Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Umidigi Uwatch GT review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£55Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:10 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Umidigi Uwatch GT Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 26 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Umidigi Uwatch GT
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

5.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.2

Reviews score

10%

5.0

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 67% of smartwatches
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▼Worse than 62%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

24%

4.2

Health

21%

7.2

Fitness

16%

6.1

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

2.1

Hardware

▼Worse than 86%
8.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (26)
2 reviews + 24 videos, average 8.2/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 66%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet

What reviewers say about the Umidigi Uwatch GT

Based on 2 · 12

Reviewers praise the build and battery life, but music, weather, notifications and calls feel limited, and GPS disappoints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Umidigi Uwatch GT

Based on 43 owners sharing their experience in online comments

16%positive28%mixed56%negative

Owners praise the long battery life, while notification problems and hardware failures cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Phone notifications fail to show, especially WhatsApp and incoming calls, when the companion app is closed; some owners say the app must stay open.6
  • Some owners report the screen goes black or stops lighting up after the watch dies or loses charge, even though sensors may still work.5
  • Owners say the watch needs its original charger; once the charger is lost or broken, the watch stops charging and replacements are hard to identify.4
  • Owners say only about four watch faces are available, and some report sleep tracking never recorded any data.4
  • Some units show no signs of life out of the box or after charging, and a few owners report the watch never powered on again.4
  • Owners report the watch stopped working after brief water contact or prolonged swimming, despite its water-resistance claim.3
  • Owners say the watch often disconnects from the phone app, which stops notifications and calls, and some cannot start the Bluetooth link.3
  • Owners say the screen turns off too quickly, and some hope a software update will allow a longer display timeout.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Umidigi Uwatch GT

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

24%

4.2

Health

21%

7.2

Fitness

16%

6.1

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

2.1

Hardware

5.0
Reviews score
8.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may depend on phone GPS/app on some models.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
10 days
This smartwatch lasts 10 days on a charge, which is longer than 59.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 6.6% of Smartwatches.
Up to 15 days on standby.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
235 mAh
This smartwatch has a 235 mAh battery, which is smaller than 77.6% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.4% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 120 min, which is quicker than 13.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 44.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 59.8% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.3 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.3 inch screen, which is smaller than 67.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 10.8% of Smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
This smartwatch uses TFT LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 14.5% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 75.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
261 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 261 ppi, which is lower than 75.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 4.1% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Nordic nRF52840
This smartwatch uses the Nordic nRF52840 processor model.
RAM
2 GB
This smartwatch has 2 GB of RAM, which is more than 76.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 22.3% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
0 GB
This smartwatch has 0 GB of internal storage, which is less than 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 23.5% of Smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Umidigi Uwatch GT vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 3 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (10 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Up to 15 days on standby.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • 17.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (26)
    2 reviews + 24 videos, average 8.2/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.0
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • 3 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (19 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    19 mm vs 22 mm
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 17.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (26)
    2 reviews + 24 videos, average 8.2/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.0
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • 3 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (10 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Up to 15 days on standby.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 3 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (19 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    19 mm vs 22 mm
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 2x more RAM
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (2 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 1 GB
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (TFT LCD vs AMOLED).
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 33.3% lower sentiment score
    5.0 vs 7.5
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • 2 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2019 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    November 2019
    2019 vs 2021
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 78 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (12 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    12 vs 90
  • No achievement tracking
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 87% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 70 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (235 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    235 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (TFT LCD vs AMOLED).
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No always-on display
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 70.3% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Weaker ingress protection
    This smartwatch has weaker ingress protection than the average smartwatch (IPX8 vs IP68).
    Water resistance is listed as 5ATM (ATM/pressure rating, not an official IP code).
    IPX8 vs IP68
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 2.3 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (14 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    14 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    240x240 vs 360x360
  • 11.1 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (56.1 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    56.1 g vs 45 g
  • 65 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (261 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    261 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 4.5 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    47 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 2 mm taller case
    This smartwatch has a taller case than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45 mm tall.
    47 mm vs 45 mm
  • Basic band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, tpu for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, tpu vs silicone
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No gesture control
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 79.6% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No camera remote
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.5% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Mike's unboxing, reviews and how to
≈ estimated
03/09/2020
Full review · features, app and value
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch GT is a rugged, good-looking watch with excellent value for money, though it is less polished than Fitbit or Apple.
8.0
ALLCHECKOUT
✓ explicit
31/08/2020
Hands-on review · two days of wear, features and app tests
Verdict
The Umidigi Uwatch GT is an attractive, comfortable watch with plenty of features, though limited functions and notifications hold it back.
8.0
Lion's Review
≈ estimated
15/05/2020
Hands-on review · comparison with previous model and app
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch GT improves on the previous model, and the creator wears it daily, but it has fewer features and costs a bit more.
9.0
JeromeQ Reactions
≈ estimated
22/01/2020
Hands-on review · outdoor walk and app setup
Verdict
The Umidigi Uwatch GT is a really nice watch that is pleasant on the wrist, and the reviewer recommends buying it.
7.0
Donavon Hornbeck
≈ estimated
07/01/2020
Hands-on review · fitness tracking, app and build
Verdict
Umidigi Uwatch GT is a decent fitness tracker worth considering if fitness is your main focus, but weak on smartwatch features.
4.0
NoSoloMoviles
≈ estimated
21/11/2020
First look · unboxing and first tests
Verdict
The Umidigi Uwatch GT is not recommended at this price, as better options exist for a little more money.
9.0
AMTR
≈ estimated
02/05/2020
First look · feature walkthrough and first impressions
Verdict
The Umidigi Uwatch GT impresses with its build and touch response, and its battery lasts ten to fifteen days.
9.0
J. Williams
≈ estimated
03/01/2020
Follow-up review · one week of daily use
Verdict
The Umidigi Uwatch GT has excellent battery life and a good build for the money, though watch faces and screen timeout are limited.
8.0
J. Williams
≈ estimated
26/12/2019
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
The Umidigi Uwatch GT feels light and comfortable, but its controls take some figuring out.
Not graded
Not graded
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
chinagadgetsreviews.com
≈ estimated
Not Dated
First impressions · Unboxing
Verdict
The UMIDIGI Uwatch GT looks premium, with 5ATM water resistance and about two weeks of battery, though these are first impressions only.
8.0
idealwatch.de
≈ estimated
13/07/2020
Hands-on review · Rugged sports watch
Verdict
The UMIDIGI Uwatch GT is a rugged sports watch with side buttons that work with wet fingers, but its bulky 47mm case and unreliable sleep tracking hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Umidigi Uwatch GT

  • Excellent battery life, often lasting 10-15 days on a single charge
  • Premium design and build quality that looks more expensive than it is
  • Highly affordable price point, offering great value for money
  • Quick charging capabilities, taking only about 20-30 minutes for a significant charge
  • Comfortable to wear for long periods due to its lightweight design and soft strap
  • Good water resistance (5ATM), making it suitable for swimming

What customers don't like about Umidigi Uwatch GT

  • Inconsistent accuracy for step counting and heart rate monitoring
  • Very limited selection of watch faces (typically only 4 pre-installed)
  • Software UI feels dated and lacks advanced customisation options
  • Basic notification system that allows rejecting calls but not answering or replying to messages
  • Wrist-gesture to wake the screen is sometimes unresponsive or slow
  • Lack of native GPS, relying instead on a connected smartphone's GPS

Verdict

The Umidigi Uwatch GT is a rugged, sports-oriented smartwatch featuring a 47mm 316L stainless steel frame and a 1.3-inch circular TFT-LCD color display with a 240x240 resolution. Key specifications include 5ATM water resistance (up to 50 meters), Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity, and a 260mAh battery that delivers roughly 10 to 15 days of typical use. It supports 12 sports modes, 24/7 heart rate monitoring, and sleep tracking, syncing with the VeryFitPro app for comprehensive data guidance. Major pros include its premium metal build quality, exceptional battery life for its price point, and reliable waterproofing for swimming. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS (requiring a connected smartphone for route tracking), a limited selection of pre-set watch faces, and the inability to answer phone calls directly from the device.

Compare Umidigi Uwatch GT with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Umidigi Uwatch GT and other Smartwatches

No results found