OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£590RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:10.95 inchesChipset:Google Tensor G2

Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB)
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

90%

7.5

Technical score

10%

9.1

User score

▲Better than 80% of tablets
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

7.4

Price

▲Better than 67%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components

22%

9.0

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

6.3

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

9.7

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

7.2

Audio & Multimedia

▲Better than 78%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 91%
  • google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
  • google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
  • google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
  • google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
  • google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
  • google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
google-pixel-tablet-8gb-256gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 256GB8GB + 128GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components:

22%

9.0

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

6.3

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

9.7

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

7.2

Audio & Multimedia

7.5
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.1
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) has a user popularity of 9.3 points, which is lower than 87.4% of Tablets.
9.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

7.4

Price

7.6
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
5 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 5 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 84.6% of tablets and equal to the node used in 3.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,442 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 1,442 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 76.1% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Google Tensor G2
This tablet uses the Google Tensor G2 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 78.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2560×1600
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2560×1600 which is higher than that of 77.6% of tablets and equal to that of 10.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
276 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 276 ppi which is higher than that of 83% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,020 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,020 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 57.6% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 52.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
493 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 493 g which is heavier than 50.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
30 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 30 ms, which is higher than that of 92.2% of tablets and equal to that of 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 87.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 5.2% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Google Tensor G2 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 42.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.85 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • 3.44x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (51.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    51.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • 14% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Google Pixel Tablet
    the average tablet
    Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.12 vs 8.000).
    9.12 vs 8
  • 92.9% more popular
    Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.28 vs 4.8).
    9.28 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Google Tensor G2 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 42.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.85 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.44x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (51.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    51.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 4,534 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (6,400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    6,400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3
  • 64.3% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (5 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    5 nm vs 14 nm
  • 97.8% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,442 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,442 points vs 729 points
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-G710 MP7 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G710 MP7 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 30.5% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (848 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    848 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 3 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (7 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    7 vs 4
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1612:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,612:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 23.2% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (276 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    276 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 99 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    500 nits vs 401 nits
  • 0.85 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.95 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • 55 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (276 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    276 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 6.7% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7,020 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    7,020 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    June 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 2 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (3 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    3 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • 21 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (30 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    30 ms vs 9 ms
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • 2.27x more expensive
    Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£590 vs £260).
    £590 vs £260
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • 21 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (30 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    30 ms vs 9 ms
  • 83.5 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (258.8 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    258.8 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theverge.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: the dock makes all the difference
T
theguardian.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Pixel Tablet review: Google's Android slate and smart display rolled into one
U
uk.pcmag.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet - Review 2023 - PCMag UK
T
techradar.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: A new home for the same old Android
E
expertreviews.co.uk
28/11/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: Big dock energy Would you like a comparison of battery life results or display performance metrics from these specific tes...
S
shortlist.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: 5 things to know
M
metro.co.uk
26/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet 2023 review: A tablet you will actually use
W
whathifi.com
25/07/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review - What Hi-Fi?
P
phonearena.com
13/02/2024
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: check out what my Nest Hub can do
I
ign.com
22/05/2024
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet Review PCMag UK +11
C
cnet.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet Review: Android Tablets Are Back
T
techcrunch.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: It’s all about the dock
P
pcmag.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet Review
E
engadget.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: Clever accessories transform an unexciting tablet
P
pocket-lint.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: Hi honey, I'm (Google) home
S
stuff.tv
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: welcome home
T
trustedreviews.com
20/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet Review
S
sciencefocus.com
24/08/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: A surprising twist on the classic home hub
T
thurrott.com
28/06/2023
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet Review
A
androidcentral.com
08/09/2025
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Tablet review: Jack of most trades, master of one Would you like me to look for long-term usage reviews or comparisons with the Samsung G...

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB)

  • Innovative hybrid design that functions as both a tablet and a smart home hub
  • Included Charging Speaker Dock provides a convenient home for the device
  • Significantly improved audio quality and bass when docked
  • Excellent battery life, often exceeding 15 hours of video playback
  • Clean 'Pixel' Android experience with useful features like Hub Mode
  • Fast and reliable fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button
  • Lightweight and comfortable build that is easy to hold for long periods

What customers don't like about Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB)

  • Display is limited to a 60Hz refresh rate, which can feel less smooth than competitors
  • Uses an LCD panel instead of OLED, resulting in lower contrast and narrower viewing angles
  • Many Android apps are still not fully optimized for large tablet screens
  • The Speaker Dock is completely non-functional when the tablet is not attached
  • Lack of official first-party productivity accessories like a keyboard or stylus
  • 16:10 aspect ratio can feel awkward for reading in portrait mode
  • Fixed-focus cameras are adequate for video calls but poor for photography

Verdict

The Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) features a 10.95-inch LCD with a 2560 x 1600 resolution and 500 nits of brightness, powered by the Google Tensor G2 processor and a Titan M2 security chip. Its primary characteristic is the unique Charging Speaker Dock that transforms the device into a smart home hub with Hub Mode and built-in Chromecast. Main pros include its seamless integration into the Google ecosystem, solid performance for multitasking, and a durable aluminum body with a nano-ceramic coating. However, notable cons include a display limited to a 60Hz refresh rate, the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and no expandable microSD storage.

Compare Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel Tablet (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found