OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Vivo Watch GT Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Screen size:1.85 inchBattery life:10 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Vivo Watch GT Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 8 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Technical score

30%

7.7

Review score ( 4 · 4)

Review score 30% · 7.7 · based on 8 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–²Better than 71% of smartwatches
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

24%

6.0

Health

21%

7.8

Fitness

16%

7.4

Battery

14%

7.5

Smart features

12%

8.0

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

â–²Better than 72% of smartwatches
7.7

Review score

Review score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Grades by review (8)
4 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
2

20%

9.0

pinoytechnoguide.com

20%

5.0

my.priceshop.com

≈ estimated
2

20%

8.0

yugatech.com

10%

8.0

unboxdiaries.com

Video reviews 4

10%

9.0

Gadget Sidekick

10%

8.0

techbeatph.com

5%

8.0

Manila Shaker

5%

8.0

TrendGrnd

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 50% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £90

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Vivo Watch GT

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components:

24%

6.0

Health

21%

7.8

Fitness

16%

7.4

Battery

14%

7.5

Smart features

12%

8.0

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

7.2
Review score
Review score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Grades by review (8)
4 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
2

20%

9.0

pinoytechnoguide.com

20%

5.0

my.priceshop.com

≈ estimated
2

20%

8.0

yugatech.com

10%

8.0

unboxdiaries.com

Video reviews 4

10%

9.0

Gadget Sidekick

10%

8.0

techbeatph.com

5%

8.0

Manila Shaker

5%

8.0

TrendGrnd

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Vivo Watch GT has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 70.7% of smartwatches.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components:

60%

7.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.2
Brand name
Vivo
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
10 days
Battery life
10 days
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 10 days which is longer than that of 63.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
492 mAh
Battery power
492 mAh
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 492 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 92% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.2% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
BlueOS
Operating system
BlueOS
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch runs BlueOS which is less advanced than the operating system in 50.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 0.6% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.85 inch
Screen size
1.85 inch
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.85 inch which is larger than the screens of 91.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 2.3% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
390x 450
Resolution
390x 450
â–² Better than 67% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 390x450 which is higher than that of 67.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
322 ppi
Pixel density
322 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 322 ppi which is lower than that of 56.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
4 GB
Internal storage
4 GB
â–² Better than 40% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 4 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 40.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 27% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Vivo Watch GT vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
    Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 11.7% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • 192 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    492 mAh days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (492 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    492 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 3 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    10 days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 10 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 11.7% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 0.45 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.85 inch
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.9 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.85 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 12 g lighter weight
    Weight
    33.0 g
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (33 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    33.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Better band material
    Band material
    rubber, leather
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses rubber, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    rubber, leather vs silicone
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
    Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    BlueOS
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (BlueOS vs Proprietary OS).
    BlueOS vs Proprietary OS
  • 3 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2024 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    May 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 30 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    20 m
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (20 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    2 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    20 m vs 50 m
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 6.12x less popular
    Vivo Watch GT has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • No camera remote
    Camera remote control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.6% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • Less practical form
    Form
    square
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • 6.12x less popular
    Vivo Watch GT has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 30 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    20 m
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (20 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    2 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    20 m vs 50 m
  • Less practical form
    Form
    square
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • No camera remote
    Camera remote control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.6% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
techbeatph.com
≈ estimated
11/08/2025
Unboxing and review · features, audio and app tests
Verdict
Vivo Watch GT is a solid entry for Vivo users and fitness fans, but call audio and messaging are weak.
8.0
Manila Shaker
≈ estimated
18/08/2025
Quick review · design, display and battery
Verdict
Vivo Watch GT is not a bad first smartwatch if you have the budget, despite pairing and strap issues.
8.0
TrendGrnd
≈ estimated
05/07/2025
First look · unboxing and setup
Verdict
Vivo Watch GT has an attractive design and good value, with an easy setup and a pleasant interface.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded

What reviewers agree on

Based on 4 · 4

Reviewers praise the long battery, solid health and workout tracking and light design, but call audio and the app disappoint.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
yugatech.com
≈ estimated
18/07/2024
Hands-on review · Everyday smartwatch
Verdict
vivo Watch GT is a light, square smartwatch with long battery life and fast alerts, but its weak call audio and lack of social media replies hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Vivo Watch GT

  • Sleek and premium square-shaped design with a lightweight aluminum alloy body (33g)
  • Exceptional battery life, lasting up to 21 days in Bluetooth mode and around 10 days with regular use
  • Vibrant 1.85-inch AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate and good outdoor brightness
  • Comprehensive health tracking including heart rate, SpO2, stress levels, and over 100 sports modes
  • eSIM support allows for independent calls and text messaging without a phone
  • Built-in GPS and NFC for access cards and payments

What we don't like about Vivo Watch GT

  • Lack of advanced sports hardware like a barometer/altimeter for tracking elevation or incline during hikes
  • Occasional display responsiveness issues, including micro-jitters during scrolling or needing multiple swipes
  • Limited variety in official watch bands, and some users find the rubber strap tricky to put on
  • Microphone and speaker quality can be distorted or lacks sufficient volume in noisy environments
  • Connectivity frustrations with the vivo Health app, sometimes requiring frequent re-logging
  • Restricted third-party app ecosystem outside of China, specifically regarding social media notifications

Verdict

The Vivo Watch GT is a sleek, square-faced smartwatch featuring a 1.85-inch AMOLED display with a 390x450 resolution and 2.5D curved glass, all housed in a lightweight 33g matte aluminum alloy frame. Key characteristics include its proprietary BlueOS with AI-driven features like voice-generated watch faces and smart note-taking, alongside comprehensive 24/7 health tracking for heart rate, SpO2, stress, and sleep. Its primary pros are a long-lasting 505mAh battery providing up to 21 days of life in Bluetooth mode, independent eSIM connectivity for calls and SMS, and support for over 100 sports modes. However, notable cons include its 2ATM water resistance rating being lower than the 5ATM industry standard, a lack of a built-in barometer for altitude tracking, and reported interface micro-jitters due to a modest 60Hz refresh rate.

Compare Vivo Watch GT with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Vivo Watch GT and other Smartwatches

No results found