8.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
27/11/2022
Hands-on review · Fan Edition tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a good big-screen tablet for streaming and DeX multitasking, but 4GB RAM and an expensive keyboard cover hold it back.
7.0
cnet.com
≈ estimated
30/10/2021
Hands-on review · Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a decent iPad alternative for Android fans, with good streaming and long battery life, though it won't impress on performance.
7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
19/08/2021
Hands-on test · Digital drawing tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab S7 FE suits hobbyist digital artists thanks to its pressure-sensitive S Pen, but weak gaming power makes it slightly too expensive.
6.0
laptopmedia.com
≈ estimated
26/08/2021
Lab test · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a sturdy, long-lasting tablet with a bright display, but its weak processor may not be worth its price.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
30/09/2021
Hands-on review · Productivity tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a well-built tablet with excellent battery life that suits video and everyday tasks, but it is too slow to replace a laptop.
W
whathifi.com
29/12/2021
✓ explicit
8.0
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 12.4-inch tablet review
A
androidauthority.com
07/06/2024
✓ explicit
7.0
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE review: Pretty, but underpowered Would you like a breakdown of the specific hardware differences between the LTE and Wi-Fi on...
5.0
xda-developers.com
≈ estimated
30/06/2021
Ten-day review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE feels premium but stutters under load and lacks a fingerprint sensor, so it is hard to recommend at its price.
7.0
teknofilo.com
≈ estimated
26/07/2021
In-depth review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a thin, attractive tablet with accurate colours, but its 60Hz LCD and lack of water resistance hold it back.
8.0
computerhoy.20minutos.es
✓ explicit
31/07/2021
Full review · Big-screen tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a well-built tablet for watching media, with a strong battery and speakers, held back by its 60Hz screen.
6.9
larazon.es
✓ explicit
07/07/2021
Hands-on test · Media-focused tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE suits media lovers with its long battery, but it stutters on demanding tasks like photo editing.
8.0
rpp.pe
≈ estimated
18/10/2021
Hands-on test · Big-screen family tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a family-friendly tablet with a huge battery and good sound, but its 4GB RAM model is a bottleneck.
8.0
tuexperto.com
≈ estimated
07/07/2021
One-week test · Office tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is a large but light tablet suited to office work and S Pen notes, though its TFT screen has weaker contrast than AMOLED.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB)

  • Large and vibrant 12.4-inch display, excellent for watching movies and multitasking.
  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting up to two days with moderate use.
  • Included S Pen provides a natural writing experience with low latency.
  • Premium aluminum build quality that matches higher-end flagship models.
  • Samsung DeX support allows for a productive, laptop-like desktop interface.
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot up to 1TB.

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB)

  • Mediocre performance on the LTE model due to the Snapdragon 750G chipset, which is slower than the Wi-Fi version's 778G.
  • The 4GB RAM in the base model frequently leads to lagging, app crashes, and poor multitasking.
  • The 60Hz LCD screen lacks the smoothness of 120Hz panels and the deep blacks of AMOLED displays.
  • Slow charging out of the box, as the included 15W charger takes nearly 4 hours for a full charge.
  • Missing a fingerprint sensor for biometric security, relying only on less secure 2D face unlock.
  • Cameras are basic and struggle significantly in low-light conditions.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB) features a large 12.4-inch TFT LCD display with a 2560 x 1600 resolution and is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G chipset. This high-tier configuration pairs 8GB of RAM with 256GB of internal storage, expandable up to 1TB via microSD, and includes a substantial 10,090mAh battery supporting 45W fast charging. Key pros include the premium aluminum unibody design, an included S Pen with low latency for productivity, integrated Samsung DeX for a desktop-like experience, and impressive battery life for media consumption. However, notable cons include the lack of a high refresh rate (limited to 60Hz), the absence of an AMOLED panel compared to flagship S7 models, no fingerprint sensor, and relatively slow 15W in-box charging despite supporting higher speeds.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE LTE (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found