OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.36 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB)
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

â–²Better than 63% of tablets
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–²Better than 71%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

22%

6.5

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

7.0

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

6.3

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software & Features

5%

8.1

Design

3%

8.2

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 61%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 78%
  • oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
  • oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
  • oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
  • oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
  • oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
  • oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
  • oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
oppo-pad-air-4gb-64gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB
Other versions:
4GB + 128GB6GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

22%

6.5

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

7.0

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

6.3

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software & Features

5%

8.1

Design

3%

8.2

Audio & Multimedia

6.6
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Popularity:
Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 6.9 points, which is lower than 68.5% of Tablets.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.7
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
416 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 416 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 64.8% of tablets and equal to the score of 4% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 58.7% of tablets and equal to those in 1.8% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2000×1200
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2000×1200 which is higher than that of 58.2% of tablets and equal to that of 8.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
225 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 225 ppi which is higher than that of 61.6% of tablets and equal to that of 1.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,100 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,100 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 59.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
?
Weight
440 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 440 g which is lighter than 69.2% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.9% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
2 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 2 ms, which is lower than that of 88.9% of tablets and equal to that of 11.1% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
yes
This tablet supports aptX Adaptive. 93.1% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.36x cheaper
    Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£110 vs £260).
    £110 vs £260
  • 3.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo Pad Air
    the average tablet
    Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.27 vs 8.000).
    8.27 vs 8
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • 71.5% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (1,115 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    1,115 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1391:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,391:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2000×1200 vs 1920×1200
  • 0.26 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.36 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 7.9% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    7,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 7 ms lower pen latency
    This tablet has lower pen latency than the average tablet (2 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    2 ms vs 9 ms
  • 10.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (440 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    440 g vs 490 g
  • 1.06 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.94 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This tablet supports aptX Adaptive, the average tablet does not. 6.9% of tablets include aptX Adaptive support.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • 41 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    360 nits vs 401 nits
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    100% sRGB coverage reported.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 42.9% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (416 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    416 points vs 729 points
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 41 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    360 nits vs 401 nits
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    100% sRGB coverage reported.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 40 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    360 nits vs 400 nits
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 45.08 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (245.1 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    245.08 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
TechwithUsama
≈ estimated
30/09/2022
Hands-on review · 10 days of use, benchmarks and games
Verdict
Oppo Pad Air has impressive features for its level and is a strong pick for first-time tablet buyers.
9.0
Pratima Adhikari
≈ estimated
13/09/2022
Multi-week hands-on review · display, performance, battery and design
Verdict
Oppo Pad Air is a strong budget pick for media and everyday use, though not for power users or artists.
8.4
Sadiqslens
✓ explicit
29/07/2022
Unboxing and review · display, sound, battery and gaming
Verdict
Oppo Pad Air offers immersive sound and a bright display, with the camera as its only weak point.
8.0
Lim Reviews
≈ estimated
14/09/2022
Hands-on review · battery, display and features
Verdict
Oppo Pad Air is a budget tablet worth considering for media and light work, thanks to its long battery life.
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techadvisor.com
10/01/2023
Summary of the review
Oppo Pad Air Review: An Easy Tablet to Recommend
E
expertreviews.co.uk
04/07/2023
Summary of the review
Oppo Pad Air review: Featherweight build with heavyweight stamina
T
techradar.com
03/09/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Pad Air - TechRadar
T
trustedreviews.com
19/06/2023
Summary of the review
Oppo Pad Air Review - Trusted Reviews
T
t3.com
14/12/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Pad Air review - T3
P
pocket-lint.com
30/11/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Pad Air review: A low-budget beauty
R
reviews.org
10/11/2022
Summary of the review
OPPO Pad Air review: More average than awesome
T
techguide.com.au
28/11/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Pad Air review - the affordable tablet that punches above its weight
G
gadgetpilipinas.net
08/01/2023
Summary of the review
OPPO Pad Air Review - Gadget Pilipinas
D
digitec.ch
25/10/2022
Summary of the review
The Oppo Pad Air: enduring, multitasking and definitely well intentioned
L
lesnumeriques.com
10/09/2022
Summary of the review
Test Oppo Pad Air: une première tablette simple et pratique
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
27/02/2023
Summary of the review
Test Oppo Pad Air: une tablette très classique, mais un bon rapport qualité/prix
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
05/10/2022
Summary of the review
Test de la Oppo Pad Air: efficace mais sans prise de risque
(Translated)Show original
T
tomsguide.fr
30/10/2022
Summary of the review
Test Oppo Pad Air: une tablette pas chère, taillée pour le streaming vidéo
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
17/10/2022
Summary of the review
Test du Oppo Pad Air: l'efficacité sans prétention
(Translated)Show original
D
digitec.ch
25/10/2022
Summary of the review
L'Oppo Pad Air: endurant, multitâche et certainement bien intentionné
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.businessam.be
03/10/2022
Summary of the review
Test - Oppo Pad Air: une première tablette sur le marché européen
(Translated)Show original
2
20minutes.fr
16/09/2022
Summary of the review
Pad Air : Après ses smartphones, montres et écouteurs, Oppo montre ses tablettes
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
22/10/2022
Summary of the review
Test de l'Oppo Pad Air : notre avis sur la 1ère tablette de la marque sous ColorOS
(Translated)Show original
T
tomsguide.fr
21/05/2024
Summary of the review
Meilleures tablettes pas chères : quel modèle choisir en 2024
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB)

  • Premium, slim, and lightweight all-metal build quality
  • Sharp 2K IPS display with 2000x1200 resolution and good viewing angles
  • Excellent battery life, often lasting several days with casual use
  • Impressive quad-speaker setup with Dolby Atmos support
  • Clean software experience with useful multitasking features like split-screen
  • Expandable storage via microSD card slot

What customers don't like about Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB)

  • Mediocre performance from the Snapdragon 680, especially for gaming and heavy multitasking
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack
  • Slow 18W charging takes nearly three hours for a full charge
  • No cellular (LTE/5G) connectivity options available
  • Poor camera quality, particularly in low light
  • Display lacks high refresh rate (limited to 60Hz) and is highly reflective outdoors
  • No fingerprint sensor for biometric security

Verdict

The Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) is a budget-friendly tablet featuring a 10.36-inch 2K IPS Eye-Care display with a 2000 x 1200 resolution and a 60Hz refresh rate. It is powered by an octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 processor and includes 4GB of LPDDR4X RAM, which can be virtually expanded by up to 3GB using its 64GB of UFS 2.2 internal storage. Key advantages include its ultra-slim 6.94mm metallic body weighing only 440g, an immersive quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos support, and a long-lasting 7100mAh battery that offers up to 15 hours of video calls. However, users should note several drawbacks, such as the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, a lack of cellular connectivity, and relatively slow 18W charging that takes over two hours for a full top-up. Additionally, while the device handles everyday tasks well, its performance may struggle with graphically intensive 3D gaming.

Compare Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Pad Air (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found