OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

ZTE Nubia Watch review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£190Screen size:4.01 inchBattery life:3 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

ZTE Nubia Watch Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 41 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

ZTE Nubia Watch
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

35%

6.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.2

Reviews score

10%

6.2

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 65% of smartwatches
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

▼Worse than 69%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

24%

4.8

Health

21%

7.3

Fitness

16%

6.0

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

7.1

Connectivity

9%

5.9

Display & Design

4%

7.8

Hardware

▼Worse than 53%
6.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models

6.2

Mark 6.5 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

5.9

Average grade

20%

8.8

Popularity

Grades by review (41)
16 reviews + 25 videos, average 5.6/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 67%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • zte-nubia-watch
zte-nubia-watch
Where to buy
    N/A~ £190
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the ZTE Nubia Watch

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers like the sharp screen, solid build and health tracking, but criticise weak software, sports modes, calls and the bulky size.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ZTE Nubia Watch

Based on 31 owners sharing their experience in online comments

19%positive26%mixed55%negative

Owners love the dramatic oversized look, but buggy software, unreliable notifications, and weak call audio make it frustrating to use.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report the software feels unfinished: notification setup offers mainly Chinese-language apps like WeChat and QQ, compass and some features do not work, and app updates have stopped.8
  • Owners say notifications often fail to arrive, including WhatsApp group messages and email, and some report no incoming alerts at all after setup.5
  • Owners say syncing photos and contacts to the watch often fails, with the app hanging on upload, and music or calendar syncing does not work for some.4
  • Owners say the speaker is too quiet for calls, and the other person's voice is hard to hear, though holding the watch to the ear works.4
  • Owners say the company has not responded to questions and has gone silent on shipping updates, and some report difficulty getting refunds.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch ZTE Nubia Watch

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

24%

4.8

Health

21%

7.3

Fitness

16%

6.0

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

7.1

Connectivity

9%

5.9

Display & Design

4%

7.8

Hardware

6.2
Reviews score
6.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
?
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
3 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 3 days on a charge, which is shorter than 76.7% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.5% of Smartwatches.
Used the typical 2-4 day figure; ignored the 7-day power-saving mode.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
27 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 27 h with GPS on, which is longer than 65.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.3% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
420 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 420 mAh battery, which is larger than 75.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.5% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
85 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 85 min, which is quicker than 74.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.8% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 42% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 83.5% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM on cellular version only.
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
4.01 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 4.01 inch screen, which is larger than 99.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.2% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
192x 960
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 192x960 which is lower than that of 92.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
244 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 244 ppi, which is lower than 82.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.1 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.1 GHz which is faster than that in 82.6% of smartwatches and equal to that in 2.3% of smartwatches.
Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 2100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM, which is more than 34.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 41.8% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

ZTE Nubia Watch vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Built-in cellular module
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • 35 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (85 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    85 min vs 120 min
  • 2.61 inch larger display
    This smartwatch has a larger screen than the average smartwatch (4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    4.01 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • 6 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (27 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    27 h vs 21 h
  • 115 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (420 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    420 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • 35 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (85 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    85 min vs 120 min
  • 6 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (27 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    27 h vs 21 h
  • 115 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (420 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    420 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Built-in cellular module
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • 2.61 inch larger display
    This smartwatch has a larger screen than the average smartwatch (4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    4.01 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    leather vs silicone
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20 mm vs 22 mm
  • Faster CPU speed
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.1 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
    4x1.1 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No swim mode
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 76.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 11.4% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models

    6.2

    Mark 6.5 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    5.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (41)
    16 reviews + 25 videos, average 5.6/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.2 vs 7.0
  • 17.3% lower sentiment score
    6.2 vs 7.5
  • 72.7% more expensive
    ZTE Nubia Watch is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£190 vs £110).
    £190 vs £110
  • 4% worse value for money
    ZTE Nubia Watch has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.46 vs 7.8).
    7.46 vs 7.76
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • 1 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2020
    2020 vs 2021
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No swim mode
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 76.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 86 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (4 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    4 vs 90
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 4 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (3 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Used the typical 2-4 day figure; ignored the 7-day power-saving mode.
    3 days vs 7 days
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • Weaker ingress protection
    This smartwatch has weaker ingress protection than the average smartwatch (IP54 vs IP68).
    IP54 vs IP68
  • 53 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (98 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    98 g vs 45 g
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 2.5 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (14.2 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    14.2 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 192x960, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    192x960 vs 360x360
  • 82 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (244 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    244 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 80 mm taller case
    This smartwatch has a taller case than the average smartwatch (125 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45 mm tall.
    125 mm vs 45 mm
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0
innoiso
≈ estimated
28/03/2021
Long-term test · a couple of months of use
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch feels like a beta product and is too limited to recommend over a traditional smartwatch.
6.0
TallBros Tech
≈ estimated
23/02/2021
Hands-on review · features, battery and app setup
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch has a nice wrap-around design, but its limited features make it mainly a fun fashion watch.
9.0
Flossy Carter
≈ estimated
20/02/2021
Hands-on review · notification tests and specifications
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch is good value at its low price, though it has limited features and an older processor.
7.0
MakeUseOf
≈ estimated
17/12/2020
Hands-on review · sleep, battery and file transfer tests
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch is a good option only for people who want to leave their phone behind, with weak fitness and sleep tracking.
7.0
Nikolay Tanev
≈ estimated
13/10/2020
Hands-on review · display, battery and health tests
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch has a very unusual design some buyers will love, with a good display and battery, but it needs more features.
4.0
TechTablets
≈ estimated
13/10/2020
Hands-on review · app, speaker and fitness tests
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch has a good build and design, but its unfinished app and missing features make it a weak smartwatch.
7.0
TK Bay
≈ estimated
09/10/2020
Hands-on review · one week of daily use
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch is recommended only for those who want a unique look, as durability and water resistance are real concerns.
6.0
JonoRay Tech & Collectibles
≈ estimated
11/01/2021
Unboxing · setup and app walkthrough
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch is light and cool-looking, but it has old hardware and only splash resistance, which is misleading.
7.0
TechLine
≈ estimated
19/11/2020
Hands-on review · design, display and app tests
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch has a striking design and solid build, but limited features and app glitches suit buyers who prioritise looks.
4.0
MrMobile [Michael Fisher]
≈ estimated
04/09/2020
Hands-on review · four days of wear
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch has a sharp, responsive curved display, but buggy software and little practical benefit make it hard to recommend.
7.0
SourceForge
≈ estimated
18/08/2020
Hands-on review · design, notifications and fitness tests
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch is worth considering mainly for design fans who want glanceable notifications, given its limited features.
7.0
ben's gadget reviews
≈ estimated
03/08/2020
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
ZTE Nubia Watch offers solid hardware at a fair early-bird price, but the software is lacking and the plastic screen may not be durable.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
09/07/2021
Quick review · Curved-screen watch
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch has a long curved screen and suits buyers who only want to text and count steps, not a daily companion.
6.0
androidheadlines.com
✓ explicit
23/09/2020
Hands-on review · Hybrid fitness watch
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch suits buyers who want a big, bright screen and basic fitness tracking, but its bulk and few sports modes hold it back.
6.0
tomsguide.com
≈ estimated
20/08/2020
Hands-on test · Curved-display watch
Verdict
The Nubia Watch is a cool-looking novelty with impressive hardware, but its software and weight keep it niche.
5.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
18/08/2020
Hands-on · Kickstarter smartwatch
Verdict
The Nubia Watch is a novelty smartwatch for people who want a big flexible screen, but its software is still early and unreliable.
5.0
geekspin.co
✓ explicit
02/09/2020
Review · Curved OLED watch
Verdict
The Nubia Watch has beautiful hardware, but weak software and a battery that barely lasts a day make it one to wait on.
5.0
notebookcheck.net
≈ estimated
21/10/2020
Lab test · Curved-display smartwatch
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch is a curved-screen watch with accurate heart rate readings, but its slow GPS and inaccurate route distances make it a poor choice for runners.
6.0
daskannwas.ch
≈ estimated
30/09/2020
Early hands-on · Pre-production model
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch has a metal case and a bright long screen, but its own software is limited and still had glitches on the test unit.
3.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
12/12/2020
Hands-on test · Design and comfort
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch has an unusual design, but at 98g and 14.4mm thick it is tiring to wear, and you never see the whole screen at once.
3.0
journaldugeek.com
✓ explicit
23/10/2020
Full test · Software and fitness
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch has a bright curved screen, but its app is poorly translated and its health tracking is too thin to rely on.
2.0
clubic.com
✓ explicit
24/12/2020
Full test · Flexible-screen watch
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch is worth a look only for its flexible screen; the compass and calendar fail, and the speaker is near-silent.
5.0
droidsoft.fr
≈ estimated
14/11/2020
Hands-on test · Classic-style watch
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch has a classic look and suits people who want a big screen and few connected features, but its dated software holds it back.
6.8
smartworld.it
✓ explicit
01/11/2020
Hands-on review · Concept watch
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch lasts two days on a charge despite its large screen, but its thin, half-finished software is the weak point.
7.9
tweakers.net
✓ explicit
19/04/2021
Full review · Curved-screen watch
Verdict
The ZTE Nubia Watch's long curved screen shows more than most watches, but its weight and weak fitness tracking limit it to curious buyers.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ZTE Nubia Watch

  • Unique, 4.01-inch flexible AMOLED display that wraps around the wrist
  • Futuristic and eye-catching industrial design
  • Sturdy construction with a stainless steel and aluminium frame
  • Decent battery life of roughly 2 to 7 days depending on usage mode
  • Onboard music storage and GPS for phone-free workouts
  • Bright screen with vibrant colours that are easy to read

What customers don't like about ZTE Nubia Watch

  • Extremely bulky and heavy (98g), making it uncomfortable for small wrists
  • Proprietary software is limited and lacks a third-party app ecosystem
  • Notification system is clunky and often does not allow for replies
  • Basic fitness tracking with limited sports modes and no historic data view
  • Low water resistance rating (IP54), not suitable for swimming
  • No NFC for contactless payments and no internal speaker in international models

Verdict

The ZTE Nubia Watch is a futuristic wearable defined by its expansive 4.01-inch flexible AMOLED wraparound display (960 x 192 resolution, 244 ppi) and a durable build featuring 316L stainless steel and aluminum alloy. Powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage, it includes built-in GPS, a heart rate monitor, and an IP54 water resistance rating. Main pros include its unique high-tech aesthetic, smooth UI performance, and the ability to make Bluetooth calls or play local music directly via wireless earbuds. However, it suffers from significant cons such as a bulky 98g weight that can be cumbersome, a highly limited ecosystem with no third-party app support, basic fitness tracking modes, and a software experience that lacks the ability to fully reply to notifications.

Compare ZTE Nubia Watch with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ZTE Nubia Watch and other Smartwatches

No results found